Jump to content

Bose–Einstein condensation (network theory)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by OAbot (talk | contribs) at 21:32, 6 April 2019 (Open access bot: add arxiv identifier to citation with #oabot.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Bose–Einstein condensation at 400, 200, and 50 nanokelvins (left to right). As the temperature falls, more and more atoms "condense" to the same energy level, producing more prominent "peaks".

Bose–Einstein condensation in networks [1] is a phase transition observed in complex networks that can be described by the Bianconi-Barabási model [2] . This phase transition predicts a "winner-takes-all" phenomena in complex networks and can be mathematically mapped to the mathematical model explaining Bose–Einstein condensation in physics.


Background

In physics, a Bose–Einstein condensate is a state of matter that occurs in certain gases at very low temperatures. Any elementary particle, atom, or molecule, can be classified as one of two types: a boson or a fermion. For example, an electron is a fermion, while a photon or a helium atom is a boson. In quantum mechanics, the energy of a (bound) particle is limited to a set of discrete values, called energy levels. An important characteristic of a fermion is that it obeys the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no two fermions may occupy the same state. Bosons, on the other hand, do not obey the exclusion principle, and any number can exist in the same state. As a result, at very low energies (or temperatures), a great majority of the bosons in a Bose gas can be crowded into the lowest energy state, creating a Bose–Einstein condensate.

Bose and Einstein have established that the statistical properties of a Bose gas are governed by the Bose–Einstein statistics. In Bose–Einstein statistics, any number of identical bosons can be in the same state. In particular, given an energy state ε, the number of non-interacting bosons in thermal equilibrium at temperature T = 1/β is given by the Bose occupation number

where the constant μ is determined by an equation describing the conservation of the number of particles

with g(ε) being the density of states of the system.

This last equation may lack a solution at low enough temperatures when g(ε) → 0 for ε → 0. In this case a critical temperature Tc is found such that for T < Tc the system is in a Bose-Einstein condensed phase and a finite fraction of the bosons are in the ground state.

The density of states g(ε) depends on the dimensionality of the space. In particular therefore g(ε) → 0 for ε → 0 only in dimensions d > 2. Therefore, a Bose-Einstein condensation of an ideal Bose gas can only occur for dimensions d > 2.


The concept

The evolution of many complex systems, including the World Wide Web, business, and citation networks, is encoded in the dynamic web describing the interactions between the system’s constituents. The evolution of these networks is captured by the Bianconi-Barabási model that includes two main characteristics of growing networks: their constant growth by the addition of new nodes and links and the heterogeneous ability of each node to acquire new links described by the node fitness. Therefore the model is also knwon as fitness model. Despite their irreversible and nonequilibrium nature these networks follow the Bose statistics and can be mapped to a Bose gas. In this mapping each node is mapped to an energy state determined by its fitness and each new link attached to a given node is mapped to a Bose particle occupying the corresponding energy state. This mapping predicts that the Bianconi-Barabási model can undergo a topological phase transition in correspondence to the Bose–Einstein condensation of the Bose gas. This phase transition is therefore called Bose-Einstein condenstaion in complex networks. Consequently addressing the dynamical properties of these nonequilibrium systems within the framework of equilibrium quantum gases predicts that the “first-mover-advantage,” “fit-get-rich (FGR),” and “winner-takes-all” phenomena observed in competitive systems are thermodynamically distinct phases of the underlying evolving networks.[1]

Schematic illustration of the mapping between the network model and the Bose gas.[1]

The mathematical mapping of the network evolution to the Bose gas

Starting from the Bianconi-Barabási model, the mapping of a Bose gas to a network can be done by assigning an energy εi to each node, determined by its fitness through the relation [1][3]

where β = 1 / T . In particular when β = 0 all the nodes have equal fitness, when instead β ≫ 1 nodes with different "energy" have very different fitness. We assume that the network evolves through a modified preferential attachment mechanism. At each time a new node i with energy εi drawn from a probability distribution p(ε) enters in the network and attach a new link to a node j chosen with probability:

In the mapping to a Bose gas, we assign to every new link linked by preferential attachment to node j a particle in the energy state εj.

The continuum theory predicts that the rate at which links accumulate on node i with "energy " εi is given by

where indicating the number of links attached to node i that was added to the network at the time step . is the partition function, defined as:

The solution of this differential equation is:

where the dynamic exponent satisfies , μ plays the role of the chemical potential, satisfying the equation

where p(ε) is the probability that a node has "energy" ε and "fitness" η = e−βε. In the limit, t → ∞, the occupation number, giving the number of links linked to nodes with "energy" ε, follows the familiar Bose statistics

The definition of the constant μ in the network models is surprisingly similar to the definition of the chemical potential in a Bose gas. In particular for probabilities p(ε) such that p(ε) → 0 for ε → 0 at high enough value of β we have a condensation phase transition in the network model. When this occurs, one node, the one with higher fitness acquires a finite fraction of all the links. The Bose–Einstein condensation in complex networks is therefore a topological phase transition after which the network has a star-like dominant structure.

Bose–Einstein phase transition in complex networks

Numerical evidence for Bose–Einstein condensation in a network model.[1]

The mapping of a Bose gas predicts the existence of two distinct phases as a function of the energy distribution. In the fit-get-rich phase, describing the case of uniform fitness, the fitter nodes acquire edges at a higher rate than older but less fit nodes. In the end the fittest node will have the most edges, but the richest node is not the absolute winner, since its share of the edges (i.e. the ratio of its edges to the total number of edges in the system) reduces to zero in the limit of large system sizes (Fig.2(b)). The unexpected outcome of this mapping is the possibility of Bose–Einstein condensation for T < TBE, when the fittest node acquires a finite fraction of the edges and maintains this share of edges over time (Fig.2(c)).

A representative fitness distribution ρ(η) that leads to a condensations

with λ = 1.

However, the existence of the Bose–Einstein condensation or the fit-get-rich phase does not depend on the temperature or β of the system but depends only on the functional form of the fitness distribution ρ(ν) of the system. In the end, β falls out of all topologically important quantities. In fact it can be shown that Bose–Einstein condensation exists in the fitness model even without mapping to a Bose gas.[4] A similar gelation can be seen in models with superlinear preferential attachment,[5] however, it is not clear whether this is an accident or a deeper connection lies between this and the fitness model.

Quantum statistics in complex networks

Using a very similar mathematical approach [6] used to map the Bianconi–Barabási model to the Bose gas in Ref. [7] it has been shown that a growing Cayley tree with fitness of the nodes can be mapped to a Fermi gas. Recently it has been shown that the Bianconi–Barabási model can be interpreted as a limit case of the model for emergent hyperbolic network geometry [8] called Network Geometry with Flavor [9]. This is a model of simplicial complexes in which the faces of different dimension have statistical properties captured by the Fermi-Dirac, the Boltzmann or the Bose-Einstein distribution depending on their dimension and on a parameter called flavor [9]. In correspondence of the Bose-Einstein distribution the network geometry of these structures displays a phase transion [8].

Bose–Einstein condensation in evolutionary models and ecological systems

In evolutionary models each species reproduces proportionally to its fitness. In the infinite alleles model, each mutation generates a new species with a random fitness. This model was studied by the statistician J. F. C. Kingman and is known as the "house of cards" models.[10] Depending on the fitness distribution, the model shows a condensation phase transition. Kingman did not realize that this phase transition could be mapped to a Bose–Einstein condensation. Recently the mapping of this model to a Bose–Einstein condensation was made in the context of a stochastic model for non-neutral ecologies.[11] When the condensation phenomenon in an ecological system occurs, one species becomes dominant and strongly reduces the biodiversity of the system. This phase transition describes a basic stylized mechanism which is responsible for the large impact of invasive species in many ecological systems.

Memory understood as an equilibrium Bose gas

Herbert Fröhlich is the source of the idea that quantum coherent waves could be generated in the biological neural network. His studies claimed to show that with an oscillating charge in a thermal bath, large numbers of quanta may condense into a single state known as a Bose condensate.[12] Already in 1970 Pascual-Leone had shown that memory experiments can be modelled by the Bose–Einstein occupancy model.[13] From this and a large body of other empirical findings (based on studies of EEG and psychometrics) Weiss and Weiss draw the generalized conclusion that memory span can be understood as the quantum number of a harmonic oscillator, where memory is to be mapped into an equilibrium Bose gas.[14]


History

In year 2000, Ginestra Bianconi was a graduate student, working with Prof. Albert-László Barabási, a noted network theorist. At his request, she began investigating a network model, later called the Bianconi-Barabási model or fitness model, in which the network evolves with the "preferential attachment" mechanism but in addition, each node has an intrinsic quality or fitness that describes its ability to acquire new links. For example, in the world wide web each web page has different contents, in social networks different people might have different social skills, in airport networks each airport is connected to cities with unevenly distributed economic activity, etc. It was found that under certain conditions, a single node could acquire a large fraction of all the links of the network, resulting in the network analog of a Bose–Einstein condensate. In particular, a perfect mapping [1] can be drawn between the mathematics of the network and the mathematics of a Bose gas if each node in the network were thought of as an energy level, and each link as a particle. These results have implications for any real situation involving random graphs, including the world wide web, social networks, and financial markets.

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f Bianconi, Ginestra; Barabási, Albert-László (2001). "Bose–Einstein condensation in complex networks". Physical Review Letters. 86: 5632–5635. arXiv:cond-mat/0011224. Bibcode:2001PhRvL..86.5632B. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5632.
  2. ^ Bianconi, Ginestra; Barabási, Albert-László (2001). "Competition and multiscaling in evolving networks". Europhysics Letters. 54: 436–442. arXiv:cond-mat/0011029. Bibcode:2001EL.....54..436B. doi:10.1209/epl/i2001-00260-6.
  3. ^ Albert, R.; Barabási, A.-L. (2002). "Statistical mechanics of complex networks." Rev. Mod. Phys. 74: 47–97.
  4. ^ Dorogovtsev, S. N.; Mendes, J. F. F. (2001). "Scaling properties of scale-free evolving networks:  Continuous approach. Phys. Rev. E 63: 056125.
  5. ^ Krapivsky, P. L.; Redner, S.; Leyvraz, F. (2000). "Connectivity of Growing Random Networks." Phys. Rev. Lett. 85: 4629–32.
  6. ^ Bianconi, Ginestra (2002). "Quantum statistics in complex networks". Physical Review E. 66: 056123. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.66.056123.
  7. ^ Bianconi, Ginestra (2002). "Growing Cayley trees described by a Fermi distribution". Physical Review E. 66: 036116. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.66.036116.
  8. ^ a b Bianconi, Ginestra; Rahmede, Christoph (2017). "Emergent hyperbolic network geometry". Scientific Reports. 7: 41974. doi:10.1038/srep41974.
  9. ^ a b Bianconi, Ginestra; Rahmede, Christoph (2016). "Network geometry with flavor: from complexity to quantum geometry". Physical Review E. 93: 032315. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.93.032315.
  10. ^ J. F C Kingman, A simple model for the balance between selection and mutation J. Appl. Prob. 15 (1978)1
  11. ^ G. Bianconi L Ferretti and S. Franz, Non-neutral theory of biodiversity Europhys. Lett. 87 (2009) P07028
  12. ^ Frohlich, H. (1968). Long range coherence and energy storage in biological systems. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry, 2, 641-649 [1]
  13. ^ Pascual-Leone, J. (1970). A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages. Acta Psychologica, 32, 301-345
  14. ^ Weiss V., Weiss H. (2003). The golden mean as clock cycle of brain waves. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 18, 643-652. Full text