Talk:Arthropod head problem

A fact from Arthropod head problem appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 July 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that despite over a hundred years of scientific study, fierce debate still rages about how arthropods' heads are constructed?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/July.

Wikipedia

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Arthropods

	Arthropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arthropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of arthropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArthropodsWikipedia:WikiProject ArthropodsTemplate:WikiProject ArthropodsArthropods
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Animal anatomy Mid‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Animal anatomy, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to animal anatomy apart from human anatomy. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Animal anatomy. This project is an offshoot of WikiProject AnimalsAnimal anatomyWikipedia:WikiProject Animal anatomyTemplate:WikiProject Animal anatomyAnimal anatomy
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Diagrams

The fossil evidence and different theories of Cambrian arthropod head segmentation sections could really use some diagrams. --Savant13 (talk) 18:48, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to MADS-box genes in molecular development section

An edit (2, to be precise) by user MartinJ12033 at 07:05, 29 April 2008 and 07:07, 29 April 2008 inserted some language into the section on molecular development which is grammatically incorrect, refers to MADS-box genes - but talks about them in conjunction with sexual expression in plants - and is generally incomprehensible.

I'm not knowledgeable in this area; but since MartinJ12033 appears never to have made any other edits on Wikipedia, I doubt he will be available to ask him what he actually meant. Would anyone object to me changing that section back to its state before that edit? It hasn't changed since MartinJ12033's edit.

The version I can understand: "The arthropod head problem has been tackled in three main ways in this regard, first by using genetic segmental markers to probe the obscure region in front of the mouth, especially in insects; second by looking at Hox gene expression patterns to detect patterns of homology between different arthropods; and third, by studying gene expression in particular features (especially the labrum) to determine its appendiculate or other status."

The version I can't: "The arthropod head problem has been tackled in three main ways in this regard, first by using genetic segmental markers to probe the obscure region in front of the mouth, especially in insects; second by Hox gene, showing evidence of being evovled in the Paleozoic era, have the ability to express patterns of homology between different arthrods. Just as Hox genes express patterns, Mads-box genes have the potential to initiate an important role in the integration of sexual expression time pathways in plants." Third, by studying gene expression in particular features (especially the labrum) to determine its appendiculate or other status." —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peace Makes Plenty (talk • contribs) 12:02, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article is not clear

Although I read it through I couldn't understand what is the "Arthropod head problem" acctually. It should be clear from the first section and it isn't. Idvash (talk) 14:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated

The article is seriously out of date. Most of the references are dated before 2006 (ten years ago now); the main diagram introducing the problem is based on 2004 re-drawing of a 2000 original.

In particular, evidence is pretty conclusive now that there is no such clade as Tracheata – the phylogeny of extant arthropods groups insects with (actually inside) crustaceans, not with myriapods. This alters the nature of the "problem" and in particular any "solution". Peter coxhead (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very Outdated

There have been some recent papers on trilobites in regards to the head problem which could add some valuable information to this page. Also as people have said before, much of the page does not reflect modern cladistic groupings. In the coming days I will begin to update this page with the resources I can find. Reklaw27 (talk) 12:31, 6 september 2017 (UTC)

As you can see from my comment above, I agree that this page needs updating. It's been on my to-do list for some time, so I'll keep an eye on your work. Thanks for undertaking this! Peter coxhead (talk) 08:28, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reklaw27: it will be important to avoid relying on primary research sources for anything other than "X argued that xyz" type statements, as there are many conflicting points of view. Secondary (review) articles would be better, but with recent rapid change, old reviews may be of little use. It might be best to take a historical approach and to say '1900: A argued that abc', '1930: B argued that def', etc. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:13, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Diagram: no legs on thorax of Trilobite?

Do I read this diagram correctly and does it state that Trilobites do not have any appendages on their thorax? I don't have access to Invertebrate zoology, so I can't check the original diagram. BoH (talk) 22:21, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BoH: the diagram is misleadingly labelled, or perhaps more accurately, the terminology used for different groups of arthropods and by different authors is confusing. The non-shading and shading of the segments are exactly as per Ruppert, Fox & Barnes (2004) (which I have). However, their text says "Cephalization, or the development of an anterior tagma (head, cephalon, or cephalothorax) ..." So the unshaded part in the case of trilobitomorphs is, I think, what would be called the "cephalothorax" in other groups (e.g. arachnids). We need to see the original Ax source, which I don't have, to really understand the diagram. Later in Ruppert, Fox & Barnes (2004), they say that trilobites have 4 pairs of legs on their "cephalon", which isn't consistent with the diagram from Ax.

I'm not quite sure what to do about the diagram at present. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:15, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]