User talk:Mushroom
| Archives
|
|---|
|
Welcome to my talk page!
- If you leave a message here, I will usually answer here.
- If I leave a message on your talk page, feel free to answer there.
- If you cannot find something, look in the archives.
Mushroom (Talk) 21:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Activity level
I have annotated all the major Shakespeare plays in a unique way in that the definitions of difficult words and the explanations of difficult passages appear within the text, in boldfaced type inside brackets. Thus, for the most part, the reader does not need to interrupt his or her perusal of a text by navigating to a footnote, then back to the text. Each text appears on one page. However, to assure fast loading of a page—and to make it appealing to a user—I have omitted ads and images. My site has received favorable reviews from The New York Times, the BBC, the British Library, and teacher sites. Wikipedia, on the other hand, has deleted links that I have posted even though Wikipedia editors accept links to Shakespeare sites that contain ads and cannot match the scholarship on my pages. If you doubt what I say, check out the following links to Shakespeare plays.
http://shakespearestudyguide.com/JuliusCaesarText.html http://shakespearestudyguide.com/CoriolanusText.html http://shakespearestudyguide.com/MuchAdoAbout.html http://www.shakespearestudyguide.com/TwelfthNightGuide.html
May I have permission to post links to my Shakepeare texts without worry that someone will delete them?
Wikipedia is an extraordinary resource for students, teachers, and researchers. I believe my Shakespeare texts can enhance the experience of Wikipedia users researching Shakespeare.
Sincerely, Michael J. Cummings mcum.mings@mail.comZekscrab (talk) 00:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Hey Mushroom, I'm about to write you an email in reference to WP:INACTIVITY but the procedure requires I also leave a note here. So, here's the note... Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Thank you, I have replied to your email. Mushroom (Talk) 11:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- Got it--thank you. I'm happy to hear you are still with us! Drmies (talk) 15:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Thanks for contributing to the article Shigureden. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). Thanks! P.S. If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677: Thank you, I have added some references to the article. Mushroom (Talk) 12:39, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Jax 0677:, you know Mushroom is an admin, right? I think it's safe to assume that they don't need a template, but a note is always appreciated. Drmies (talk) 15:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Mushroom. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.
Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.
Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:00, 22 February 2019 (UTC)