User talk:Digitalsavvy
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Digitalsavvy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —PaleoNeonate – 01:25, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm Tdslk. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Iragavaram mandal have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Tdslk (talk) 19:49, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
- I also had to revert you at Materialism, the issue being that the article should be based on reliable secondary scholarly sources (WP:RS for more information). I have also left a message at the top with more links on how Wikipedia works. We all start somewhere. Happy editing, —PaleoNeonate – 01:25, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- I appreciate the assistance. I've revised the aforementioned citation to a scholarly source as noted. Digitalsavvy
- That is considered a tertiary source which is also acceptable (this type of source is also useful to have an idea of the major aspects of a topic and if they provide citations those can also be consulted/used as secondary sources, etc). Thank you for improving it. About the assistance, you're welcome, including asking on my talk page. In case I can't help in time, the WP:Teahouse is also a great place. To sign posts, simply append them using four tildes (
~~~~) which will also include a timestamp. —PaleoNeonate – 02:24, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
- That is considered a tertiary source which is also acceptable (this type of source is also useful to have an idea of the major aspects of a topic and if they provide citations those can also be consulted/used as secondary sources, etc). Thank you for improving it. About the assistance, you're welcome, including asking on my talk page. In case I can't help in time, the WP:Teahouse is also a great place. To sign posts, simply append them using four tildes (
- I appreciate the assistance. I've revised the aforementioned citation to a scholarly source as noted. Digitalsavvy