User talk:Kdbuffalo

User:Kdbuffalo/Arch1kdbuffalo

Opinionated but hardly inflammatory

I think his user page is borderline and is questionably within the userpage guidelines. I'll drop a note saying that to him. JoshuaZ 06:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since you felt my page was inflammatory, I removed what I think were the most controversial parts. If you would be good enough to look at it again, I would humbly suggest that you might find some of the topics I listed more fruitful areas to investigate. It is not a good idea to attack well-established standard science with arguments that can be easily dismissed and tend to present you in a certain negative light. I think if you wanted to put some serious effort and thought into it, you might find that any of the topics I suggest will present huge opportunities for you and the agenda you are trying to promote. You will get a much better "return on your investment" if you work on these instead of just repeatedly crossing swords with everyone else. Remember, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar.--ReasonIsBest 17:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Emails

Um, your Wikipedia email isn't even activated. Do you mean messages on your talk page? In any event, I see nothing harrassing with the messages he has sent. If you think they constitute harrassement you should either ask him to stop or find an admin who thinks they are problematic (and that is not an excuse to admin shop). JoshuaZ 06:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 07:33, 20 November 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Your RfC again

Just so you know, 23 editors have now expressed concern in the RfC and there has been some discussion about asking the community to restrict your editing. I strongly recommend that you take the RfC more seriously. JoshuaZ 17:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]