User talk:Swil999

Welcome!

Hello, Swil999, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Talk:Mark Dice. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! valereee (talk) 12:59, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Dice

Hi, Swil999! I see you've moved a copy of the Mark Dice page into user space (I assume so you can work on bits of it?) and I believe it's your unsigned comment on the Mark Dice talk page, asking for edits? If you make the changes you want to see in your user space version, I'll take a look at them. It's easier than trying to follow the narrative of your edit request. Ping me when you've done it, either here by using {{u|Valereee}} or by posting a comment to my talk page.

Please sign all talk page posts by put four tildes after the post like this: ~~~~ This makes is easier for other editors to figure out who is saying what. --valereee (talk) 13:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Spyder212 (talk) 16:22, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spyder212: Hi Spyder212, I'm not sure which page/edit you're referring to? Swil999 (talk) 16:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This one on Sodium nitroprusside, which I initially interpreted as an unconstructive edit. After reviewing some of your other edits, however, I notice you contribute quite positively, and that this one edit was probably an error. You may ignore the vandalism warning. Spyder212 (talk) 16:32, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Spyder212: I think what happened is I was using the search tool to search for ergotism and might have accidentally linked the erotica search (since it's #2 in the search or some reason). Sorry, computer's been freezing up today... Anyways, fixed the link now. Whatever algorithm Wikipedia uses for linking in the editor should be looked at in order to prioritize search results that are in the same category of the page, and egotism has nothing in common with erotica except 3 letters even though it comes up as #2. Not even sure how "Sex in Film" is remotely similar to ergotism or sodium nitroprusside...

Entirely agree! Spyder212 (talk) 17:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Epstein article

Numerous times in your article you call the children Epstein had sex with, "underage girls." I went to edit the article to change that to "little girls/children." Also, you need to change the wording, "sexual contact" to "rape." We in "me too" are outraged that many articles are using "lesser language" regarding the victims of Epstein. If you won't allow editing, (arrogant to say the least as though you have some higher gift of editing) then you need to change this. Call it what it is. For too long language has been dumbed down regarding sexual abuse, and it needs to end. "Underage" is an insult!!! These little girls are children call it what it is. And sexual contact is RAPE. Jojokata (talk) 14:00, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]