Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuad Alakbarov (2nd nomination)

Fuad Alakbarov

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An autobiography (1, 2) which does not pass any of the relevant notability criteria - WP:NCHESS, WP:NPOL, WP:NACADEMIC, WP:CREATIVE, WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per all of the above. Autobiography that appears to have been created and solely edited by a sockpuppet after their initial article was also deleted. WP:BOMBARD: with three unrelated sources from the Guardian, openDemocracy, and politics.co.uk cited to demonstrate chess credentials despite no mention of chess in those sources. Nomination for the "Noon Award" in lede, although the award bears no notability and is not mentioned in linked article for Baron Noon. Trumped up claims of political activism re Europe Sees Syria, despite untrue figure of "two million gathered" not reflected in cited sources; worth nominating that article for deletion again also. Wrenhaven (talk) 13:40, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article has been sourced well. Subject meets WP:GNG. Passes WP:NTEMP. Subject had media coverage prior to the event.

Furthermore, nominated user Wrenhaven, have a very odd track record. As you can see from here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wrenhaven

The user never contributed a lot the Wikipedia (exactly from September 2016) but suddently, pops-up randomly in 28 May 2019 and —interested in subject and knows too much about this issue, raises questions he is a sockpuppet of the banned user. --Azerifactory (talk) 20:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete mostly just a WP:REFBOMB of passing references, personal works, and non-reliable sources. The subject failed notability standards the first time this article was created and he doesn't pass them now. This may also be a possible WP:SALT situation as well. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep--Babək Akifoğlu (talk) 21:29, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems Passes WP:NTEMP.--SalmanZ (talk) 22:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Düşünürəm ki, səxsin ensiklopedik olmasını sübut edən yetərincə istinad var. Hörmətlə.--Nicat49 (talk) 02:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Pertinent to point out that three of the four keeps above are from sysops of the Azerbaijani Wiki (Babək Akifoğlu, Nicat49, Azerifactory). One of those three, Azerifactory, is the subject of the article in question. Wrenhaven (talk) 03:35, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The biggest odd thing about this is Wrenhaven's obsession with this topic. Especially, this user not contributed anything major in last three years but appears to be very knowledgable, which raises huge question that how somebody so low contributing to Wiki, knows too much about banned user, without been here, which is classic case of WP:DUCK for me and I would suggest admins to do Checkuser on him.--Azerifactory (talk) 09:34, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The poor admins of en:WP just have a mop and a bucket. They don't have checkuser abilities. You'll have to ask a "checkuser". Please see Wikipedia:CheckUser. -- Hoary (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hoary, Azerifactory, A checkuser was conducted yesterday and Wrenhaven was cleared. Azerifactory was already aware as he is a named party in the SPI. Cabayi (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question. I read above that "The article has been sourced well." This claim (by Azerifactory) surprises me. The article says (after trivial reformatting) that "On 12 September 2015, along with few activists, he created Europe Sees Syria campaign, which gathered over two million people around cities like Glasgow, London, Berlin, Aberdeen, Athens and Barcelona to raise awareness about the European refugee crisis.^[1]^[2]" Now, I am getting very old and my eyesight may be failing, but I don't notice anything about two million people in either of those "references". Are my ageing eyes overlooking something, or is this poetic licence, or what? -- Hoary (talk) 11:18, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^ Armour, Robert. "Thousands to attend mass day of action in support of refugees". Third Force News. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
^ Naysmith, Stephen. "Grassroots campaigns add to pressure on Government over refugee crisis". The Herald. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

[1] Armour, Robert. "Thousands to attend mass day of action in support of refugees". Third Force News. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

[2] Naysmith, Stephen. "Grassroots campaigns add to pressure on Government over refugee crisis". The Herald. Archived from the original on 8 May 2018. Retrieved 12 April 2018. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |dead-url= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)

[1]

[2]