User talk:Tseung kang 99

Renaming

Hello! The use of multiple accounts is not allowed, thus, you have to choose between these two accounts: Tseung kang 99 (formerly Abcbabc11111) and Iloveviolin45 (formerly Whong922) and forget the other one. Thanks. I am not a number (talk) 08:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tseung kang 99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tseung kang 99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Tseung kang 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25062 was submitted on May 06, 2019 01:33:09.

Notes:

If you are the blocked user, an administrator will find your request on UTRS and should email you shortly. Please do not request additional unblocks. Tickets may take 24-48 hours to process. Tickets will expire after 1 week if you have not responded via the web interface to any emails from the reviewing administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:33, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Note: the user pushed copyvio to Wikipedia. Moreover, uploaded copyvio to Commons, some deliberately in the PNG format to hinder detection. Where does the user admit wrongdoing? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:36, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tseung kang 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have waited a few months now for this account to get unblocked as informed by the arbitration committee. I did not intend for any spam at all. It was my first time to publish a wiki page and I was in learning steps to use it. Plz let me know if any actions are required for it to get unblocked.

Decline reason:

This request does not address your use of multiple accounts and addition of copyright violations. Moreover, what will you edit about if unblocked? MER-C 09:00, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tseung kang 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am well aware that I violated rules regarding the use of multiple accounts and addition of copyright violations issues. As noted to the arbitration committee earlier, these happened because I was new to the platform. I will abide to the rules of Wikipedia moving forward. For example, I waited a few months as suggested by arbitration committee before requesting unblock. I intend to mainly involved in subjects that I am interested, such as matters related to physics, finance, math, music, computer, education, etc. As per your request User:Boing! said Zebedee, I will stick with this id and discard the other id.

Decline reason:

After requesting input, the consensus is that this edit was you editing in violation of your block. Because of this, I am declining your request at this time. The standard offer is open to you:

Wait at least six months, without sockpuppetry or block evasion.
Promise to avoid the behavior that led to the block/ban.
Don't create any extraordinary reasons to object to a return.

--Chris (talk) 23:36, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It sounds like you are claiming that you haven't edited since this account was blocked, though this edit appears to be you editing while logged out, less than two months ago. Is this true? --Chris (talk) 22:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

To Chris: I edited this page much long ago using this account and the other account I accidentally created. This became the reason of blocking. I do not have any other accounts and have not made any edits since then. It seems that the more recent one you are referring to is not from me. Tseung kang 99 (talk) 03:54, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tseung kang 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not edit that page. That IP is not mine as well. I already abides to Wiki rule for almost six months. What should I do then to unblock this account then?? Can you at least set the deadline for unblock of this account?

Decline reason:

It appears to me that several people have already invested significant effort in evaluating your contributions and determining the attribution of material you have contributed anonymously and under other identities. If you wish to return in six months to request the standard offer, you may do so. I do not recommend that you make additional unblock requests before then. Uninvited Company 22:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.