Talk:Seth Moulton

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

Withdrawn, September 8, 2014, see discussion.
Delete, June 28, 2013, see discussion.

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography: Politics and Government Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

United States: Massachusetts

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

U.S. Congress Start‑class

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been assigned a subject. The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".

New Draft for Seth Moulton

This is a draft for a new page on Seth Moulton. The previous page was deleted due to lack of references and perceived importance (See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Seth_Moulton). I believe this draft satisfies all Wikipedia rules regarding notability, references, and neutral point-of-view. Please feel free to edit or comment on this draft page - I am currently giving the admins responsible for the prior deletion time to comment, but will be posting this to the new page shortly. -Rustavo, 1 September, 2014

Please feel free to join the discussion about this draft at Kudpung's talk page. -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 01:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to mainspace per d/w Kudpung -Rustavo^{Talk/Contribs} 22:16, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Congressional Photo

Are we not able to get his congressional photo for the infobox? Guyb123321 (talk) 19:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see one on his congressional website. But we would be able to use it, if you found it somewhere else. -- Calidum 19:47, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Concern about promotional tone of recent edits

I'm concerned about the promotional tone of recent edits to this article. For example, this recent edit [1] contains a long, self-congratulatory quote by the candidate. The edit summary for the edit is "Add more on his commitment to Veterans." That edit summary and the content of the edit, as well as other recent edits here, leave me concerned that our neutrality policy is not being adhered to. We should be impartial and fact-based, not seeking to show that a politician has a "commitment" to anything in particular. Champaign Supernova (talk) 19:11, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am in agreement that the recent edits by 1077 seem NPOV in nature, however they are also adding new information which is certainly needed. I would suggest the aticle be gone over with a comb to sift out any obvious promotion, but that being said this is an article about a US Rep from MA so someone will probably come along in the near and try to get it up to GA status. And with that being said, a close eye should probably be put on this page, and 1077 be warned if they go from seemingly/implied to blatant promotion. Do you/anyone have any other suggestions? Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 23:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it now seems like 1077 is just blatantly copying info from Moulton's House page and including outright non-neutral wording. Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 04:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes, good catch. I'm going to go through the article today with a fine-toothed comb to make sure it doesn't contain any other copyright violations. Champaign Supernova (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody Should Improve the Bronze Star Part

The article makes it seem like a Bronze Star is a bit more than it is. Now I'm not running down this medal, having one myself, but it also is true that it doesn't take Audie Murphy-esqe actions to earn one even with the "v" device.

2018 anti-Pelosi efforts

Why is there nothing about his 2018 efforts to prevent Pelosi from becoming House speaker? It's by far what he's received the most national news coverage for in recent months... AnonMoos (talk) 18:04, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign policy

The only comment in this article under "Foreign policy" is:

"Moulton opposed sending U.S. troops back to Iraq in 2014."

How lame can you be? Readers of this article deserve to be given a reasonable account of his views on Foreign policy. ---Dagme (talk) 13:53, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]