Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Explicitmultimedia (talk | contribs) at 00:03, 6 July 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Main pageTalk pageSubmissions
Category, List, Sorting, Feed		ShowcaseParticipants
Apply, By subject		Reviewing instructions
Help deskBacklog
drives
Shortcuts
Welcome to the Articles for Creation help desk

  • This page is only for questions about article submissions—are you in the right place?
  • Do not provide your email address or other contact details. Answers will be provided on this page.
  • Watch out for scammers! If someone contacts you saying that they can get your draft published for payment, they are trying to scam you. Report such attempts here.
Ask a new question
Please check back often for answers.
Skip to today's questions · Skip to the bottom · Archived discussions


June 29

10:03:01, 29 June 2019 review of submission by Pratiwicitra12

hello. I wrote my article as neutral as I can. I didn't write to promote that person.

Pratiwicitra12 (talk) 10:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


10:51:50, 29 June 2019 review of submission by XernonnE.L.

This article clearly meets the notability requirements in multiple places for both the Composer,songwriter..librettist as well as musician group. Please review the criteria for both with regards to the revised article:

Composers, songwriters, librettists or lyricists, may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria: 

   Has credit for writing or co-writing either lyrics or music for a notable composition.
   Has written musical theatre of some sort (includes musicals, operas, etc.) that was performed in a notable theatre that had a reasonable run as such things are judged in their particular situation and time.
   Has had a work used as the basis for a later composition by a songwriter, composer or lyricist who meets the above criteria.
   Has written a composition that has won (or in some cases been given a second or other place) in a major music competition not established expressly for newcomers.
   Has been listed as a major influence or teacher of a composer, songwriter or lyricist that meets the above criteria.
   Appears at reasonable length in standard reference books on his or her genre of music.

Musicians or ensembles (this category includes bands, singers, rappers, orchestras, DJs, musical theatre groups, instrumentalists, etc.) may be notable if they meet at least one of the following criteria. 

   Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1]
       This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, online versions of print media, and television documentaries[note 2] except for the following:
           Any reprints of press releases, other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about themselves, and all advertising that mentions the musician or ensemble, including manufacturers' advertising.[note 3]
           Works consisting merely of trivial coverage, such as articles that simply report performance dates, release information or track listings, or the publications of contact and booking details in directories.
           Articles in a school or university newspaper (or similar), in most cases.
   Has had a single or album on any country's national music chart.
   Has had a record certified gold or higher in at least one country.
   Has received non-trivial coverage in independent reliable sources of an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one sovereign country.[note 4]
   Has released two or more albums on a major record label or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable).
   Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles.[note 5] This should be adapted appropriately for musical genre; for example, having performed two lead roles at major opera houses. Note that this criterion needs to be interpreted with caution, as there have been instances where this criterion was cited in a circular manner to create a self-fulfilling notability loop (e.g. musicians who were "notable" only for having been in two bands, of which one or both were "notable" only because those musicians had been in them.)
   Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.
   Has won or been nominated for a major music award, such as a Grammy, Juno, Mercury, Choice or Grammis award.
   Has won first, second or third place in a major music competition.
   Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g., a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read the policy and notability guideline on subjects notable only for one event, for further clarifications).
   Has been placed in rotation nationally by a major radio or music television network.
   Has been a featured subject of a substantial broadcast segment across a national radio or TV network.


XernonnE.L. (talk) 10:51, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:54:39, 29 June 2019 review of submission by Keleperkins

I submitted a new article (on Patty Carreto) which was rejected on false grounds that I did not include any references. I did include a reference to a Los Angeles Times article from May 1987. The reviewer falsely claimed that no reference was included. Keleperkins (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Keleperkins: - hi there. The reviewer was indeed incorrect to say that it had no sources - and yours is a good one. Unlike many sports, swimming doesn't have a specific "if you did this, you're notable" set of guidelines, so we default to the BASIC/GNG requirements. In short, that requires a 2nd good source, which is not yet met. I had a look for another source myself, and couldn't find any with more than 2 lines. However if you can find one with a couple of paragraphs that would be enough to demonstrate notability. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The LA times article is available online. I took a quick glance from that article and already found the information. The reviewer not only incorrectly said there's no source, but also incorrectly failed it per WP:NSPORTS. The subject passes notability per WP:NOLYMPICS. OhanaUnitedTalk page 17:41, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:49:43, 29 June 2019 review of submission by 213.205.241.131

Article has been reviewed and passed through. There's never any worry about articles being forgotten - they work their way up in our list as they age. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:02:41, 29 June 2019 review of draft by Bonniedust


I'm requesting help because I do not understand in what way the article violets wikipedia's standards for referencing, and even more so, how it "needs more secondary sources". Every statement in this article is backed up with a source that meets journalistic standards. It would be helpful if the reviewer could point out which parts specifically he or she deems insufficient. Thank you! Bonniedust (talk) 17:02, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Mjs1991: - I would say that while a couple might have issues, there's relatively little content that would violate the bare minimum standards of inline citations and I think they are covered. Their comment however is probably more legitimate (in terms of content that meets all 4 requirements of secondary/significant coverage/independent/reliable). I was unsure about the clash however, so hopefully they can clarify.
For future note, the easiest route is to go to their talk page (see the linked username above the resubmit button) and ask there. Nosebagbear (talk) 19:40, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Bonniedust and Nosebagbear:, the reason i declined the article was the fact that most of the articles only relatively focus on Dan Bodan's albums, rather than himself. It's a fairly good article, but if there were more secondary sources that focused on him and gave it significant coverage then I'd gladly accept it. Have a read of WP:THREE--Mjs1991 (talk) 04:41, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you @Mjs1991 and Nosebagbear:. I added two more secondary sources with information on Bodan's life and activities that are not music-related. I would like to make sure that it now meets wikipedia's/your criteria?

17:38:53, 29 June 2019 review of draft by Nautiluscreed


Dear WikiProject Help Desk,

I would be very thankful, if you could give some pointers on speeding up the approval for the posting of this page. The image used for the profile was tagged as a potential copyright violation, however the owner of the image gave permission via OTRS. Could this be the reason for delays in approval?

Kind regards! Nautiluscreed (talk) 17:38, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nautiluscreed. The image has nothing to do with how long it takes to be reviewed. The draft has been in the pool to be reviewed for one week. The current backlog is four months. The best thing that you can do for the draft is to make it as good as possible, so that if it's approved (probably 80% of submissions never are), it's approved the first time it's reviewed. To do that, study Wikipedia's policies and guidelines and gain experience by editing existing articles. --Worldbruce (talk) 20:07, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:27:28, 29 June 2019 review of draft by Uipmonline2019


Uipmonline2019 (talk) 23:27, 29 June 2019 (UTC) "Uipmonline2019, her notability depends primarily on her published books. There is one substantial published book by U. Oklahoma Press, FireLight. There need to be added references to substantial 3rd party published reviews in reliable sources. She is apparently about to publish another book at the publisher, and the article would be much more likely to be acepted once it has been published and also gotten such substantial 3rd party reviews ( and do not use Amazon or book jacket tributes or anything from the publisher's site for such reviews--they aren ot independent). , I;d suggest withdrawing this now, and trying after that 2nd book has attractedsubstantial notice. DGG ( talk ) 09:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC) .[reply]

June 30

08:27:47, 30 June 2019 review of submission by Mariferchis


I have followed the advise of the reviewer and enlarged the contribution in order to show the relevance of defining a new art move that is emerging in France.

Best regards,

Mariferchis (talk) 08:27, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariferchis: With no substantive changes since your question was answered on 22 June, the draft remains unacceptable. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:15, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:34:08, 30 June 2019 review of draft by The Greek FISHERMAN


The Greek FISHERMAN (talk) 08:34, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The draft is currently in the pool of drafts awaiting review. The backlog is currently about 4 months, so please be patient. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 14:05, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
but I doubt it will be accepted. This is too early in his career. "Youth ambassador" is not a notable position. DGG ( talk ) 09:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:02:00, 30 June 2019 review of submission by Arsa123


Arsa123 (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply] 

Hello, why is the creation of the Appa group page not sufficient for Wikipedia? are there certain guidelines I forgot to include or did I break certain laws? Please let me know.
See below. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 14:02, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:04:28, 30 June 2019 review of submission by Arsa123


Arsa123 (talk) 11:04, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Het david, What would make this sufficient for Wikipedia? Is there not enough info?

I see some problems here:

21:36:16, 30 June 2019 review of draft by Mercer5089


I have added a source which is a paper map of the county. Is this a reliable enough reference? I could add a Wisconsin Highway Map as a reference as well.

Mercer5089 (talk) 21:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mercer5089 yes you can reference a published map. There is even a {{Cite map}} template that you can use. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:04, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 1

Request on 05:02:54, 1 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Nilomimehta



Nilomimehta (talk) 05:02, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Please find that we have not used any copyrighted material illegally or unethically. The website IAGD has granted us rights to use the information published on their page. Please help us get this article published.

Who is "we"? Wikipedia accounts cannot be shared by multiple people. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 07:24, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:50:14, 1 July 2019 review of submission by 77.247.249.172


77.247.249.172 (talk) 08:50, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 09:34, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:49:09, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Gopal jha bjp


Gopal jha bjp (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 12:13:59, 1 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by 65.242.187.146


Thanks for the note. I’m sorry the page came across as promotional. We modeled it after the UCaaS wiki page. Can you be more specific regarding what was promotional about it? We’re more than happy to add/delete/edit with your guidance. Thank you.


65.242.187.146 (talk) 12:13, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

who is "we"? If you are getting paid to edit Wikipedia, you must disclose it. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 15:23, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:18:31, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Mohammadk97


The reason for the rejection, which was "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia", was not very clear. I don't see any reason for it not being accepted, even after reviewing all the rules of submission. The person of the titled article is well known in the automobiles business in Lebanon, and is looked upon by so many people interested in the industry. I've edited the intro and added his Guinness Word Record breaking.

Mohammadk97 (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

we do not consider Guinness as evidence for notability , especially when its for as minor and specialized a matter as here.There are just not sufficient accomplishements, which accounts for the lack of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources DGG ( talk ) 09:33, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:16:06, 1 July 2019 review of submission by HillsOne


HillsOne (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:29:09, 1 July 2019 review of draft by 2600:1700:93B0:1350:30AC:F6D2:572C:63BC

So there was going to be a announcement during September and we have to wait.

2600:1700:93B0:1350:30AC:F6D2:572C:63BC (talk) 15:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:38:03, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Farhinvohra07


I am sking for re-review because i have written this content by myself. And for the person i am writing is famous person he is a creator of 07 team a famous tiktok team which has million of followers in India as well as worldwide.

If there is any mistake in content or title is not suitable please advice me I will change the content and title. Farhinvohra07 (talk) 15:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:01:42, 1 July 2019 review of submission by O'Hagan22


Hi, This is my first time publishing a page so I have a lot to learn, my recent attempt to publish the above page was declined and I am unsure what I should do in order to move forward. My recent note was 'references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage' The page I'm trying to create is information on a novel which has been published in several countries and languages, has been reviewed by a number of notable newspapers and magazines, NY Times, Guardian, Telegraph and so on and It was published by a well known and reputable publishers Faber & Faber and is sold in most high street book stores. The author in question has a number of novels some of which are on schools curriculums. Having looked at other contemporary authors and their novels pages I can't see any notable difference in my content. Could you please advise? Thank you :)


O'Hagan22 (talk) 16:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

16:49:52, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Vishnubharathan002

vishnu bharathan is a notable person in malayalam short films , his works are famous beacuse of its humour . it was widley got critical and audience appreciation , so here request you to please re think about this decison Vishnubharathan002 (talk) 16:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


19:01:45, 1 July 2019 review of draft by Pi314m


It could very well be that the publication itself (HRO Today) is not notable, in which case I can easily understand that it has no place in Wikipedia, _BUT_

the awards they put out, (Baker's dozen, Top RPO (Recruitment process outsourcing) Provider, and other CapitaLized AcroNyms), get attention.
  • HRO Today is cited both in Wiki articles and in NYTimes articles that follow awardees of HRO Today's awards
Question: Should the article be flipped- named something like HRO Today award series and then just have a minor section about the magazine, which still does seem notable for-
an article titled "Insourcing, Outsourcing? How about Self-sourcing?" that
  • mined Wikipedia's history of a pair of banks that merged decades ago as Standard Chartered and, after September 11, rebuilt its personnel department in an innovative way.
as for a pair of words, "selfsourcing" or "self-sourcing" : I have no source that they were first, so I wrote that the article was an "early user of."

To repeat and summarize: Am I better off "flipping" the orientation to awards - since that's what gets attention? Pi314m (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pi314m (talk) 19:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

22:36:52, 1 July 2019 review of submission by Beth A. Farrell


Beth A. Farrell (talk) 22:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Page Name: Beth Farrell

User Name: Beth A. Farrell

Hi! I was notified that my submission was declined because it appeared to be a "test article". I don't understand what that means. I'm trying to submit my information/article as a legitimate, recognized and published artist. Any advice on how I can do that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Beth Farrell

Beth A. Farrell I wouldn't of denied it as a test edit. However I do see two problems here. First off it seems to be a autobiography which are strongly discouraged here on Wikipedia. Secondly you only have a link to your personal website for a reference which is a primary source. Wikipedia requires several secondary sources for inclusion on Wikipedia. Whispering(t) 22:59, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


July 2

Request on 02:38:22, 2 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Adwerd



Adwerd (talk) 02:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC) I have been trying to wite an article bit is being rejected for some reasons can you help me with that please[reply]

04:06:13, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Fans of samrat


News article is given as reference. Twitter and IMDB are in a external link. To prove anything, news article reference is enough. Kindly recheck once again. I've write very basic information about person with news reference. Hope this will be publish soon.

Fans of samrat (talk) 04:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05:01:51, 2 July 2019 review of submission by 61.69.125.170

{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Jacob is a professional footballer playing in Cyprus, as a professional footballer. There are far more insignificant athletes with profiles then Jacob. ie Bai Antoniou

61.69.125.170 (talk) 05:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


05:45:38, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Jani.rik


Hi,

I made a few changes to the article. I added more credible references to the text for example from Nasdaq. I also re-write more articulate text about the company's services.

Br, Jani

Jani.rik (talk) 05:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:06:14, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Nilomimehta


Nilomimehta (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Hi I need your help. My article has been declined for copyright infringement but the website from which the content is clashing has given us full authority to use the same. Kindly help me with the same.[reply]

Nilomimehta Pls provide link of the page where it stated such claimed. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:43, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:19:06, 2 July 2019 review of submission by 21805hp

Hunter is a Political Activist and a Youtuber, he has done amazing things for someone of his age, his Wikipedia page is a great place for people who don't know alot about him to find out. Please approve it 21805hp (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any affiliation with him? I'm unwilling to approve this, because Wikipedia isn't a vehicle for promoting something or somebody. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 17:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:25:51, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Mikedc73

Please give help in how to get this published. Mikedc73 (talk) 07:25, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


07:49:06, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Swampcygnet


Could you check over the article for The The Youth? Have made some changes. Thanks.

Swampcygnet (talk) 07:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


08:16:21, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott


hi hi the article of Jeffrey Feinman had been updated by adding more references.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

Pls review and see if it is acceptable for publishing.

If any further enhancement is needed, pls advise what should be done.

thx Jordi Scott (talk) 08:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft still has no inline citations and the tone is totally unacceptable "Dr. Jeff and his wonderful wife Amy live in Weston", "highly successful practice", "homeopathy’s remarkable successes", "prestigious Proceedings". for example! Theroadislong (talk) 08:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:32, 2 July 2019 review of draft by Paulmil


Paulmil (talk) 09:05, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have made the revisions to Henry Moss page 6 months ago and am still waiting for approval. I understand this can take up to 8 weeks but 6 months seems to be an unduly long time. Please advise. Thank you.

Hi Paulmil. The draft was submitted on 24 March, so it hasn't been quite 6 months yet. The current backlog (advertised as "8 weeks or more") is actually about 4 months right now. So the draft likely will be reviewed later this month. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:33, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:13:04, 2 July 2019 review of submission by SuperSwift

The original page for Bella Disu has been blocked for reasons of putting up promotional content and as such I cannot move the draft. I've written this article from a NPOV and have done so with the aim of promoting notable women through the Women in Red Project. I need this article to be reviewed so that Deb can unblock the page. Thanks

SuperSwift (talk) 09:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SuperSwift. To have the draft reviewed, add {{subst|submit}} to the top of the draft. The current reviewing backlog is roughly four months. If that doesn't seem super swift, you (and Deb) are welcome to sign up to join the reviewing team. It isn't the done thing to review your own submission, but you could nudge it along by helping reduce the backlog. --Worldbruce (talk) 14:27, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Under no circumstances should User:SuperSwift review his own draft. Deb (talk) 14:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure Deb, that wouldn't be right at all. I'll wait for the review while I work on other articles. Gracias.

SuperSwift (talk) 02:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:24:31, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott


article of Jeffrey Feinman was edited based on given comment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

Pls see if it will be acceptable or further editing is required.

Thks and regards

Jordi Scott (talk) 11:24, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:58:22, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Saeedr2000


Saeedr2000 (talk) 11:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


hello what sources are required until accept this wiki page ? Fataneh is a famous iranin singer but she have not website thanks

Saeedr2000 The reviewer had given the answer on the comment section and in the grey panel atop of the page. We need independent, reliable sources such as from major newspapers for verification. Sources can be in any languages. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:07, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

13:10:01, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Novembersummer


Novembersummer (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Have shared details of a novel that was published in 2014 along with ten web links, including the book launch event in Mumbai. The book is available on Amazon and Flipkart apart from having a proper ISBN listing code on goodreads. Despite that the article has been rejected. Kindly help on what proof is needed to show notability.[reply]

no Declined with further explanation on User:Novembersummer/sandbox of notability for books. --Worldbruce (talk) 13:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:52:01, 2 July 2019 review of submission by Mpampismate


Hello,

there is a page for Pix4D but not for its major product "pix4dmapper". The article is edited with a neutral point of view like "3DF Zephyr", "IMAGINE Photogrammetry", "Metashape" etc. Those pages were taken as a template in order for the article to be as neutral and unbiased as possible. Mpampismate (talk) 14:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The existence of one article doesn't necessarily mean that another does too, see WP:OSE. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 17:04, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:14:19, 2 July 2019 review of submission by QuantumBinary


QuantumBinary (talk) 15:14, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been told numerous times that the topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:45:34, 2 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mercer5089


I'm confused about why my added source - the paper map - is not verifiable. Are you asking me to literally show you the map? How would you like me to verify it?

Mercer5089 (talk) 16:45, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:55:33, 2 July 2019 review of draft by Alightjones


I am working on adding an article about Veronica Kirin and my submission was rejected due to not enough citations regarding her awards. I have photos of each of her awards (from the source). How can these be submitted or should I leave awards off altogether? I am having trouble finding how to include citations for these items as news coverage was limited or out of print.

Here is a Dropbox folder with all the images: Dropbox link w award images for citation.


Alightjones (talk) 18:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Basically, one book is not enough. The awards are relatively minor. It's probably too early in her career for a successful article. DGG ( talk ) 09:38, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

23:56:34, 2 July 2019 review of draft by Keothere


Hi, I want an article for my fine comic series, COLLEGE BUDDIES, but it was rejected on the grounds that there are not enough "Reliable, secondary" sources for it. Please explain what this means and what I can do. Keothere (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keothere (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Keothere: Please return to the Teahouse. 331dot (talk) 23:58, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, certainly! Keothere (talk) 23:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 3

01:36:06, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Arman-BCSEA

I am seeing that the page is rejected due to being "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia." BCSEA has been cited on the Climate change mitigation page where a dedicated article is missing and BCSEA is also mentioned in the History of green policies in Vancouver. I am confused about the decision. A dedicated article can help complete the two pages. Also, organizations of the same type that we have worked with frequently in the past like the Sierra Club Canada have a page. Can you please Re-Review or let me know if there is anything I can do about this decision?

(disclaimer as my account says: I am a volunteer for the organization). Arman-BCSEA (talk) 01:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

02:49:59, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Gipsyblues


Gipsyblues (talk) 02:49, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Draft writer/editor: Gipsyblues Draft: DVEO This question or request is for advice is for a page I am writing for DVEO which was rejected by DGG on June 9, 2019,as looking more like an ad than a wikipedia article Unfortunately that remark is NOT helpful because there is no definition about the ad characteristics which the draft has which makes it look more like a commercial.[reply]

I hope that experienced editors will help newer editors by not only describing an article is looking like a commercial but explain why an article looks like a commercial.

I am writing about a DVEO - a company which has contributed to the success of NASA's efforts to educate the general public as to what is happening in the Space program by supplying a key component to the video production section of the airborne equipment to help NASA send very high quality video streams from Space to the NASA facility on earth to re broadcast those images and activities to the general public on earth.

I have since then done a number of re edits . In the History of company section, I have re-written the first part as prose as opposed to using a bullet format to explain activities in specified dates. I have intentionally left the second half of the History using the bulleted date format. Please comments will be very helpful

I had a section for key products which I have deleted completely and retained at the end of the draft, a list of awards DVEO has received. I could use some help in that section too

I would also welcome other advice and how to organize this draft to make it look or meet the conditions of a wikipedia article

Sincerely

Gipsyblues

04:56:53, 3 July 2019 review of draft by GouravSWS


May I know is there any changes required in this page and I want to know how much time it takes for verification. I am waiting for your response.. Thanks in Advance GouravSWS (talk) 04:56, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GouravSWS: the review backlog is currently about 3 to 4 months. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:36, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 06:39:34, 3 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Craig-SG-Wright


Hello. I have had an article about a product called Paligo rejected. I have been given the codes for the reasons why, but I am unsure what parts I need to change or remove in order to get the article accepted. Is it possible to get more detailed information on what parts are deemed unacceptable?

Thanks Craig-SG-Wright (talk) 06:39, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is an almost total absence of references providing substantial coverage from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements. Yhe only substanial refernces is a interview where the head of the firmjust says whatever they want to . This is PR, not an trully independent source. If the product is truly important, there should be better sources. DGG ( talk ) 09:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:05:13, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Jordi Scott


for page of Jeffrey Feinman, the list of external links was edited.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jeffrey_Feinman

pls review and advise if it is acceptable.

thx Jordi Scott (talk) 09:05, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hopelessly promotional article on a homeopathic veterinarian, described epeatedly in hearticle as "Dr. Jeff.", just asit would be in his advertising. If he isnotable, which I doubt, atotal rewrite would be needed by a editor with a neutral point of view. DGG ( talk ) 09:12, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:37:09, 3 July 2019 review of submission by 95.185.199.156


95.185.199.156 (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This draft was approved and has been moved to mainspace. If you created it, Congratulations! Jannik Schwaß (talk) 05:06, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:23:31, 3 July 2019 review of submission by S4satishverma


S4satishverma (talk) 11:23, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

14:28:00, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Kbradley26


Please provide me with assistance and what I can do to get my submission approved. What do I need to change and do differently?

Kbradley26 (talk) 14:28, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:29:32, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Rgb326

As you can tell from my article. Rory Diamond is very notable for his work as CEO of K9s for Warriors (the nations largest service dog provider for veterans who suffer from PTSD). Rory is also a city councilman for Jacksonville and serves as the vice chairman for the rules committee. Rory has appeared on many news stations including Fox News, CSPAN, and Washington Post. Rory Diamond also received a distinguished service award in 2001 from President George Bush for his work in the White house during 9/11. As you can can tell, Rory is a very notable person. If you need any more information please feel free to reach out. Thank you for your reconsideration. Rgb326 (talk) 16:29, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:42:50, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Sarahmpalmer.0

This is my first time posting to Wiki. I did not intend to advertise my topic but recieved a rejection based on that. Was there something specific that was unacceptable about my post? I understand that my links need to be from other sources other than the creator of my topic.... is that correct? Sarahmpalmer.0 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC) Sarahmpalmer.0 (talk) 16:42, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

19:03:31, 3 July 2019 review of submission by Texacomexico


Texacomexico (talk) 19:03, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


July 4

Request on 04:51:30, 4 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Mercer5089


I resubmitted the article with an additional citation. I'm unsure how to make the paper map verifiable, but the new citation contains the correct information and includes a digital map. Please let me know if I need to add additional citations, and thanks for your help.

Mercer5089 (talk) 04:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

05:07:35, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Rosster montreal


To whom it may concern,

Months ago, i added an album from the band The Atomic Bitchwax, and I was sent a message, "Stub created, hope that helps. All the best.": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitron_(album)

i am now trying to add an album from the band Madball, and it is being rejected. I don't understand why? Is it because I tried to create a page (a standalone article) instead of a "stub"? Or it is something else?

Could some one give me some advice. :-)

Thanks

Ross

Rosster montreal (talk) 05:07, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:24:08, 4 July 2019 review of draft by Banquo92

{{SAFESUBST:Void|



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Integrated_Management_Concept Please review the latest comment (from the 1st of July) in the article draft (a response to a question I posted on the reviewers talk page). Seems like there is no reason for the article being rejected. Please advise.


Banquo92 (talk) 06:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

06:26:56, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Ferdig75


Ferdig75 (talk) 06:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I added the reference of the main italian economic newspaper (Il Sole 24 Ore)

06:36:27, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Ngugi Muiruri

1.Since this my first article i would appreciate assistance on the content that need to be inserted or deleted to meet wikipedia main purpose. 2.Would appreciate assistance on changes that i ought do made on the article to reflect wikipedia main purpose 3.Would like the article to be informative i.e History of Catholic Men Association at Holy Family Minor Basilica to be known and easily accessible. Ngugi Muiruri (talk) 06:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


06:38:53, 4 July 2019 review of draft by Shalini suresh mwrt


I need to publish an article on madras west round table india.I need to know on what criteria does a web site be provided for citations and notablity? Shalini suresh mwrt (talk) 06:38, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:25:27, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Abbycarroll


Couldn't draft Dujuan Thomas be considered a WP:ENT ? with his large following, contributions to the modeling and fashion industry with works including celebrities, and his role in film and modeling for websites. Abbycarroll (talk) 08:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


08:55:07, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Sindysparkles

Just wondering what I have done wrong for the article to be rejected if anyone could please help. Sindysparkles (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

08:55:37, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Marshmallowmabel

I have added a reliable source that backs up information on Cierra Cinti's early life and career. The source is from a published magazine, called Tyler Neighbors South. Cinti covered the magazine and a full article was written about her music career. This article is cited as reference 2. I feel this new reference should be enough to satisfy the necessity of an outside publishing of a musician. Marshmallowmabel (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:27:17, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Sindysparkles

I have added more references and wondering if the article could please be reviewed? Thanks! Sindysparkles (talk) 09:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


09:55:09, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Muralidhar kurni


My recent article submission has been rejected. Let me know the reason for rejection. My user name is "Muralidhar kurni"

Muralidhar kurni (talk) 09:55, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:15:42, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Muthukumar21366


Muthukumar21366 (talk) 11:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:24:31, 4 July 2019 review of submission by EgohunterRecordings

Hello, I see an article for Psysex was rejected before because it was not notable enough (the person who uploaded it did not put any references in the past). I fixed the article for Psysex, adding reference links and taking out some lines that seemed subjective. I belive the article is now objective and referenced correctly. Can you review it again? why is it still declined? EgohunterRecordings (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:PROMO and your user talkpage. Jannik Schwaß (talk) 06:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:57:35, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Peaksofmind

I am requesting a re-review because we believe this article is relevant based on evidence from the official Explorer's Grand Slam page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explorers_Grand_Slam#cite_note-pancoe-43 Alex is #49 on the official list of individuals who have completed this challenge. Pancoe is the first brain tumor survivor to complete the grand slam.

Peaksofmind (talk) 12:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


13:33:05, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Muthukumar21366


Muthukumar21366 (talk) 13:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:15:26, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Axsli

I am requesting a re-review as I now have made many changes to the article, added prominent information and used strong sources of information. Axsli (talk) 15:15, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:52:50, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Jawsisra84

I not really sure what other soruces you would need. The Book was publisjed last year on Amazon and only sold 4 Paperback version and 1 Ebook version the 4 Paperbacks were by me. And I have no idea who bought the ebook version I suspect it was a family member but they never said if they did or not.

Not sure what you meen about the book. It starts out with Chapter 0 which talks about my self a little bit then Chapter 1 though 10 is the main story. Bonus chapter is the orignal story I started writing, then it has character bios its less then 100 pages long.

Book 2 which I am currently working on I plan on the same number of chapters but will be longer and will include conspect art I did.

I plan on marketing the entire series though many Self publishing sites as well as I am thinking of having other items made. such as tee shirts, playing cards. But I am witing to see if book sales go up.

as for review the person who bought the ebook version never gave a review and smashword I just placed it a few days ago so I not yet sold any copies. I only created the wikiapedia page because some one told me it would help promote the book more.

some one said that because of how rare the 4 Paperback books currently are that a Wikipedia page would help drive up sales but they just became more rare the other day. 1 is a Proof copy that says Not For Sale on it. It is a smaller version then the others. the 3 Author Editions were printed before the cover was fixed (when it was first printed Amazon used one of their covers because my cover would not fit) so they are the only 3 in existance with the Amazon General Cover. 1 of which is signed by me. 2 as given to a friend with out my signature, 1 was given to a friend in prison with my signature and the 3rd I still have and I plan on signing it toon


I as you can tell I have a gammer issue. I have a nerlogical/learning disorder to the brain Its why the book to me 6 years to write because I had to keep going back and fixing my grammer, and spelling I even end up using a program to help fix the grammer. I kept the book partly a secret from my family they knew I was writing it but they had no idea I had it published till after I had it published.

Any Advice would be grearful Jawsisra84 (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


16:27:09, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Iamlucawild


The article has been fixed up to the request upon the reviewer.

Iamlucawild (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 16:44:19, 4 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Marshmallowmabel


Included in references is an independent magazine that includes an entire article about Cierra Cinti. I do not know why it this submission was declined.

Marshmallowmabel (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

17:28:39, 4 July 2019 review of draft by 2600:1700:93B0:1350:DDC0:CBCE:A933:F190

still no confirmation from ShoPro or in the games a confirmation about how many Pokémon are gonna be in the Galar Dex.

2600:1700:93B0:1350:DDC0:CBCE:A933:F190 (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:27:07, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Marshmallowmabel

There are multiple articles referenced that talk about Cierra Cinti and her music career. Marshmallowmabel (talk) 18:27, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Marshmallowmabel
  • This [1] says "451: Unavailable for legal reasons" it may contain in-depth coverage but I can't tell.
  • This [2] is a photograph of a magazine not a reference.
  • This [3] and this [4] are links to Spotify which is not a reliable source.
  • This [5] is a link to Twitter which is also not a reliable source. Theroadislong (talk) 18:37, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

20:25:57, 4 July 2019 review of submission by Redben12

Sources 2 and 3 of my page were videos that had info from interviews with the person in question and therefore do count as credible sources. I can see why you would be confused at first glance and if needed, I will removed them from the page. However as they're right now, I do believe that these count as credible sources.

Best regards, Redben12 Redben12 (talk) 20:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Interviews are of little use, Wikipedia has no interest in what the articles subject says about himself, only what reliable sources have reported and YouTube is not considered a reliable source. Theroadislong (talk) 20:30, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


July 5

01:16:22, 5 July 2019 review of submission by EagerBeaverPJ

@CASSIOPEIA: Hi, so a few days back you told me to elaborate more on how the water crisis came about, and I have been working with another editor to add some more information that you wanted me to add. Do you think it's fine to be published as a real page now? I feel like other editors could help us elaborate more on the different sections once we publish it. EagerBeaverPJ (talk) 01:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EagerBeaverPJ Good day. Thank you for adding more info and sources. Reviewed and accepted - see 2019 Chennai water crisis. Please add more content as info is available - see 1998 Sydney water crisis for example. Thank you for your contribution and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

04:21:19, 5 July 2019 review of draft by Fulber


Fulber (talk) 04:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

how do I quote or refer to published books and magazines that the artist has appeared in? thanks in advance.

Hi Fulber Welcome to AfC help desk. Pls see referencing for inline citation info and instruction. You also would use Template:Cite book template to cite books ; Template:Cite web template to cite sources from internet or Template:Cite journal for journal. Do use "horizontal template format". Since I am, do read WP:My First Article if you havent. Let us know if you need further assistance. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 04:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 05:46:57, 5 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Rica Ethier



Rica Ethier (talk) 05:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 07:03:16, 5 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by NeilJudson



NeilJudson (talk) 07:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilJudson: please see the message I've left you regarding undisclosed paid editing. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:08, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

07:26:03, 5 July 2019 review of submission by 194.243.213.83


194.243.213.83 (talk) 07:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC) The draft article contains no references or sources. Dan arndt (talk) 08:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:04:02, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Ruby838

The reason for the rejection last time, which was "not notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". I supposed that there was not enough reference, so I provide links where the content was collected. If there is any mistake in content which is not suitable or if I'm still in the wrong direction, please give me detailed advice, thank you.

Ruby838 (talk) 09:04, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Request on 09:23:50, 5 July 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Medicalresearchindia2



Medicalresearchindia2 (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09:47:06, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Medicalresearchindia2


Medicalresearchindia2 (talk) 09:47, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10:46:56, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Ejvalerio


Ejvalerio (talk) 10:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


11:15:21, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Bernat Paredes


Bernat Paredes (talk) 11:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bernat Paredes: Draft:Lola Pirindola tales is not a subject suitable for a Wikipedia article. Please read WP:N. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:21, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

11:50:16, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Miityu

I am trying to publish an information page for the brand "Healing Hotels of the World". I tried to rewrite it many times now, added several reliable sources and used quotations. I also didn't use promotional adjectives or similar to avoid a selling indication. But it gets rejected every time. I also checked similar pages to compare the style but nothing is different. Miityu (talk) 11:50, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Miityu: I have reviewed the draft and read the various references. Together there's not enough secondary, independent, in-depth coverage of the company to meet the WP:NCORP criteria for inclusion. Please also note the message on your user talk page about a possible conflict of interest, which you've not responded to. You must do so before editing further. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:07:34, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Raga vedha

I have updated details in WP:NCOMPANY and Added References. Raga vedha (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Raga vedha: all you've done is add your LinkedIn page as a reference. Anything published by you or the company is not an independent source. Please re-read WP:NCORP. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:13, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:16:46, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Suhani Kanwar


Suhani Kanwar (talk) 12:16, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I have added references wherever required, but still unsure why the page isn't getting published. I would like to know specifically what changes are required to be made so that the issue can be fixed quickly.

````

@Suhani Kanwar: There is no quick fix, because the subject is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia). There are plenty of search results for the name, but they're little more than mentions in the credits. They are not significant coverage. Examples of significant coverage of a TV screenwriter would be: [6] [7] and [8]. Contrast them with the draft's deepest source, [9]. She may become notable as her career progresses, but right now it is WP:TOOSOON. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:57, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:35:18, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Axsli

I was wondering if the post could be re-reviewed as I have resolved any problems and then published, I would also appreciate if you told me anything I need to improve. Axsli (talk) 12:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Axsli: - the reject is still the reasonable judgement. Sources have to be independent - this means any website from a company he worked at can't help prove notability - it has a reason to be biased. The same applies to interviews. Sources need to be in-depth, secondary (newspapers, books etc), reliable and independent. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:39, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

12:58:38, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Shilpaga05

Because I have added some references according to the Notability that you should see once.

Shilpaga05 (talk) 12:58, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


15:18:08, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Anandregunathan


I have added further links of reliable sources of information. Also, have added a link to the organization's official Annual Report. The organization for which the wiki page is being made is an Not-For-Profit organization whose daily operations and facts may not always be reported to news agencies everyday as it cannot afford to spend its money on heavy marketing and news. Also a lot of news coverage has happened in Indian local language news media which may not be of help to quote here (as it is in languages such as Telugu, Kannada, Tamil, etc). Besides this, I have also quoted the English news coverage.

It is important to create a wikipedia page for this Not for Profit organization because it is now big enough in size that it is able to feed 200,000+ children with free nutritious breakfast, and wants to serve up to 1 million needy children in the near future.

In case you have any other advice/suggestions/edits for this page to be published, kindly let know.

It is of prime importance that as a wikipedia contributor i would like to ensure the best and most accurate information be published.

Anandregunathan (talk) 15:18, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Anandregunathan: - firstly, the biggest issue the article faces is its blatant advertorial tone. To give one example "Annapoorna has had a roller coast ride right since its inception. There has been no looking back from the start, and the number of children benefitted have grown exponentially. 20 Million+ Meals have been served so far !" is complete non neutral and not in an encyclopedic tone.
Sources in other languages are fine. However an annual report doesn't help prove anything more controversial than things like name & location. Wikipedia requires secondary sources that are independent and reliable. A company's report has strong reason to present a positive viewpoint.
As a smaller note, an article shouldn't "talk" to its readers. Nosebagbear (talk) 15:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

15:20:35, 5 July 2019 review of draft by MemeTrooper


I was wondering if I could use the current logo I put for the article? It was removed when I saw the draft, but can i put it back? Also, what happens if i submit it for review and it is declined? MemeTrooper (talk) 15:20, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MemeTrooper: - fair use generally only authorises usage of a logo in an article. Its presence won't hinder a draft being accepted, and it can always be uploaded and added once it becomes an article again.
Most drafts that aren't accepted are declined. You get a summary explanation, possibly a longer explanation (you can always ask the reviewer to be more in-depth), and can fix it and resubmit. Obviously, given the delays atm, it's preferable to get it right first time.
I would suggest asking Onel5969 if they can clarify specific promotional points (I would just briefly say that it speaks constantly about the pluses and successes of the company)
A bigger issue is that the draft seems to only be sourced through sites linked to the company. Sources need to be in-depth, reliable, independent (sources with no reason not to be fully accurate. This also rules out most interviews), and they need to be secondary sources (newspapers, books, etc) Nosebagbear (talk) 16:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nosebagbear: - The logo's description apparently says non free content rather than free use, but i could have sworn it was put as free use when I first added it to the article. Also, am I just asking One if the article will be approved simply for listing the successes of the company? I didn't completely understand why your directing me to him. MemeTrooper (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2019 (UTC)MemeTrooper (talk) 16:22, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MemeTrooper: - To clarify, I was saying that currently the draft only talks about the company's positive actions. They may (or may not) be accurate, but it would still give a one-sided viewpoint if neutral and even negative info wasn't included. However, it's some of the phrasing that is also potentially problematic. Ask Onel for some examples on what made the article (now draft) promotional,
How would you know the logo was free use - has the company declare it such? Nosebagbear (talk) 17:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Nosebagbear: Probably not, my memory just may be wrong since I put the logo in the article months ago. I was given a notification that it is an orphaned non free image. I'm a bit confused on it. It says in the message that I can readd it if I think it is useful, but I thought that non free images can't be used Wikipedia and only fair use can. Am I able to add it back because I was told I can in that message?MemeTrooper (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

18:43:25, 5 July 2019 review of submission by Nachlassprofi

18:43:25, 5 July 2019 review of draft by Nachlassprofi


Entrümpelungsfirma Nachlassprofi (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


20:28:39, 5 July 2019 review of submission by 103.66.233.56

COZ I AM VERY NEWER FRIST TIMER ON WIKIPEDIA SO IF POSSIBLE PLEASE HELP ME FOR THIS ARTICLE WHICH IS ABOUT ME IF I DESERVE OTHERVISE ITS MY LAST TRY THANKS YOU ALL....AND WKIPEDIA20:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)103.66.233.56 (talk)****** 103.66.233.56 (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


21:33:42, 5 July 2019 review of draft by Explicitmultimedia


I JUST SUBMITTED A DRAFT AND IT WAS NOT ACCEPTED.. CAN I HAVE HELP OF KNOWING THE CORRECTIONS TO MAKE?

Explicitmultimedia (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Explicitmultimedia: Please do not write in all capitals, it is regarded as shouting. I've declined the draft for the reasons stated on it. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:02, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

00:03:57, 6 July 2019 review of draft by Explicitmultimedia


Explicitmultimedia (talk) 00:03, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&oldid=904984028"