Jump to content

User talk:Rev. Michael S. Margolin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 158.184.149.13 (talk) at 23:09, 28 November 2006 (→Warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

HS, My religion is a valid and legal religion since 1999. We have the support of the O.T.O. A:.A:. Scott Rite Masons ULCM and many Satanic groups except the church of Satan. They have for going on 7 years tried their very best to undermine and keep SoS hidden from the public. Are theses actions of a church that supports freedom of religion? No, they are the actions of a tyrant that thinks it can monopolize religion and kill any potential competition. I will not edit the post anymore if you agree to place it under the LaVey one I removed if that makes you happy. ISN Baphomet Rex 666 The Mad Poet ACBHB O.T.O. Rev. Michael S. Margolin HP www.sosatan.org

HS, as far as Fame ever think of looking to Barnes & Noble? We are in a book called "Think you're the only one" Author Seth Brown Pub 2005 Let me also point out that church of satan was not mentioned in this book and they were quite upest that I was. O well. ISN 666 HS, I was not the original poster of "Margolinian" with over 4,000 members world wide, I have no idea who the original poster was. I was very glad to see it and then disapointed to see it gone the following day. That is why I wrote and posted one. I see you removed it again lol as I wrote before after 7 years we are used to the Church of Satan's religiuos biggotry but we don't let it keep us down. ISN 666

HS, thank you for your help and article. I hope this is an acceptable comprimize. ISN 666

The Satanism article

http://www.abcnews4.com/externalwebsite.hrb?website=http://www.sosatan.org/

Please read the section of the Talk page entitled Sinagogue of Satan before continuing to edit the Satanism article. I really don't want this to become a revert war. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 22:42, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Since you seem to refuse discussion, I have filed for mediation in regards to the Satanism article. My case can be found at this link. In case you are unaware, mediation is an attempt by regular Wikipedia members to resolve a conflict. Basically, some people will try to help us work out how to proceed. It is my hope that we can work this out easily and to everyone's benefit. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 05:37, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SoSatan

Re if it is a vanity page where is the bragging which you have posted all over the place. An article does not need to brag to be vanity - it simply means that it is created by the person to which it relates

I was not the original poster of the article, so your comment is nihl and void. I merely edited it after you Atwon LaGay fans butcherd it!

If you think the article Sinagogue of Satan should exist, please make your case at Deletion review. -- RHaworth 19:23, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/8 01 2006 Satanism

Hello, I'm the cabal mediator and I'd like to hear your side of the story of what's going on at the article Satanism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). There has been an edit war over whether a section you have written should be included. Now I'm not sure yet whether is should or shouldn't, but I have noticed that you are not explaining your edits on the talk page. As you are new here, you don't probably know that only reverting to a disputed version of the page without discussing why on the talk page is generally disapproved of. We have policies such as three-revert rule, which you have come really close to violating and if you do, you can be blocked from editing for up to 24 hours. Please explain why whoever is disputing your edits is wrong in doing so. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to contact me. Thanks. Izehar 10:10, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

One other fact the whole section is a vanity page for church of satan including the philisophical satanism section. Since I am different than anything in the Satanism articles and I pulled the "PHILISOPHICLE CHECKMATE" it makes sense that my artical comes before the "Philisophical section and the rest of this page is an anton lavey worshipping vanity page. I accuse the editors of being Biased, which wikipedia is supposedly against.

If it is a vanity page where is the bragging or vanity? NOR AM I THE ORIGINAL POSTER! Fact Rev. Margolin is supported by the O.T.O. A:.A:., Freemasons, and many satanic groups except church of satan. The reason why church of satan has tried to suppress and destroy Sinagogue of Satan from its start is the fact that it is Based on Aleister Crowley and Albert Pike and has nothing to do with Anton LaVey. CoS went so far as to have some of its members join to find other CoS members in SoS to expell them. Are these the actions of a church that supports freedom of religion, let alone freedom of the individual? You will see SoS does not slander CoS or even discuss them, unlike church of satan's actions against other satanic groups calling them "Pseudo Satanists" . I assume Mikeblas is an Anton LaVey Fan and or a CoS member and is trying to undermine Sinagogue of Satan's existance as CoS has been doing for going on 7 years. The other fact I bring up is SoS does not charge for membership or ask for dues ever from its members. Membership so far is over 4,000 people world wide. CoS now charges $200 for membership. Do The Math 4,000 x $200= $800,000 in lost membership fees. This and the fact we have nothing to do with Anton LaVeys Satanism is the reason CoS wishes to Destroy SoS. I proclaim this dispute as biased! I ask wikipedia to stand by its non biased policies and protect Sinagogue of Satan's inclusion in it's encyclopedia. Thank you for your Time. Rev. Michael S. Margolin P.S. Besides if I wanted to bragg I'd need a few more pages.

That Section You Wanted

Here is the section you wanted, spellchecked to the best of my ability and grammar-corrected:

Hello America,
If you will do me the honor of making me your next President, I promise to take care of domestic policies before granting anymore foreign aid. I also promise to uphold the post at 1/4 the salary of the current President. My agenda is as follows:

  1. Concentrate on domestic affairs before giving anymore foreign aid and reduce the aid that is being given now, so as to first help America's needs.
  2. Cut the pay of all politicians in half and as an act of good faith take a three quarters pay cut to show that I am a President for the people and by the people, not corporations or private enterprises.
  3. I promise to drastically reduce income taxes for family households that make less than $200,000 per year and to abolish taxes for house holds that have an annual income tax of less than $80,000 per year. Furthermore, I will abolish taxes on Social Security payments for households that make less than $40,000 per year. These changes will apply to any private retirement plans as well.
  4. An affordable and efficient healthcare system for all American citizens.
  5. Carefully and calculatingly bring our troops home from Iraq, Afghanistan, and Korea with minimal jeopardy to the goals achieved by their sacrifices.
  6. End all sanctions against Cuba and work toward a long and prosperous friendship with the country.
  7. Improve foreign relations by supporting diversity of culture, belief, and political rule, no matter how much it may differ from our own system, culture and set of beliefs.
  8. Continue to finance space exploration and technologies, general sciences and all aspects of the medical fields so that we may further the standard of living for all American citizens and residents.
  9. Ensure that the federally funded education systems are affordable for students of all ages, and make our education system best in the world.
  10. Create a checks-and-balances system to ensure the American government becomes and remains a government for the people by the people. To begin this process, I will make the office of President only achievable by popular vote, abolishing the electoral college.
  11. Review and repeal sanctions on religions. Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints will have the legal right to be polygamists, as will Muslims and any other religions that allow the practice. Homosexuals will be granted the same marriage rights as heterosexuals. The use of sacraments of all religions shall be protected by federal law, including wine, hashish, marijuana, salvia divinorum, as well as any others.

In conclusion, I'd like to say that I am just as poor as Abraham Lincoln was when he ran for President, but just as hard working. Please do not let my humble beginnings blind you from making this country a better place for all American Citizens.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
Rev. Michael S.Margolin
Baphomet Rex 666
H.P. and founder of the Sinagogue of Satan

CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 15:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU CABHAN YOU SO ROCK!!!!!! But I don't wish to abolish social security payments just the taxes on them lol I have a.d.d. and as you know at 42 I'm still hyper so proof reading is a major chore for me. I'm going to copy paste this to word and correct the SS payments sentance. No worries on more work than what you already have done. I am in your debt. THANK YOU!!!! O and it is not a section for wihipedia it is a letter to America I won't be posting it on wikipedia because I don't see how it can belong here Again thank you and glad I caught that SS sentance before A.A.R.P showed up at my door. I got Visions of Alex from "Clock work orange" being beat up by all those old men.

The sinagogue of satan link still says please don't recreate this section so I guess I'm asking for another favor. Gee I went from fighting with you to depending on your talents, what a world, what a world.

Heh, no problem. I thought it was a little against what you were saying, but I wasn't sure about how best to put it. I did note one more problem that I failed to correct. The phrase "and any other religions that allow the practice" should be "and the followers of any other religions that allow the practice".
As far as the issue with the page still saying "Don't recreate", I have requested that Izehar change that. What may be beneficial is to start working on a page at User:Rev. Michael S. Margolin/Sinagogue of Satan and then, if people complain that the page shouldn't be recreated, you can show them what you intend for the page to be.
As far as the whole fighting thing, I'll admit that I was being a bit harsh in my feelings towards you. I did think that you were just a sort of anonymous vandal, but I'm glad that we managed to get the ordeal over with.

No as you can see I'm not a vandal, just a nutty old man with very big dreams. Again thank you for all your help. R.M.S.M.

Anywho, good luck, and if you need anything, please feel free to contact me on my Talk Page. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 19:37, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sinagogue of Satan

http://www.abcnews4.com/externalwebsite.hrb?website=http://www.sosatan.org/

Hello, about unprotecting Sinagogue of Satan. I agree with Cabhan that you should do make it at User:Rev. Michael S. Margolin/Sinagogue of Satan first. Read our Manual of Style and make sure that your proposal complies with it. When it is ready, leave a note on my talk page letting me know. I'm sure Cabhan would help you with anything, if you asked him. Once it is ready, I'll check it and if it's OK, then I'll unprotect the protected page. Izehar 22:59, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you both I have a wild idea I'll even pay you but I ain't rich so please don't get gready. All the info that I want on "Margolinian" is at http://www.acadine.org/enwiki/w/Sinagogue_of_Satan If you guys make it and I agree on the finished article it will save a shit load of hassles by people that do not see our agreement in the same light. This way the article will conform to all standards because I know you'd make sure they did. And I am very flexible I already understand the titles of the documents will be a problem but very willing to work out renaming them. If you two are not interestedin this I will go ahead and work on a page as you said and present it for aproval. Though I'm a poet/ religious leader I'm sure you can see you'd do a far better job than me. I fix buildings for a living, even unclog a crapper or two but hey I'll try with Jr.'s help. Thank you both for you patience and help. ISN me

I've gone ahead and copied a good bit over, and done some rephrasing and all that jazz. Go and take a look.

Looks good bro, is there a way we can get my 2nd degree cert, letter from Margie Bower, and my Expullsion letter from CoS up? Yes you can Change the names lol Jr was having fun with the guy from Acadine, If you look at the history the guy even wrote we were like CoS. But I was diplomatic and it all went well. If you didn't see the items I'm talking about they are linked to the Ordo templi orientis, LaVey and LaVey's in my page on Acadine. Thank you for all your help seriously. As far as different to me everything is different starting from the source of it all. Mine is from Freemasonery, O.T.O., A:.A:., Golden Dawn, Crowley. And is not based on anything from LaVey's bible. LaVey even called Crowley a child molester, something Crowley was never accused of in life. If you read www.sosatan.org you'd be familiar with "Tune in Turn on Take over" also not part of LaVey's teachings. Also LaVeian boast Eliteism we are not Elitists we are Philanthropists. We are about taking an active role in making society a better, freer place for everyone. I'm more than happy to help you in any way I can and thank you for all your help it is apreciated wheather I can spell it right or not lol Again thank you CABHAN and my point about you guys making leads back you Future edits of CoS members. If you guys make it and there starts to be a revert war again we all know it was made to wikipedia guide lines and with the help of wikipedia admins so if the page has to get locked to protect it at least it will be locked with a page I approve of. I don't know if you read www.sosatan.org or not but if you do I'm sure you'll see the only thing I have in common with LaVey is the freedom of the individual issue but not even that since I practice what I preach.


I would be interested in adding a bit more about the differences with LaVeyan Satanism, such as the social action vs. self-indulgence and belief on atheism. If you don't feel up to adding them in yourself, get me the info somehow, and I'll do it. I can be reached at my Talk Page, or I can be e-mailed from my User Page. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 03:45, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HS Bro look above your paragraph I gave you some very good ones, and if you want you can use anything from my expullsion letter or the other two documents as long as you do not manipulate things. Meaning don't take things out of context or arange things to sway to one side or the other leave reality alone and let people come to their own conclusions. You will also notice that I and my people are placid, the paragraph at the very least says your not discriminating. I would like to add the Margolinian page to a link in the paragraph as we discussed. As far as noteriety issue, did you ask the secret societys who I am? They know, they all know. That quote of old Mordi Shapriro is what he gave Theophony records and is qouted on their site a "Christian" record company I might add. Dave Jones of enochian fame said "Mike Margolin is the best living Poet" notice the person that put up the articale didn't have that quote nor Keneth Angers Quote and Ken and my son pissed off a bunch of yuppies lol he rather talk to my son and made them all wait lol. Unlike LaVey I support freedom of religion and many support me back. Some people don't mind losing a game of chess to me. In ending I'd like very much to see the page made to wikipedia standards and including those documents. And if I was into vanity how come I never once mentioned I'm a famous occult poet? hhhmmm makes me wonder how bout you?

ISN

666

Possible Restoration to Article Namespace

Hi there! Well, since I think this article is significantly better than the former blurb that existed at Sinagogue of Satan, I have posted at Talk:Sinagogue of Satan that in a week, I will contact an admin to possibly restore the article. The week is so that there is time for objections or advice to be posted.

I should also note that I removed the comparisons to LaVeyan Satanism, as I realize that simply because a religion is Satanic does not mean that it must be compared to the CoS.

So yeah. Assuming that the article restoration occurs, I will link the Satanism article to the page right after. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 22:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm still working on it. The admins were unable to do anything, so I took the issue to Deletion Review. The discussion is ongoing at: WP:DRV#Sinagogue of Satan. It doesn't look like the article will be restored, but there is a chance. I would advise you to not post there, as it is often frowned upon for someone involved in the page to offer a vote on it. Anyway, we'll see how that goes. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 00:53, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the undeletion failed. You will see the decision under the section at: WP:DRV#2006 April. The discussion is at: [1].

There's nothing else to be done: sorry. Good luck with your future endeavors. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 16:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What Do You Mean?

I'm curious as to what you mean by saying Wikipedia went back on our agreement. In that the section was taken out of the Satanism article, I discussed that on the talk page there, and it should be back in. I admittedly haven't checked: if it's not there, I'll re-add it now.

As for making a Sinagogue of Satan article, I have done what I can, but the overwhelming feeling was that the Sinagogue of Satan is not notable enough to warrant an article of its own. I presented the same evidence that you did me, including your appearance in the book, as well as the to-be-expected lower Internet visibility of any Satanic organization, but the Wikipedia community decided that it was not enough. They were also put off by the lack of support except for your own website: if you have any other resources that can verify the information in the article, that would help greatly.

You are certainly welcome to try again with an undeletion request, though I do think it is unlikely to work. Wikipedia:Deletion Review. If you do decide to try again, please be sure to follow the appropriate procedure and formatting, as otherwise you are likely to turn opinion against you.

As far as the ACLU comment, there is no civil rights issue here: the Sinagogue of Satan is not being excluded because Wikipedia feels that it should not be included, but rather because it cannot meet the notability and verifiability standards of Wikipedia the community. I believed before, and I still do, that the group is unnotable in Wikipedia's sense of the word: I feel that the only Satanic organizations that are notable and verifiable enough for Wikipedia are the CoS and the Temple of Set, as they have a great deal of 3rd party information about them available, as well as a general awareness of them.


"I feel that the only Satanic organizations that are notable and verifiable enough for Wikipedia are the CoS and the Temple of Set, as they have a great deal of 3rd party information about them available, as well as a general awareness of them." Gee if that is the case why didn't Fcos and a few other orgs that were added to the list after SoS get treated like we did? Can you say BUSTED? Some Wiki editors were and still are biased toward SoS because they are CoS fans if not out right members. I see the groups that use CoS stuff are not hassled at all, gee why is that not a suprize?


Here and thats only 4 pages from google note I did not use any of the wikki and affiliates ones.

Unusual ChurchesThe Sinagogue of Satan is a religion based on the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Free Masonry's definition of Satanism. This religion is not based on those of ... unusualchurches.blogspot.com/2005/01/sinagogue-of-satan.html - 40k - East Los Angeles Chapel of Satan Emporium - Lulu.comHe is also a priest to both the East Los Angeles Chapel of Satan and the SINagogue of Satan. ----- Visit the First Rastafarian Church of Satan's official Sophia Bestiae - The Wisdom of The Beast, US version, Aestheteka ...site - Sinagogue of Satan. The Church of Satan. 10th July, 2006. Here is an unusual tome which sets out to prove that the God of the “Holy” scriptures is ... 

Portal Of EvilSinagogue Of Satan. 05/21/03, 10:05 Society & Culture Occult · 10 Comments Oh, "Baphomet Rex 666" yourself, you crazy metalhead. Rock on with the Dark One!

the League of Satanists"I have known about the Sinagogue of Satan for some time. ... What is the Sinagogue of Satan and What Makes it different from other Satanic organizations ... www.leagueofsatanists.com/revmikeinterview.html - 12k Sinagogue of Satan - Acadine ArchiveThe Sinagogue of Satan is an organization founded by Reverend Michael S . ... The Sinagogue of Satan promotes freedom of religion , and encourages its ... www.acadine.org/enwiki/w/Sinagogue_of_Satan - www.myspace.com/i_am_maggotI am a member of the Sinagogue of Satan and its these people that I feel have truly helped me to where I am today, even if I have never met any by face www.myspace.com/knife420mvMad Satanic ranting by the Ambassador "Knife" Sotelo of The Sinagogue of Satan residing in East Los Angeles, California, Satanic Rap set to psychedelic Houston Satanic CounselA satellite of Sinagogue of Satan. Welcome to The Houston Satanic Counsel. The true name of Satan, the Kabalists say, is that of Yahveh reversed; for Satan ... 

The Star and Scum of SocietyAlso on June 4, 2005, Knife has joined the Sinagogue of Satan where there he would meet the Stars of Society. - Late 2005, Knife has become an Ambassador of

VampireFreaks Cult: Sinagogue_Of_SatanNot Only Is He The High Preist Of The Sinagogue Of Satan. ... Please Note, By Joining The Sinagogue of Satan Cult On Vampire Freaks Does Not In Any Way Make Merry Meet and Welcome to Mystical Village : Sinagogue of SatanSite Logo. Find in. entire site, wiki pages, galleries, images, files, forums, faqs, blogs, blog posts, directory, articles ... Journal CommentsMessenger one night Shadow stumbled on a room titled Sinagogue Of Satan, curiosity willed Matt to enter as he did. As he chatted in that room that night he ... Anti-Satanism: Just another form of bigotry<www.firstchurchofsatan.org>, and the Sinagogue of Satan <www.zoo-gate. fi/~lvythn/sos/>. Research and educational foundations such as the Australian Crystal Dreams Publishing : Sophia Bestiae – The Wisdom of The ...Review by the Sinagogue of Satan. "Well, one good thing about all the exposure this book and the Da Vinci Code has received is that it is exposing people to Synagogue Of SatanWelcome to The Sinagogue of Satan founded on 1-29-99 ... called "Thien Tao; or, The Synagogue of Satan." Cannot be denied nor can we deny ... ... www.latorah.com/links/synagogue-of-satan.html Other theistic Satanism sitesStella Tenebrarum (in Croatia -- excellent site); Sinagogue of Satan; Church of the Fallen - based on the novel The Apocrypha by John A. De Vito. ... www.angelfire.com/ny5/dvera/other.html - 24k YouTube - Aleister Crowley - Masters of Darkness pt 3Sinagogue of Satan? Jesus Christ, at least Discordians are honest about establishing BS orders to stick more letters, numbers, and titles after their names. Browse Music & Audio - Lulu.com - Self Publishing - FreeDescription: Mad Satanic rapping by the Ambassador "Knife" Sotelo of The Sinagogue of Satan residing in East Los Angeles, California, Satanic Rap set to ... satan :: research :: searchSatanic Hysteria Pages · Church of Satan · Snail of Satan · Disciples of Satan · Sinagogue of Satan · Radio Free Satan · Satan Shop ... Open Directory - Society: Religion and Spirituality: Esoteric and ...Sinagogue of Satan - A free church for change. Society of Dark Lily - A modern Satanic society with articles and message boards Organizations: Satanism at Canadian ContentSinagogue of Satan A free church for change . http : / / www . sosatan . org. Church of Pergamos First Church based on Doctrines of Pergamos . ... www.canadiancontent.net/dir/Top/Society/Religion_and_Spirituality/Esoteric_and_Occult/Satanism/Organizations/ - 38k - Supplemental Result - Sun Signs, Astrology, Psychic, Tarot, Satanism, Numerology ...The Sinagogue of Satan is an organization of the religion founded by Reverend Michael S . Margolin based on the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Free Masonry's First Church Of Lucifer - Cult Of CthulhuNamely, the Sect Of Entrance, The Sinagogue Of Satan, and the Satanic Reds, as well as a member of The Cult Of Cthulhu. World of Satan on SquidooAlthough named for Satan, a name associated with evil and temptation, ... Sinagogue of Satan: A religion based on the Ancient and Accepted Rite of Free Seth Brown - Arts DispatchesFrom the Sinagogue of Satan, which hopes to "destroy religion as the world knows it," to the National Association of Left-Handed Golfers and its mission to ... Satanists, Satanism Meetups, events, clubs and groups near Houston ..."im josh im a 23 year old male from houston Tx i have been a member of Sinagogue of Satan for 7 years now www.SOSATAN.ORG". Learn how you could meet Shiatan ... Critisism of Christanity/Marcus - Edot forumsMost satanic beliefs are centered on the mythological being, satan, being the first ... about 70 Christians worldwide are members of the Sinagogue of Satan. Occult and Dark ReligionsSinagogue of Satan *. Spellmaker · Teenage Satanism (Club) · Ymp's Page. WICCA. Circle Sanctuary · Doug's Wicca Page · History of Wicca in England ... www.house-of-pain.com/zombie/darkreligion.html - 10k Theophany Records (reconstruct): The Mad PoetMad Satanic ranting by the Reverend Michael S. Margolin of The Sinagogue of Satan in Mountain View, California, set to psychedelic garage ambient dub. ... invictus alchemyYou can support The Sinagogue of Satan by making a ... http://www.xeper.org/australasia/links.html Temple of Set Australasia: Links ... Satan - Loyal Servant Of God? - ULC Online ForumThe Sinagogue of Satan (IMG:style_emoticons/default/thumbsup(1).gif) ... It seems that everyone has a differing idea of satan and even satanists differ too. About meI considered that both God and Satan were alien beings and that mankind got it ... which were the First Church of Satan and the Sinagogue of Satan for they ... sapp.telepac.pt/marcoagpinto/me.html - 91k Moon And Back Graphics ~ Thrill of DiscoveryOrder of the Nine Angels: An Introduction to Satan www.totse.com - Order of the ... Sinagogue of Satan · Stella Tenebrarum · Syndicate of the Five Points ... www.heart7.net/mc.html - Best of the Web - What's New in Society For 7/10/2006Sinagogue of Satan - Provides details membership, priesthood, satanist, organizations, and information about chat and message board. ...


And one more thing Cabhan, Thank you for all your help. I do apreciate it. I understand you don't run the place and you are up against alot but all this info has been up and we are way more known and popular than alot of the other org.s listed I think even you have to admit after all you've seen some of wikki's editors are mega biased in some areas. And you really can't claim a non biased stance with biased editors, thats been the point I've been trying to show from the start. And your newest add even I've never even heard of nor my cofounder in Finland. But I see since they use Anton's 11 rules that makes it mentionable, even though far more people have heard of SoS. See my point? Anyway thanks for being the only non biased editor in wikkipedia and actually helping SoS I wish there were more of you in Wikki Cabhan. ISN RvMSM





I sympathize in that you cannot have an article of your own, but there really is nothing more I can do. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 03:43, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]


To e-mail me, you just go to User:Cabhan, and in the "toolbox" on the left of the page, click "E-mail this user". -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 03:14, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your Recent Additions to my Talk Page

Hey. You've recently mentioned some stuff on my talk page. First off, the ABC News link that you keep posting is simply a link to your site. There's no interview. I then went to the ABC4 News site, and searched "Sinagogue of Satan", and there isn't anything. Secondly, you asked why we need to compare the SoS with the CoS: I'm not actually sure what you're referring to. Even when I was working on the article for you, we decided to remove that. -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 02:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]


The Satanism Article

Yeah...while I agree with them that the article was a mess, I do disagree with the position that LaVeyan Satanism is the only Satanism: I would prefer to have a general page describing different approaches towards Satanism, with LaVeyan Satanism being its own article. Unfortunately, my original reversion after they began this was shot down, and I really don't care to fight it anymore. Best of luck with your own path, and it was good to work with you despite our conflicts :). -- CABHAN TALK CONTRIBS 05:27, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HS, see I'm only half crazy that comparison is back again lol ISNRev. Michael S. Margolin 23:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC) P.S. thanks for finding the strength to take up the battle again. It is an important issue that goes far beyond just Satanism.[reply]

Just heard of SOS

Hi I have just read about SOS on the theistic satanism page and googled it, it sounds excellent. I also feel from all you've written above that you have a story to tell. I want to see the expulsion letter, etc:) Is all this detailed on the SOS website, I couldn't see it. It sort of edifies the tone of the site not to have it there- but I still want the gossip:) So feel free to add to my talk page or email me. HS, http://www.sosatan.org/picspoke.html ISNRev. Michael S. Margolin 03:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply] 

 I am trying to make the bit about the Joy of Satan encyclopedic in tone- have you heard of them?Merkinsmum 02:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HS, Yes I've heard of them. One of their members joined recently. She is the Chineese Canadian girl that was involved in that run away teen Satanist fiasco. She joined a few weeks ago. ISNRev. Michael S. Margolin 03:57, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Please do not vandalize pages merely because you have a difference of opinion with the person for whom the article is a biography. See also the Wikipedia policy on articles on living persons. Further violations will be reported to Wikipedia administrators. -Lvthn13 04:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? If you are referring to the biography of Nadramia what I added is history, real and supported with documentation. And it was in context as far as trivia which I placed it under. Again your bias shines like a light house on a clear moonless night. You Lvthn13 are the real Vandal, and your own words, actions and bias will show that, even to the blind, deaf and dumb.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 05:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So Lvthn13 can't erase his own trial by his own hand I'm posting it here.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 08:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC) [edit] Vandalism Please do not vandalize pages merely because you have a difference of opinion with the person for whom the article is a biography. See also the Wikipedia policy on articles on living persons. Further violations will be reported to Wikipedia administrators. -Lvthn13 04:59, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism? If you are referring to the biography of Nadramia what I added is history, real and supported with documentation. And it was in context as far as trivia which I placed it under. Again your bias shines like a light house on a clear moonless night. You Lvthn13 are the real Vandal, and your own words, actions and bias will show that, even to the blind, deaf and dumb.Also note that what I posted was not demeaning toward Nadramia at all and if anything was demeaning to myself as the page history will show all the other admins and of course it points out your bias just like your removal of the Stantan LaVey wedding post. I promise to expose you for the bias vandal you are. Rev. Michael S. Margolin 05:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

From Lvthn13 's talk page

Do you suppose your personal opinion is of any relevance to a biography? Or do you suppose I get worked up when silly blowhards threaten to expose me? Get a library card. -Lvthn13 01:37, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

What I posted had nothing to do with personal opinion and everything to do with relative history and facts placed in context. Now stop your pathetic attempts to manipulate reality by spinning the non biased facts presented to the Satanism article including Stantan LaVey's wedding in which I was a guest weather you like that reality, fact and or not Mr. Opinion.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 07:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Why would I care whose wedding you went to, and why are you bothering with this? Do you think you'll convince me of something? -Lvthn13 07:52, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

It was STANTAN LaVey's NOT JUST ANYONES, ANTON'S GRANDSON! AND YOU REMOVED THE POST ABOUT IT!Rev. Michael S. Margolin 07:56, 29 October 2006 (UTC) With Guests, Glen Danzig, Hank Williams 3, Snoop Dog, Dolomite, Marvin Knifer Sotelo, Rev. Michael S. Margolin, Wee Man from Jack Ass and many more including CoS Priests that did not attend CoS's tiny shin dig.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 08:05, 29 October 2006 (UTC)


And? I reiterate, I don't care whose wedding you went to. Why are you wasting your time telling me this? In case you didn't notice, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a message board, I'm an editor, not a gossip hound, and there are no "posts" here to remove. If you think so badly of me, why do you care what I think enough to keep telling me this? Shouldn't you be doing something productive? -Lvthn13 08:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

As with the Nadramia post it is relevent to the subject matter and is not only history but fact. But due to your personal opinion and Bias you edit it out.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 08:08, 29 October 2006 (UTC) Also fact by your own hand as wiki history can back up with it's saved pages. Rev. Michael S. Margolin 08:10, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

And I find interfering with your attempt to manipulate reality through wikipedia very productive.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 08:15, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

How are you interfering with anything except your own free time? I'm still editing pages. But enough of this, it is pathetic and I will remove this from my page shortly to keep from cluttering it with your foolishness. I'm sure you'll accuse me of bias for that as well, which is fine. -Lvthn13 08:27, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

You mean erase the evidence before other admins see you are guilty of personal bias?Rev. Michael S. Margolin 08:31, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lvthn13"

Your edit to Rev. Michael S. Margolin

Your recent edit to Rev. Michael S. Margolin (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:16, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nope wasn't vandalism, I deleated the article about me because I didn't want another lame ass battle.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 05:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I hope you find truth. All I have to say. --Yancyfry jr 04:02, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Truth? who's truth yours? Just as you would call Satan a liar for his truths, I call you a liar for your truths. And that is all I have to say to you christian.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 16:47, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Look, Christians have a view that Satan is stupid & doesn't realize what's going on. I know that Satan knows what's going on & he has a better knowledge of us & the bible than we do. Satan uses his knowledge to decieve us. He wants us to do anything that would get us into the Lake of Fire & suffer with him for all eternity. We would all deserve it. --66.218.18.224 05:18, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is your reality, not mine nor 10 million Budhists, Hindus and Zorastarians. Again when you try to force your belief and or realities on people that don't share your belief and or reality you are commiting the hate crime of religious harassment. If you can not respect the right of others to believe as they will, you should be deported to a country that does not have freedom of religion. A good place for christians is Kuwait, they kill you for being christian there. Now stop trying to undermine the Beauty and Freedom of America with your brand of poison/slavery.Rev. Michael S. Margolin 15:32, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Warning

You keep recreating your article despite a clear consensus for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sinagogue of Satan. Recreating consensus-deleted articles is considere vandalism. In addition, please review WP:COI. User:Zoe|(talk) 23:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rev._Michael_S._Margolin&oldid=90769126"