Talk:List of chord progressions

Lists List‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList
List	This article has been rated as List-class on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article title, figured bass

I recommend changing the title of the article to List of Common Chord Progressions.

Also include the Figured bass with all of the progressions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.155.84 (talk) 18:34, 13 July 2011

Incomplete

Incredibly incomplete... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.222.194.205 (talk) 19:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I-♭VI-V

The chord sequence i-Flat VI-V is universally used in Slavic and Eastern European folk and popular music. Rachmaninoff used it for one of his preludes; Czech artist Raduza and German artist DJ Shantel have both used it in their songs. 74.223.82.114 (talk) 19:42, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a citation? Does it have a name? Hyacinth (talk) 09:15, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

The so-called Andalusian cadence is not in the lydian mode but in the phrygian mode. The page seems a bit too complicated for me to edit though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnavlavan (talk • contribs) 11:27, 22 January 2013

from later commenter Kevintimba: I agree. The progression shown, Am-G-F-E sounds like it's i-bVII-bVI-V in A minor. What brought me to this page (and about which i'm still not sure) is whether the term Andalusian should apply to i-bVII-bVI-V or to something more along the lines of I-bII-bIII-bII. I like the idea of this page though.

Roman Numerals?

Can someone add Roman numeral notation to all of these? I feel like that would add so much to the at-a-glance understandability of this information. 108.4.92.150 (talk) 15:33, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Modified major/minor on side

I just changed the major/minor distinction so that it is actually sortable, because before since 90% of them were labeled "M" and only distinction was color, it wasn't sortable. Please consider sortability if you change this, it is pointless to even append it if you just place an "M" since there is ambitguity 192.34.49.10 (talk) 17:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]