Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2006 November 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Python eggs (talk | contribs) at 08:25, 23 November 2006 (Template:zh-d-xxx: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 23

Template:AFL XXXX Round YY (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have no idea what this would do for an article apart from making it rather large and ugly.><RichardΩ612 UW 07:26, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:5tseT (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unused and rather silly template ><RichardΩ612 UW 07:22, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Numismatic Galleries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Unencyclopedic. All of the galleries herein have been nominated to be transwikied to Wikimedia Commons. --SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:01, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. Unencyclopedic? Wha? When all of the galleries have been transwikied, and aren't just proposed to be, you have a good argument. But a nomination doesn't mean it will happen. -Amarkov blahedits 02:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep until... There have been AfD for these articles. See
And all the results were keep. And there has been a discussion on how to break up these galleries at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics. When the method of partition is decided, the plan will be carried out and, of course, more encyclopedia text will be added. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 02:14, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Template:Indo-Iranian-speaking (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Delete The template is very empty because "..speaking-nations" templates categorized with an offical language but this template is categorize nations where the language speak, according this template what is next? English speaking nations template with 250 countries? Zaparojdik (talk · contribs) 01:19 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Keep There are many "..speaking-nations" templates such as Template:Turkic-speaking, that you yourself created and maintain, which proves that this is a POV nomination. --ManiF 23:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:zh-d-xxx

Template:Zh-d-cp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Zh-d-cpw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Zh-d-sp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Zh-d-spw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Zh-d-tp (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Template:Zh-d-tpw (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

These templates are similar to {{zh-cp}}, {{zh-cpw}}, {{zh-sp}}, {{zh-spw}}, {{zh-tp}}, {{zh-tpw}}, but only make Chinese text inside as links to Wiktionary as a whole. They have been created for long time but almost no one use them, and, in most cases, what we want is to link each character to Wiktionary separately, but these six templates do not help. (so no one use them) Yao Ziyuan 07:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Why do we want to link to characters instead of words in Wiktionary? If we talk about a Chinese word, we should link to the word's entry, not the individual characters. Kusma (討論) 08:04, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Two points, (1). No one uses it at this time. (2) I mean, actually we have better method without zh-d-xxx, for example, create a new template called "zh-d" or something alike, and use <nowiki>Chinese: Template:Zh-dTemplate:Zh-dTemplate:Zh-d<nowiki>, this is much more flexible. ~~~~