Jump to content

Talk:Derek M. Yellon

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Dudewheresmywallet (talk | contribs) at 16:52, 21 August 2019. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Edit request

I would like to update the page from the previous version to the updated one I posted earlier this year. It was rejected but I don't understand why, the information is supported. Grateful for any help.ProfYellon (talk) 08:28, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 10-JUL-2019

  Clarification requested  

  1. Kindly provide a WP:DIFF of the edits along with the reasoning for their implementation.[1]
  2. When ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the {{request edit}} template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes to |ans=no. Thank you!

Regards,  Spintendo  12:18, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "Template:Request edit". Wikipedia. 7 July 2019. Instructions for submitters — #6: "If the rationale for a change is not obvious (particularly for proposed deletions), explain.


Thank you for this information. What I'm trying to do is remove the previous text entirely and replace with refreshed and more robust information and references. This has required a complete revision of the text rather than small edits here and there - we re-structured the information in a more organised manner. Is this possible or are edits just meant to be minor? While the ethos of the article is to highlight Prof Yellon's work and place in the field of cardiovascular research and the revised text retains much of the original article, the format is changed and there are multiple edits as a new piece almost entirely.

Many thanks, Sara ProfYellon (talk) 11:43, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of article

I am nominating this article for deletion. A quick search yields no significant notable information for the subject. There are no significant [1] articles, in books beyond self-authored publications. Similar issue with JSTOR and scholar. The subject is not notable at all where a Wikipedia article is merited. A more significant concern appears to be that this appears to be an article created, either by self or by payment, for (self-)promotion. A review of the article history demonstrates a substantial focus on quarternary sources, e.g., where the subject has been mentioned in isolated sentences or in appendices. Of even more serious concern is that tags highlighting possible COI and concerns of notability to have been summarily removed by this single purpose user.Dudewheresmywallet (talk) 16:45, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]