User talk:AngusWOOF

Archives (Index)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Help in making the article acceptable

Dear Editor,

The article link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jaan_Nissar_Lone . Can you help me format and make this article acceptable as this subject qualifies as per point 12 of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability_(music) shown how this person meets Music bio Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles as there is an interview on DD Kashmir which is a national/ State run News Channel, the link to this is provided in citation no.3 . The other citations also do qualify the article, please let me know on the required changes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TavadiaP (talk • contribs) 11:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

There are too many references to primary sourced music vendors. They should be trimmed down and combined to just music video and one vendor listing. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

TavadiaP, per WP:MUSICBIO, "To meet Wikipedia's standards for verifiability and notability, the article in question must actually document that the criterion is true." so the article should include the details about the films and songs he participated in and that can be backed up by the provided sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:14, 14 January 2019 (UTC)

The article is provided with sufficient references and all unnecessary have been trimmed down. References have been provided for all statements. Requesting you to provide your valuable feedback. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TavadiaP (talk • contribs) 14:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Request on 20:50:42, 28 January 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by CANdo-artreview

• CANdo-artreview (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jacob Lipkin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello The Jacob Lipkin draft page uses information from unpublished biography by Richard Rivera. [1], from the unpublished Jacob Lipkin biography Creative Obsession written by Richard Rivera. I have permission to do this and it has been text has been approved by Richard Rivera. How do I make reference to this material and show his approval? Also Richard will add to the page his photographs of the artist and his sculptures. How do I add the photos and show his approval? Does Richard need to add his approval and photos and how and when do I do this? Many thanks. CANdo-artreview (talk) 20:50, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

CANdo-artreview, as that source is unreleased, you can't copy-paste lines from his biography of Lipkin as that is original research. WP:NOR You need to rewrite the biography in your own words, perhaps with less detail and restricted to only the sources that have already been published. Also if you are connected to Lipkin or Rivera you might have a conflict of interest. See WP:COI AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Mohammed bin Said bin Salim Al Shanfari

Can you help me please?

You have just rejected my submission. It was as you can see rejected before and I have done a lot of work to try to make it acceptable But have not succeeded in your opinion

Can I ask you please to be specific so that I know how to proceed from now What is it exactly that has lead you to reject this latest version I am a fan of this man's work but am trying to write a balanced article in a neutral way so as to get the facts into a public record

This is not a moan at you ! It is a serious and heartfelt request for help

Can you assist me please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oldtaxman (talk • contribs) 17:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman (talk) 17:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

PS I just saw your question: "Is this a resume so he can get a position in Wikipedia?"

The answer to that is no it is not. He is not seeking a position in Wikipedia or elsewhere.

You will see from the draft article that he died in April 2016

Oldtaxman (talk) 17:40, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, I would change the headers to something more suitable like Early life and education, Career, Personal life, Awards and nominations, Stage work, Filmography (for his work in film and television). The current headers make it look like a resume. In his infobox, simplify his occupation to Director, playwright, actor. Remove the linguist part. For spouse list the spouse name followed by years married (19xx-2016) and move the 37 years part to the Personal life section. I would also link to Wikipedia articles any notable awards, schools, locations, organizations. If you have any news articles and references that offer significant coverage of the person, please point those out. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:42, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

The domestic and international contributions section should be moved into his Career section as major activities he did while at work. If he had other organizations unrelated to work, then you can add a Philanthropy or Other ventures section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:45, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you Food for thought Appreciate your help! Oldtaxman (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, can you explain what the role of "prepared" is? Was he the producer on the play, a screenwriter, or some other crew role? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:08, 29 January 2019 (UTC)

I am a Wiki beginner as you can no doubt discern BUT I think you have made some helpful edits and are now helping us further For which ... MANY thanks I will get back to you when my brain wakes up and I have had a chance to contact his wife .... quickie though .... what citation would we need re the citation needed for their marriage please? Oldtaxman (talk) 06:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

My brain is now almost awake...... I have had this from his wife ... whose first language is not English ... "He was supervising the whole thing. If he put in another Director he was still doing everything. He was supervising Director too teaching him. He just liked to promote young Omanis. He was teaching the actors from the street it was a big big job he was working day and night."

If it would move us along the road towards publication we are content to leave it as "Directed" Oldtaxman (talk) 09:35, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

You queried Mansoor Makkawi. I am told: "M Makkawi was Egiption (Egyptian)writer. He did some work he got some prize which reach him on the day he died and he needed this apriation (appreciation) as well he was depressed. He was writing those plays for Mohammed in his department" Mansoor too seems to be inadequately recorded and there is as you say nothing about him in Wikipedia yet. Oldtaxman (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Update: A Wiki Arabic entry for Mansour Makkawi has been located and I have updated my draft Its not terrific but it is there ... منصور مكاوي Oldtaxman (talk) 11:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Drat! https://ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D9%86%D8%B5%D9%88%D8%B1_%D9%85%D9%83%D8%A7%D9%88%D9%8A only a draft I think ??? Oldtaxman (talk) 11:12, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, please note if you are getting information directly from his family members then that is original research and can't be used. However, if it has been published in the newspapers, magazines, or programs how long they were married or when they were married, then you should use that instead. Also if you know of or have interacted with the family members personally you may have to declare connected contributor per WP:COI AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:38, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, regarding his role, what does it list for those program credits, Supervising director? Advisor? Or does he get co-director credit? Some of the writing of details on the play can go into his career section, and the stagework can be a simple bullet listing or table. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:40, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

OK Thanks Have done good bit more work but there is more to do The title missing from Note 3 is "A Knight stepped down from the Stage of Life " but 'Im afraid I dont know how to insert that Can you help please And thank you for your continuing support and assistance!! Oldtaxman (talk) 22:48, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, in the References section, I just need the title of the magazine article in Arabic. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, so do you know the family personally or professionally? You mentioned that you talked with his wife about his roles, or did you read that from the related magazine? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

It is فارس ترجل من على خشبة مسرح الحياة Thanks! Oldtaxman (talk) 09:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

I never knew or met or had any dealings of any kind with the subject of the article Mohammed Al Shanfari, and until recently I had never even heard of him.

I know nobody in the Al Shanfari family and have no business or professional or any other relationship with any of them. His widow is a recent acquaintance whose first language is not English.

I am not being and will not be paid for my work. I am working on the article as an “outsider”.

I have heard what his widow has said to me about Al Shanfari but have tried very hard and hopefully successfully to rely not on her recollections but on the published sources that I have been able to find. There aren’t a lot of them, but what there are are very helpful in that they have a lot of “content” and substantiate virtually all of what I have said and everything that is important.

I think I am too remote to be conflicted. Oldtaxman (talk) 09:14, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Is the article now OK for publication in your view please? IF it is OK, is it possible for you to publish it? I ask that because I am happy with what I have been able to achieve with your guidance and am worried that I might fall victim to another Editor/Reviewer who might take a different approach Oldtaxman (talk) 07:58, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Forgive me but something I have done seems to have deleted the Arabic that you kindly inserted for me in Note 3 فارس ترجل من على خشبة مسرح الحياة Oldtaxman (talk) 08:50, 3 February 2019 (UTC) I just took my life in my hands and changed it .... apparently succesfully ..... Oldtaxman (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

So can I ask you please – is this article now in an acceptable state for publication on Wikipedia?

If it is OK perhaps you’d be kind enough to tell me how to proceed now. Can you yourself accept and publish it? Or do I need to resubmit it? Thanks again! Oldtaxman (talk) 08:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, I would resubmit it and see how AFC reviewers respond to it. I don't know that much about Omani magazines and newspapers, but if any of those have Wikipedia pages, that would help show whether those papers are reliable sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Cheers ! And many thanks for your help Oldtaxman (talk) 17:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Oldtaxman, I accepted it. Still needs cleanup but the article in https://www.alittihad.ae helps. Those are the kind of newspapers and magazines I'm looking for. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

I'll keep at it trying to improve it. As I said MANY hanks for your help!! Id never have got it anywhere near decent without your invaluable help !Oldtaxman (talk) 17:56, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

about the declined article: Apeiron - Research and Publishing Institute for Security and Defence Studies

hi AngusWOOF, thank you very much for your review. I've corrected the article, added new sources and rewrited it in a neutral point of view. Hope it works well now. But in case of any further reservations, I would really appreciate a detailed tip (eg. which part of the piece needs further improvement). cheers Jakub :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakub Dusza (talk • contribs) 12:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Jakub Dusza, I would simplify the list of journals to a bullet list with single paragraph for each journal. I would also find more sources that show the journals are notable per WP:NJOURNAL and highlight that in the comments. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the tips. I've rewrited the article as requested. When it comes to sources that shows the the journals are notable, they are ranked in the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education journal list, they are also presented in Index Copernicus and are indexed in ERIH+. I've put relevant citations (2,3,4,5,6) in the text. Jakub Dusza (talk) 16:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Jakub Dusza, the official website implies this is some kind of university organization [2] [3]. Should it be restructured to focus on that? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:58, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

"University" and "publishing house" are two separate things, although they share a part of the name ("apeiron"). I'm planning to write about the University in a second article and then make appropriate links Jakub Dusza (talk) 10:00, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi AngusWOOF, is there a chance to review the last version of the article any soon? cheers Jakub Dusza (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Re: Lesley Jane Seymour

I edited the page to make it less promotional, and have included reliable sources (CNN and Fortune) to back the claims up. Please let me know if this works, or if any other edits need to be made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesC33401 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

JamesC33401, can you add more secondary sources like the CNN one? the Fortune one is authored by her so that's a primary, and some of the other ones are interviews. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF Thanks for your feedback. I edited the piece to remove the self-authored Fortune piece. I also included references from The New York Times, and have removed links to her firm's website as sources. Is there anything else I need to do to get this approved? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesC33401 (talk • contribs) 02:18, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

JamesC33401, just to let you know I have approved the article and added a bunch of press releases to her earlier career. Please continue to add more details about her career and what she did during those jobs at the magazines. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:33, 17 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF Thanks so much for your help and the approval. I'll continue to add details. Best, JamesC33401

About the declined article: LogicInMind

Dear AngusWOOF,

Thank you for your review of this draft page [4].

The article is supported by a reliable and independant source which provides significant coverage of the subject. The author of the mentioned source is Jerry Seregni, a journalist and technolgy specialist. His review of LogicInMind's product was broadcasted on the television channel WVUE Fox 8 during the morning news. The transcript and video were also published on the WVUE Fox 8 website. A significant coverage of the product was made during the live demonstration of the product and a relatively large audience was reached by this subject.

I would be glad if you could provide some indications on how I could improve my submission. Thanks!

Best regards,

Rjobidon (talk) 05:24, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

Rjobidon, Jerry's review is good, but needs more than just that. WP:GNG The other source links to the product catalog. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:13, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Request on 13:46:23, 1 February 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by ObongiFrank

• ObongiFrank (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:List of Kenyan businesspeople (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi AngusWOOF, you recently turned down my article for creation Draft:List_of_Kenyan_businesspeople citing that the article lacked sufficient content to require an article of its own and suggested I merge it with the existing article at List of Kenyans by net worth. You also mentioned that there aren't really any List of (country) businesspeople lists, only categories. Since this article sorts by net worth, you might want to redirect your efforts towards that article instead. I have taken time to check other articles on Wikipedia and found that there are indeed articles that are list of (country) businesspeople lists, especially in Africa. Examples include:

• List of Swedish entrepreneurs
• List of Turkish entrepreneurs
• List of Brazilian entrepreneurs
• List of Indian entrepreneurs
• List of Nigerian entrepreneurs

While the articles use the term entrepreneur, they each open by stating that "this is a list of (country) entrepreneurs and businesspeople". Secondly, I also checked and found that the lists have names of businesspeople without much else, compared to my list which have even brief descriptions as well as references. The two main concerns therefore would remain the use of the term businesspeople in my title and the not so many names on the list. About the first, would changing the word influence the article's veracity? If so I will change it. About the second, naturally, I understand the concept of Wikipedia to be one of crowdsourcing information. Thus, rather than pin me down to include more names, it would be easier to accept the article and allow other editors informed on the subject to expand it further. Per these comments, I ask that you kindly consider accepting the article request for submission and give others a chance to expand the list as has been the case with the other lists I mention. Thanks.

ObongiFrank (talk) 13:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

ObongiFrank, those are better options. Thanks for reformatting the list. In this case, the List of Kenyan entrepreneurs list redirects to the net worth list that's already in mainspace though. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

ObongiFrank, I renamed the list to entrepreneurs, there's a current redirect to the net worth one, but I think it might be worth splitting off from the net worth one anyway. Can you clean up the entries where the person is only noted for having a high net worth? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:50, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I have done this. I believe it's now commendable. Thanks for guiding me through this. It was my first attempt at making a list and future ones will be thorough from the onset. You're doing a good job.

ObongiFrank, I pushed it through. Thanks again. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:11, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

About the Declining of Draft:Atari Flashback Classics

Hello, AngusWOOF. I have noticed that there are many citations for release dates and reception, while there isn't many for other information. I have added some extras, but would getting citations on certain information (mainly the Notes section) from AtariAge be an okay source to use? Thanks!

CreeperDudeBro (talk) 10:39, 1 February 2019 (PT)

CreeperDudeBro, it would be preferable to use citations from reliable sources in the WP:VG/RS. According to that list, AtariAge is inconclusive. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:42, 1 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, Thank you for bringing this to my attention, I shall re-do the information by adding more references in the article. In any case, you specifically said in the comment: "Need more WP:VG/RS reviews on the package." Is this partaining to review based on the game (Ex. Giant Bomb, IGN, etc.) or other information in general? Thanks! CreeperDudeBro (talk) 15:55, 1 February 2019 (PT)

CreeperDudeBro, I would say both, but not Giant Bomb as that isn't a reliable source for that. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:09, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Request on 16:48:41, 2 February 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Billkaboo

• Billkaboo (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Lail Arad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wondering how to progress. Reason for creating this page: someone recently created a page about her on german Wiki, but much of it is incorrect, and she's not german. Trying to right that wrong.

Not sure how best to proceed. Any assistance would be appreciated.

Billkaboo (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Billkaboo, see the comments I posted on the draft page. You need to list out some sources that would enable her to meet WP:MUSICBIO. I couldn't tell which ones were notable based on what you listed so far. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Global Health Care Equivalency (GHCE)

Dear Angus:

Thank you very much for getting back. I will correct and get up to speed on the items that you mention. Since this a new topic, there are no formal secondary sources as yet, although I am sure there will be once the book is published. Might the mention of GHCE in online articles count?

Many Thanks and All my Best, Frank — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cellrep7 (talk • contribs) 19:20, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Online articles are okay as long as they are not sourced from the researchers or organizations who are proposing the topic. See WP:ORIGINAL and WP:GNG. Also if you are connected to the subject, you need to declare this per WP:COI AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Miraculous Ladybug: Is it distributed by Toei Company?

Hi. Is Miraculous Ladybug distributed by Toei Company? I know that Toei Animation was of course involved in early 2D promo, and is still one of production companies by having their executive producers credited in its current form. And since the animation company was owned by Toei Company, is it distributed by Toei Company in Japan/internationally? I'm just curious. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

You'd have to check how the show is being distributed in Japan. Toei is still attached to the project. [5] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:19, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Check how the show is being distributed in Japan? Why? I know Toei Animation is still attached to the project, But Is Toei Company a distributor for Miraculous? One: Both are owned by Toei Company. Two: Both are made in Japan. PascalMuganyizi (talk) 21:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

About the declined article on CK Birla Hospital for Women

Hi Angus, I had removed all links corresponding to Hospital's own website. I had corrected year of establishment to 2017. Can you please tell me anything else that needs to be done to get this article up and running? The so so guy (talk) 07:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

The so so guy, please read WP:ORGCRIT and come up with more news articles about the organization. Also the individual doctors do not need to be mentioned and linked to their directory entries unless they are the top leaders or founders of the organization. It needs to describe better how it's connected to and sponsored by CK Birla, who funded them initially and built the facility. Is it a private hospital or public? Non-profit or for-profit? The main thing is satisfying WP:ORGCRIT and WP:GNG so make sure you can find those news articles that aren't press releases. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

The so so guy, I added more feedback on Draft:CK Birla Hospital for Women. Please adjust and also please address the concerns I have listed here on my talk page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Paul Schrier#Birth name

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Paul Schrier#Birth name. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 04:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)Template:Z48

Ryan Wyatt

Hey, thanks for reviewing the draft and getting it to the mainspace. It seems now that the client I did it for is taking matters into their own hands in making some edits they wanted live on the article, so seeing as I have a COI I'll let you and other editors worry about its quality from now on, besides making minor edits if necessary (spelling mistakes, adding/removing cats, etc). Davykamanzi → talk • contribs • alter ego 06:31, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

The client can't edit directly as they have COI as well, but you and they can make suggestions on the talk page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Davykamanzi, I've tagged the two editors you mentioned as COI / connected contributor. They should make recommendations on the talk page rather than edit directly unless it's for obvious typos and corrections like the removal of the website. It appears they wanted the verbiage to be one of the older versions of the text. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Want to discuss & clarify

Dear angus sir, you have asked in the draft that how produced it, directed it etc & whats the purpose. Dear i have added the reference of two newspapers & news websites , they have mentioned it that film is written, directed & produced by DJ Kamal Mustafa. The film is animated independent film which was released on web, the subject of film is war against terrorism, the film is dedicated to armed forces. It's been cleared in newspapers kindly use translate button in chrome & page will be translate automatically.

The film news & who produced is & directed is mentioned here https://www.naibaat.pk/04-Feb-2019/20792 (nai baat is a tv channel of Pakistan & newspaper)

The same has been in https://www.humsub.com.pk/208606/dj-kamal-mustafa/

The same news & stills updated on https://www.medianetworknews.com/archives/2966

Article in English https://hamariweb.com/articles/115223

FoziaNaveed (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Please add those sources to the article and add a Production section and a Reception section. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:35, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

FoziaNaveed, Hamariweb.com is posted from the author himself though. Do you have coverage of this by someone who is not connected to the producer/film company? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I should remove hamariweb? I added it because its in English so wikipedia mod will understand what's the actual movie is for. & as i mentioned its an independent film which was released online only, same as https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Evil_Marriage

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son_of_Kashmir:_Burhan

Same as operation 786 I'm not paid to write this article if you are thinking like this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoziaNaveed (talk • contribs) 18:43, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

FoziaNaveed, you can use Hamariweb to beef up the production section on how the film was made, but the main thing is to find more secondary sources outside of the subject and to answer the questions on whether it can be notable per WP:NFILM and WP:GNG. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry I'm just confused actually I'm making article by checking the Wikipedia pages of films which isn't yet released in Pakistan but the Wikipedia page is created. The film is animated its been made from softwares Ofcourse, but in website Like naibaat, humsub they have published that the film is a first pakistani animated film of Pakistan which is showing positive image of Pakistan, the film story is mentioned in that newspapers, according to newspapers the film is showing operations done by armed forces against terrorists & its been dedicated to martyred childrens of army public school. I'm writing same as its been mentioned in newspapers. Nai baat has a wikipedia page here its a leading newspaper in Pakistan. Alao humsub is a magazine along with other sources which i mentioned. Kindly suggest alternative way. There are many newspapers are going to cover it as well, do we have any mod from Pakistan? Because they will understand urdu & newspapers is a best source of notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoziaNaveed (talk • contribs)

I'm confused, is it being released in theatres? Or is it only a web release? Has it already been released? Need dates on that and then the reception. Was it screened at film festivals? You need to expand on the article besides list it all in plot. Who stars in it? Who are the Various artists? Are they well known actors doing voices? The plot should just be the plot. The other details should be in other sections for the article. There should be a Promotion and release section to describe how it was premiered (YouTube? Website? Physical screening at a theatre?) Then the critics need to analyze the film, saying what they liked or didn't like about it. That would go in the Reception section. If there are plans to release it to a film festival (short films) or a main theatrical release or direct-to-video release, then you should discuss that as well. Also any awards the film and its producer/director has received. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

FoziaNaveed, please see how I fixed up the reference for the Nai Baat newspaper. The article was written in Urdu, not English. This would help show secondary coverage. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:30, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

FoziaNaveed, the plot should discuss what the format of the film is. A drama anthology of different stories from the forces? One story with different scenes? Is it a comedy, tragedy, drama, documentary? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:32, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

I got it sir i will definitely follow your guidance & will complete this article soon :) thanks I've wrote another article today as well. Thanks for the help sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FoziaNaveed (talk • contribs) 19:36, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello sir

As per your guidance I've added gener, & secondary source of film in reference kindly check. MemonBhai (talk) 14:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello dear sir do i need to add more sources? Recently i added source in English. I also see that few wikipedia pages are published from same references & the films are even not yet released & even they have sources from wordpress.com but few editors have published it the film is also from Pakistan.

Example of wikipedia pages who have less then references & few are those who's website is even wrong , wordpress sources are also visible.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buz-e-Chini https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Evil_Marriage — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 13:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

MemonBhai, I wouldn't worry about other film articles unless they're really not notable at all. See WP:OSE. As for adding more sources, you can add non-English sources. Those are fine. They just have to demonstrate critic reviews of the film or significant coverage and not just be a news announcement or a calendar entry. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Already added https://beam.pk/animated-film-operation-786/ the other articles have same urls & they are approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 17:59, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

MemonBhai, it looks like Operation 786 is a live article now. Thanks. Keep pushing on getting more sources on there and reception. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:40, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:List of compositions by Joby Talbot

AngusWOOF, you cited List of compositions by John Williams as an example to follow. I was looking at the List of compositions by Jake Heggie as Williams only composes film scores while Talbot, in addition to film scores, composes opera, choral works, orchestral works, etc., more like Heggie. Is there something specific in Williams format you think more appropriate for Talbot 148.75.165.78 (talk) 18:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

148.75.165.78, the main thing is to discuss it at Talbot's talk page on whether to split off the list of works. It doesn't need to be drafted or go through AFC if the consensus is to split. How to organize it is how I listed Williams's page, but if there are better arrangements and tables, feel free to use those, preferably formats that have gone through GA or better. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Understood. TY. 148.75.165.78 (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Dundo Maroje - draft review

Hello AngusWOOF, could you please review the draft: Draft:Dundo Maroje? Thanks in advance. 141.138.39.213 (talk) 22:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)

Celalettin-Field Quantum Observation Tunnel (Complete)

Hi Angus.

If you could cast a quick eye over my page you'll find that I have satisfied every single request thoroughly

It would be much appreciated

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Polar115 (talk • contribs)

Polar115, please see concerns by the other AFC reviewers. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:43, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft sumbal khan

Hi you've asked few questions, yes she is alived, she is an actress & did not you have seen that I've mentioned reference of indian news website? https://dailypost.in/news/entertainment/sumbal-khan/ it's clearly saying that she is film actress & singer her picture is there. But anyways I've removed the actress field. So now as she is singer & musician & she is been featured in newspapers & websites which I've mentioned already. MemonBhai (talk) 06:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

MemonBhai, the denial is from Sumbul Iqbal Khan who is an actress. [6] So two different people. The Pashto singer died. The actress is still alive. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear sir you are mixing it up kindly check articles & pictures of sumbal khan pashto singer & move to her verified page she is doing live sessions on her page the same sumbal khan who is alive & mentioned in articles along with her photos. Sumbal iqbal is some other lady & she is also alive. There are 5 sumbal khan in Pakistan.

Sumbal khan the one whose wiki I'm writing Sumbal khan dead who was also pashto singer Sumbal khan dancer Sumbal khan dancer again & sumbal iqbal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 16:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

You need to clarify which Khan you want to write about. One of them is confirmed killed with multiple reliable sources. Please check that her career stuff isn't mixed with the Khan actress or the Khan other singer. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Alive sumbal khan & the one whose news of dead was circulation are same, but the dead sumbal khan is someone else, kindly see the pictures in articles website, I've not shared the article of dead sumbal khan.

See alive Sumbal khan reference.

https://dailypost.in/news/sumbal-khans-new-track-rahat-fateh-ali-khan/

https://dailypost.in/news/entertainment/sumbal-khan/

https://www.urdupoint.com/en/pakistan/renowned-pashto-artist-sumbal-shot-dead-in-ma-254850.html (fake news that she was dead, see her same picture).

Now see other sumbal khan who was stage actress she is dead , see her picture this is different from all the articles i shared

https://www.dawn.com/news/1387065

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/02/03/stage-actor-sumbul-khan-shot-dead-for-resisting-abduction-bid-in-mardan/

Hope you understand now, there are 5 sumbal khan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 16:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Kindly guide me sir actually I'm writing for alive Sumbal khan but the fake news of her circulating on social media so I've added reference here with pictures, either i can remove the reference of sumbal khan fake death news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 16:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

MemonBhai, the "new face" articles from Daily Post is confusing as it mixes information in from Sumbal Iqbal about having a sister and acting in "Sumbul Iqbal has acted in some comedy serials too such as ‘Kis Din Mera Viyah Howay Ga’ of Geo TV and ‘Raju Rocket’ of Hum TV". AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Sorry sir accept my apology, I've removed that reference lemme know if i should fix any other because on her name there is more articles reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MemonBhai (talk • contribs) 17:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

MemonBhai, once you have the Khan singer, try to find news sources and articles that aren't confusing them with the other Khans, and see if that will meet WP:MUSICBIO. It may be that the current Khan singer may still not be notable yet. The one in Mardan who was killed doesn't seem to be that famous otherwise, other than for the event that she was killed which made international news and got confused with the Iqbal actress. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Reviewing Draft:Divya Dhayal

Hi Angus! Thank you for reviewing Draft:Divya Dhayal. I've made substantial improvements to the draft. If you have the opportunity to revisit it, I'd be thankful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangsa (talk • contribs) 12:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Sangsa, see my comments on that draft. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi Angus! These are replies to the questions you have asked:

Question 1. "I don't see Divya's name on the winners / medalists for the 2017 World Cup or 2018 World Cup articles"?

Answer: Archery World Cup is held in 4 stages (4 times a year at different locations). It's pretty confusing, please bear with me:

For World Cup 2017 Wikipedia link to "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Archery_World_Cup#cite_note-27" Here Under "Mixed Team" Round "2", India won the Bronze medal due to "Divya Dhayal and Abhishek Verma" as per official link: "https://worldarchery.org/competition/15915/antalya-2017-hyundai-archery-world-cup-stage-2#/team/IND/CX/team"

For World Cup 2018 Specific Wikipedia link is not yet available for 2018 World Cup and the general World Cup link below is not updated: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archery_World_Cup" The official link shows her winning Silver in Compound Women Team catagory as under: "https://worldarchery.org/competition/18116/antalya-2018-hyundai-archery-world-cup#/team/IND/CW/team"

Question 2. Please specify which news articles cover her career in detail that aren't interviews.

Answer: The span of her career is just about 3 years as yet and she has made quite a mark being an Archery player (Archery being an uncelebrated sport in India)

These are the three best articles I could find:

https://www.hindustantimes.com/pune-news/pune-s-30-under-30-part-1-young-achievers-aiming-for-the-stars/story-lwXL2wA5P3yrpmGiZSaz5J.html (this newspaper is read by ~1 million people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindustan_Times)

https://thebridge.in/looking-back-2017-divya-dhayal-raised-bar-archery-asia-cup/

http://www.espn.in/espn/story/_/id/19597329/india-win-bronze-compound-mixed-team-event-world-cup

Thanks for your time! Sangsa (talk) 09:48, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Sangsa, the ESPN one is a passing mention and wouldn't be notable for athletes. The 30 under 30 is borderline as it is only a brief paragraph. The Bridge one is better as that focuses on Divya Dhayal specifically. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:34, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

You're right AngusWOOF. All other articles that I found were Interviews. Non Interview mentions for a Compound Archery Player in India is pretty rare! She became the no. 1 Compound Archery player (national champion) out of 1.5 billion people at just 15 years of age. And that was for the 1st time it had happened. Still there were no tall mentions in media. It would have been different if it had to do something related to cricket. That is the main reason such players need to be published. There's no money in the sport, no celebrity status fame (like Cricket in India), no mentions of achievements or the amount of hard work these players go through. Let's give such players a fair chance so that many more follow the sport. Thanks for your time again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sangsa (talk • contribs)

Sangsa, if some of the interviews are more like The Bridge article (not so much Q&A), then you can highlight those for notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, here are three articles worth mentioning to have her considered for notability purposes: Mention of Divya Dhayal as a prodigy in Hindustan Times: https://www.hindustantimes.com/pune-news/pune-s-archery-prodigy-divya-dhayal-brings-home-two-medals-from-manila-asia-cup/story-hpGpFw480FoYy7vkakLAkN.html Mention in another very reputable newspaper: https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/dhayal-sisters-qualify-for-youth-world-championship-4829422/ And a more detailed article in the bridge: https://thebridge.in/everybody-excels-in-their-own-time-you-just-need-to-be-patient-by-divya-dhayal/ Other Women Compound Archery players from India for your reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madhumita_Kumari https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trisha_Deb https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muskan_Kirar ThanksSangsa (talk) 18:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Sangsa, the first of the three might be okay. The second is half passing mention but can be used to bolster her career section. The third is written by Dhayal so that's primary/self-pub. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

You're right AngusWOOF. The first one clearly distinguishes her as a subject for notability and I have mentioned it as a reference in the Draft. Currently reference no. 18 in the Draft. Now if all seems alright to you, what's the next step for me so that the article is published? Thanks again Sangsa (talk) 18:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Sangsa, I would resubmit it and add to the comments the sources that you think will meet WP:GNG AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch AngusWOOF for your inputs and time! I'll mention the article in my comment for WP:GNG. If time permits, it would be highly appreciated if you could review the article for acceptance after that. Looking forward to more inputs from you on other humble edits form me towards wikipedia. Thanks Sangsa (talk) 18:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I have added the references as a comment in the draft for WP:GNG and published it as a minor edit. The article is already under review so I didn't resubmit it. If you want me to resubmit it then i'll do that. Thanks Sangsa (talk) 19:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Tim Curnow draft RESPONSE to comments

Hello Angus First of all, thank you to all the editors who do such a lot of work to ensure that Wikipedia's articles are of a good standard. In response to your comments: This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Comment: It is not clear which of the offline sources (which is all of them) meet WP:GNG. There's evidence that Tim is Allen Curnow's son, but it appears a lot of them are passing mentions, as they are out of books by some other author. So that can only confirm that he perhaps edited some of those author's books. Please indicate which of these sources give detailed coverage on the subject. Note Allen Curnow may be in the Dictionary of New Zealand Biography but Tim does not have a similar entry. Answer: These sources are reliable –as a journalist of some 50 years standing and an editor for many of those years, I always ensure sources are reliable. None of these works were edited or written by Tim Curnow – he is a literary agent not an author or editor. The important “sources” for the article are in the “References” section where direct quotes or information is taken from the works cited. These sources are reliable, especially the definitive biography of Tim's father, Allen Curnow, one of the best British Commonwealth poets. Tim did not write this book and does not have an autobiography written about him.. There are 27 indexed references to Tim in this book., “Simply By Sailing in New Direction,” many of them multiple pages. The works consulted and cited under Sources reference Tim Curnow’s professional role and provide extra reading for those wanting to check other sources about his career and working relationships with writers and others working in the arts and the literary environment in Australia and New Zealand. Some of the sources provided quite detailed reference to Curnow’s work while some reference Curnow’s role as part of a much larger work – many are of a biographical or autobiographical nature but all those cited do add to the entry on Curnow which I have submitted. Only one book cited relates to his father the poet Allen Curnow and is included as Tim Curnow acted as literary agent for his father as well for the biographer Terry Sturm.

Comment: Also the detailed list of authors represented are more for Curtis Brown (literary agents) than Curnow's page. Answer: It is true that the authors were clients of Curtis Brown but the reality is that they were first and foremost clients of Curnow. The writers regarded Curnow as their literary agent and not the company – being an agent is a personal and professional relationship and this applies worldwide in the business, just like agents for actors or performers. Wikipedia's own existing articles recognise this, and the approach for Tim Curnow simply uses this convention. Under the personal Wikipedia articles of literary agents Pat Kavanagh and Ed Victor, the reference is to the agent's clients and not to the clients being part of an agency.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Kavanagh_(agent) Clients Her clients included:[4] … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ed_Victor Selected clients From official website[18]

In the US publishing weekly journal Publishers Weekly, in any reference to a retirement or death of a publisher or agent, the text always lists some of the writers represented or they have published. Very much accepted practice in the publishing industry despite being employed by an agency or a publisher I have now deleted some of the clients represented to make the list less unwieldy. Hope this is a satisfactory response to your comments. Regards Terry Snow SnowbirdTS (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Terry please post this response on the talk page for the draft and perhaps that can sway some of the AFC reviewers. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Terry, at this point the references really need to be cleaned up as they are posted redundantly. I'll see if I can format that. My concern again with GNG is that they are all offline magazine and news references, and can't be determined by a glance whether they discuss Tim Curnow's life or are passing mentions of Tim Curnow and mainly focusing on his client's writing career. If you can pick out which news articles you cited that are focused on Tim Curnow's specific career, then note those first on the talk page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

Terry, another concern is that the writing still paints a rosy view of Curnow's career, so it would have to be adjusted for tone. This might be harder to neutralize since you are connected to the subject. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)

"Safety Signs" - Split Proposal

So, I've had a merge proposal posted on the Warning sign article since last week of November, and nobody's made any sort of comment on it. Is there a next step if a split proposal gets zero feedback of any kind?
(I'm not quite ready to resubmit for approval, but I want ready by the end of February and I want to get the ball rolling in case this is a process that just requires waiting, or time to set in motion.
(If you need to refresh your memory as to who I am, and our conversation & my draft Draft:Safety sign, this is your archive our original conversation in late November 2018: User Talk:AngusWOOF - Archive 8) Hope all is well.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 10:31, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

The Navigators, can you notify Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health about the split? Any other Wikiprojects? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:40, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Done, notified WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, Wikipedia:WikiProject Transport & Wikipedia:WikiProject Highways on their talk pages, with links to the split proposal.--The Navigators (talk)-May British Rail Rest in Peace. 21:52, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Mel Heifetz Article -- Please kindly reconsider

Dear AngusWOOF,

You have rejected the Mel Heifetz article (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mel_Heifetz) on January 1st, 2019. After detailed and careful edits and re-writes, I am confident that the article deserves a re-review. I would appreciate your help and time. Thank you.

EditingandWriting (talk) 03:38, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

EditingandWriting, did you resubmit the draft? Maybe another AFC reviewer can check it again. It's better than when it was first flagged for just being an award winner. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:11, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

I did indeed re-submit the draft. Is there any way you could help approve it? Thank you in advance.

EditingandWriting (talk) 00:44, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

REVIEW

Hi, Angus. You had declined my draft-Sripur Hat High School on 23rd Januar, 2019. I have edited the page and added notable refrences, have a look at it again. Thank you Aasman98 (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Aasman98, okay please resubmit it Draft:Sripur Hat High School, and AFC reviewer (doesn't have to be me) can take a look. If you can identify which sources meet WP:GNG and WP:ORGCRIT up front, that will help. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:12, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Help in Making the Article Acceptable

Hello, I was hoping you could help comment more in depth on the article that I have written and you've recently reviewed. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aglaia_Kong I have rewrote it to be factual based on the website cover and articles that I have read about the subject. I was wondering if you could specify where or what references are not suitable to be approved and any other comments to help be approved. Thank you so much! Vivian0314 (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC) Vivian 2.12.2019 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivian0314 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Vivian0314 the ones that are company profiles or convention speaker / panel profiles would be considered primary or self-published sources, so you would need something else instead of those. Also Q&A interviews are primary. If you can find detailed news articles or journals that cover Kong's career, please use those. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:46, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF Hello, I've resubmitted the draft with references changed to new articles instead of convention profiles and was hoping you could take a look or offer some additional advice. Thank you! Vivian0314 (talk) 17:07, 15 February 2019 (UTC) Vivian 2.15.2019

Vivian0314, can you identify up front on that article, which of these news articles meet WP:GNG? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:49, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF Hello, I've just identified the sources that meet WP:GNG on the top of the article! Thank you so much for helping and reviewing. Please let me know if this suffices. Vivian0314 (talk) 14:11, 19 February 2019 (UTC) Vivian 2.19.2019

KimLip

Hi, those singles, named after each of the members (see Loona (group)#Single albums) are officialy recorded by "Loona", not by each of the members. Snowflake91 (talk) 10:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Snowflake91 It's rather tricky how they market their girl group members as "solo artists", but yeah for now this can still be lumped as part of their group, and not a true solo career spinoff. That's not to say they couldn't implement that strategy later and then she could be notable for that single. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Ryoko Akama

Dear AngusWOOF,

I’m replying to your question regarding Ryoko Akama’s notability on behalf of the author of this article. I am professor for computer music composition at the University of Music and Performing Arts in Graz. This article has been written by a student of mine as an assignment for a class. Please allow me to briefly explain the background of this particular course, which is titled “Repertoire of Computer Music”.

The field of experimental computer music is strongly dominated by male composers. Last summer there was an international initiative which ran under the name ComposingWikipedia where people joint efforts in order to write articles on relevant female composers and to put them on Wikipedia. The idea behind this is that an increased availability of information of these composers will also lead to a stronger awareness of their artistic work in the scene of contemporary electronic music. Within my course we often discussed the problem, that female artists are often overlooked in the history of particular genres, especially if these are characterized by the use of technology. Therefore we decided to carry on with the initiative of “ComposingWikipedia” and to develop articles according to academic standards and to submit them to Wikipedia. Together we studied Wikipedia’s criteria of Notability and discussed which composers are notable enough to get an article. We honor the criteria stated by Wikipedia, however, unfortunately even the criteria listed under the category “Others” is not fully applicable to the field of experimental music. Terms such as #tune#, #melody# and #standards# don’t play a role in this sort of music. On the other hand influences in style etc. can only be recognized with a temporal distance, which would usually exclude any composers under the age of 50 or older to get any mention.

This is the reason, why in the case of Ryoko Akama it is not easy to deliver ‘evidence’ that she is a relevant composer that deserves to have a Wikipedia article. I’m convinced, though, that she is relevant enough. In the experimental music scene relevance is often shown when composers are regularly presenting at festivals. With Ryoko Akama this is definitely the case. She can regularly be found in festival programs. Also, she has often been interviewed by magazines that are covering the experimental music scene, such as musicaelettronica.it or anothertimbre.org. Most importantly, though, I would like to point out that Ryoko Akama has taught at the “International Courses for Contemporary Music Darmstadt”. This is probably the festival with the longest tradition and strongest influence in contemporary music. To be invited to this course is a strong indicator that the person not only has relevance but that she is seen as a representative of a particular meaningful direction in contemporary composition.

I understand that all of this is no ‘hard evidence’ of Ryoko Akama’s relevance. I would be grateful, though, if you would give this article the benefit of the doubt because of what I stated above, and especially because of the urgent need to give female composers a stronger presence on Wikipedia.

Sincerely,

Prof. Dr. Marko Ciciliani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Korin Rizzo (talk • contribs) 11:36, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Korin Rizzo, thanks for your insights. We're looking for news articles and journal articles that describe Akama in detail that aren't just Q&A interviews, so if you have those to support her case for meeting WP:MUSICBIO or WP:GNG, that would be helpful. A lot of what is already presented are primary sources, coming from brochures/program writeups. Bandcamp is self-published so that isn't a reliable source. Also many of the references currently listed are press releases / announcements that are passing mentions about Akama, that she is in participating that festival or program followed by her profile writeup. We need the external newspaper writeup instead, perhaps a critics' review of her work. Hope that helps. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Matt Goulding article

Thanks for the suggestions—I edited the lead, removed some other language, and added more sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lschwartz2416 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Lschwartz2416, it looks like the articles have been approved. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:53, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft For Spaceflight Simulator page

Dear Editor,

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Spaceflight_Simulator

This article would be nice to see. Even though I’m not a user, it’s a bit disappointing when I see a game I’ve played for months with a red redirect. Seeing you did further work on it before, I wondered if you had spare time for it. There are no sources I can find on it (maybe Google Play Store, where it is hosted?) otherwise it would be done now. There’s a Fandom over it, but you can’t cite that. It would be nice to see it there with the rest. Sorry for inconvenience and your time. Thank you.

P.S. Since I have no account, I may bookmark your page on my browser. You wouldn’t be able to find me. :( I may remember in the far future. I can, however, provide info on the game, but no sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1A11:427C:3038:F86C:150C:7954 (talk) 06:24, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Until it gets some reliable sources, preferably from WP:VG/RS, it will probably stay in draft for now. Hopefully it can garner reviews. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Seth's Temptation

Hi AngusWOOF In 1910 professional journals are almost the only sources available. These are the only ones that give a little - probably not enough detail. This is the case of The Moving Picture World, The Film Index and The New York Dramatic Mirror in the USA and The Bioscope in Great Britain. I added an illustration of the film in this case an advertisement. The film is also part of the American Film Institute Catalog, which is a reference on films presented in the USA. Finally on the external link that I give on the site devoted to Sidney Olcott, there is the reproduction of three articles devoted to the film If that's not enough, I think we'll have to erase everything that is devoted to silent film on Wikipedia. Sincerely Derrien56 Derrien56 (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

References

Derrien56, are you able to connect those news references to the article? That might help notability. It's hard to tell if it is just a directory entry in a database. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Convert2Pay

You mean G11. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:18, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, the advertising one. I get A11 and G11 mixed up sometimes. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 02:27, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

I get G4 and G5 mixed up. That makes me think of getting second normal form violation and third normal form violation mixed up when I was doing databases. I could look at a database design and see that it hadn't been fully normalized, which means that the database design needed tweaking in order to ensure that everything was consistent after the data was updated, but I never did remember which of the two rule violations was which, and I was the database expert. If I saw that the design was wrong, I could look up which of the rules was being violated, but it didn't matter, because I did know how to fix it, just not what the number was of the rule I was using. G4 and G5 are both about trying to sneak something or someone in. One of them is about a banned article and the other is about a banned editor. Before we required autoconfirmed status to create new articles, A1 and A3 were common on New Page Patrol and were easy to confuse. They are two different kinds of nothing. How can there be two kinds of nothing? Robert McClenon (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Vic Mignogna#Voice actors vs. voice actresses

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Vic Mignogna#Voice actors vs. voice actresses. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:39, 15 February 2019 (UTC)Template:Z48

Please note that the discussion is closed--Fradio71 (talk) 05:42, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Fradio71, discussion doesn't appear to be closed. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:22, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Engineering consultant

Bad decline; the bluelink is a redirect to a tangentially-related subject, not an article. VQuakr (talk) 20:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

VQuakr,Why? Engineering consultant was redirected there since 2010. It's only today that you redirected it to the new article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Right, it was a redirect to Engineering management, which is a clearly different topic. The AfC decline claiming "Submission is duplicated by another article already in mainspace" was inaccurate. VQuakr (talk) 01:40, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Heads up: One of your draft rejections made it into the Washington Post

Hey, just a little heads up, your AFC rejection of Draft:Alison Waley was (indirectly) mentioned in the Washington Post. Regards SoWhy 10:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, SoWhy. I can't see the article at the moment because of the paywall. Maybe that can be added to the talk page for press? But that draft still needed more details about Waley herself, not just "married another man". What year did that happen? When did she write her memoirs? There's a ton of missing biographical information. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

If you have problems with their paywall, try opening the link in a private (incognito) window. It should work. Regards SoWhy 13:21, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

SoWhy, thanks, I see it now. Yay! Let's get it in press. My point still stands. If the only thing she's notable for is that she is that guy's husband, then it should just be a section of it. WP:NOTINHERITED If it's more than that, then expand the article with refs. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

I hope they aren't concluding it's a gender discrimination issue though. I've been strict on men's biographies for the same reasons and recently promoted another women writer's article at Lesley Jane Seymour. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Social inequalities in wildfire preparedness comments and request for advisement

Hello -

I wanted to follow up on the declined request for Draft:Social inequalities in wildfire preparedness. On the topic of this not meeting WP:OR, all ideas within this article are expressed and cited directly within the three source peer-reviewed journal articles listed in the references. Would it be more clear if I also cited the ideas that are re-presented within the lead? 47.147.221.147 (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Could you also clarify the specific instances of bias that you noticed? I can back up or contest any of those points with additional input from other peer-reviewed journal articles on the topic of social vulnerability in hazard mitigation. 47.147.221.147 (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

47.147.221.147, it reads like it belongs in a journal rather than Wikipedia. See WP:NOTJOURNAL. If you want it for Wikipedia, you would have to wrap some context around what this topic is. It needs more background and history. When was it conceived? Who raised this as a term? How was it promoted? How has the public received the term? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:47, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Those are great points and I do appreciate the advice, and will incorporate that into the draft as I move forward before my resubmission.

I do want to ask a clarification, though - and I am not asking this to circumvent the discussions to be had behind the issues in the draft involving WP:NOTJOURNAL - but are there more stringent controls on the creation-worthiness of a submission at WP:AFC that I should consider in addition to merely WP:N? I had understood that for articles that meet WP:N should in themselves qualify for creation, assuming they aren't WP:POVFORKs, even if substantial future work is required to develop the article beyond a stub. 47.147.221.147 (talk) 19:44, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

I would recommend WP:GNG first. The journals, while being reliable sources, are strongly tied to the subject and might be interpreted as WP:PRIMARY sources and so are not really independent of the subject. the other thing it really needs is WP:PCR Provide context to the reader. Most readers won't know what a social inequity is and when it applies to wildfire preparedness. If this is a recently-formulated concept, it needs background as to when it was created, who created it, and how was it rolled out. Also, how is it received in the communities and the world. WP:NOTJOURNAL and WP:NOTMANUAL still apply. The goal isn't to explain how exactly it is implemented but to provide a general summary and its importance / impact. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:55, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Notice that Social vulnerability article, the one you are basing this work on, and how that one is structured with a Background, History, Models, Criticism sections. Another thing to note is WP:XY. You're trying to describe Social vulnerability in the context of wildfire preparedness. AFC reviewers may think these are two separate topics that don't really need a combined article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

A Barnstar for You!

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		Thank you for helping me write an article. You gave great suggestions on reception. You also helped me write in my own words. Thanks for all your help and keep helping others with creating articles.

LPS and MLP Fan (talk) 21:39, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

Plot sections

Is there a tool that allows us to automatically count how many words there are in the section? I don't want to trim the article too much.Tintor2 (talk) 22:34, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Tintor2, found it: User:Alex 21/script-plotlength AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:49, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Alexander Navab

Hello I noticed you declined Draft:Alexander Navab when I came to review the draft the decline option wasn't available so I commented instead, I've noticed that this happens in about one in every 20 or so drafts I review, have you any thoughts on what causes this? Theroadislong (talk) 20:39, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Theroadislong, that's strange. Did Clean Submission help out? If someone left a weird signature, that might mess things up? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:43, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Article Drafts

I was just wondering something. Are people allowed to ask if a reviewer can review their draft? NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 21:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

NerdyKaiExpo, sure, you can ask any of the AFC reviewers. It doesn't have to be the same one who reviewed it previously. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:36, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Why did you remove the Official Synopsis? NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

It's not needed and would be a copy violation. WP:COPYVIO AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:10, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

I resubmitted the article. NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 23:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

NerdyKaiExpo, it looks like it's been approved. I've removed the summary that was copied from the Fandom Wikia page. You can replace it with your own writeup. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:01, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Ok, and btw I actually wrote the setting part. NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 00:02, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

NerdyKaiExpo, that's fine. It can be integrated into the summary unless the environment is fairly elaborate that it needs a separate section like with Divergent (novel). AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:04, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Question; would it be ok if I took a summary from a source and then reference it to that source and be fine, or do I actually to write it myself? NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 00:12, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

It's probably better to rewrite one in your own words. It can be a short one for now if you don't have time or the patience to write a longer one AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:14, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Can you go onto Files for upload and look at the 3 photos i’m Trying to upload for the article? NerdyKaiExpo (talk) 00:24, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

How to fix Draft:Jostar (surname)

It has be rejected TWICE, and I want to know that. Also, can you add it to The anime and manga club thing please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JojokeGodFunhand (talk • contribs) 22:48, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

JojokeGodFunhand, Joestar already redirects to the series. There is no need to elaborate on the surname in a separate article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

AngusWOOF, I just wanted it better defined. I LOVE Jojo's Bizarre Adventure and I want more Jostar pages. Jojo's is HUGE in Japan and it would be a "Golden Wind" if there was more than just the main and DIO. Also,is it Jostar or Joe-star? Funhand is god lol 22:58, 21 February 2019 (UTC)