Jump to content

Talk:Yumehanna

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nyamo Kurosawa (talk | contribs) at 20:45, 30 June 2019 (Merger proposal: oppose). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconTrains: Rapid transit / in Japan Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Trains in Japan.
Note icon
This article lacks references.
Note icon
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Possible merge discussion

@2406:3003:2004:6A0:C179:9D0D:53A8:D147: This is the appropriate place for you to propose a merger. I don't think simply duplicating the content of the two pages makes much sense, but consensus is th way to go. "Articles that have been separate for a long time should usually be discussed first (...)" (WP:MERGEPROP), so please discuss your intentions. Regards, Nyamo Kurosawa (huh?) 09:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Should I merge the Chuo Line and the Keihanna Line into this article?

It will help in the articles having more references in one single page. 2406:3003:2004:6A0:C179:9D0D:53A8:D147 (talk) 09:25, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2406:3003:2004:6A0:C179:9D0D:53A8:D147: Although references are important, I wouldn't say thats a reason to merge these two articles. Regards, Nyamo Kurosawa (huh?) 15:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nyamo Kurosawa: It would also be more convenient. 2406:3003:2004:6A0:1836:8049:8B63:D4E2 (talk) 10:17, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@2406:3003:2004:6A0:1836:8049:8B63:D4E2: Please don't restore your merged version. Instead, open a merge request and get consensus if you want to pursue this further. Nyamo Kurosawa (huh?) 04:33, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose to merge Osaka Metro Chūō Line and Keihanna Line into Yumehanna. I think that the content in the Osaka Metro Chūō Line and Keihanna Line articles can easily be explained in the context of Yumehanna, and the Yumehanna article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Osaka Metro Chūō Line and Keihanna Line will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. 2406:3003:2004:6A0:3DB9:A1CF:B05A:8B12 (talk) 15:53, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: They are two railway lines operated by two different companies. Apart from through services and a unified branding campaign (which i couldn't find on either Osaka Metro's and Kintetsu's en websites), they seem to be rather autonomous. Also, the Yumehanna article currently relies on a single source from Kintetsu, so i'd say Yumehanna wouldn't be a good title for this proposed page, as it doesn't seem to be the common name. (@2406:3003:2004:6A0:3DB9:A1CF:B05A:8B12: You should probably tag the articles, as outlined in step 2 of WP:MERGEINIT) Regards, Nyamo Kurosawa (huh?) 20:45, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]