Wikipedia:Teahouse

AlanM1, a Teahouse host

Welcome to the Teahouse!
Your go-to place for friendly help with using and editing Wikipedia.

Ask a question

Question forumMeet your hostsArticles to improveBecome a host

New to Wikipedia? See our tutorial for new editors or introduction to contributing page.
Note: Newer questions appear at the bottom of the Teahouse. Completed questions are archived within 2–3 days.

Help Wikipedia

(Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.)

Need help

Is there anyone who can help me with my Wikipedia Article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MVMG2019 (talk • contribs) 16:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

@MVMG2019: Welcome to he teahouse. Are you referring to this article (draft): M.A.C. (rapper)? OkayKenG (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes I am. Thanks

Hi @MVMG2019:. I did some research about your subject but I cannot find any news article or published story about him. If you have access to reliable third party sources, perhaps you could list them here. Maybe we can take a look if you need help with adding content. It would also establish notability. Regards, Darwin Naz (talk) 23:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

There are no news articles or published story about him just yet but there will be with in the next month. What about published Songs does that not count? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:1A10:E12B:CCE6:93C4:D005:945D (talk) 23:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

The best place, MVMG2019, for your published songs is not a general Encyclopedia like Wikipedia. Social media, including Facebook, exist for the purpose of promotion which you seek. Would you expect to be in Encyclopedia Brittanica? While better-known rappers may have articles here written about them, it is because they are WP:Notable. You may be someday, but not quite yet.--Quisqualis (talk) 06:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

A radio host article: are the sources non-reliable?

Hello, I'm also having this same issue on a page I submitted for a known, internationally-syndicated radio host from my local station out of personal interest. I linked to a ton of news articles, and the review said basically "this isn't an encyclopedia because all citations are his personal website". Not true. There was 1 link to personal website talking about his volunteer work building drinking water wells in Africa. I included numerous news organizations citations, so where do I go from here? I'm a bit confused by the reviewer's response that I supposedly didn't include citations. I copied the format of numerous other radio personalities on Wikipedia. Thanks!Smithryanallen (talk) 19:46, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi, @Smithryanallen: great you decided to write here, and please accept that I made your own thread; hope people would find it easier to answer to your question, and there won't be any mix up with the other question you were encouraged to ask help. I've read your draft and added citation details to sources you have included (sorted out citations used more than once). I guess some are the information source while others are using those without mentioning the citation.

Wish others will come in and grant advise. Anyway, enjoy writing. Cheers, --Omotecho (talk) 17:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Images deleted during publication

Hi! We just tried to publish our draft and all the images we had completely disappeared. Why is that? and how can we add the images again and publish it without them being deleted?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serena1996 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC) Serena1996 (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Serena1996, if you're talking about this draft, the images were deleted from Wikimedia Commons by administrators there as they were copyright violations. You could ask the deleting admins on Commons for further details (you can see which admin deleted it by visiting the image page for the deleted images), but the most common reason is that images were copied off the Web and are not released under a free license such as CC-BY-SA. Commons does not accept nonfree content at all, and aside from a few narrow exceptions, neither does Wikipedia. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:47, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Serena1996. As Seraphimblade points out above, the files were uploaded to Commons. Commons and Wikipedia are both Wikimedia Foundation projects, but they each have their own policies and guidelines, and their own administrators and community of editors. There's lots of overlap between the two, but for the most part Commons matters need to be resolved on Commons. If you want to know who nominated these files for deletion and the reasons why they did so, please take a look at the messages posted at c:User talk:Alexa1816.

For reference, only administrators can delete files from Wikipedia and Commons and they usually only do so because of copyright concerns. So, it's not a good idea to simply try and re-upload the file(s) in question when this happens because most likely that will just lead to the re-uploads being deleted as well and also the possibility of being warned not to do it again. Commons only accepts certain types of licensed content as explained in c:Commons:Licensing and its administrators tend to have little patience with editors who repeatedly upload files which are considered to be copyright violations. If you don't understand why a file was deleted or feel it was deleted in error, then it's best to discuss things with the administrator who deleted the file. You can almost always find out who this is by simply clicking on the deleted file's red link.

Finally, if you're a student as Valereee surmises below and your class/course is one those connected to Wikipedia:Education program, then your course should've been assigned a Wik Ed adviser, and this person's name should be listed on your course's Wikipedia page. Wiki Ed advisers are generally really experienced at editing and are good sources for information. You're almost certainly not the first student to have files deleted from Commons, and your adviser can help you sort such things out. You might also want to take a look at Wikipedia:Education program/Students and in particular this tutorial about uploading ad using images. -- Marchjuly (talk) 23:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

FYI to teahouse helpers, this well-written and well-researched article looks like it might be a multi-student project. --valereee (talk) 14:58, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

• Hi! I'm trying to determine which school they're in - as far as I know their class isn't with us. Serena1996, I've left a message on your talk page about this and some contact information. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Empty checkboxes

When I open Preferences / Gadgets then the checkboxes are empty and remain empty even when I have clicked into one. Therefore I do not see the result i.e. whether the box is marked or not. I use Firefox (67.) and Windows 8.1 (both up to date). I have a similar problem with some websites: that the mouse indicator becomes a pointing hand, but there is just empty background and there is no other icon or text (caption) anywhere close to it. I had this or these problems already before I installed two adblockers (AdGuard and uBlock Origin) but I have disabled them for the WP.
Steue (talk) 22:45, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

@Steue: If you don't get a reply here within 24 hours, it might be reasonable to repeat this question at Village Pump Technical. It sounds like the old Windows 8 OS isn't liking something. I've just loaded up Firefox ver 67 in Windows 10 and there's no issue visible to me. Again, try another browser, and do also check Firefox's own Options settings (these have checkboxes, too, so can you see those?) Does W8.1 have a 'compatability mode' you can try? And what happens in preferences when you try to click a tick box and then 'restore defaults'? That option only appears live once you'e ticked or unticked one of the check boxes. Finally, a Google search does suggest that Firefox users have experienced this in older versions (see here), so maybe a further root around online might reveal some other issues. And always do a reboot of your PC/mobile just to make sure it hasn't loaded up with a glitch. Sorry I can't offer further suggestions. Hope one of these might work. Let me know. Cheers Nick Moyes (talk) 02:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@Steue: Is it the same in the German Wikipedia? Does Monobook work? PrimeHunter (talk) 08:47, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

• A: With Internet Explorer the checkboxes are empty as well.
• B: Firefox options do have good checkboxes.
• C: Checking, saving and resetting did not change the appearance of the checkboxes.
• D: I use a notebook.
• E: It's independent of reboot.
• F: It was the same in the German WP (How do you know? I can not remember having mentioned Germany)
• G: With Monobook the checkboxes are as they should be: correct colour (in them), mark (tick) if checked, and the radiobuttons are smaller than with the default skin.
• H: With the default skin the radiobuttons were larger but it was visible which one was selected.
• I tried it again with the default skin and the checkboxes were empty again.
  Steue (talk) 12:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Courtesy ping to PrimeHunter so he's notified of Steue's replies, above. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:18, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Steue: If your interface language is English then the bottom of Special:Contributions/Steue has an "accounts" link to Special:CentralAuth/Steue which shows German. I don't have a fix but MonoBook is apparently a workaround. It's normal that the boxes look different in MonoBook. If you place the below in your common JavaScript then you get a "MonoBook" link to the left of "Preferences" if you are not already in preferences. The link goes to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Preferences?useskin=monobook and works while you change preferences tabs and select preferences. If you add the code in meta:Special:MyPage/global.js instead then it should work in all Wikimedia wikis. You can also just manually add ?useskin=monobook to the url. PrimeHunter (talk) 08:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

$.when( mw.loader.using( ['mediawiki.util'] ), $.ready ).done( function() {
  mw.util.addPortletLink(
    'p-personal',
    mw.util.getUrl( 'Special:Preferences' ) + '?useskin=monobook',
    'MonoBook',
    'pt-monobook',
    'Preferences in MonoBook',
    null,
    '#pt-preferences'
  );
});

Forgotten password

Lets say you have been blocked, but you have forgotten the password to your user account, what should you do? 79.67.93.60 (talk) 16:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

If you did not provide an email address to your account in its Preferences, there unfortunately is nothing that can be done to recover it; you will need to create a new account and identify it as a successor account to your original one. 331dot (talk) 17:08, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

If you are blocked, however, you won't be able to create an account most likely, so you will need to request unblock from your IP. If you do not do that first, it is block evasion(which you are technically doing now). 331dot (talk) 17:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict):Two independent questions. If you have been blocked, you should not post, anywhere, from any account, on any subject, unless you are specifically following the steps of Appealing a block.

Secondly, if you have an email set up on the account, and still have access to that email, then usually you can reset your password using that email (but I don't know whether that is possible when you are blocked or not). If you haven't, then you can't. --ColinFine (talk) 17:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Plausibility

Please create guideline on plausibility. 85.221.158.102 (talk) 17:07, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Teahouse, please explain what do you really mean by this. Regards.--PATH SLOPU 17:18, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

This type of requests are handled at WP:VPI. Masum Reza^📞 17:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Nees Help in Fixing the This Article i Recently Made.

Hello there, I have recently created the article Kshitij Tarey, He is an Award Winner Singer/Composer from India and i request my friends over here to get it fixed!! Thanks :)) Shringhringshring (talk) 18:11, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kshitij Tarey In process of being evaluated for deletion. David notMD (talk) 15:03, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

How can i publish a well known poet article but its denied by Wikipedia article verification

I wrote a article about my personally fav Indian poet wajid shaikh and he is quite famous on social media and youtube but his article verification is just denied by some admins,kindly please help me to publish this article to main Wikipedia Draft:Wajid Shaikh (poet) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naimatsid (talk • contribs) 18:35, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Naimatsid. The problem is that your draft has no references. Wikipedia is not interested in what you know (or I know, or any random person on the internet knows): it is only interested in what has been published in reliable sources, mostly independent of the subject. You need to find some sources, forget everything you know about the poet, and write your draft entirely from the sources. Please see your first article. --ColinFine (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Redirecting a name

Hello,

I am writing an entry on a dance artist, Elizabeth Langley, but the link goes to a different person of the same name. My entry is still in my Sandbox. Any help as to solve this issue is most welcome.

Thank you. --Dancepluswordsps (talk) 19:01, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Dancepluswordsps. We handle this sort of issue by adding a word or phrase to one or all articles to distinguish them: see WP:PRECISION. I suggest you don't worry about it at this stage: when you submit your draft for review, the reviewing editor who accepts it will move it to a suitable name and sort out any name clashes. --ColinFine (talk) 19:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Page for A Musician

Hello,

I would like to know the best way to get a wiki page up and running for a nationally and internationally renowned artist... I see that some of them are automatically generated... The artist is Cary Morin http://www.carymorin.com

Thanks so much for any help!

Celeste — Preceding unsigned comment added by CaryMorin (talk • contribs) 19:06, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

@CaryMorin: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. So there are a few things to tell you; First, if you are not Cary Morin, you cannot use their name as your username. Please go to Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS to request that your username be changed. Second, I gather that you represent Cary Morin; if so, you should review conflict of interest and paid editing.

I'm not sure why you think Wikipedia articles(not just "pages") are automatically generated; they are written by humans, the vast majority of which are volunteers. Ideally, the article should be written by someone unaffiliated with the subject(again, please read about conflict of interest). This is because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that has articles about subjects shown with independent reliable sources to meet Wikipedia's special definition of notablility. For musicians, that is written at WP:BAND. Wikipedia is not interested in what an article subject(or their representative) wants to say about themselves- only in what independent sources state. The best thing for you to do is nothing, and allow an independent editor to write about Cary Morin. Also keep in mind that Wikipedia has no interest in helping Morin's career or internet search results; we're here to write an encyclopedia of human knowledge for the benefit of all. A Wikipedia article is not necessarily desirable either; there are good reasons to not want one.

In short- and I apologize for the great deal of information- it is best for you to let independent editors take note of Morin and write about them. 331dot (talk) 19:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Review article

Hey Patrollers, I saw a draft for an Indian singer I believe needs to be moved asap, I have checked the sources and information. everything is pretty reliable and Independent also checked the CopyVio all good. after checking history article seemed to be moved in the draft because of a Now-blocked user creation (summary) so if anyone who can review here is link Draft:Tripti Shakya would be great if a reviewer is Indian --Siddharth 📨 19:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm confused - what makes you believe that any draft article needs to be moved asap and why would the reviewer's nationality matter? --bonadea contributions talk 19:52, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Furthermore, the article is exactly identical to what it was when it was moved to draftspace, except that it has been submitted to AfC review. --bonadea contributions talk 19:55, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

...and it is a copyright violation to boot. --bonadea contributions talk 19:57, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

User:SidPedian, Bonadea, it's worth noting that ever since VixHere has been blocked a number of users have been trying to move drafts that Vixhere created into article mainspace. Let's just say that that raises a few eyebrows and some editors may be asked to explain just how they just randomly happened to notice draft articles. Note that undisclosed paid editing is not allowed. See WP:COIPAYDISCLOSE Vexations (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, I noticed that just now, when looking into VH's edits. Also some AfD disruption, looks like. --bonadea contributions talk 20:15, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

okay not a problem --Siddharth 📨 20:10, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

• User:Vexations and User:Bonadea Because when Vixhere created one article it appeared in new pages feed and I tagged it with like citations needed etc.. and that article was also moved and it came into my watchlist. though I checked all articles moved to draft and I was about to complain about paid moves but I don't think that's my call. so I didn't. but Singer Tripti Shakya is known that's the reason I submitted it for Review and asked asap because I thought keeping articles in the draft would not make Wikipedia better. but if the reviewer thinks it's copyright violation then I have only good faith. I always respect other creators and their actions. If I had any connection with Tripti Shakya I would have moved it back I do have the privilege. --Siddharth 📨 20:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

  SidPedian, you've barely been around for a month, you have trouble noticing copyright violations, but you already want to review articles and move drafts by blocked editors to mainspace. I suggest you slow down and refrain from reviewing, and instead work on improving the sourcing of articles on subjects that have notability issues. Vexations (talk) 20:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

S - You started by claiming the draft passed copyright violation, but since deleted for copyright violation. Try harder. David notMD (talk) 20:37, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

user:David notMD sorry I did not understand what to try harder?--Siddharth 📨 20:40, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

The draft was deleted because it was and "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.bhojpurifilmiduniya.com/2015/12/singer-tripti-shakya.html?m=1)" You had written here that you had checked it, and said it did not have a copyright violation. Try harder to not make errors. David notMD (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Vexations yes that's what I do most of the time. I do not review articles. I add references to the articles created by others you can go through my contributions all I do is tags, citing, linking, removing unnecessary linking, Most of the time I choose articles by directing visiting them once I watch any show or movie I go visit its article and make necessary edits. today watched Hostages (Indian series) I fixed references in Reception section that's what I do most of the time. I'm learning everyday new policy about AFD's and for BLP's--Siddharth 📨 20:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Student, looking to create a wikipedia page for the first time

Hello,

As the title says, I am a student in a fourth year Germanics class and I am looking to create an article for an author as a final project. Is there someone here who is able to provide a little assistance and tutoring to help ensure it is properly formatted and does not get taken down?

Thank you in advance! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davisa88 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Davisa88 welcome to the Teahouse. I'll try and give you a few pointers, by means of linking to some key pages which you will have to work through. The only thing that can stop an article from getting taken down from the encyclopaedia is if the subject of that article clearly meets what we call our 'Notability criteria'. If they fail that test (see Wikipedia:Notability (people)), a person or topic is deemed non-notable and, after a 'deletion discussion', it will be removed. So, the first thing you need to do is work out whether they do meet them. We assess notability by how the world at large has taken note of and written about that subject, and not by what that person or their friends happen to think about them. So we need reliable, third party sources which have written about them in depth, or solid proof of major awards or other recognised honours bestowed upon them. The specific criteria to help you is at this shortcut link: WP:NAUTHOR, or possibly WP:NBOOK if it's their published work, not the person that you want to write about.

The next thing to read is Your First Article, which advises you how to work on and then submit a draft for review. You can also draft an article in your sandbox, which is often a good thing for students to do, as it's far less likely to be deleted there, and you'll always have something to show you tutor. Take a look at similar articles to see how they've been constructed and formatted. Note that if the person is still alive, we are extra strict about requiring personal statements about them to be fully supported by citations. Learn more about referencing at WP:REFBEGIN, and maybe try out The Wikipedia Adventure, which is an interactive tour of how Wikipedia works. I'm sure others could also offer advice, but I'd suggest you first of all start gathering all your sources together, and work through each one to extract key information which you then collatein your own words to form the meat of the article. Avoid personal opinion or original research/interpretation of your own. Don't write a student essay - write an encyclopaedia article. When you've got some way with it you can always pop back and ask for feedback. We do have a rather complex 'Manual of Style' to show precisely how things need laying out, and in what format, but here's a shortcut version to just the basics. I've left a 'welcome' message on your talk page with a few other basic links to also help you get started. I hope this helps a bit. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Help with Draft:Theolonius Kelly

hello

im ediing wiki/Theolonius_Kelly

if anyone wishes help please do — Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoloniusfearguskelly (talk • contribs) 00:48, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

A Google search doesn't bring up any WP:Reliable sources. Have any books been published which describe that individual? Wikipedia requires sources which are both reliable and verifiable. Facebook and LinkedIn do not hold to that particular standard. Consider using them.--Quisqualis (talk) 05:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Answered at Help desk. In future, do not ask at two places. David notMD (talk) 10:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Here's the link to the, help desk (not to be confused with Wikipedia:Help Desk). OkayKenG (talk) 13:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Slowness

I have been checking the Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback and a draft I made, Draft:The Children of Willesden Lane, frequently for the past few days. It has been a few days since since I awaited approval for both the draft and permission request, but I feel like it’s taking forever for someone to check both. What’s the holdup? The last few times I applied for rollback and submitted drafts, it did not take long for someone to review them. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 01:22, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

We are all volunteers here. Please be patient. Thanks. --Thegooduser Life Begins With a Smile :) 🍁 01:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. LPS and MLP Fan (LittlestPetShop) (MyLittlePony) 01:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Good article or Featured article

How do I create a discussion or promote an article to be featured or good article? I think Alia Bhatt is good article and needs to have good article badge. --Siddharth 📨 07:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@SidPedian: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. Good articles (GAs) or featured Articles (FAs) are labeled as such after evaluation against certain criteria. For more information, see this info page for GAs. DannyS712 (talk) 07:24, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Editors who believe an article is approaching GA quality usually make dozens to scores of edits to further improve the article before submitting to the GA process. David notMD (talk) 10:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Editing

Hello. I like to ask how I can do correct way Editing. Earlier I try to ed more information about first name. Someone told me that Iam Vandalizing and if I don't stop I will be blocked. Iam Very Sorry but I don't understand what wrong I did. May Anyone Please tell me how I can do Editing the correct way. Thank You So Much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wafa10 (talk • contribs) 09:14, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

You were told at User talk:Everedux#Jaber to take the discussion to the article talk page. You also need to be more careful with your spelling and punctuation. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Wafa10: you replaced

Jaber is an Arabic name for males used as a given name and surname. Alternative spellings are Gaber and Jabir.

by

Jaber is an Arebian Christian First Name Use Only for Male's. It Means : Healer,Adviser,Teacher,Strong Minded.

Your version is mis-spelled, mispunctuated, wrongly capitalises words, and is written all in boldface. When other editors restored the original text, you repeatedly restored variants of your version. But Everedux should not have accused you of vandalism. Your edits were clearly not vandalism, they were the result of poor understanding of English and ignorance of Wikipedia's standards. Maproom (talk) 09:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

You changed the article four times. Each time reverted (reversed). The normal procedure is make a change; if reverted, then start a discussion at the Talk page of the article to attempt to reach an agreement with the other editors. The key issue here is you want to add what you know (what "Jaber" means as a name), but to do so will require a reference to a published document that explains the meaning of Arabic names. Your knowing what is true is not sufficient. David notMD (talk) 10:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Just like to say Thank You David. Wafa10 (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Where do I contact people who live in Lancashire?

I'm trying to contact the author of an abandoned circa-2006 Geocities page. From the URL I know the person's name and from the content I know they live in or about Bury, Lancashire. Where would I go to talk to other people in the area who might be able to find a phone number or even mail address? Maury Markowitz (talk) 10:25, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Maury Markowitz: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. This board is for new Wikipedia users to ask questions about using Wikipedia, and is not a general question asking forum. You could try the Reference Desk or do a search with your preferred search engine. 331dot (talk) 10:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I wouldn't be here if Google could find the answer, and the reference desk is definitely not the place to ask. Do you have any other suggestions? Maury Markowitz (talk) 10:40, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't. 331dot (talk) 10:43, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I'm curious why you think the reference desk definitely isn't the place to ask, Maury Markowitz. I think your chances are slim there, but that it's a more appropriate venue than the Teahouse, which is a place to learn about editing Wikipedia. You never know - someone might have an old copy of a phone book local to the area. Cordless Larry (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Maury Markowitz, i just wanted to say that i've seen questions similar to yours at the reference desk before, and i think it is a very appropriate place to ask this question. i don't think your emphasis is appropriate, because i think it actually is the place to ask this question. --Habst (talk) 13:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Maury Markowitz: You may try browsing user categories (Category:Wikipedians → Category:Wikipedians by location → Category:Wikipedians in England and so on), but I wouldn't expect a big success. Nobody would go into the street to ask everybody 'Excuse me, are you possibly the one who created that page at Geocities ten years ago...?'. And searching the internet from Manchester can be equally easy or hard as from Montevideo, from Vilnius or from Cape Town. --CiaPan (talk) 11:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

One suggestion would be to leave a message on the facebook pages of people from Bury. It's just possible that someone might know the person you are looking for. Dbfirs 15:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

hardcopy references

How do I give references to newspaper articles that I do not have the softcopy of? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyavinod (talk • contribs) 12:47, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Shreyavinod, you can cite them just like you'd cite any published source like in a school research paper for example. The fact that the citation exists (in any format) is the most important part, but Wikipedia's preferred formats can be found at Help:Citations quick reference and more specifically at WP:CITE. If you want you can try to show us an example citation here and we can say if it is good enough. --Habst (talk) 13:51, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Adding to Habst's response, perhaps Help:Referencing for beginners References not online and Wikipedia:Citing sources Newspaper articles (spefic section in WP:CITE) may help as well. They give recommendations on how to create references for sources that are not online (softcopy) . Thank you for the question! OkayKenG (talk) 14:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

review before submission

I have pasted my wiki article which I would like to submit for review before I submit. Please let me know if the article is suitable for Wikipedia and dosent violate any rule. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shreyavinod (talk • contribs) 13:16, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

If you don't tell us where your draft is, we can't tell you whether it is suitable. Your contribution record shows no draft. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Topic ban

Where does one go to make one's appeal that a year-old ban be lifted? Jzsj (talk) 13:53, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Jzsj: Per WP:UNBAN this is typically done at the Administrator's noticeboard. 331dot (talk) 13:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Start Class entries and SEO

Hi,

Does the designation 'Start-Class' impact an articles search-engine ranking?

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.114.94.135 (talk) 15:16, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I have no idea. But I do know that SEO is a tool of promotion, so anybody who is concerned about the SEO of a Wikipedia article has almost certainly fundamentally misunderstood the purposes of Wikipedia, and imagines that it has any role whatever in WP:promotion. I don't know which article you are wondering about, but whoever is thinking that SEO for an article might be important needs to realise that the subject of an article has no control whatever over the contents of the article: see WP:OWN. --ColinFine (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, Wikipedia has no interest in search rankings, sorry. 331dot (talk) 16:02, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

If you refer to Wikipedia's own search engine then it has no impact. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:21, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Regarding pictures for my Raymond J. Chambers draft entry

Dear Teahouse contributors, I have three pictures that are not under copyright which I would like to upload to my wikipedia entry for Raymond J. Chambers. However, the system gives me an error when I try to upload them, stating the following:

We could not determine whether this file is suitable for Wikimedia Commons. Please only upload photos that you took yourself with your camera, or see what else is acceptable. See the guide to make sure the file is acceptable and learn how to upload it on Wikimedia Commons.

I have tried to read about this issue but reached no conclusion as to how to make this work, so I'm now posting the query here in the hope that someone knows about a fix!

With best wishes, Martin — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.E.Persson (talk • these contribs) 16:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, M.E.Persson. Please tell us the specific circumstances of how you obtained these photographs and why you believe that they are not copyrighted. A large majority of published photos are copyrighted. What is your evidence that these particular photos are not copyrighted? Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Adding an image on a Wikipedia page

Happy editing!

How do I add an image? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Distinctiveg (talk • contribs) 16:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Distinctiveg: Check out the code for the image I've added- the "file:smiley.svg" can be replaced with whatever image you so desire, the "thumb" tells it to display on the right-hand side with the box (applicable in 98% of on-wiki needs for pictures), the "75px" tells it how big to be (this can be changed or even removed entirely), and the "happy editing" fills in the caption. Best of luck in your Wiki-journey! -A lad insane (Channel 2) 17:01, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Distinctiveg: Welcome to the Teahouse. I should add that you can't insert a link to an external dropbox file and expect it to display correctly (as I think you tried on your userpage). Only properly licenced images can be uploaded and used here; other people's copyrighted images are not allowed. You can read more on how to upload your own image by reading Wikipedia:Uploading images. Hope this helps. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Anyone willing to help??

Hello WikiWorld. I am a brand new editor and I am asking for a "mentor". Someone to take me under their wing and guide me. I have a subject matter that does not come up on Wikipedia. I would like to add it. Thanks in advance. Any takers? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GindyLacey (talk • contribs) 16:42, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@GindyLacey: How long are you planning on sticking around? If you are planning to stay for a while, this program may be for you, but if not, this article is a handy read on how to make your article stick around a bit. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 16:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@GindyLacey: If your subject matter doesn't come up on Wikipedia, it could be that it's not regarded as relevant to this encyclopaedia, or fails to meet our Notability criteria. We have different critieria for different subject areas, so it might have helped had you actually said what that subject matter was. To be frank, the Teahouse is a far better place for a brand new user like you to get support than the Adopt-a-User scheme. My own opinion of recently getting involved with that scheme is that nowadays it is best suited to relatively inexperienced editors, but to those who do already have a proven record of serious commitment to Wikipedia, rather than to totally brand new users like yourself with no edits yet to your name. Not that there's anything wrong in being a new user - we all have to start somewhere! But adoption requires a huge commitment from both sides, and in the past, too many people have used it just to get one article written, only then to clear off and never be seen again. Thus a bad investment for us adopters to make. Nowadays, we can probably help you better in the short term here and at our other help fora, and also at Articles for Creation, provided you explain what help you need, and can demonstrate a few sources that show the subject matter is noteworthy enough. For someone to adopt you I do think you need to have created a simple userpage which explains a little about you and your editing interests here. Without that, and with no edits to your name, how can a potential adopter see whether you would suit one another? So please don't be put off if your approach to Denver20 is not successful. I will however pop by in a moment and leave a welcome message full of other helpful links. BTW: You can also gain an understanding of how things work here by having a go at The Wikipedia Adventure - an interactive self-guided tour. Regards, and do pop back and tell us more about what you'd like to achieve here, Nick Moyes (talk) 20:54, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes thank you for your helpful insight. I am completely green at this whole process. I don't even know how to make a simple userpage. I guess I should start with that as my first "tutoring assignment". So if you have the time maybe a quick step by step on the userpage area?? GindyLacey (talk) 16:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)Gindy Lacey 4 June 2019

Corresponding page

Should a draft page be deleted if a corresponding page with mostly identical content exists? If so, how? 79.67.68.214 (talk) 19:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

You can merge the drafts by redirecting one of the page to the other. Interstellarity T 🌟 21:23, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

No, i mean if one of the articles is in mainspace. Should a similar/near identical draft be deleted in that case? 79.67.68.214 (talk) 21:35, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

I am not familiar with the draft mainspace. Someone else will be along shortly to answer your question. Interstellarity T 🌟 21:49, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, IP editor. Welcome to the Teahouse. Short answer: 'Yes'; use Miscellany for Deletion. Longer answer: Because you didn't link to either the article or the draft, it's hard to say what should best happen to the draft in that particular instance. speedy deletion would only apply to a draft articles were there a clear copyright violation. But after 6 months all unedited/abandoned drafts are liable for automatic deletion, so simply leaving it there is one way of knowing it will eventually disappear. WP:PROD does not apply to draft articles, so can't be used. If the draft is actively being worked upon, I think the really courteous and helpful thing for you to do would be to contact the drafting editor and advise them that a similar/identical article already exists, and point out that they're wasting their time working in draftspace. Whether or not the draft is being worked on, assuming you see no likelihood of there being any salvageable content that could go into the main article, then your course of action (assuming you don't simply want to leave it there until 6 months are up) would be to submit it to Miscellany for Deletion where a discussion will be held over the merits, or otherwise, of its removal. I hope this helps, and my thanks to Interstellarity for recognising the right point to step back. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:29, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes: When you were helping JJBullet, you have asked him to not try things he doesn't have the experience for. When you were helping him, it inspired me to become a better editor as well. Interstellarity T 🌟 22:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: That's fantastic to hear, my friend. I still want to become a better editor myself, and have gained as much from reading the answers that other hosts give to questions I can't answer here as I have from being able to help others and seeing their editing skills develop, like yours have. I know that editing Wikipedia can seem really daunting at first, but it never ceases to amaze me how well this complex system actually operates, and how the cooperation between editors has collated this vast and valuable repository of information and sources. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Reattribution of IP edits

Hi! Although I've created this account a long time ago, I forgot I had it and haven't used it until recently. I mainly don't want it to look like two different users have the same opinion when it's only me. I've seen the old page about reattributing. What is the correct way to proceed to make sure I'm not considered two different people for ex. on a talk page? Providing a list of contributions on my user page is not a clear and direct indication for anyone reading the talk page that my username and the IP are the same person. Dithpri (talk) 21:10, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Dithpri: The best thing to do is to state on your user pages that these accounts are both operated by the same person. Please read the policy on multiple accounts here for more information. Interstellarity T 🌟 21:20, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: Thank you for the response. The IP in question is (supposed to be) dynamic, so I don't think I can change the IP page. I will follow the advice and list the edits from the IP on my user page and replace the signatures on talk pages to avoid sockpuppeting claims. Dithpri (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Dithpri: The best thing to do is use the account when editing rather than the IP. You are not going to get in trouble for switching to editing with an account from editing with an IP address. Does this help? Interstellarity T 🌟 21:45, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: Yes, thank you. I might have been unclear in my wording. I made edits as an IP, then switched to an account. I wanted to make it obvious that a comment on a talk page was mine. According to this page I should be able to edit the comment made by the IP (so that it is signed by me). If it fails, I'll just mention it's mine in a response. Now I only use my account and everything should be clear. Dithpri (talk) 21:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@Dithpri: Notice that (per WP:LOGOUT) you do not even need to change the edit signatures (as long as you are not lying about being two different persons). Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 14:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

What can i do if i think there is a socketpuppet on deWiki

Hello, What can i do if everything what i write in the de.Wiki about the suspicion gets deleted and ignored ? like this :
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fde.wikipedia.org%2Fw%2Findex.php%3Ftitle%3DBenutzerin_Diskussion%253AAlraunenstern%26type%3Drevision%26diff%3D189224708%26oldid%3D189224425
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=auto&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=https://de.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php%3Ftitle%3DWikipedia:Projekt_Moderation/Einzelf%25C3%25A4lle%26diff%3Dprev%26oldid%3D189224549&xid=17259,15700021,15700186,15700191,15700256,15700259&usg=ALkJrhhDqOpae2VSb9HX8lVuwrZtSJghyg

These Links are also Interesting if you want to see how insane the (econazi)german Wikipedia is User_talk:WikiVerwelkt User_talk:Steue

And i know that a reaction from an important Person like Jimbo Wales is a bit too dreamed but does he has even read it ? what do you think? User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Dear_Godfather_of_Wikipedia,

And who can i else ask for help ?

WikiVerwelkt (talk) 23:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

@WikiVerwelkt: To be completely honest, we can't do anything if they're not breaking rules here. I also can't really tell what's going on with those diffs- what do copper and aluminum have to do with socking? It may also be due to your shouting- try lowercase next time. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 00:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Article on Canadian Academy of Engineering

Hello - I am trying to improve this article. Someone (who has now closed his account) wrote over 53K bytes of text into the article. It was lengthy and some parts irrelevant. The author seemed to have copied from 2 of the PDF files cited on the article concerning history. I have tried to shorten the article but was hindered by another editor. He too disappeared after I asked him to help in shortening it. Rather he just "undo" my efforts. Given this situation, I am asking other editors to help look at this article. Thanks. CanadaMaple123 (talk) 01:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

It is Canadian Academy of Engineering. And appears to be copyright violation of https://www.cae-acg.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/A-History-1987-2018-of-the-Canadian-Academy-of-Engineering-1.pdf David notMD (talk) 02:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@David notMD: Wow. Thanks David for alerting me. I checked and indeed it is copied sentence by sentence, paragraph by paragraph from that article. I saw the wikipedia article on Canadian Academy of Engineering has now been reverted to its original form. Thank you @Gab4gab: for your action. CanadaMaple123 (talk) 04:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Trying to figure out how to respond in talk for a page

I have comments in talk from another user and I don’t know how to reply with the visual editor without starting a new conversation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennmorris1 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

How to keep a page from being deleted

I’m doing research on a subject where an author came up in the reading I’ve been doing and a research network Seminar I participated in. I decided to edit it for course assignment and it turns out it was originally submitted by the person that the article is about. I edited it and found sources to help make it correspond with the concerns listed on the page. I even had to explain I wasn’t the person who originally submitted it. I’d like to make sure the page isn’t deleted but not sure how so I can continue with my assignment and because it’s relevant to my research. Should I create a new page with my own words and let the other one be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennmorris1 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Jennmorris1: The issue is notability. You may wish to make an offline copy of the article. -A lad insane (Channel 2) 03:29, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, Jennmorris1. If your academic work improves the encyclopedia, then that is fine for all concerned. But it is essential that your work here complies with our policies and guidelines. Please do your best to understand the most important of them. Notability is probably the most important and most widely accepted content guideline. Successful editors must develop a deep understanding of this guideline and how it is most commonly applied. In the end, it comes down to consensus. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:22, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Cullen328 I made my argument about why I thought the entry was notable, and provided more sources in the article to back that up. Maybe if I discussed in particular the content of her work/writing that I see and have seen others discuss that I think is notable? I totally get it’s by consensus but if other editors on Wikipedia have never heard of the entry and I have and it’s notable in my field, I’m trying to figure out how to convey this.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jennmorris1 (talk • contribs) 04:44, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Jennmorris1. Please try to sign your talk page posts because it makes it easier for others to see who posted what and when. If you're not sure how to sign a post, please take a look at Wikipedia:Signature for more specific information. Not signing a post might not be such a big deal here at the teahouse where everything tends to be neatly divided into separate sections, but it can help on other pages like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melissa Miles McCarter where lots of editors may be posting and bascially the page itself is one big section. Anyway, I've added your signature above, but please try and remember to sign your posts yourself in the future.

Another good reason to sign posts is that notification templates like Template:u only work when a post is properly signed the first time around. I'll ping Cullen328 for you this time, but try to also keep this in mind when posting. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:30, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Jennmorris1: if your objective is to prevent the page from being deleted, so that you can continue with your assignment, that's easy: move it to draft space, or encourage someone else to do so. If your objective is to have it accepted as an article, that will be more difficult, maybe impossible. You'll need to find and cite some sources that actually attest to the subject's notability; and you should also remove most or all of the worthless references that do not attest to notability, and seem to be there to act as a smokescreen to conceal the lack of good references. Maproom (talk) 08:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Maproom: The condition you used at the beginning of your reply: ‘if your objective is to prevent the page from being deleted’ can be understood as a suggestion that a work can be saved in a somewhat 'safer' areas of Wikipedia even if it doesn't fit requirements for articles (especially as opposed to ‘to have it accepted as an article’). It's worth noting. however, that such interpretation is wrong. The draft space is not a repository for arbitrary contents (because, generally, Wikipedia is not a STORAGE or a REPOSITORY). The draft space is for developing articles until they meet Wikipedia standards, but only within a limited timespan – Wikipedia:Drafts says after six months abandoned drafts become eligible for deletion, too. So moving to the Draft: is just a way to keep the work from being deleted until it becomes accepted as an article, not if it can't be accepted as an article. (Ping: Jennmorris1) --CiaPan (talk) 11:09, 4 June 2019 (UTC) @Maproom:

@CiaPan: so does that mean I can move it to draft to work on it or I should give up? I totally understand the arguments why it’s not notable, although I think that it’s somewhat subjective and a basis of consensus can be problematic (for example, underrepresented voices that might not have as much of an electronic footprint and is discussed in niche- I understand there’s a debate about what is niche - is discourse that can fall through the cracks). For example, how many people reviewing this article are female, disabled etc with a familiarity with the focus on rhetoric and composition and familiar with off-line discussions dealing with this subject? I understand that identity and familiarity doesn’t preclude or overwrite the standards of academic, but are considerations I’d like to point out, at least for food for thought about more general editing practices that aren’t limited to this particular article. Plus the bias against self-publishing as self-promotion can be problematic, although I can see if there’s not much or widespread electronic footprint saying it is more than self-promotion, then that doesn’t meet the standards of Wikipedia. From what I can see though, this standard is not used uniformly, but perhaps it is evolving from prior years—I saw in a discussion of deletion of another article that oversight has gotten more stringent now than years ago? Anyway, this has been a lesson of rhetorical discourse I’m willing to walk away from with a better understanding. Okay I’m going to try to sign this right now!!! Jennmorris1 (talk) 01:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)jennmorris1

For the curious: Melissa Miles McCarter is the article, and as of 3 June, at AfD. David notMD (talk) 10:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

How to Redirect without leaving redirect?

I see some action summaries are written as moved page or reverted without leaving redirection I want to know how to do it? because when I redirect it leaves redirection--Siddharth 📨 06:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Admins and page movers have the option to move without leaving a redirect; we mortals don't. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

How to send a message to another editor

Another editor has been sending me messages and I do not know how to reply. How do I send a message? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toandanel49 (talk • contribs) 10:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

If you are referring to the messages Magnolia677 has posted to your talk page, simply edit the talk page. You do need to take notice of the messages however. (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) Martin of Sheffield (talk) 10:07, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I can't find the link of the page that I created

Helo,

I need help. Has just created https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shunichi_Toki but why I can't find it on my internet search engine. Did something wrong with the page? I follow the instruction how to create a page and there was no problem on my previous page. please help me and thank you. Juliet6884 (talk) 10:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Juliet6884: Hello and welcome to the Teahouse. The article has not been formally reviewed by a New Page Patroller; until it is, it will not appear in internet search engines. Once it is marked as reviewed, it will take time for the search engines to index the page. You will need to be patient. 331dot (talk) 10:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@331dot: Oh, Thank you! I'll update the page and make it more complete.

I don't read Japanese, so I can't be sure, but the references look like publicity releases rather than independent WP:Reliable sources. Perhaps you could check this before the article is reviewed? Dbfirs 18:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

why is Forbes not an acceptable citation source?

hi,

can you please tell me why the citation from forbes was removed? is forbes not considered a reliable enough source?

thank you in advance for explaining. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillieRichie (talk • contribs) 11:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@BillieRichie: Editor GermanJoe, who removed your contribution, left a note at the removal: “Forbes "contributor" fluff and mere interviews are not independent reliable sources.” Have you seen it? --CiaPan (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@BillieRichie: You might also want to take a look at WP:RSP#Forbes, especially the part about "Forbes.com contributors". Regards SoWhy 13:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello @BillieRichie:, you are always welcome to ask an editor for clarification about their reasoning, if an edit summary is not clear enough. To offer some more details: reliable sources should have some kind of editorial oversight. Forbes contributor articles, as opposed to Forbes staffer articles, have little to no editorial oversight. Another problematic aspect in this specific case: the article, written by a marketing professional, is almost entirely based on interviews and simply parrots PR statements from various involved businesspeople with no critical analysis or independent research of the presented claims. Due to these and similar flaws, many Forbes contributor articles are usually discouraged (although not entirely prohibited in specific cases). WP:RSP#Forbes is good guidance, but you should read the whole page and its advice in context when you have some time later. Hope this helps a bit. GermanJoe (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. I had not seen any of those specific issues about Forbes. I am quite surprised, to say the least. I always thought Forbes was a respectable media outlet. I still don't know quite to make of this. Anyway, the citation is real and it's not fluff. In any case, when i have a citation that hopefully meets the wikipedia pages, i'll add that. thank you again for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BillieRichie (talk • contribs) 16:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Article Declined

Hi, I wrote an article about this director and screenwriter. There is an artcle about her in my home language and I wanted to translate that article. I used a lot those same references but now english Wikipedia is saying my references arent valid enough? I used IMD and newspapers and those kind of valid resources. What should I do to get it published? There isn't that much of other kind of recources because she is making movies is well known but hasn't any books about her. Do you have any tips for me? Could someone explain why that article is okay in different langugage but not in english. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Mari_Mantela (Link to the draft)

Best wishes, AH — Preceding unsigned comment added by CopywriterAH (talk • contribs) 12:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Convenience link: Draft:Mari Mantela. --CiaPan (talk)

@CopywriterAH: Possibly you need to verify if those references fit standards of English Wikipedia. Each language Wikipedia is a separate project – and they have slightly different rules and requirements.
As for IMDb, please see WP:RS/IMDB which includes the site among Questionable resources. --CiaPan (talk) 12:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Links

Am I supposed to add a link wherever I can? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Microsoft0102 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Microsoft0102! If you mean wikilinks like Canada, see MOS:OVERLINK. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Microsoft0102:You can add wikilinks (link to a page in wikipedia) using [["name of page"]] in Wikipedia. You can add external links (link to page outside Wikipedia using ["URL of page"]. Add only the links in appropriate places. But do not add external links in non-appropriate places such as main body of article, etc (please read this Points remembered when adding links, overlinking). Thank you.--PATH SLOPU 13:20, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

may i join

Can I please join???— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cole steinhoff1 (talk • contribs) 6:58 pm, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Cole steinhoff1:Welcome to teahouse. You can ask any doubts regarding editing wikipedia in this page. Feel free to edit articles in good faith. You can add reliable information with sources. Best.--PATH SLOPU 14:15, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I see that you have already joined, but remember that additions to an article need to be supported with WP:Reliable sources. See WP:Referencing for beginners for details. Dbfirs 18:34, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi!, How to de-pixelate a picture?

It's this one [1], it's large and awesome, I removed marks and stains but if you look closer, there are like little points, pixelation on it, English is not my first language, please tell me if something is not got across. Very very kind regards. --LLcentury (talk) 14:17, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

• @LLcentury: Those little points do not look like pixels to me (if they were, they would all have the same size and square shapes), but rather like film grain artifacts of the original 1912 photograph.

I do not know how to clean up such artifacts, but your best try is to ask the fine folks at the Wikipedia:Graphics Lab. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 14:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Tigraan:, thanks a lot! --LLcentury (talk) 14:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I really wouldn't bother trying to remove the grains. The picture is over 100 years old and used the technology of the time; no-one expects it to be 21st century perfect. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 19:47, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Martin of Sheffield and LLcentury: Well, that kind of cleanup is useful, if not top-notch priority. (As long as it is not too extreme: the line between technical cleanup and photo manipulation is blurry.) Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 08:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Adding a band to Wikipedia

Hello,

I'm currently trying to add the band Patawawa to Wiki - They've been a band for 6 years, they're signed to a label, agency and PR. Is someone able to help me with the steps? I'm a bit confused on the layout and structure. Thanks in advance.

Kind Regards,

Daniel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dancesnitch (talk • contribs) 15:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Dancesnitch: Is this the band that you work with as you stated in March? You were ) given advice on that question, which you should heed. 331dot (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

I can't edit because my schools IP is blocked, even when I'm logged in

When I tried to edit I got a message saying the IP was blocked even though at the time I was logged in to my account. I tried logging out and logging back in but it didn't change anything. I'm not sure if this is what's supposed to happen and I just am unaware of the policy (I'm new to Wikipedia as well). Thanks for all the help. GoodKeming (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

GoodKeming, Wikipedia:IP block exemption is a guide to getting past this problem. Hope that helps, Cabayi (talk) 17:03, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, you are obviously an editor in good standing, so there should be no problem granting the exemption. There must have been a lot of vandalism from others at your school. Dbfirs 19:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

It is exceptionally rare for a school to be blocked for logged-in users. I would say two things before you take the advice above. First, try again. Unless it happens persistently or regularly (or at least more than once), you might not qualify for block exemption. Second, take a note of the block message and importantly, the IP address and other details contained in the block message. If you need to request a block exemption (or for the block to be re-examined), this will be most useful. If you need a shortcut through the process after following this advice, feel free to drop me an email. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:23, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

How do I publish an article?

Hello, I have an article I am working on, how do I publish it?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:XTMontana/sandbox/Canada#Introduction--XTMontana (talk) 16:13, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@XTMontana:Welcome to Teahouse. You can publish a page in draft by moving it to mainspace. For new users, it is better to add a template {{subst:Submit}} in the top of draft. By this an experienced user will review the draft and publish in Wikipedia. But your draft is about Canada which is already exists in Wikipedia. Please also think about that. Also try to link the pages in Wikipedia using [[ ]] markup. Thank you.--PATH SLOPU 16:46, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Also, you must not copy content from another website because this is illegal under copyright law. Your draft has been deleted for this reason. Dbfirs 18:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Dbfirs: This account has been indefinitely blocked for vandalism. Interstellarity T 🌟 20:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Yes, if I'd looked at the editor's history (or his brother's), I wouldn't have tried to be helpful. Dbfirs 20:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Change of Name from Dean Ambrose to Jon Moxley

I need to ask somebody experienced that there is need of changing the title name of Dean Ambrose page to Jon Moxley, because all the reliable sources like forbes, sbnation, wrestling inc, comicbookdotcom have updated using his name as Jon moxley. But wikipedia is still not updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FkinJonMoxley21 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
I suggest a new page be made, because Dean Ambrose was his old character, so they are two different people and not related.--XTMontana (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

They are the same person, but there is a discussion going on at Talk:Dean Ambrose. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 20:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Publishing Article

Hey! I'm really sorry if this is a stupid question, but I just joined wikipedia and I really don't know a lot. I was just wondering about when the articles I make in my sandbox get published. If anyone could tell me that would be great. Thanks so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayag224 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Mayag224:Welcome to Teahouse. Feel free to ask any of your doubts on editing here. There is no problem for that. Normally , we can create an article in mainspace after searching it's name in search bar. But the better way for you ( since you created draft in sandbox) is adding a template {{subst:Submit}} in the top of your article that you prepared in the sandbox (I done it for you). By this an experienced user will review your article and publish it. Regards.--PATH SLOPU 16:56, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

The draft would benefit from a couple more WP:Reliable sources before it is reviewed. Dbfirs 18:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC) Now too late! Dbfirs 19:43, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Mayag224: The article has already been rejected as a draft: Draft:The Guy Who Didn't Like Musicals. Recreating it as a sandbox entry will not improve its chances of success. Your best bet is to take your sandbox content and merge the info into the rejected draft, and try to find sources that demonstrate notability. Please read WP:GNG. I'd also cull the overly long plot synopsis in the draft. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:49, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

How to publish article?

How do you publish an article from a draft onto Wikipedia? I'm new and just wanted to know.

Wacarder09 (talk) 17:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Wacarder09: I recommend you read Wikipedia:Your first article. Your draft is not ready to be published until it clearly shows why the subject is notable. There are a few reviews of the series - you just have to incorporate them as sources. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

User Boxes

Can you tell me how to add user boxes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Affan7 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Your question was asked and answered at User talk:David Biddulph#Ask. --David Biddulph (talk) 19:33, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict):Hi Affan7 and welcome to the Teahouse. Wikipedia:Userboxes gives some technical details, but it's OK to copy user boxes that you like from other editors' user pages. Dbfirs 19:36, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Hey, Affan7, I've just popped over to your userpage and sorted out your userbox problem. It needed the 'nowiki' elements removing. These allow our 'wikimarkup' (a bit like html) to be shown as text, rather than acted upon by your browser. But when you want that markup to actually do something, you must remove the nowiki bits either side of that code. I hope this makes sense, and that you're happy with what I've done. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:26, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

(Un)paid Editors - Notifying someone on social media you've made an edit about them

Hi,

If I see an editor creating positive articles and edits regarding living persons they regularly communicate with on social media and then send them a link to the edits they've made what policy does that come under?

It follows the principles of a Paid Editor more than a COI but no money has changed hands

Mattevansc3 (talk) 21:52, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Mattevansc3: I'd be careful about violating Wikipedia:Harassment, which is posting personal information here about someone else's off-Wiki activities. There's no indication that the situation you described is an example of COI or paid editing. I'd also be worried about violating the terms of your conditional unblock as you did with this edit [[2]], removing a sentence from the lede of a controversial article without first going to the talk page. The information was subsequently restored. Lastly, I'd read WP:BADSOCK, and if you've edited using different account names, we request that you post a disclosure on your user page with the other account name(s) you've edited under, per User talk:Mattevansc3. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:19, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@TimTempleton: I was being vague to ensure I wasn't in breach of harassment guidelines. The COI is based on them doing positive edits of individuals they converse with online to push a shared ideology without declaring their connections. I just wanted to know if on top of that them publicly announcing their edit and tagging in the subject of the edit made it more than a COI before I went to a functionary due to the evidence being off-Wiki. I only use the one account. Mattevansc3 (talk) 00:33, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Mattevansc3: Regardless of any off-line discussions, if someone is adding information without sources that pushes a point of view, that's WP:OR and can be quickly identified and deleted. If you see examples of this, you can challenge the additions and discuss on the talk page. If you see other editors adding unsourced info who are not engaging constructively on the article talk page, you can always start a thread at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. If they are wrong, they will be warned and then possibly blocked. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:43, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Sandbox name

How do you change your sandbox name?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gamerkillerz (talk • contribs) 22:50, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

@Gamerkillerz: you can go to your sandbox and type anything you want following the "/" after your user name in the URL, and save it. But to launch an article into namespace, read Wikipedia:Your first article. (Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four keyboard tildes like this: ~~~~. Or, you can use the [ reply ] button, which automatically signs posts.) TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:27, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

How to cite the same source multiple times under 1 reference

I've been wondering this for a little while. If I cite the same source multiple times using references it pops up under different numbers and just makes it messy. How do you make it so if I reference something multiple times it ends up under the same number in the reference box.

If that isn't clear enough, I will make an example.

If you reference the exact same thing twice using the same wording it is different.

How do I make these references the same number at the bottom of the page and right here-->

References

Thank you in advance CBatteries (talk) 00:41, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@CBatteries: I think the info you are looking for is in the named footnotes section. Help:Footnotes#Footnotes: using a source more than once TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:45, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Timtempleton: that was indeed what I was looking for! Thank you very much CBatteries (talk) 00:49, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Draft: Thelma Mothershed-Wair

Hi there!

For a school project I chose to work on the Wiki page for Thelma Mothershed-Wair, and I have not heard anything (email or otherwise) on the status of my draft. For a while, the Wiki page showed my changes, but after returning to the page it has gone back to the way it looked before I had added anything.

I was told to contact Wiki to find out the status- Please help!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sarahacard (talk • contribs) 02:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

First, it is not your draft, it is an existing article which you have been editing. Second, editors do not get notified about their edits. Third, at the article, if you click on View history on the top menu it shows that you made 14 edits, and then all were reverted to bring the article back to a version before you started. The reason was not that the content you added was not true, but that you did not properly create the references in support of that content. See Help:Referencing for beginners. P.S. All of the content you added is also at View history, so not lost. If you can learn how to create references, you can work on adding some of it back. David notMD (talk) 02:54, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

wikipedia editors keep deleting legitimate content

I am editing a page for a body freedom activist Gypsy Taub. I want to add information about her current charity work that she does in Mexico and wikipedia keeps deleting it right away. Even when I gave a reference to a legitimate news publication they deleted it and threatened to block me for "defamatory content"

Here is what I am trying to add:

She currently runs a psychedelic clinic and rehab for street kids in Mexico.

Here is the source of information:

https://sfbay.ca/2018/09/30/buck-naked-activists-march-for-psychedelics-body-freedom/

How do I get around wikipedia editors deleting my information? Do I need to contact someone higher up? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesThomas888 (talk • contribs) 02:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

You added it once and it was deleted once. Reason is that the reference is to an interview with Taub. What people say about themselves is not considered a reliable source. Also, you deleted a referenced quotation and a referenced paragraph without any explanation. The subsequent editor reverted all that in addition to deleting the psych clinic statement and ref. David notMD (talk) 03:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi JamesThomas888. Just to add to what David notMD posted above, there aren't really any higher ups when it comes to editing; in other words, there's no central editorial board which reviews every edit made to an article. Some editor, such as administrators, maybe be able to do certain things to help keep Wikipedia running smoothly, but all editors are basically expected to (1) be WP:HERE and (2) adhere to WP:5PILLARS when they edit. Wikipedia wants editors to be BOLD in trying to improve articles, but at the same time it wants editors to REVERT edits which they think do not comply with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Sometimes this leads to disagreement among editor s,; and when that happens they are going are going to be expected to resolve their disagreement through DISCUSSION.

Basically, someone is Bold and makes a change to the article. someone then comes along and feel that the change is not an improvement or not in accordance with some relevant policy or guideline; so, they Revert the change either completely or partially. At that point, the original edit is considered to be contentious and it is them up to the first editor (the BOLD person) to Discuss on the article's talk page to see if some kind of consensus can be reached about the disputed content. This is a bit of an oversimplication perhaps since things may be more complicated or involve some kind of vandalism or other major policy or guideline violation, but basically WP:BRD is pretty much how articles are maintained and improved over time.

What you need to do now is start a discussion at Talk:Gypsy Taub and try to establish a consensus in favor of the changes you want to make. Looking at the page history of Gypsy Taub though, it looks as if one of the edit summaries you left been revision deleted by an administrator or oversighter. This kind of thing only happens whenever what was posted is a serious violation or a major policy or guideline. Since I'm not an administrator, I can't check to see what it was that you wrote, but I strongly advise you against trying to post the same thing anywhere on Wikipedia again. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

I need some help using Article Templates

Hi. I wrote a draft on the novel Urchin Of The Riding Stars by M. I. McAllister. I wanted to use the 'Prose' article template, but I can't figure out how to use it. Any help?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Polymeric Organism (talk • contribs) 05:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Polymeric Organism. It's not clear what you mean by 'Prose' article template. Do you mean use Template:Prose or do you mean use a template found in the Wikipedia article Prose? Perhaps what you're trying to figure out is how to add a MOS:INFOBOX to Draft:Urchin Of The Riding Stars? -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Page protection

Hi Everyone, hope everyone is doing good.

i would like to know if there is a away to claim a certain page / profile on wikipedia as information keeps changing just wonderingif there is away i could stop that from happening

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat1991 (talk • contribs) 05:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Nat1991. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project where anyone from anywhere in the world can edit a page at anytime; so, some pages might always be changing. Wikipedia articles aren't owned by anyone in particular for this reason. In some cases, an administrator may decide to protect a page to keep it stable to for some period of time, but this is usually only done when there's been some constant disruptive editing or serious violations of Wikipedia policies and guidelines happening. Page protection can be requested here, but there needs to be a really good reason such a request to be accepted. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Hi Nat1991 and welcome to the Teahouse. Pages belong to the Wikipedia community. No individual can claim ownership or editing rights. This is the encyclopaedia that anyone can edit. Page protection is granted only in cases of repeated vandalism, and the edits at Arjun (singer) look like a content dispute, not vandalism, so they should be discussed on the talk page of the article. Dbfirs 05:51, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hi Thanks, guys for the info I'm still very new to doing editing, etc for Wikipedia and I'm still getting the hang of it. I'm also doing the page editing for Mr. Arjun, I am an employee. someone had also requested to delete the new image that I had uploaded and the editing of information I have put also has been deleted could someone please be kind enough to advise me on what to do?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat1991 (talk • contribs) 05:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

You might benefit from trying WP:The Wikipedia Adventure. Please don't overlink articles. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking for guidance. Your comment suggests that you might have a WP:Conflict of interest, and possibly WP:Paid status which must be declared. Wikipedia does not have "profiles" or pages "for" individuals, but only articles about subjects. The subject does not own the article. Dbfirs 06:03, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

(edit conflict) OK Nat1991. Before you edit Arjun (singer), you need to carefully read through Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide and Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Arjun doesn't own the Wikipedia article written about him and neither he nor anyone working for him has any editorial control over what's written in the article. In fact, he and anyone associated with him are considered to have a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest with respect to anything written about him anywhere on Wikipedia. Moreover, you as his employee are not only considered to a conflict of interest, but also a finanical conflict of interest. So, before you make any further edits to that article or any content about Arjun, you would be wise to familiarize yourself with relevant Wikipedia policies and guidelines related to both conflict of interest editing and paid editing. I will add a template to your user talk page that contain links to the pages you need to take a look at.

As for the image file, you uploaded that to Wikimedia Commons which is technically a separate project. The file is being discussed at c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arjun18.jpg if you want to know why the file was nominated from deletion. Before commenting in that discusison though you might want to read c:Commons:Licensing and c:Commons:OTRS for some general information since I think you'll find it helpful. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks alot for the info !!! much appreciated :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat1991 (talk • contribs) 06:17, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Nat1991. Please comply immediately with Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure, which is mandatory. Thank you. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 07:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Message on your Talk page explains how to declare paid on your user page. As a paid editor, you are supposed to suggest specific article changes at the article's Talk page (with references). Non-involved editors will decide to change the article accordingly or not. David notMD (talk) 10:16, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Need Information.

Respected Sir/Ma'am, Good evening. I am Kirtikumar an independent cybersecurity researcher from Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India. I have edited the article:- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristoffer_von_Hassel I am adding my achievements which show that I am the youngest child in Microsoft hall of fame. Bookofachievers:-https://bookofachievers.com/articles/meet-the-youngest-cybersecurity-researcher-on-microsoft-fame-page 1st World Record:-http://www.worldrecordsindia.com/2018/07/youngest-cyber-security-researcher/ 2nd World Record:- http://onlineworldrecords.com/youngest-cyber-security-researcher/ Cyber Security Awards:- http://cybersecurityawards.com/2018-winners Security Serious Awards:- https://www.securityserious.com/unsung-heroes-awards/ Sony(Star badge for multiple reports and youngest child among all the researchers):- https://secure.sony.net/hallofthanks Transloadit(1st Rank among 129 researchers of the World):- https://transloadit.com/security/ Apple( Youngest Child to be listed on Apple's Hall of fame):- https://support.apple.com/zh-mo/HT201536 Microsoft( Youngest child to get listed on their fame page consecutively 2times):- https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/msrc/researcher-acknowledgments-online-services-archive Infovys:- https://infovys.com/acknowledgement_2018.html

Please check it and let me know. Looking forward to your positive reply. Have a nice day!

Kind Regards, Kirti — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelozappia96 (talk • contribs) 07:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse, Angelozappia96. You don't seem to have edited the article, but you have posted a request on its talk page, which is the best approach if you are indeed the subject of the article. You'll see that someone has replied to your request, asking for more information. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:04, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

My apologies - re-reading the above and CiaPan's comments below, it is clear that you are not claiming to be the subject of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

@Angelozappia96: I have reverted changes in the article Kristoffer von Hassel you made here: Special:Diff/900380598, because you have replaced the article with the contents apparently about another person. If you'd like to create a new article about another person please kindly see the Wikipedia:Your first article tutorial. --CiaPan (talk) 09:10, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Please also see – and follow – the requirements of WP:Verifiability policy, as well as rules about WP:Citing sources. --CiaPan (talk) 09:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Exercise Tiger (1944)

Much of your current entry on Exercise Tiger is factually wrong, and too much of it is now about the exercise itself but about comparatively trivial related matters. I am the author of two books about Tiger, "Channel Firing" (UK, 1989, published in the US in 1990 as "Exercise Tiger", and "The Cover Plan Conspiracy: the British and Exercise Tiger, 1944" (kindle e-book, 2017). I think I can claim to know more about Tiger than anyone on either side of the Atlantic, and it really bugs me to see false information about it published in Wikipedia. I am therefore trying to emend the current entry. My problem is twofold. 1) I have no experience whatever in editing a Wikipedia entry, and I am doing my best to learn as I go along, 2) "The Cover Plan Conspiracy", which contains a great deal of new information, is a Kindle e-book and, as you will know, the e-book format is not friendly to extensive footnotes or endnotes (if only because of the obtrusive hyperlinks). Nor does an e-book allow me to refer to page-numbers. So in citing a source that the reader can verify for him or herself I am forced to refer only to the book itself.

There is perhaps an additional problem in that "The Cover Plan Conspiracy", which is closely argued, has some pretty contentious things to say. Not to mention, of course, the tendency to look down on non-fiction e-books as likely to be the work of deluded single-issue fanatics (otherwise they would have sought out and found "real" publishers, wouldn't they?)

I would appreciate your guidance on these issues.

Nigel Lewis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigel S. Lewis (talk • contribs) 08:02, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

• @Nigel S. Lewis: OK, that's a lot in one post. Let's try to take things in order.

First of all, per Wikipedia:Expert editors, none cares who you are, as long as you make useful edits referenced to reliable sources. "I know this because I have a PhD in the topic" has less weight than even a mediocre source. The reason is twofold: first, we have no way to check the claimed competency of an editor in a given topic, and second, we want readers to be able to check sources by themselves rather than say "trust that User:RandomGuyOnWikipedia who edited the page got it right". Of course, being an expert in a given topic still helps to edit that topic, but within Wikipedia's guidelines, so sources are key.

Second: if I understand correctly, The Cover Plan... is a self-published book (being an e-book rather than paperback is irrelevant). That means essentially there has been no editorial oversight from a reputable editor, and it cannot be considered a reliable secondary source, but rather a self-published source. The problem is not so much that non-fiction e-books as likely to be the work of deluded single-issue fanatics but that there is no reputation for fact-checking to rely on, and even a competent researcher might make mistakes if not checked carefully. On the other hand, Channel Firing seems to have been published by Penguin Books, a reputable publisher, which we expect (rightly or wrongly) to have a decent fact-checking process in place before publication; it can be used as a source, but beware of not using Wikipedia as a means of promotion for your book.

Third: I am not sure I understand your problem with reference formatting (the e-book format is not friendly to extensive footnotes or endnotes - well, maybe, but we are talking about references in Wikipedia, right?) Can you clarify what issues you encountered? Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 08:39, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Nigel S. Lewis. Just adding to what Tigraan has said above, the advice in Wikipedia:Expert editors makes it clear that we really do welcome the input of subject experts, and it also points out the need to follow the norms of editing Wikipedia - namely that no editor, no matter how much they know, may add statements that are not supported by reliable, published sources ('reliable' being defined by Wikipedia, not to suggest you or anyone else is an unreliable person). Now, I know nothing of the topic you are interested in, but I am currently mentoring a retired US geology professor who has worked at the cutting edge of underwater geological science. Yesterday, he asked me for guidance in how to set about correcting and updating a fundamental page we have on Mid-ocean ridges. Had he come to me 'out of the blue' I would have warned him not to dive in and make major changed to Wikipedia without first spending time understanding how things work around here, and how we collaborate together. But, luckily, we've been working together for over a year now (you've only been editing for two days), and he himself still recognises the problem of trying to make a major rewrite to an existing article that both he, and a fellow world-expert professor he works with, both feel is fundamentally flawed. I thought you might be interested to read the advice I have just given him as to how he might set about working to make signficant changes to that aricle for the benefit of Wikipedia users. You can read his question, and my initial answer here, on his talk page. I'm not sure if you'll find it all helpful, but the key thing is to bring in other editors and explain on the article's talk page clearly and simply what is a) wrong, and b) what changes you would like to make, and then gaining agreement on the direction of travel before setting out to implement those improvements, based on validly published resources and not original research, of course. (I'm afraid I can't offer to adopt/mentor you for the task you want to do, but I do wish you luck. The key to success here is collaboration with other editors, and learning to walk before trying to run.) Regards from the UK in this special, 75th anniversary week. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:44, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Follow-up to Article not accepted

We have found few more references to add onto the article Draft:Aaruush. Before we add them, we wanted to know, what more can be done, so that the article will get accepted. We also have pictures to add onto the page for each event, if necessary. Please suggest us further changes, so that we will act onto it immediately. Thank You!!