Jump to content

Metamood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rjwilmsi (talk | contribs) at 13:36, 9 June 2019 (Journal cites,). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Meta-mood is a term used by psychologists to refer to an individual's awareness of their emotions.[1] The term was first utilised by John D. Mayer and Peter Salovey, who believed that the experience of mood involved two key components - direct and indirect.[2] The direct level refers to the simple appearance of mood - happiness, fear, anger, sadness, and surprise (often referred to as the six basic emotions, introduced by Paul Ekman).[3] The indirect level, or the meta-mood experience, does not solely consist of the emotions experienced by an individual in the moment - rather, it is a reflective state which involves additional thoughts and feelings about the mood itself.[2] "I shouldn’t feel this way" or "I am thinking of ways to improve my mood" are examples of reflective thoughts during a meta-mood experience.[4]

Trait meta-mood is also a facet of emotional intelligence. Emotional intelligence is a broad characterisation of a variety of emotional abilities, and it generally consists of four key parts: the awareness and expression of emotions, the awareness of how feelings can influence thought patterns, the capability of understanding one’s emotions, and the ability to control and adjust one’s mood in a manner than leads to self-growth.[5] Alexithymia is generally viewed to be antagonistic to meta-mood and is often used to describe individuals who lack any emotional abilities. For example, individuals who have symptoms of alexithymia often have trouble describing and analysing their emotions. People who are unreflective and emotionally stable have fewer meta-mood experiences and commonly do not need them.[3] On the other hand, individuals who are generally self-aware and have high emotionality have highly developed meta-mood experiences. Studies have shown that individuals who are able to improve negative moods through meta-emotions are seen to possess healthier personalities than individuals who are not able to have such experiences.[3]

Individual meta-mood experiences

Variance in meta-mood reflective states amongst individuals helps to determine the different mechanisms individuals utilise to recognise, monitor, and regulate their feelings and emotions. The means by which individuals recognise their current mood, distinguish between different feelings, and adjust their emotions is crucial for the understanding of adaptive strategies they use to cope with interpersonal conflict and stress in their life.[2] The measurement of trait meta-mood involves three main components: Attention to Feelings (the individual awareness of one’s mood), Clarity of Feelings (the individual ability to distinguish between moods), and Mood Repair (the ability to regulate mood from a negative to positive state).[6] Of all three components, Mood Repair plays the greatest importance in achieving a healthy emotional mindset. Mood regulation takes place on both conscious and unconscious levels.[4] Mayer et al contend that "a negative mood that is evaluated as out of control, unacceptable, and long-lasting is devastating; but were the evaluations reversed so as to view the mood as under control and soon to change, the overall feeling would be far less destructive to one’s equanimity".[3] Self-control and self-regulation are crucial components of emotional intelligence and are associated with positive cognitive responses to social interactions.[5]

Coping strategies individuals use are central determinants of overall psychological well-being and mental health.[7] Meta-mood experiences, such as mood clarity and emotional repair, are high predictors of life satisfaction. Individuals who are prone to being open about their emotions and who recognise their negative and positive responses towards a variety of environmental stressors have a greater probability of experiencing higher levels of life satisfaction than individuals who withhold their emotions.[2] Individuals who are aware of their emotional states and are able to regulate their cognitive and emotional responses, are able to turn their attention towards coping strategies in difficult situations and minimise the psychological impact of stressful events. Ultimately, individuals prone to meta-mood experiences are able to acknowledge and respond to external environmental demands more easily and recover from troubled situations at a quicker pace.[2] However, individuals low on emotional intelligence often exhibit avoidance-oriented and emotion-oriented coping styles.[5]

Previous research has shown that meta-mood is linked to lower levels of depression and anxiety, and higher levels self-esteem. In addition, individuals who are not able to regulate and repair negative mood states have higher reports of illness.[6] The perceived ability to distinguish and repair distressing moods or preserve positive moods predicts superior overall well-being. Emotional repair is also found to have direct links to the maintenance of subjective happiness.[8]

Implications for psychotherapy

Comprehending and measuring the degree to which individuals are able to respond to and understand their emotions is an important precondition if one were to predict future behaviours, emotional disorders, and psychological maladjustments.[2] Meta-mood experiences have possible implications for a variety of treatments and preventative measures within the field of clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Mood repair is key in tackling the harmful effects of anxiety, depression, and other psychological conditions. As such, a variety of studies concerning meta-mood experiences have accentuated the importance of positive psychology and stress management programs for assisting individuals in coping with distressing situations in daily life.[8] In their study, Lourdes Rey et al have argued that "it seems reasonable to assume that individuals might be able to be trained to acquire mood repair abilities, given the high similarity between mood repair and other traditional techniques like positive refocusing or learned optimism styles".[8] Training individuals to be aware of their emotions, to be able to differentiate amongst different feelings, and consequently change their mood, is useful in psychotherapy because patients with meta-mood experiences are better equipped to handle difficult situations. Studies have shown that mindfulness intervention in colleges increases meta-mood experiences of students, and therefore leads to an improvement in student well-being.[7] Mindfulness meditation consists of attentional training and focuses on developing insight into one’s emotional experience.[7] In addition, when patients believe that their mood and meta-mood experiences are understood, they are more willing to open up about their character, their fears, and their core beliefs.

Trait meta-mood scale

The Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS) is used to measure emotional beliefs and attitudes people have towards their own emotional experiences.[9] The TMMS scale measures three cognitive components of emotional intelligence: Attention to Feelings, Clarity of Feelings, and Mood Repair. Scores on the TMMS are utilised to analyse stable individual differences in the manner through which individuals respond to their emotional states.[5] Individuals who score high on the TMMS scale have less melancholic thoughts, lower levels of anxiety and depression, and lower rates of borderline personality disorders. In a 7-week study examining the link between meta-mood and subjective happiness, higher scores on the TMMS were associated with fewer negative psychological reactions to interpersonal conflicts, measured through cortisol and blood pressure changes.[10]

References

  1. ^ Goleman, Daniel. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books, 1995
  2. ^ a b c d e f Extremera, Natalio; Durán, Auxiliadora; Rey, Lourdes (2009). "The moderating effect of trait meta-mood and perceived stress on life satisfaction". Personality and Individual Differences. 47 (2): 116–121. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.02.007. ISSN 0191-8869.
  3. ^ a b c d Mayer, John D.; Gaschke, Yvonne N. (1988). "The experience and meta-experience of mood". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 55 (1): 102–111. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.102. ISSN 0022-3514.
  4. ^ a b Mayer, John D.; Stevens, Alexander A. (1994). "An Emerging Understanding of the Reflective (Meta-) Experience of Mood". Journal of Research in Personality. 28 (3): 351–373. doi:10.1006/jrpe.1994.1025. ISSN 0092-6566.
  5. ^ a b c d Fitness, Julie; Curtis, Marie (2005-07-08). "Emotional Intelligence and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale: Relationships with Empathy, Attributional Complexity, Self-control, and Responses to Interpersonal Conflict". E-Journal of Applied Psychology. 1 (1): 50–62. doi:10.7790/ejap.v1i1.9. ISSN 1832-7931.
  6. ^ a b Thompson, Brian L.; Waltz, Jennifer; Croyle, Kristin; Pepper, Alison C. (2007). "Trait meta-mood and affect as predictors of somatic symptoms and life satisfaction". Personality and Individual Differences. 43 (7): 1786–1795. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.05.017. ISSN 0191-8869.
  7. ^ a b c Canby, Nicholas K.; Cameron, Ian M.; Calhoun, Amrit T.; Buchanan, Gregory M. (2014-11-18). "A Brief Mindfulness Intervention for Healthy College Students and Its Effects on Psychological Distress, Self-Control, Meta-Mood, and Subjective Vitality". Mindfulness. 6 (5): 1071–1081. doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0356-5. ISSN 1868-8527.
  8. ^ a b c Rey, Lourdes; Extremera, Natalio; Durán, Ma Auxiliadora (2012). "Core self-evaluations, meta-mood experience, and happiness: Tests of direct and moderating effects". Personality and Individual Differences. 53 (3): 207–212. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.03.009. ISSN 0191-8869.
  9. ^ Salguero, José M.; Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo; Balluerka, Nekane; Aritzeta, Aitor (1 October 2010). "Measuring Perceived Emotional Intelligence in the Adolescent Population: Psychometric Properties of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale". Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal. pp. 1197–1209. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.9.1197. Retrieved 27 September 2011.
  10. ^ Extremera, Natalio; Salguero, Jose Martín; Fernández-Berrocal, Pablo (2010-11-18). "Trait Meta-Mood and Subjective Happiness: A 7-week Prospective Study". Journal of Happiness Studies. 12 (3): 509–517. doi:10.1007/s10902-010-9233-7. ISSN 1389-4978.