User talk:Tidushuyin
Welcome!
|
Called (Avalon album) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Called (Avalon album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:04, 15 July 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Called (Avalon album) (July 16)
Hello, Tidushuyin!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 02:44, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
|
Declare any connection
Hello Tidushuyin. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:Called (Avalon album), but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tidushuyin. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tidushuyin|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}
. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Compensation in this context is not limited to cash, it can be merchandise, tickets, discounts, preferential access, networking, etc.Template:Z159 --Worldbruce (talk) 14:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)
In response to this inquiry, no, I am not being compensated at all for my edits. I am not receiving cash, tickets, special treatment or access of any sort. I am a dedicated fan and have been for years. I pride myself in being able to contribute to a band I have grown up with but am in no way being compensated for my edits.