Jump to content

User talk:Jauerback

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 88.66.63.40 (talk) at 13:01, 31 March 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    pls block this guy.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:41.210.14.250 Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.167.147.99 (talk) 04:26, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

     Already done By Materialscientist. - FlightTime (open channel) 04:29, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Oh..Ok, sorry for wasting your time then, lol. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.167.147.99 (talk) 15:58, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Edits made to Hunting Hitler and Bob Baer articles

    Jauerback,

    I was very disappointed by the unprofessional way in which you chose to address me, and I think you are confused about the timeline of events.

    First, I edited the Hunting Hitler and Bob Baer articles with factual information and citations. Then you removed these things, saying the sources were not reliable enough. I then put the edits back and tried to briefly explain why these source were valid.

    After all this, I received three emails from you. One welcoming me to Wikipedia, then a second telling me you took my content down because you did not believe my sources were reliable enough. You asked me to contact you, and I would have, but ten minutes later you sent a third message, which was needlessly rude, telling me not to keep reverting the edits. Perhaps you thought I ignored you second message and went ahead and reverted the edits without speaking to you but this still does not justify you being rude.

    I feel at this point that I cannot get a fair hearing from you, since you are already convinced that I don't know what I am doing and you are right about everything, so can you please hand this matter over to a different Administrator, who will be better able to reasonably assess what I have to say and what should or should not be done with these two articles?

    Thank you, James — Preceding unsigned comment added by JKLambert (talkcontribs) 00:08, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

    Give me a break. First of all, I'm not confused by the timeline. You added, I reverted. You added again. I'm the one who initiated a discussion. What do I have wrong here? Second, you have an interesting idea of what constitutes a "fact". Hell, the very thing you are trying to insert is an opinion, whether it's yours or whether it's cited to someone else. Third, you need to cite everything to a reliable source, which I've linked a few times to your talk page. Fourth, I've sent you zero emails. Those are called talk page messages; just like you've left here. Perhaps you got email notifications? Regardless, there was nothing rude whatsoever about them. Those messages show you some resources for you to help navigate Wikipedia as well as the beginning of the discussion. What's rude about that? Finally, a fair hearing? Good Lord, I'm trying to actually help you make the articles better, but you don't appear to be able to handle constructive criticism or even recognize when someone is trying to help. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 02:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]