Jump to content

User talk:NorthPark1417

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by NorthPark1417 (talk | contribs) at 09:20, 23 April 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, NorthPark1417, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as LadybiRdS, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of LadybiRdS

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LadybiRdS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 04:44, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Regional Community Theatre (album).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Regional Community Theatre (album).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teeter Sperber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bamboozle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pencey Prep, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fairmont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neil Sabatino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Replacements (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shane Vidaurri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University of the Arts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Teeter Sperber, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blogger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, NorthPark1417. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wonka Vision issue 37.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wonka Vision issue 37.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:01, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, NorthPark1417. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pirate!

Hello NorthPark1417,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pirate! for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Meatsgains(talk) 01:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pirate logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pirate logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:23, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Patchwork (compilation album) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Patchwork (compilation album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Snowycats (talk) 02:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Patchwork compilation album.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Patchwork compilation album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:The City of Brass cover.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inline citations needed

Hi NorthPark1417, Good day. I am one of the article reviewers and I noticed you have created some article which you have provide "online" and "print" sources for the article you created. However, the rightway to do it is to provide inline citations on the body text so we reviewer could locate the which sources support which section/sentence in the article. Pls visit refereeing for beginners for info and instructions. Pls provide inline citations at soonest so we could review it and get the article publish. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:49, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I use shortened notes linked with {{tl|sfn}} and citation templates.

File:North Jersey Indie Rock Festival 2016.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:13, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dagger (zine)

Notice

The article Dagger (zine) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

References only present in-passing mentions. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dagger (zine) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dagger (zine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagger (zine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Live & Acoustic from the Forest of Chaos.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:32, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article: Michael Nestor

Hi, I am on the edge of whether this page is notable enough to be its own. I don't want to make any more edits without talking this through, namely that I think you should remove the "education" section. I don't think it is relevant to the context of the article. I think doing that would make this better and less apt to notability challenges in my opinion, as least from me. You don't want to overstate this musician. Ricksanchez (talk) 08:10, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ricksanchez, Nestor has been in three notable groups and is listed in eight notable albums, and has founded a record label. For the education, he passes Academic, being a Fellow at three prestigious institutions and authoring a large number of white papers and journals. - NorthPark1417 (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the Academic guidelines and this person does not fully meet the criteria. They must have publications that have "significant impact" on the field. This person has plenty of publications and a great publication record, but it is a hard to say any of them have "significant" impact. This might be a point of contention. They may down the line, but as of right now they do not. The positions at prestigious institutions are postdoctoral fellowships, not assistant, associate, or full professorships, one of these is a staff scientist position, so I am not sure if that would qualify. Thus, none of them fully qualify under Academic, although a quick Google search does show this person is a Director at his current institute, which may mildly qualify. Here is what I would be OK with, could you find at least 1-2 more references to back up this section? Also, your link to the Hussman Institute is incorrect. There is no wiki page for The Hussman Institute for Autism, you are welcome to make one, I am happy to help as I kind of got roped into this via my editing of The Seldon Plan. Just be prepared for others who are more agressive than me, and don't like to talk things out first (I am an old fogie user from when WP was a nicer place) to slap deletes/notability on this, and be ready to argue your case.Ricksanchez (talk) 15:37, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NorthPark1417 Please consider providing more substance under the "Underlined Passages" section of this article. In addition, please consider removing the current employment under the "Education" section. It would be OK to list Fellowships but current employment is not education and might be a violation of terms. Ricksanchez (talk) 03:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Album covers by label has been nominated for discussion

Category:Album covers by label, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 23:37, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGHTCRWLRS (album).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dagger (zine) (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
Just deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagger (zine). We can't override that at AfC. WP:DRV is the process you need to follow. I'll leave this up so it is available for the DRV discussion.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dagger (zine) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dagger (zine). Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 06:02, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dagger zine.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dagger zine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dagger (zine) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dagger (zine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dagger (zine) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Couch Surfin USA (EP).jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13 articles reviewed

Hi NorthPark1417!

I have reviewed the following 13 articles which you created. There are 22 articles which you created still awaiting review.

  1. The Components - WP:BAND#1 checkY
  2. Continuum (The Components album) - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  3. Attendre et Espérer - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  4. New England Music Awards - WP:GNG checkY
  5. The Furies (band) - WP:BAND#1 checkY
  6. Could Eat, Would Sleep - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  7. Yawn Mower Ruins Christmas - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  8. Get to the Boat - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  9. The Gap (magazine) - WP:GNG checkY
  10. Window Unit Blues - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  11. Meet the Skullers - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  12. Live & Acoustic from the Forest of Chaos - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY
  13. What's All This New Piss? - WP:NALBUMS#1 checkY

My advice in terms of improvement is flesh out the lead paragraphs (for albums, mention their release year in the lead), try and use more specific categories and ensure you include a {{short description}} in your articles.

Many thanks,

SITH (talk) 10:47, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Paint Brain) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Paint Brain.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mint 400 Records album covers has been nominated for discussion

Category:Mint 400 Records album covers, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 14:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hoboken Music Awards

Hello, NorthPark1417,

Thanks for creating Hoboken Music Awards! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Nice articles on these bands, etc. On this one, can you find any non-regional coverage of the event? That would solidify it's notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 13:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Dentist (album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Dentist (album).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Ceilings (album)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Ceilings (album).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice work, again!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

MainlyTwelve (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Space Jamz.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Space Jamz.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jersey Beat, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:17, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Jersey Beat shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dagger (zine) Laughing Hyenas.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dagger (zine) Laughing Hyenas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 09:22, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dagger zine.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dagger zine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Bar/None Records artists moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of Bar/None Records artists, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:49, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tim Hinely

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tim Hinely requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Health Palm

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Health Palm requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Shirt58 (talk) 11:09, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Writer's Barnstar for you

The Writer's Barnstar
A barnstar for you for creating album related articles. Thank you for your contribution. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 07:46, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

This is the only warning you will receive about ownership of articles, which you showed at Jersey Beat. The next time you continue to disruptively edit Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. There is nothing to discuss. Read WP:OVERLINK and MOS:INFOBOX, specifically MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. They are not for links, they're for summarizing articles. If you want to discuss, do so on the talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And for the record, if you're going to tell me to follow BRD you should do so yourself. The last time we tried it, you ignored any rational point and avoided making any policy-based arguments. When I called for normal dispute resolution and someone said that you were wrong and we should compromise, you ignored it. So I have every reason to believe you're WP:NOTHERE to work cooperatively on building an encyclopedia. If you'd like to first read OVERLINK and then discuss why the United States in an infobox needs to be linked based on it, feel free to. You were bold, you were reverted so you start the discussion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:42, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jersey Beat; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:47, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:NorthPark1417 reported by User:Walter Görlitz (Result: ). Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:50, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You've been blocked from editing for 72 hours due to violating the 3 revert rule. Please be more careful in the future. El_C 08:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NorthPark1417 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Following WP:BRD on Jersey Beat. Edit was a link for United States, for an American magazine. (Fantastic, Notre-Dame de Paris)

Decline reason:

WP:BRD does not override WP:3RR - it is BRD, not BRRRRRRR - you must do the D. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:32, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NorthPark1417 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

Usually. Not always. Please read WP:GAB before making any further unblock requests, because this was not an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 12:14, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's with four reverts. With five I usually extend it to 48 hours, and I take it to 72 hours for six reverts. El_C 18:27, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Binksternet:, revert this edit, and discuss on Infobox talk page. The modification of a featured article has the implications of unwritten, and non-discussed changes in the manual of style. - NorthPark1417 (talk) 08:03, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    NorthPark1417, as far as I can see, you first added the link with this edit and two others have now reverted it. That means the onus is on you to start a discussion and seek consensus for its addition, not on the others who reverted your addition. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:19, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello Boing! said Zebedee, the consensus on the style of a featured article exceeds a start class article, of which Jersey Beat is solely my writing. - NorthPark1417 (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Then you need to make that argument in a discussion aimed at seeking consensus and not edit war over it, as you must do when any change you wish to make is contested. There's absolutely no point making the argument here, with me as I am not the one contesting your change and this is not the place to argue it. If you can't get your head around Wikipedia's core approach of discussion and consensus (which overrides pretty much everything else), then I fear your time with us will be short. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:16, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did ping Binksternet, but I don't mind discussing it with you. The consensus is already made, in following Wikipedia's highest standard in stylistic guideline, the Featured Article.
    In the mean time, I opened your user page, Binksternet, and you link to the country in the infobox, in a featured article you wrote, Santa María de Óvila. - NorthPark1417 (talk) 10:35, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    Ah well, if you won't listen, I guess there's nothing more I can say - just that if you continue to edit war when this block expires rather than seeking consensus, you should expect to be blocked for longer. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nobody ever challenged the link to Spain in the Santa María de Óvila article. I'm willing to have it removed if consensus changes, but a strong committee of copyeditors did not think it was a problem. Unlike your Jersey Beat article, the monastery article actually contains some government references – the Spanish government of course – so the link could be seen as useful. Your Jersey Beat article has no actions from the United States government. Binksternet (talk) 14:01, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • This is the page prior to edit reversions. I can give input if the editors initiate a discussion at the Infobox template talk page. - NorthPark1417 (talk) 11:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    That is the page *after* you made your contested addition, and it is *you* who needs to start the discussion, not those who contested your edit and reverted it. I really don't know why you can't understand that or will not listen to how edit warring policy works. Your stubbornness will not help you. But, on your own head be it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to admins: User came on IRC and moaned he was blocked after block had ended, he said above edit was not made by him. Logs available to any admin that has signed the confidentiality agreements as non public information. Please email me to request them. RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) 08:27, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • user:NPk 74 is almost certainly an impersonator, which is why I blocked them as such. We've been getting a lot like that recently - it's some troll making fake socks and fake unblock requests (on wiki and via UTRS) for newly blocked accounts. Oh, and NorthPark1417 was not re-blocked after the block ended and has been editing since. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:22, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
NorthPark1417 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
... (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Decline reason: If you are autoblocked, you will need to exactly follow the directions that appear when you attempt to edit, or otherwise tell what IP address or account is blocked. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:PAID/WP:COI

Wondering your connection with the subject you write about. I have blocked you until this issues is dealt with.

Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:43, 22 April 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

NorthPark1417 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello @Doc James:, I do not get paid, or have a conflict of interest. - NorthPark1417 (talk) 20:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Hello <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Doc James|Doc James]]:</span>, I do not get paid, or have a conflict of interest. - [[User:NorthPark1417|NorthPark1417]] ([[User talk:NorthPark1417#top|talk]]) 20:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Doc James|Doc James]]:</span>, I do not get paid, or have a conflict of interest. - [[User:NorthPark1417|NorthPark1417]] ([[User talk:NorthPark1417#top|talk]]) 20:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Hello <span class="template-ping">@[[User:Doc James|Doc James]]:</span>, I do not get paid, or have a conflict of interest. - [[User:NorthPark1417|NorthPark1417]] ([[User talk:NorthPark1417#top|talk]]) 20:12, 22 April 2019 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
  • @Walter Görlitz: Regarding the citation date style I use, "editors should not attempt to change an article's established citation style merely on the grounds of personal preference, to make it match other articles, or without first seeking consensus for the change. If the article you are editing is already using a particular citation style, you should follow it." WP:CITEVAR - NorthPark1417 (talk) 09:17, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NorthPark1417&oldid=893743044"