User talk:Tvx1
| This is Tvx1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| This is Tvx1's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
11:52:55, 18 April 2016 review of submission by Mohit Rajani8
Hi Tvx1,
Can you please tell me minimum how many reference links should be there for new article creation? Is there any terms or conditions for this?
I have seen some other articles which have very few links but still it'll be there on space. for example: "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingenta"
So, can you please explain me this how and why?
And also please guide me if someone like me want to create article which have very few sources or one could not find it but whatever information and knowledge individuals have they want to go with that then what are the suggestions from your end?
18:03:38, 26 January 2017 review of submission by 24.60.203.149
Just wondering what is wrong with sources like the Boston Globe, Wall Street Journal, San Facisco Chronicle, Music Web International etc?
German to English
Request translation: de:Jakob Schmid (Pedell) (Jakob Schmid), de:Henning von Thadden (Henning von Thadden). Thank you. --79.54.23.199 16:26, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
- Can you translate these last two? --95.232.38.195 15:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
Your recent editing history at 2020 Formula One World Championship shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I agree that this was discussed on the talk page and therefore Mclarenfan17 needs to take it to the talk page but I need to tag you as well in the interest of fairness. 2 people are required for an edit war and you are the other person. SSSB (talk) 09:02, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Warning templates
Hi,
About the recent revert you made to 2019 Formula One World Championship: Next time you might want to place a warning template. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2019 (UTC)