User talk:Bueller 007

Yo’ Ferris... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:A601:A625:B500:806D:9EE9:4711:6922 (talk) 23:17, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

withdrawing

here you go - just follow this: WP:WDAFD Jytdog (talk) 17:08, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abu Zubaydah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bush administration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking your help to translate from English

Hello my fellow Wikipedian,

Thanks for taking your time off to help hapless Wikipedians and otherwise stucked-up articles find their way to the forefront of other non-English speaking readers. I would hope that I have approached you the right way.

Nonetheless, I humbly seeks your intervention to translate the following pages, since I gathered that it may mean something to Wiki readers in other languages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ten_Letters_to_Obama

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Adonis

Thanks in anticipation for facilitating this request.

Webwatchergy (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you nominate this article for deletion?

Did you actually nominate the article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennis_Adonis for deletion?

Are you crazy?

Where are your reasons?

You was asked to assist with translation because I felt that the article is deserving of translation.

I consider this vandalism.

It is not vandalism. Reasons for deletion are given on the deletion page. Bueller 007 (talk) 16:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Totally disagreed, and would maintain that it is an act of vandalism.

Then you need to learn how to use Wikipedia. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:06, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Input

I noticed you have been policing non-notable bios. I've had several on my watchlist that have been notability-tagged for quite a while and would appreciate your opinion on whether they might be salvaged or would better go to AfD or Prod: Alexa Sand, Animal Rights Hall of Fame, Annie Reiner, Chris Griscom, Debra Fine, Dying While Black, Jane M. Blocker, Jenna Torres, Kiki Ebsen, Ronald Loui, Sarah Turner (journalist), Sarita Shrestha, Tamara Millay, Tanya Mayo, Ted Junker, The Quiet Club. Thanks in advance for any attention you might be able to give to these. Agricola44 (talk) 16:20, 20 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]

My recommendations would be to keep "Sarita Shrestha" and (probably) "Animal Rights Hall of Fame" (though I think that is already established here, so it can just be a redirect). Probably keep "Kiki Ebsen" (though the article/referencing needs to be improved). "Tamara Millay" should merely be a redirect page to the most recent election that she has run in. The "Ted Junker" story seems like it might be notable and interesting, but on the other hand WP:ONEEVENT and the article is crap. All the rest can be deleted for sure, I'd say. Bueller 007 (talk) 16:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Agricola44 (talk) 17:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for starting to take care of some the edits (Tamara Millay, Animal Rights Hall of Fame). I think the really obvious ones I will first try to Prod to see how those pan out. Agricola44 (talk) 22:09, 20 January 2015 (UTC).[reply]

dropping by, in my opinion Jane Blocker will easily meet WP:PROF. Richard Louis might well be notable, but the article is outrageous over-detail, the very sort of thing that is so difficult to deal with here. DGG ( talk ) 01:23, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update on Ariel Fernandez: Latest Book

I am glad to report on the publication of my new book: Biomolecular Interfaces (Springer). Please update the wikipedia article Ariel Fernandez as you see fit. The link to the Springer title is pasted below: http://www.springer.com/la/book/9783319168494 Appreciated. 201.219.86.155 (talk) 01:57, 29 April 2015 (UTC)Ariel Fernandez[reply]

Fiorina

Thanks for giving some expert attention to the Carly Fiorina article. This is just a friendly reminder about the WP:3RR policy. I haven't examined your edits closely enough to see if you've exceeded the 3RR threshold, but I figured it couldn't hurt to remind you about it, given the number of edits today. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 02:17, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3RR is designed to prevent edit wars, and there's no evidence that any of my recent edits are part of one. Or that I have reverted anything more than once. What exactly are you suggesting? Bueller 007 (talk) 02:21, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a matter of how many times you have been reverted. It's a matter of how many times you have reverted stuff that was already in the article. There are probably editors besides myself who have stopped themselves after changing article content several times today. If you haven't read the WP:3RR policy in a while, it might be worth a look. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 02:26, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right, it's about undoing what others have done. Quoting, "A series of consecutive saved revert edits by one user with no intervening edits by another user counts as one revert." As I said, 3RR is about edit warring; there can be no war if there's only one person engaged... There have been no intervening edits to any of the content that I've changed, so I have performed a total of exactly one "revert" today. Bueller 007 (talk) 02:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The intervening edits need not involve the same content.Anythingyouwant (talk) 02:48, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology!

Greetings!

I am happy to introduce you to the new WikiProject Evolutionary biology! The newly designed WikiProject features automatically updated work lists, article quality class predictions, and a feed that tracks discussions on the 663 talk pages tagged by the WikiProject. Our hope is that these new tools will help you as a Wikipedia editor interested in evolutionary biology.

Browse the new WikiProject page
Become a member today! – members have access to an opt-in notification system

Hope to see you join! Harej (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Belosevic

A tag has been placed on Mike Belosevic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable person, fails to meet WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444^Talk 11:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of A. Richard Palmer

A tag has been placed on A. Richard Palmer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable person, fails to meet WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444^Talk 11:36, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mark A. Lewis

A tag has been placed on Mark A. Lewis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Unremarkable person, fails to meet WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KDS4444^Talk 11:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Strangers in the Night

Thanks for the citation, which supports elements of the story. I hope you can see why I originally deleted the section though - it has been unreferenced for over a year, and your citation only appeared today! Everything on Wikipedia, MUST be reliably referenced. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 20:09, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carnivora may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[File:Brown Bear us fish.jpg|thumb|[[Brown bear]], the largest terrestrial carnivoran

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited International Association for Bear Research and Management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ursus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

I'm pleased to tell you that I have started reviewing Polar bear, an article you nominated for peer review. User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk 19:24, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel Fernandez article editing

Dear Bueller007, I appreciate your efforts to tighten and fix the BLP (I may disagree with some things but will not interfere). I have an idea to put this matter to rest once and for all. Would you agree to tighten up the paragraph on the challenged papers? Instead of "more than two hundred peer-reviewed papers", the accurate statement would be "more than 250 peer reviewed papers (Scopus), or about 350 (listed in his CV)". Instead of "Several" papers have been questioned, I would say "Four". If you agree with such changes, I could have someone translate the entire BLP into Spanish and thus fix the Spanish version as it seems to be a matter of concern to you as well. Sincerely, Ariel Fernandez.181.10.76.232 (talk) 13:06, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think 200 is a better estimate according to Scopus, since the total article count is just over 250, and a number of the papers listed are errata, corrigenda, etc. Google Scholar is not an acceptable source for total article count because it picks up poster presentations, etc. I think several --> four is a fair change. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is fine with me. Appreciated. In order to show my side of the story, would you consider quoting a brief disclaimer that I can compose and post in my professional website? The disclaimer could read as follows:

"In regards to my four papers challenged by NIH software contractor Joshua L. Cherry, I hereby state that no proof of invalid data exists or has been presented that would require retraction. AF " Once you are satisfied with the BLP, I can translate it into Spanish, so you can incorporate it into the Spanish Wkipedia as you see fit. I trust this would be agreeable to you. Sincerely, AF.181.10.76.232 (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ariel. I suggest that "Joshua L. Cherry" is removed from the statement, as Wikipedia will not be able to quote your statement directly unless you can substantiate that he is the claimant somewhere on a non-self-published source. If you put the statement on your own website under your own name and send me the URL, I will add the statement to the end of that paragraph. (However, it will be up to the community to determine whether they wish to keep the statement on the article or not. In the interest of balance, I think it will be safe to say that it should be kept.) You should not contribute to your own article in any language (even if it is just a translation), so I recommend you check with the Wikipedia list of English-Spanish translators to convert it. Bueller 007 (talk) 23:38, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Bueller007. I posted a brief disclaimer and removed the name Joshua L. Cherry from it. The disclaimer is now published online at the url:

http://www.profarielfernandez.com/disclaimer.html In regards to the Spanish translation, I will search for an official Wikipedia translator once you are satisfied with the article. Sincerely, AF.186.138.183.140 (talk) 00:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bueller007, I must say that you have done an exceptionally good job with the BLP. I may not necessarily agree with everything or like what is there but cannot deny that you have been extremely careful and thorough. I doubt there may be other edits of this quality in Wikipedia, where the editor takes the trouble to read professional papers. I regret our earlier differences and apologize for the troubles this has caused. On a positive note, the quality of the final product makes up for the earlier problems. AF.186.138.183.140 (talk) 11:35, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bueller007, Someone may fail to reproduce a result due to his or her incompetence, not because the result is invalid. As PLoS Genetics clearly stated in its Expression of Concern: "This Expression of Concern should not be considered as a statement regarding the validity of the work, but rather as a notification to readers". This is exactly the position of COPE they abide by. AF.186.138.183.140 (talk) 00:00, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bueller, please don't personalize the discussion on the Fernandez talk page. Please do not accuse me of working in bad faith. I would appreciate it if you would strike what you wrote about me in in this dif. Jytdog (talk) 00:40, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the page has totally calmed down now. Thanks again for facilitating that. Jytdog (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derek Roff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life history. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

In a recent edit to the page Black Forest gateau, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Jeni ^(talk) 15:45, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Ian McTaggart-Cowan at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 08:57, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Payne

You should probably close the merge discussion on the talk page, as it appears you have already merged the two articles. MB298 (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marcia Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Outrage. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Amber Heard. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Davey2010^Talk 02:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update for article Ariel Fernandez

Happy to inform that I have recently published a new book entitled "Physics at the Biomolecular Interface". I would like to request that the Wikipedia biography be updated accordingly. In the list of books please include also the most recent one: Physics at the Biomolecular Interface, by Ariel Fernández (ISBN 978-3319308517, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016). In addition, where it says "Fernandez has published two books..." it should say "Fernandez has published three books..."

The new book is available in amazon at http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Biomolecular-Interface-Fundamentals-Biological/dp/3319308513

Thanks much for your cooperation. Ariel Fernandez186.138.183.140 (talk) 12:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Conservation Genetics (journal)

added a link pointing to Springer

Conservation Genetics Resources

added a link pointing to Springer

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Audience score

Is there anything in the Wikipedia rules that says audience scores aren't allowed? Rickraptor707 (talk) 06:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. "Do not include user ratings submitted to websites such as the Internet Movie Database or Rotten Tomatoes, as they are vulnerable to vote stacking and demographic skew." [1] Bueller 007 (talk) 14:15, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yanmar Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yanmar Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ursus maritimus tyrannus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ursus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

saw your name

at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Translators_available#Japanese-to-English , do you by chance take requests?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:27, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bueller 007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bueller 007. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Ian McTaggart-Cowan

On 12 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ian McTaggart-Cowan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ian McTaggart-Cowan was considered "the father of Canadian ecology"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ian McTaggart-Cowan. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ian McTaggart-Cowan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:45, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bill Paxton. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 18:06, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits, such as those to Shigeru Miyamoto, appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 22:14, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Simpler language

For medical articles we work to write the WP:leads, if not the entire article, as simply as possible without introducing errors. English Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia used extensively by many who speak English as a second language. We therefore try to use common words as well as short sentences. See here for more details. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:28, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Translation Help

Good day! I would like to ask for your help in translating a Japanese wiki article. This article in English wiki was nominated for deletion (see [2]). The English article's sources seem weak for establishing notability so I went to find a Japanese wiki article and was unable to find one. Another editor suggested that this Japanese wiki article (see - "お田鶴の方". ) was about subject of the AFD (Iio Tazu - aka Otatsu no Kata) but it appears to be about a different person. If you have the time, would you take a look at the "お田鶴の方". article and see if it is useful to the AFD[3] and, if possible, leave your response there. Thanks! CBS527^Talk 23:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Long-term effects of cannabis. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 06:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rinat Akhmetshin clarification

What part of that statement did you want more clarification on when you added the tag with this diff?

From the cited source[4] "The topic of discussion: A high-profile Russian money laundering case and related sanctions on Russia......The focus, according to two eyewitnesses in the hotel lobby, was a U.S. federal money-laundering case in New York. The government is targeting Prevezon Holdings, a Cyprus company that has invested.....Rohrabacher acknowledged to CNN that the case came up in conversation with Akhmetshin."

Written into article was: "There was a discussion about the Prevezon money laundering case, along with the related sanctions against Russia."

I wanted to remove tag, but am not sure what needs to be clarified first. Thanks, WikiVirusC^(talk) 23:24, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It says "There was a discussion about the Prevezon money laundering case", but there is zero explanation anywhere in the article what the "Prevezon money laundering case" is. It should either be changed to "a money laundering case" or a parenthetical explanation should be added. Bueller 007 (talk) 00:20, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ive changed it. When I first wrote it, I just figured saying a money laundering case by itself would be what needed more clarification, hence why I went and got more information about the case from rest of article and added the name of it in.

Translation request

Hi, I'm reaching out to you since you were listed on Wikipedia:Translators available#Japanese-to-English. User:Phoenix_God made a request of me to add some information but since I don't speak Japanese I asked on their behalf at WikiProject Anime and manga, but didn't get any takers there. What needs to be added is that for the series Domestic Girlfriend, a web movie was made. The user suggested this source, but the jawiki article's source or any other could also suffice. Let me know if you're able to take it, if not, we'll just have to see elsewhere. Opencooper (talk) 02:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I won't touch manga/anime. Bueller 007 (talk) 02:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for letting us know. Happy editing :). Opencooper (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NBHS

You've been here for nearly 3 years. You should know what notable means by now. It has nothing to do with fame. The Notable alumni section in any school article has two requirements. One, the person has to be Notable. He isn't. You will not find one reliable source that has ever discussed this assclown in any context outside his connection to the church shooting. That means he fails WP:BLP1E. Second, his tie to the school must be reliably sourced, either in the list or in his non existent biography. Third, posting negative info about a person subject to WP:BLP without sources is a serious policy violation. BLP is quite clear that blp issues stay out without consensus. There is no consensus. Going forward, you are welcome to try to establish one, or write his bio. Per guidelines we do not mention non notable students past or present in school articles. Please establish a consensus as to why we should make an exception for this guy. John from Idegon (talk) 18:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Try not to insult other editors in edit summaries--they tend to live very long

"Twit" is uncalled for. Drmies (talk) 02:32, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Devin Patrick Kelley.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Devin Patrick Kelley.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Please be aware of Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2017_July_7#File:James_Thomas_Hodgkinson.png, which was a similar case. The image of the perpetrator of this crime is not critical to the article, and as such fails WP:NFCC. If you have questions about this, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Baker

I see you've been admonished by other editors for edit-warring and for uncivil edit summaries, among other things. You now appear to be edit-warring at Ken Baker (entertainment journalist). Per WP:BRD, once you were reverted, protocol is to discuss your proposed edits on the article talk page and attempt to reach consensus with other editors.

However, your proposed edits contain some bright-line violations. We cannot make uncited personal-life claims, including uncited claims of birth dates, per WP:BLP. These need WP:RS citing. As well, we do not highlight unproven allegations in the WP:LEAD, which is a summary of why the person is notable. Additionally, per WP:BLPCRIME, "A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court of law," and in this case there is not even a charge but simply a claim. While they may or may not be notable for the article body, it has no bearing on his notability and does not belong in the lead. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:44, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The citations for his birth date and location are his own books. The information is publicly available. In addition, you should feel free to continue whitewashing unproven sexual assault allegations on these articles: Harvey Weinstein, Roy Moore, etc. Bueller 007 (talk) 01:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RS citations need to be in the article as proper footnotes; we can't just "take your word for it."

As to other articles, any that contain violative content need to be brought up to standard, not used as an example. WP:OTHERSTUFF. Feel free to edit those articles.--Tenebrae (talk) 01:57, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bueller 007. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't swear in edit summaries

Hello, I noticed you used the word "shitty" in a recent edit summary for [Boone and Crockett Club]. I ask of you to refrain from using such vulgar language in summaries, it really doesn't help anyone. WikiRay360 (talk) 02:15, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Shit" has been permitted on broadcast television for almost twenty years. Grow up. Bueller 007 (talk) 02:17, 10 December 2017 (UTC)y[reply]

Why the fuck can't he say "shitty", WikiRay360? Please by all means, point out which damn policy prohibits him from using fucking shitty language such as "shitty". It doesn't matter one fucking bit. John from Idegon (talk) 02:58, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just here to say fuck. Jeni ^(talk) 14:43, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lede and info box

Yes, both the lede and the info box per WP convention repeat what is already in the body text in shorter, more summary form. That is in fact what they should do. If they leave out the pertinent high level facts, such as here the allegation and suicide, that is a problem. Please don’t delete language that is appropriate. See, for example, WP:LEDE. 2604:2000:E016:A700:64D4:5053:1FA2:2640 (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do as I please to improve the article consistent with WP style. Stop adding trash. Bueller 007 (talk) 06:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your edits at Victoria Arbour. I very much appreciate your precise use of language, and your careful interpretation of the sources. Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 07:22, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Santa Fe High School shooting

Your recent editing history at Santa Fe High School shooting shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You have reverted the page to include the suspects intention to commit suicide. This has already been entered into the article and does not need to be duplicated. -- Mr Xaero (talk) 01:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not an edit war. Bueller 007 (talk) 02:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William A. Fletcher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Cooper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ariel Fernandez

Appreciate all of your work and efforts on behalf of the users of WP. I was wondering if you could elaborate on the reason why Ariel Fernandez left the University of Miami. Such information could actually prove useful, and the interest is not just prurient. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.15.165.222 (talk) 16:10, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Illiterate moron"?

This [5] seems a bit OTT. Didn't you notice your nowiki? William M. Connolley (talk) 20:41, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reported for edit warring

See here. --JBL (talk) 03:06, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Hi there, can you please stop adding that disturbing phrase ForMemRS immediately after the subject name in the first sentences of articles? It is rather disturbing there. I have removed a few. Other editors have too. Can you please take care of the rest? Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 09:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See also the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject_Mathematics#Postnomial on Erdos. Comments welcome. - DVdm (talk) 12:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bueller 007 - DVdm (talk) 14:37, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Paul Erdős and other articles

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:20, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Quitting Wikipedia. Adios Bueller 007 (talk) 20:21, 27 June 2018 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bueller 007. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on P90X; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Enough already. You are clearly editing against consensus. Drmies (talk) 02:46, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An edit war is not a single revert. Get a clue. Bueller 007 (talk) 03:12, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should probably get a clue as well, since your message to Drmies is nonsense. Acroterion (talk) 03:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please clarify how it is nonsense. You were apparently incapable of leaving a coherent message on his page. Bueller 007 (talk) 03:26, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Drmies has reverted once. Ronz has reverted once. Your assertion concerning Drmies is wrong. Perhaps you should walk away from the keyboard for a while, rather than complaining about other editors who might disagree with you, or who point out issues with your claims about article history. Acroterion (talk) 03:31, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have already acknowledged this error on Drmies' page. There is no need to walk away from a keyboard. Please do not impart motives or emotions to me. Bueller 007 (talk) 03:35, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good - please remember that edit-warring doesn't necessarily involve a 3RR violation, and that you've been asked to start a new discussion. Acroterion (talk) 03:42, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling errors

Chill out. I missed a letter in a last name, not a big deal. Pokerplayer513 (talk) 02:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Japan-English translation

Hello Bueller 007

I'm looking for a way to romanize this 3 web pages of N.O.M. 54 (jan 2003) about the video game The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker => [6]. Are you abble and have time to do this ? I writing the corresponding (page on Wikipedia in French, but I think this will be usefull for Wikipedia in English too.

I also asked this to Curly Turkey and Mr. Stradivarius.

Regards --Archimëa (talk) 16:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I have no interest in translating content related to anime, video games, etc. Bueller 007 (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Regards --Archimëa (talk) 10:26, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request translations

Please, if you have time, can you translate this pages from Japanese to English: ja:烏丸家 (Karasumaru family), ja:山本顧彌太 (Koyata Yamamoto), ja:亀井重清 (Shigekiyo Kamei), ja:片岡常春 (Tsuneharu Kataoka), ja:伊勢義盛 (Yoshimori Ise), ja:駿河次郎 (Jirō Suruga), ja:鷲尾義久 (Washio Yoshihisa), ja:富樫泰家 (Yasuie Togashi), ja:大社駅 (Taisha Station), ja:村田勝志 (Katsushi Murata), ja:藤井恒久 (Tsunehisa Fujii), ja:宮根誠司 (Seiji Miyane), ja:諸國沙代子 (Sayoko Shokoku), ja:世界一受けたい授業 (THE MOST USEFUL SCHOOL IN THE WORLD), ja:にっぽん丸 (Nippon Maru (1990)), ja:馬場元子 (Motoko Baba), ja:生ハムと焼うどん (Nama Ham & Yaki Udon), ja:さわかぜ (護衛艦) (JDS Sawakaze), ja:いず (巡視船・2代) (Izu (PL 31)), ja:かめりあ丸 (Camellia Maru), ja:京都府警察 (Kyoto Prefectural Police), ja:柳川次郎 (Jirō Yanagawa), ja:花形敬 (Kei Hanagata), ja:小林楠扶 (Kusuo Kobayashi), ja:毎朝新聞 (Maiasa Shinbun), ja:田中六助 (Rokusuke Tanaka), ja:角田久美子 (Kumiko Tsunoda), ja:安村直樹 (Naoki Yasumura), ja:三枝夕夏 (Yūka Saegusa), ja:少年ケニヤ (Shōnen Kenya), ja:チャンピオン太 (Champion Futoshi), ja:ジャイアント台風 (Giant Typhoon), ja:引田有美 (Yumi Hikita), ja:松岡巌鉄 (Gantetsu Matsuoka), ja:鈴木理子 (ホリプロ) (Riko Suzuki), ja:谷内里早 (Risa Taniuchi), ja:尾崎仁彦 (Kimihiko Ozaki), ja:アーサ米夏 (Aasa Maika), ja:ミスター高橋 (Mister Takahashi), ja:吉村道明 (Michiaki Yoshimura), ja:沖識名 (Shikina Oki), ja:芳の里淳三 (Junzō Yoshinosato), ja:SAKI (SAKI), ja:MIZUKI (MIZUKI), ja:万喜なつみ (Natsumi Maki). Thank you very much. --80.181.64.189 09:35, 19 April 2019 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.181.64.189 (talk) [reply]

Stop spamming me with this trash. Bueller 007 (talk) 14:08, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you do some of these translations, because I'm too busy? --95.233.3.50 15:10, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese honorifics

Please, can you help me with this discussion? Thank you. --79.24.236.241 06:25, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshitsune (TV series)

Please, can you create List of Yoshitsune (TV series) characters? Thank you. --79.44.235.28 08:26, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Complete waste of time. Not a chance. Bueller 007 (talk) 17:55, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tōkyo listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tōkyo. Since you had some involvement with the Tōkyo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hkbusfan (talk) 06:22, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]