User talk:David.moreno72
|
| This is David.moreno72's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
Welcome to Wikipedia, FAQ, Wikiquette, Be nice, and Talk page guidelines.
- Please leave your message at the bottom of this page, for example, by clicking "new section" at the top. Then put new text under the old text.
- If you came here because I reverted your unsourced change, cite your reliable references in the article you edited.
- If you came here because I added a CSD to your page, take your dispute to the talk page of the article.
- If you came here because I reverted your vandalism and you vandalise this page also, you will be reported.
- Please remember that I am not perfect and I do make mistakes.
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
NPR Newsletter No.18
Hello David.moreno72,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
Niharika Kohli, a product manager for the growth team, announced that work is underway in implementing improvements to New Page Patrol as part of the 2019 Community Wishlist and suggests all who are interested watch the project page on meta. Two requested improvements have already been completed. These are:
- Allow filtering by no citations in page curation
- Not having CSD and PRODs automatically marked as reviewed, reflecting current consensus among reviewers and current Twinkle functionality.
- Reliable Sources for NPP
Rosguill has been compiling a list of reliable sources across countries and industries that can be used by new page patrollers to help judge whether an article topic is notable or not. At this point further discussion is needed about if and how this list should be used. Please consider joining the discussion about how this potentially valuable resource should be developed and used.
- Backlog drive coming soon
Look for information on the an upcoming backlog drive in our next newsletter. If you'd like to help plan this drive, join in the discussion on the New Page Patrol talk page.
- News
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
- Discussions of interest
- A request for bot approval for a bot to patrol two kinds of redirects
- There has been a lot discussion about Notability of Academics
- What, if anything, would a SNG for Softball look like
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 7242 Low – 2393 High – 7250
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk) at 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
ZA (Restaurant) Page
Hi David,
I see that you removed by page on Za. Could you elaborate?
Thanks, Chris
ChrisFindon1 (talk) 14:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)
Ken Davis Music Page
I am in the process of constructing a page Ken Davis Music - about the artist and the music. Perhaps I was premature in submitting the page however you rejected it on the basis of not being noteworthy enough for Wikipedia. I wonder if you'd be kind enough to explain. Also, the conflict of interest is not appropriate. I have Known Ken as a fan since his performances in the early 1980s. Because of my experience in online product development (my company developed YesBoookit now part of Expedia) he has engaged my to assist with a Wikipedia page for him. Thanks, Regards Kevin
Hi, Are you able to respond to my query regarding Ken Davis Music not being notable enough for Wikipedia. Can you please explain? Thanks regards Kevin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinbade (talk • contribs) 06:59, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
G D Vashist Page
You had rejected my submission stating it is not important to be included in wiki. To justify my part, G D Vashist is the world’s only Astro- Scientist who combines science with astrology. He spent a lifetime researching in perfecting astrology, correcting its current flaws and come to apt predictions. People believe in him and come to him for life advice. Finally, he is an influencer and does good for society as well by providing jobs and financial aid for the needy. Kindly consider all this and approve my article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkx (talk • contribs) 10:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019
Hello David.moreno72,
- WMF at work on NPP Improvements
More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.
- QUALITY of REVIEWING
Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.
- Backlog
The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.
- Move to draft
NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.
- Notifying users
Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.
- PERM
Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.
- Other news
School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.
Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.
Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thx for warning me. Keith chau yet (talk) 11:47, 19 July 2019 (UTC) |
Rejected Aimsun Page
A few months ago I made an article that was rejected, I received some comments from you about how to correct it to be approved, but I have not received any response since then.
Can you tell me what to do? or what is the next step? Thank you.