Jump to content

User talk:AngusWOOF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Benawitan (talk | contribs) at 01:27, 30 August 2019 (→please review youpik again.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Draft:Planète Juniors

This draft can be moved to the article space :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Plan%C3%A8te_Juniors — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.253.250.200 (talk) 12:28, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This is a notable channel, you can find it on internet, I translated all from French page on English langage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.114.166.12 (talk) 10:47, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

196.114.166.12, you need more external news sources that focus on the particular channel and how it is distinct from Planete (TV channel). Otherwise it would merge there as one of its related channels offered. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 12:04, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed a mistake in this draft, plz move it to the article space. I mentionned the channel is a part of Planète Group but the channel is a part of Planète channels.

Example : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan%C3%A8te%2B_Thalassa — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.219.181.200 (talk) 10:30, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

45.219.181.200, fixing which Planete group it is part of doesn't make the channel independently notable from those articles. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 11:47, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I want you move this draft in the article space because I added all about this TV channel. This is a notable TV channel.

https://www.planetecsat.com/planete-n-est-plus-pour-les-juniors/

This site is from the owner of the channel (Canal+ Group). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.114.110.76 (talk) 12:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

196.114.110.76, you're still not showing external news sources evidence that the channel should have a separate article from the network article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Please re-review my draft

Hey,

I have make changes in the draft kindly please recheck it, Draft Abdullah1440 (talk) 21:11, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah1440, saying that Muhammed is the last prophet isn't anything extraordinary, but if he's a celebrity for making predictions on mainstream media and that he's gathered a following like Jeane Dixon or Harold Camping, you should outline his history of famous predictions that made the news and were either confirmed or refuted. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, i made some changes according to your guidance, kindly please check it again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullah1440 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AngusWOOF, I have edited this article to the best of my ability to make it neutral and to provide reliable resources. If there is anything you can edit to improve the article please go ahead. Or if you have any suggestions please let me know. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdullah1440 (talk • contribs)

Abdullah1440, I changed the format for the first reference to Daily Ausaf. Please take a look and update the references appropriately for that one and other Urdu-language links. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:21, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ritesh Agarwal

AngusWOOF A new page was created by COI editor User:Deenos3, who has declared COI on his user page. The new content seems to pass WP:GNG and has WP:RS. I have manually moved content from Ritesh Agarwal (entrepreneur) to Ritesh Agarwal. I am not 100% sure it was done correct and there is also a draft page Draft:Ritesh Agarwal for it. Can you please look into this? Meeanaya (talk) 08:02, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Meeanaya, normally we would use AFCH to process drafts, but since the editor, who may or may not be different from the draft editor, has directly created the page and you moved it from mainspace to mainspace. I would leave the COI tag on unless another editor has neutralized it for self-promotional tone. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritesh Agarwal and remove any claims of notability / awards mentioned there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:44, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF, it seems that someone has pulled Ritesh Agarwal page down again based on 2016 AFD. It seems that they have not reviewed the sources which were indepth. The current page has in-depth sources and sufficient RS to qualify for a Wiki page. Can you please look into this? Even, I was not the page creator however someone has added it on my talk page. I don't have enough experience or really not sure what can be done, but yes I truly believe, he is one of the most notable entrepreneur in the country. Meeanaya (talk) 04:46, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Meeanaya, I would merge it into the Oyo Rooms article. A lot of Agarwal's life can go into that since that's his main business. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:44, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF, I have just filed an undeletion request here. Meeanaya (talk) 05:48, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Meeanaya, it's now being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ritesh Agarwal (2nd nomination) AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:36, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
AngusWOOF, I have added my detailed review and why he is notable and deserves a page at AFD. I won't be voting anywhere with a default mindset but yes after a detailed review. Meeanaya (talk) 04:24, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Meeanaya, it's in mainspace now, so you can trim his sources to just the quality external secondary sources now. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:59, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:TemplateMonster

Hi, I re-wrote the article in order to make it more neutral and connected the links. Could you please have a look? Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:TemplateMonster

Desquark, there are still a pile of links at the bottom that aren't connected to the article. Also how you are citing the references needs to be cleaned up. Do you have some articles that are independent of the subject but cover it in detail beyond the press releases / general acquisition news? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:39, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AngusWOOF Thanks, I made the History section more readable, added extra facts, connected all the links and removed some of them. Also, added the Criticism section. Desquark (talk) 12:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cradle draft

Hey! I noticed that on my draft, you commented it had too much extra information, and I was wondering if you could elaborate on which parts I should remove/cut down or are not needed. Thanks! Purreader (talk) 18:48, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Purreader, the main thing is that you need to find book reviews for the series from notable sites and journals such as Publishers Weekly, School Library Journal, New York Times and Kirkus. As for what to trim down, I would remove the Magic system part as that reads like gamecruft. The summaries should be shortened to film length (less than 700 words, preferably 400). It should not be a copy of the text on Wikia, even though Wikias are freely licensed, there is concern it may have copy-pasted someone else's summary and review. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 20:35, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, maybe I should have asked about this first... it's a self-published book, and although it's very well-known and popular on the Kindle Store and in the fantasy world, it is not listed on the websites you mentioned because it does not have a publisher. I have found other reviews and interviews, but they are not on as well-known sites. Is it still eligible, or should I cut my losses and go? (I didn't copy anything from the wiki, just linked it for people to read more) Purreader (talk) 08:49, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Purreader, see the notability for books. WP:NBOOK They usually qualify by those magazine/journal/newspaper reviews I mentioned. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:55, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I checked and the only way this particular series would qualify is by the reviews. It is quite commonly reviewed, just not by sources as well-known as the ones you mentioned. Would that be enough? Purreader (talk) 15:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-review my draft

Hey AngusWOOF, I have edited this article/draft to the best of my ability to make it neutral and to provide reliable resources. If there is anything you can edit to improve the article please go ahead. Or if you have any suggestions please let me know. Thank you.

Please see the comments on Draft:Muhammad Qasim ibn Abdul Karim. I need all the non-English references to be clarified as shown in the first reference. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:31, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review still in process?

Hi AngusWoof

We finished editing this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nora_Herting on April 30 but there hasn't been any approval/decline status update. Any thing I should do at this point? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhashiva (talk • contribs) 14:40, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Rhashiva, what's with the "we"? Are you representing Herting's organization? If so, you need to declare COI. WP:COI AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:29, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rhashiva, any AFC reviewer can take a look. It doesn't have to be me. Hopefully they can get around to it. I'm still a bit suspicious about news articles where it's coming partly from a primary source such as the SXSW organization itself. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:30, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Rhashiva, please disclose whether you are connected to Herting or her organization/company in any way. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:44, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Full Intention discography

Hi AngusWOOF,

I didn't find a reliable source other than discogs for their 2006 album (connected 10 years). So I think that we can remove it and it will be OK. Don't you think so ?

And yes, Hustlers Convention is an alias for the same music duo. We could combine the two articles.

Regards,

Saunderson Anreef (talk) 18:52, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Saunderson Anreef, I would leave out any albums that aren't covered by reliable sources and only keep ones where it's discussed. If there's some biography detail saying this is Hustlers Convention's second studio album, then it's okay to list those. I also agree with combining Hustlers Convention to the Full Intention article and to include a section on Hustlers Convention there. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Saunderson Anreef, I have redirect Hustlers Convention to the Full Intention article. Please help develop the bio there so it discusses both. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:50, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Planète Rap

I created this page with English translation. I added websites from the French Wikipedia page.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan%C3%A8te_Rap

Why you declined it ?

196.114.110.76, same issue as Planete Juniors. You need external news sources evidence that the channel should have a separate article from the network article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:28, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://skyrock.fm/news/l-interview-planete-rap-de-damso/5320

This site is an interview of Damso at Planète Rap. Can be insert it on the draft ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.122.27.71 (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

196.122.27.71, you can add interviews, but it really needs more secondary news sources (non-interviews) to show notability. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.raprnb.com/tag/planete-rap/

This website mentionnate all news and interviews to show is a notable article. It can be added on the draft ?

(the website is in French language) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.218.255.139 (talk) 11:16, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

45.218.255.139, it is not clear that Raprnb is a reliable news source. Can you find more external news sources? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I found all websites about this radio programm. Can you sumbit it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.218.139.138 (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 19:12:53, 12 August 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by Milan von Brunn


Thank you for your write up

I will edit as per your suggestion and Wikipedia guidelines

As far as the "this is not a biography" - we have read dozens of similar Wikipedia entries before we wrote our entry. All entries of athletes, artists, or people in general, are written as biography-like structure ( a.i. Early Life, Education, Career, Family, Personal life, etc ). In fact we have copied one Code structure from existing Wikipedia page, edited out the info, and added our information. So not sure how we will proceed with description of Artist's life, and avoid to write details about Artist's life.

We will continue with editing our entry Thank you very much ! Milan von Brunn (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Milan von Brunn, as it stands, it reads like a resume. There is no biography section, just a list of his works. If you're going to write up a biography, it needs to be different from his official website ones and it should be cited to external news sources independent of the subject. See WP:NOTRESUME and WP:CREATIVE. Also since your username is the same as the artist, you need to declare your conflict of interest up front and read through WP:COI. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:18, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Alameda Council

Thanks for looking at the draft. I'm perplexed. The article has existed for six years. Someone moved it from the article space and too the draft space. It may be a short article, but it has enough citations to be notable. It is a 100 year old non-profit. In any case, I simply would like to see it moved back to article status. Thanks. --evrik (talk) 22:38, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You can talk to QueerEcofeminist about it? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 22:43, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm attempting a CSD of the redirect and if it goes through then I can move it back. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
evrik, it's been moved back to mainspace. Thanks again for fixing it up. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

pursuing afd

Hi Angus, can you help me pursue AFD on this article The Rules of Survival, thank you so much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.69.245.1 (talk) 09:26, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

126.69.245.1, I don't think there's enough to AFD this. See the talk page for that article. I just added a bunch of references that could be included. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik added various sources of citations to back-up the trend of social e-commerce which is trending now

please review youpik again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik

i have furnished more information

please review youpik again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talk • contribs) 11:24, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benawitan, it still reads like an advertisement for the company. Please rewrite and provide other sources besides the website. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 14:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


updated again https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Youpik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benawitan (talk • contribs) 05:38, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Benawitan, this was deleted for being too promotional / advertising. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 15:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 14:41:33, 14 August 2019 for assistance on AfC submission by AlishaTurner


Hello, I made the changes asked for and submitted better cite sources. Can you please review https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Jermaine_Carter and see if it meets criteria now. Thanks --AlishaTurner (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2019 (UTC)AlishaTurner[reply]


AlishaTurner, it still needs better sources. A lot of the ones presented are either non-notable blogs, or brief announcements. WP:ROUTINE. Please find more in-depth ones that are coming from external reliable news sources. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:29, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alameda Council confusion

Hi, I saw you marked Alameda Council for speedy so Draft:Alameda Council could be moved to mainspace, but you also declined Draft:Alameda Council at AFC, so I'm rather confused. If Draft:Alameda Council is not ready for mainspace I don't want to delete the redirect at Alameda Council, because it seems like a good redirect. Is Draft:Alameda Council ready to be moved? If so let me know and I'll take care of it. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 17:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ONUnicorn, the revised one is good to go. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I deleted the redirect and moved the article. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 20:02, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
ONUnicorn, that's great. Thanks again! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:39, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

National Democratic Training Committee

Hey AngusWoof! I've made some edits to my draft since the last time you looked at it. Do you mind taking another look and seeing what else we can do to put it in a place to be approved? --Jacobvurpillat (talk) 22:47, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jacobvurpillat, I'm still not seeing a balanced tone on the reception. So it was criticized, but by whom, when, and how? AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 23:05, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jacobvurpillat, I've gone ahead and accepted the article, but am leaving the COI tag on there until another editor can scrub it for neutrality. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:48, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 --Guy Macon (talk) 01:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Zero issues with your edits. I am just hitting everyone on the Jenny McCarthy page that hasn't received a pseudoscience and fringe science discretionary sanctions alert in the last year) --Guy Macon (talk) 01:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Guy Macon, can you add an editnotice on the talk page for Jenny McCarthy? There's nothing on that page that suggests that it is under DS. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:46, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Good suggestion. --Guy Macon (talk) 18:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unacademy company promotion article

Hello AngusWOOF, As my article "fabgrades" was removed on july 30, I have something to say about it. Firstly , I had no intention of misusing wikipedia through promoting my company through wikipedia. I had created the page on wikipedia because I found a page of similar company on wikipedia. here is the link :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unacademy , This company offers paid courses and charges its users . You can see the warning notices on the wikipedia article of unacademy . as the content is promotional . I donot charge for any service . Whwn my page is considered promotional(although all of my content is free and educational) then please have a look at other companies like unacademy who are promotng thier business through wikipedia even after wikipedia has issued notices to them. Copy of notices to unacademy: This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) Dollar sign in circle cleaned (PD version).svg This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies. (March 2018) Details of removal of my page. Your submission at Articles for creation: FabGrades (July 30) AFC-Logo Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were: This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read 'What Wikipedia is not' for more information. 

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a web host for your company. It does not need detailed syllabus of your course offerings. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FabGrades and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:FabGrades, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted. If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:16, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by OpenSourceLearningIndia (talk • contribs) 10:36, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Are you questioning whether Unacademy is notable? You could tag that for notability or raise an AFD on it. The article has the COI paid tag on it and can't be removed until the article is neutralized by someone unconnected to the subject. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@OpenSourceLearningIndia: I would not have seen this discussion if your inclusion of a bare db-g7 template in a copy of AngusWOOF's message to you had not put this whole user talk page into Category:Candidates for speedy deletion by user yesterday. Now that I've seen your article about your company, which was deservedly deleted per {{db-g11}} as a blatant advertisement of your company's services, and compared that to the Unacademy article, there is, as the saying goes, no comparison. The Unacademy page is nearly encyclopedic, meaning suitable for an encyclopedia, with several citations of reliable sources. It is not a business listing by any stretch of the imagination. – Athaenara ✉ 00:41, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article Name for S7000A

@AngusWOOF Thanks for the name change, but should it go back to "S7000A (tax law)"?

The reason I added the part about New York State is that many people do not know the bill names.

But it is in the New York State taxation category, so maybe that will help.

Ryozzo (talk) 17:22, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ryozzo, until there's another S7000A somewhere, I believe it should be primary topic. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:26, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

can i add this image to your user page[1]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nathanael raymaine gentles (talk • contribs)

BarnSakura

References

  1. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Barnstars#Topical_barnstars. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Why was my article declined?

Hi.

A few months ago you rejected an article that I submitted, called “List of largest Cities in the UK”. At the time I was told that my article was too similar to other articles so it was not worth publishing.

However, a few weeks ago, another article, “List of cities and towns in the United Kingdom by population“, which had almost the exact same, or very similar at the least, was accepted and submitted. I was very annoyed when I found that article, and I want to know why mine was declined but that article was accepted.

I don’t know who accepted the article, so I am not blaming anyone in particular, but I would wish to know why my article was rejected but a similar one accepted, especially as I spent ages on the article.

I would appreciate it if you found out why and responded.

TheKnowledgeMaster1738 (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

TheKnowledgeMaster1738, I will try a CSD first and then a histmerge with your draft if it is retained. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:56, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
TheKnowledgeMaster1738, that article had bypassed the AFC process and was placed directly in the mainspace. I had it removed by CSD and per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of cities and towns in the United Kingdom by population. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:50, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commonspoly citation update

Hi @AngusWOOF,

My article was declined for insufficient citations. I have added a few more third party citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123survesh (talk • contribs) 09:33, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was searching online for reliable sources, I could only find blogs, mostly of people inviting other people to play the actual game and talking about it. I couldn't find any news paper level publishing. Do see if the ones that I found hold good, I think they are from reputable resources. The alternative UK The P2P Foundation's blog A blog by Waag.org

I thought that a commons game like this should have its own page on wikipedia. I do understand that wikipedia is a public knowledge portal and doesn't work based on individual likes and dislikes. So if the above citations are not good enough I understand the situation and I will just add it as an alternative to monopoly as suggested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123survesh (talk • contribs) 09:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

123survesh, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources and WP:RSP on what sources are good. Blogs are usually not reliable, especially forum posts, but sometimes the authors of the blogs are reliable / notable, and sometimes it's one by the primary source. The variants page would be a good place for the game. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 13:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lightricks

Wondering if you would be able to review this page. You actually made an edit to it after it was submitted for review. It was submitted 2 weeks ago and is still waiting. If not, fair enough. I understand. Thanks. MaskedSinger (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if you saw this. Know there are over 4,500 pages awaiting review but this was has received work from a senior editor so is now in a much better position to be reviewed. Frustrating as it was rejected extremely quickly but now that it's good to go, it's just sitting there. MaskedSinger (talk) 18:34, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"VS Joy" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect VS Joy. Since you had some involvement with the VS Joy redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:48, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Lucille Lortel Award for Outstanding Projection Design


Hi AngusWOOF

This is the second time and second editor to decline this article. While I agree that the subject may not in and of itself be worthy of its own article when viewed in a vacuum, if one looks at the larger context of how entertainment industry award wikipedia pages are structured, I believe it makes sense.

In most of the various award pages one can't find sources specifically for individual award categories. If there were, I would have included them. Having said that, Lucille Lortel Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Play is of similar import and yet has its own page. The Lucille Lortel Awards award have been around for 33 years and currently has 20 categories. Clearly when all these categories are fleshed out, the main page would become unwieldy.

Including everything in the main award page is not scalable and does not in fact seem to be standard operating procedure for wikipedia awards entries

Check out the Drama Desk Award for Outstanding Lyrics, the Academy Award for Best Sound Mixing or the Tony Award for Best Choreography. They too are without sources specific to the exact topic and yeah all of these awards have individual pages for each award category.

If you still disagree, is there a path for review by a larger group of editors?

Thanks for your consideration.

148.75.165.78 (talk) 04:37, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

148.75.165.78, as discussed on your talk page, the award isn't independently notable from the collection of awards. Please provide sources otherwise. You can also discuss whether they should be split at the awards talk page. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Maxwell D Draft article -

Hi Angus,

would appreciate some guidance here as you have declined the article. I have spent some considerable time getting collecting the other reference points for this internationally famous Rap/Grime artist who has not only charted but collaberated with Ruwanga on a regular basis on hollywood and net flix movie sound tracks. he is also acknowlaged as one of the founders of the UK Grime scene and is discussed in 3 respected books on the subject. all of which i have referenced.

I am at a loss to understand what else is neaded as there are many less notible entries on the wiki - appreciate your advice and help.

many thanks Nick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nplpod (talk • contribs) 17:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nick, can you list WP:THREE sources to show that the artist meets WP:MUSICBIO? Having stream counts on Spotify does not establish any notability. Same with goodreads. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:08, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Naijapals

Hello, I noticed you haven't approved the articles I started on Naijapals due to insufficient references, which is understandable. However, I need to point out that collation of references for Nigerian music sites is very tedious and difficult due to the manner which these kind of activities are covered in Nigeria. This perhaps is also the reason why most entries in "Nigerian Music Websites" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Nigerian_music_websites are not heavily referenced. One the standard of notability, Naijapals should at least have an entry that can be built upon, as it is more significant than the entries on currently in the Nigerian Music Websites category, giving its age, footprint and overall coverage. The references that I used in the article are also independent and very reliable, example is IT realms, which is published by a Not-For-Profit writer, Remmy Nweke - https://icannwiki.org/Remmy_Nweke and other source at Hiphophead.ng. Generally, I believe the type of coverage on this subject might not bear too much online links, but is extremely significant that lack of it will represent an important knowledge gap that is required to be available on Wiki.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AngusWOOF&oldid=913121506"