Hans Schmitz-Wiedenbrück

For the current list of potentially controversial requested moves, see § Current discussions.

"Wikipedia:RM" redirects here. For other uses, see Wikipedia:RM (disambiguation).

For detailed guidance on how and when to move a page, see Wikipedia:Moving a page.

Commenting on a requested move

All editors are welcome to contribute to the discussion regarding a requested page move. There are a number of standards that Wikipedians should practice in such discussions:

• When editors recommend a course of action, they write Support or Oppose in bold text, which is done by surrounding the word with three single quotes on each side, e.g. '''Support'''.
• Comments or recommendations are added on a new bulleted line (that is, starting with *) and signed by adding ~~~~ to the end. Responses to another editor are threaded and indented using multiple bullets.
• The article itself should be reviewed before any recommendation is made; do not base recommendations solely on the information supplied by other editors. It may also help to look at the article's edit history. However, please read the earlier comments and recommendations, as well as prior move requests. They may contain relevant arguments and useful information.
• Vested interests in the article should be disclosed per Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI.

When participating, please consider the following:

• Editors should make themselves familiar with the article titling policy at Wikipedia:Article titles.
• Other important guidelines that set forth community norms for article titles include Wikipedia:Disambiguation, specific naming conventions, and the manual of style.
• The debate is not a vote; please do not make recommendations that are not sustained by arguments.
• Explain how the proposed article title meets or contravenes policy and guidelines rather than merely stating that it does so.
• Nomination already implies that the nominator supports the name change, and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line.
• Do not make conflicting recommendations. If you change your mind, use strike-through to retract your previous statement by enclosing it between <s> and </s> after the bullets, and de-bold the struck words, as in "• Support Oppose".

Please remember that reasonable editors will sometimes disagree, but that arguments based in policy, guidelines, and evidence have more weight than unsupported statements. When an editor offers an argument that does not explain how the move request is consistent with policies and guidelines, a reminder to engage in constructive, on-topic discussion may be useful. On the other hand, a pattern of responding to requests with groundless opinion, proof by assertion, and ignoring content guidelines may become disruptive. If a pattern of disruptive behavior persists after efforts are made to correct the situation through dialogue, please consider using a dispute resolution process.

Closing a requested move

Any uninvolved editor in good standing may close a move request. Please read the closing instructions for information on how to close a move request. The Simple guide to closing RM discussions details how to actually close a requested move discussion.

Relisting a requested move

Relisting a discussion moves the request out of the backlog up to the current day in order to encourage further input. The decision to relist a discussion is best left to uninvolved experienced editors upon considering, but declining, to close the discussion. In general, discussions should not be relisted more than once before properly closing. Users relisting a debate which has already been relisted, or relisting a debate with a substantial discussion, should write a short explanation on why they did not consider the debate sufficient to close. While there is no consensus forbidding participation in a requested move discussion after relisting it, many editors consider it an inadvisable form of supervote. If you want to relist a discussion and then participate in it, be prepared to explain why you think it was appropriate.

Relisting should be done using {{subst:RM relist}}, which automatically includes the relister's signature, and which must be placed at the very end of the initial request after the move requester's signature (and subsequent relisters' signatures).

When a relisted discussion reaches a resolution, it may be closed at any time according to the closing instructions; there is no required length of time to wait before closing a relisted discussion.

If discussion has become stale, or it seems that discussion would benefit from more input of editors versed in the subject area, consider more widely publicizing the discussion, such as by notifying WikiProjects of the discussion using the template {{RM notification}}. Banners placed at the top of the talk page hosting the move request can often be used to identify WikiProjects suitable for notification.

See also

• Wikipedia:Requested moves/Article alerts, which includes a list of recently closed, as well as open discussions

Hans Schmitz-Wiedenbrück was the alias of Hans Schmitz (* 3 January 1907 in Lippstadt, † 7 December 1944 in Angermund), a German painter of sacral, peasant and Nazi propaganda arts. He belonged to the Wiedenbrücker Schule school of arts.

Biography

Hans Schmitz was born in the Lippstadt / Westphalia as the son of a hotel caretaker. Beginning in 1923, he was trained in the studio of Heinrich Repke in the nearby city of Wiedenbrück where he worked for a total of 17 years, interrupted by studies in Kassel, Munich and Brussels and study trips to Denmark, Belgium, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy. With his oil painting Familienbild (Family Painting) he won 2nd prize in the arts competition Die neue deutsche Familie (The New German Family). In 1939 he was awarded the Großer Staatspreis der Preußischen Akademie der Künste (Great State Award of the Prussian Academy of Arts). Furthermore, he received the arts award Jung-Westfalen (Young Westphalia, 1939) and the Gaukulturpreis Westfalen-Süd (Gau Culture Award Southern Westphalia, 1941). Hans Schmitz-Wiedenbrück exhibited at the 22nd Venice Biennale. The artist is especially known for his 1941 triptych Arbeiter, Bauern und Soldaten (Workers, Farmers and Soldiers, sold to Adolf Hitler for a price of 30,000 reichsmark) and the oil painting Kämpfendes Volk (Fighting People, sold to Joseph Goebbels for a price of 56,000 reichsmark) which was exhibited at the 1941 Große Deutsche Kunstausstellung (Great German Arts Exhibition) in Munich. Hitler also bought Schmitz-Wiedenbrück’s oil painting Bauern im Gewitter (Farmers in a Thunderstorm, 1939, 4,500 reichsmark) and Das Johannisfeuer (Saint John’s Fire, 1940, 14,000 reichsmark) while Martin Bormann paid 25,000 reichsmark for the painting Tischgesellschaft (Table Companionship, 1944) and 20,000 reichsmark for Frau mit Stier (Woman with Bull, 1944). Many of Schmitz’ paintings from this period of time have to be considered Nazi propaganda art.

The fact that Joseph Goebbels suggested 36 year-old Hans Schmitz for a professorship at the Dusseldorf Arts Academy in 1943 illustrates the Nazi regime’s sympathies for this artist. In the same year, Hans Schmitz was drafted and consequently worked as a war painter. He died from a heart attack on 7 December of the following year.

Controversy

Controversial tribute: Hans Schmitz Street in Rheda-Wiedenbrück

In his native city Rheda-Wiedenbrück, an open discussion about Hans Schmitz’ role during the time of National Socialism began in 2016. Up to this day, three of his paintings from the years 1937 and 1937 are publicly displayed in the historic city hall. Furthermore, a street is named after him.