Talk:King's Royal Rifle Corps

Untitled

Does anyone have a suggestion for a book-length reference that pays particular attention to the Royal Americans prior to 1776? Bwilreker (talk) 05:14, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on King's Royal Rifle Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.krrcassociation.com/music/introduction.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.krrcassociation.com/history/cadets.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on King's Royal Rifle Corps. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.regiments.org/regiments/uk/inf/060KRRC.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808022957/http://www.rgjmuseum.co.uk/pages_photo/photo_0010.asp to http://www.rgjmuseum.co.uk/pages_photo/photo_0010.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304080630/http://www.rgjmuseum.co.uk/pages_photo/photo_0007.asp to http://www.rgjmuseum.co.uk/pages_photo/photo_0007.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

'universal in the British Army some 150 years later'

"a Swiss citizen, whose ideas on tactics, training and man-management (including the unofficial introduction of the rifle and more practical clothing suited to bush-fighting) would become universal in the British Army some 150 years later.'

This generalisation, which manages to be at once both unhelpfully vague and dense, risks overstating the case and needs to be unpicked. It reads like a regimental boast that does not stand up to scrutiny.

What are we saying took place, or was achieved by circa 1905? (1755+150)

The rifled musket had become general issue in the 1840s. At the same date all infantry regiments began to practice open order fighting drills and the distinction between line, light infantry and rifle regiments became matters of style rather than substance.. While experiments with looser clothing of subdued colour (other than rifle green- which became progressively less subdued) had been taking place since the 1850s, khaki became universal in India in the 1880s, for all foreign service in 1896 and universally in 1902. While attitudes to training and discipline of soldiers would become more enlightened by stages, the successive rifle regiments, down to the present 'Rifles,' would claim that their ethos still differs from other regiments. The gap has however narrowed considerably.

I have amended the sentence to make it less of a hostage to fortune. There may be a better way of putting it but I believe it is an improvement

"a Swiss citizen, whose forward-thinking ideas on tactics, training and man-management (including the unofficial introduction of the rifle and more practical clothing suited to bush-fighting) would come to be accepted as standard in the British Army many years in the future.'

'mastery of forest warfare'

"The new regiment at first lost several outlying garrisons such as Fort Michilimackinac, but finally proved its mastery of forest warfare under Bouquet's leadership at the victory of Bushy Run in August 1763"

Since Bouquet refers to 16 or 17 men of the 60th Royal Americans being with his column, and describes the decisive action at Bushy Run being a ruse executed by the contingent of Highlanders from the 42nd and 77th Regiments, this seems to be an exaggeration found in various versions of the regimental history. JF42 (talk) 19:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)