Jump to content

User talk:SenkiZesshou

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 210.55.232.218 (talk) at 16:47, 16 July 2019 (→Rollback). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Hello, Beasting123, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement, and you may wish to read our newspaper The Signpost. Happy editing! Ronz (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

An extended welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. I've added a welcome message to the top of this page that gives a great deal of information about Wikipedia. I hope you find it useful.

Additionally, I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 03:18, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Global Road Entertainment warning

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Global Road Entertainment, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Logical a company can be only founded once. Name changes and their years are handed in former names. Do not aid disruptive IP editors nor falsely attack some for removing unexplained and distruptive edits. Spshu (talk) 21:53, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reported user Spshu to Wikipedia admin board

You did a good job on reporting that user who has a long history of edit warring. Keep it up, and we'll see if the user gets banned!

--2607:FCC8:6242:B500:5063:F4AB:C062:DE01 (talk) 19:29, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves and disambiguation

Hi Beasting123. I've noticed you've made some page moves which is generally OK when needed, but you probably should not just being doing based on a feeling. For example, moving Samaraweera to Samaraweera (surname) might have been OK, but not sure why it was moved to Samaraweeran (Surname). Not only does it appear to be a different name, but the disambiguation also seems to be unnecesarily captiyalized. Disambiguation is not always necessary and when it is the page titles generally follow WP:DAB#Format and WP:TITLEVAR; so, "surname" didn't need to be capitalized any more that "football" in Brett Maher (American Football) and "meter breaststroke" in Swimming at the 2014 South American Games – Women's 100 Meter Breaststroke did, and "metre" didn't need to be changed to "meter".

Title disambiguation has been pretty well established over the years, so maybe checking to see how it has been done for other similar articles first would be a good idea. Page moves in general can be more complicated than they appear, so if you're going to change an article name it might be a good idea to be WP:CAUTIOUS the majority of the time and discuss on the article talk page; in some cases, the proposed change might have already been discussed and not done for a particular reason. Moreover, if you're going to be WP:BOLD and change an article name, you should also make any appropriate changes of the name within the article itself as well as needed. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Marchjuly: Sorry. I'll check that, and won't do it again. Beasting123 (talk) 12:53, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Information icon Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Jinst, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. WP:BURDEN. Kirbanzo (talk) 22:31, 3 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SenkiZesshou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22885 was submitted on Oct 07, 2018 20:33:05. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 20:33, 7 October 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that her block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SenkiZesshou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22887 was submitted on Oct 08, 2018 01:57:43. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:57, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1946 Wyoming Cowboys football team

Hi -- I noticed that you created 1946 Wyoming Cowboys football team today. However, the article consists of a very short one-sentence sub-stub with no infobox, no citations, no categories, and no substantive content. While Wikipedia welcomes the creation of new articles on notable subjects, the practice at the Wikipedia:WikiProject College football is that we don't create new team/season articles unless there is, at minimum, (i) a citation to a reliable source, (ii) an NCAA team season infobox, (iii) narrative providing basic information about the team's performance and results during the season at issue, (iv) appropriate categories, and (v) the team's master navbox (in this case Template:Wyoming Cowboys football navbox). Compare 1952 Wyoming Cowboys football team for an example of a more acceptable season stub article (also created today). I'd be happy to help guide you through developing the 1946 Wyoming article; let me know if I can help. (The source here provides a good starting point for developing the article.) Cbl62 (talk) 04:01, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brudenell Social Club

Hi. I am not the one adding poor/unrefereced text to the article. There is no independent reference available for the claim. As stated in my last edit summary the editor who is hell bent on the claim being in the article needs to take it to the talk page to include the claim.

79.69.123.112 (talk) 15:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP Block Exemption

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SenkiZesshou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is not blocked, my IP is. I am unable to submit to UTRS. I am requesting an IP block exemption because my parents have a VPN running at my house and on my laptop. They will not disable it, and I can't get around it. I would like to contribute to Wikipedia outside of the 20 minutes I can occasionally get at school. I enjoy contributing to Wikipedia, and would like to be able to on my free time at my home computer. (I had to submit this using my mobile hotspot. I don't have an unlimited data plan however, so editing on mobile isn't really an option. Beasting123 (talk) 01:49, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Without your IP - there is nothing we can do. Besides that point, the instructions at WP:IPECPROXY don't require UTRS, in fact - they don't mention it at all. SQLQuery me! 04:39, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Beasting123. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2018–19 Central Connecticut Blue Devils men's basketball team moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018–19 Central Connecticut Blue Devils men's basketball team, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 08:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 23:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP Post

Hey!

Hey, sorry I don’t know where to place this on your page, but you removed the following from the Nigel Clough entry, marked as not relevant: In December 2018 Clough oversaw Burton’s best ever run in the EFL Cup, overcoming Championship club Middlesbrough 1-0 to reach the semi-finals

I would strongly argue that this entry was relevant in that it describes how Clough, as manager, has taken his team, Burton, to their best ever cup performance in their 68 year history. It is referenced with a reputable source, and, indeed, is arguably a more newsworthy achievement than the majority of the rest of the article (I’m looking at you, 1-1 draws and reports of jobs under threat). Surely on reflection you’ll agree that a once-in-68-years result, with noneother than Clough as manager, is in some way relevant to Clough’s entry on Wikipedia? Or maybe not. You’re the boss. Anyway, just trying to help, J.

An IP posted this at the top of my page. I'm posting it here just to keep it. We are resolving the issue on his page. Beasting123 (talk) 23:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Barrington. USA today is the reference

Thanks Theohioburf (talk) 03:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Beasting123. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! 5 albert square (talk) 14:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Seasonal Greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Beasting123, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Everedux (talk) 15:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Thanks! Beasting123 (talk) 20:02, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Tropical Depression Nineteen-E (2018) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:51, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Capital punishment in South Korea

Hey, thanks for fixing what I did! I was on my way to manually undo it, just a misfire in Huggle. Thanks again! Snowycats (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I actually just left a message on your talk page about it, oops! Beasting123 (talk) 20:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Wayne Elsey

Hi Beasting123, I recently made changes to Wayne Elsey's page to address the issues on his page. I have informed about the changes including an edit request (tag removal request) on the article's talk page. I have removed the promotional content and have corrected the tonality of the article. Request you to please review my version and if possible, undo your actions. Thanks!TP495 (talk) 21:33, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I looked over this. I made an error. I've brought your edits back. Beasting123 (talk) 21:38, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New page reviewer granted

Hi Beasting123. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Minor user rights can now be accorded on a time limited or probationary period, so do check back at WP:PERM/NPR in case this concerns your application. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encylopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance. so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion.  Swarm  {talk}  00:14, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Turing

Hi, you recently reverted an edit of mine to Royal prerogative of mercy regarding Alan Turing citing that it was defamatory or libelous. I now see that you have reverted that reversion. I was just wondering what happened there. I've never messaged someone on here so excuse me if this is the wrong place to. Jedney625 (talk) 04:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page Troy Tulowitzki appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:39, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It is pending. He needs to pass a physical exam before he's signed. Given that he missed most of 2017 and all of 2018, he may not pass one. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:43, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In use template

Did you see the in use template at the top of the United States Military Band page? That means don't edit when I edit, because if we try to publish our work at the same time it will get clobbered. Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Two edits undone, but I do believe one of them was correct

Hi Beasting123,

You recently reverted a couple edits I made to the Cody Parkey article. In one of them, I can clearly see that I made a mistake. However, I think a legitimate edit got reverted along with it. Specifically, the first sentence of the last paragraph:

"Late in the 2018–19 NFC wild card playoff game against the Philadelphia Eagles, with the Bears down 16–15" is not a complete sentence. I merely tried to make it a complete sentence by connecting it to the following sentence with a comma in place of the period.

This is the one edit that I respectfully believe was correct as I wrote it. Thank you. 1980fast (talk) 23:46, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Escape Routes Edit

I know what the real name of the Escape Routes co-host is, but thanks for helping me out on that article.

ChimaTronX (talk) 14:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

E30 apex (talk) 19:09, 20 January 2019 (UTC) are you an admin? toasted meter is not contributing at all and just deleting content, what is up wiht me getting a warning?[reply]

E30 apex I am not an admin. I think that what he is doing is perfectly fine. You were warned for calling him "aids" and a "pleb", not anything content related. Next time, try to handle it in a calm and polite manner. Discuss it on the article's talk page, or on his talk page, don't just insult him. Also, create a new section next time. Beasting123 (talk) 19:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ALL BMW VEHICLES

I complied with the link spam you just removed the refreshed 2010s portionE30 apex (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mark Poston

Notice

The article Mark Poston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Retired minor league player; fails to meet WP:NBASE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Travis Brown (shortstop)

Notice

The article Travis Brown (shortstop) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Retired minor league player; fails to meet WP:NBASE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NatureBoyMD (talk) 17:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Teahouse logo

Hi Almy! You created a thread called Where should I report an editor at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


NPR Newsletter No.17

Hello SenkiZesshou,

News
Discussions of interest
  • Two elements of CSD G6 have been split into their own criteria: R4 for redirects in the "File:" namespace with the same name as a file or redirect at Wikimedia Commons (Discussion), and G14 for disambiguation pages which disambiguate zero pages, or have "(disambiguation)" in the title but disambiguate a single page (Discussion).
  • {{db-blankdraft}} was merged into G13 (Discussion)
  • A discussion recently closed with no consensus on whether to create a subject-specific notability guideline for theatrical plays.
  • There is an ongoing discussion on a proposal to create subject-specific notability guidelines for chemicals and organism taxa.
Reminders
  • NPR is not a binary keep / delete process. In many cases a redirect may be appropriate. The deletion policy and its associated guideline clearly emphasise that not all unsuitable articles must be deleted. Redirects are not contentious. See a classic example of the templates to use. More templates are listed at the R template index. Reviewers who are not aware, do please take this into consideration before PROD, CSD, and especially AfD because not even all admins are aware of such policies, and many NAC do not have a full knowledge of them.
NPP Tools Report
  • Superlinks – allows you to check an article's history, logs, talk page, NPP flowchart (on unpatrolled pages) and more without navigating away from the article itself.
  • copyvio-check – automatically checks the copyvio percentage of new pages in the background and displays this info with a link to the report in the 'info' panel of the Page curation toolbar.
  • The NPP flowchart now has clickable hyperlinks.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – Low – 2393 High – 4828
Looking for inspiration? There are approximately 1000 female biographies to review.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Washington-on-the-Brazos Historical Site

Hello, Almy,

Thanks for creating Washington-on-the-Brazos Historical Site! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

You need to rewrite the sections that have been cut and paste from: pennys-tuppence.blogspot.com/2012/06/washington-on-brazos-tx-brenham.html

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 07:58, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Washington-on-the-Brazos, Texas into Washington-on-the-Brazos Historical Site. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

SenkiZesshou (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just blocked for violating the BLP policy after making an edit on Jared Knabenbauer. It listed his YouTube channel as "ProJaRred" in the article, so I fixed that. I also added that PeanutButterGamer and The Completionist had removed videos featuring him, which has happened and I can provide proof of it if needed. Shortly after making this edit, I was blocked for violating the BLP policy. I have a clean block history. Can someone explain why this was done, or unblock me? I said "Fuck ProJared" in the edit summary, which might be construed as vandalism of some sort, and if that is against the rules I do apologize, but I didn't mess with the content in the article. I also haven't been warned for anything in quite a while, so I'm confused by this block. Edit: Two other editors who put "Fuck ProJared" in their edit summaries were not blocked, and in one's case not even warned, so why am I blocked?Almy (talk) 20:50, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Time served. Editor understands now, I hope. Drmies (talk) 22:40, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hmm well, there was one more, not two, and they were warned. I would think that in the meantime (or at any time since August 2018) you would have read the relevant policy, WP:BLP. Drmies (talk) 22:13, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Drmies I saw two different users who had their edit summaries deleted. Either way if they were warned and I was instantly blocked for making an edit that actually contributed to the page I'm confused why I got blocked. I've also read WP:BLP. Almy (talk) 22:15, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Because you committed a serious BLP violation in an edit summary. Four times. What's the confusion? Drmies (talk) 22:35, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
        • Drmies I apologize for that. I made an honest mistake. My confusion is why other people were allowed to do the same thing and not receive a block, but an editor who was in previously good standing like myself isn't. I didn't even put anything in the page, It was an edit summary, which I now understand is still a violating but I don't feel I should be instantly blocked without any warning whatsoever when I was trying to contribute to the page. Almy (talk) 22:36, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
          • The other editor was an IP editor. They were warned. You, as an established editor, should know better--seriously. The BLP applies everywhere, and Wikipedia is not a place where you can vent your personal anger at some internetty person. So whatever it was that you did in the article really doesn't matter. OK? Drmies (talk) 22:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Leavin' La Vida Loca

Hello, Almy,

Thanks for creating Leavin' La Vida Loca! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains(talk) 02:03, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.18

Hello SenkiZesshou,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:

  • Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
  • Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
Reliable Sources for NPP

Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.

Backlog drive coming soon

Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.

News
Discussions of interest

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your comments (to take the article from how it stands now)

That was what I was saying in the edit summary (when I made the last change). I had disputed making changes to the article as it stood now as I thought it would take too long, but I accept it as it is. My last edit wasn’t to do with this dispute. I’m free to edit on the article, yes? The article itself does need trimmed but personally I don’t have the time to do that. Cat Hudson (talk) 19:26, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hold off on editing to see what the other person has to say. Also, if you think it has to be trimmed, don't add a ton more. Almy (talk) 19:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollover in Europe

Hello,

I have just seen you reverted some text about rollovers in Europe. https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Rollover&diff=903280487&oldid=903280259

In your change, I have seen that you have used a Wikipedia:Huggle tool, but I was not able to see the reason why you did this change. When you make a change, there is an "Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)" section where you can and should and must describe your changes. This helps other users to understand what you did and the reason why you did it. And it is not so complex as I achieved to do it for my changes :-)

Could you please fill this field when you make such changes?

Could you detail in the talk page Talk:Rollover how you believe "rollover in Europe" should be dealt with?

Regards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.185.253.2 (talk) 20:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@81.185.253.2: I was trying to revert one edit where you used really dodgy grammar, not all 6. Sorry about that. Almy (talk) 14:42, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About the Charlotte Kerr page

If I put a reference to where I got the information about the charlotte kerr contract, then could i put it there, sorry im new, also how do i write on your talk page because i dont think im doing it right, FoxyLegend (talk) 20:37, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@FoxyLegend: Hi. I'm not the user who reverted your edit, but I'll answer anyway. It appears that your edit was reverted because it lacked a reliable source, so yes, you could add the information if you also add a reliable source. See WP:CITE. You are writing correctly on the talk page. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. — Lauritz Thomsen (talk) 20:47, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019

Hello SenkiZesshou,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.

Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I see you've used the rollback tool to undo an edit of mine. Please specify what you think justified this use of the tool. 210.55.232.218 (talk) 16:31, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You were edit warring. See the 3RR warning you deleted off your talk page. Almy (talk) 16:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are six circumstances listed at Wikipedia:ROLLBACKUSE in which the tool may be used. That is not one of them. Are you aware of the criteria? 210.55.232.218 (talk) 16:39, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"To revert obvious vandalism and other edits where the reason for reverting is absolutely clear". You were edit warring, therefore the reason is absolutely clear. Almy (talk) 16:42, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, it is not. Do not equate my edits with vandalism. Do not misuse your tools. 210.55.232.218 (talk) 16:46, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. 210.55.232.218 (talk) 16:47, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SenkiZesshou&oldid=906557804"