Talk:Final Fantasy XV

Versus is a latin phrase

Yeah... Unlike "Aeris" or perhapth "Aerith", Versus is a word that exists in English, and in English it means opposed to... I know the FF creators were all into opera and knew a bit of latin, but I doubt they were that deep to name it versus because they were changing the direction of the series... I could be wrong, though... I was wrong one other time.WhateverTS 01:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Trailer?

The article says "image from the trailer". There haven't been no FFV13 trailer if i recall...

Well you recall wrong then— Preceding unsigned comment added by Big Boss Inc. (talk • contribs)

It hasn't been leaked to the internet yet.—ウルタプ 13:52, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

But the picture that is shown on the page is actually a screenshot; whether there is a trailer or not, that picture itself is from one of the many pictures that were released during E3.

And it's a screenshot of trailer.--Claude 07:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

The real question, I think, is where can we see the trailer online? It looks to be as gorgeous as the main Final Fantasy XIII and many want to see it. If it's not on the internet then we'll just have to wait for it. This in no way means the trailer doesn't exist.(SilverFalcon 18:18, 2 December 2006 (UTC))

Completion

There has been much dispute as to whether the game's completion is 1 or 1.3%. This only confuses the people and so I think that it should either not be included in the page, or say something like, it is arguable whether the game's completion is 1 or 1.3%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerguy1039 (talk • contribs)

I think no one cares enough for it to be included. Obviously, in a few weeks, that figure will change and it's not necessary to be reported every time it's mentioned. The final article after the game is released won't have anything of the sort, so why should it now? Axem Titanium 19:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Axem, it's really not that big of a deal so it might as well just not be included in it, but some people might want to know so it might be a good idea to put it's maybe 1.15% complete, that way it's an inbetween. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.128.249 (talk • contribs)

Wow, that's even worse. It shouldn't be included at all since it is basically pointless info. It's at 1% completion. So what? Knowing how far a game is to completion doesn't help anybody because they can't do anything about it. Axem Titanium 21:01, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually the game's completion is at 1.3%, not 1%. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerguy1039 (talk • contribs)

As I said: NO ONE CARES. It's not notable enough for inclusion, especially since it's changing as we speak. Axem Titanium 03:06, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Well Axem if it's not notable then just delete it from the page, otherwise stop complaining. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soccerguy1039 (talk • contribs)

Then stop adding it! Seriously, you're the one who's adding it constantly, not me. I've been removing it each time. Axem Titanium 22:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Have you forgotten that I said the completion is 1.3%, why would I put 1% if I know that's wrong? My account's not old enough for me to be able to remove it, so if you just delete it then I wont care.

AH SOMEBODY JUST GET RID OF IT! I'm so tired of hearing about it, and by now the percents pretty different so it doesn't even make a difference anymore.

I'll tell you what Axem, if you just get rid of it I'll leave the Fabula Nova Crystallis page alone, but if you don't then I'll continue adding to it.

Get rid of what? Many editors have been getting rid of your stupid 1.3% thing over the past few days but you keep adding it for some reason. Axem Titanium 03:57, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

That's what I'm talking about, if you get rid of the 1% on this page, then I'll stop adding that stuff on the Fabula Nova Crystallis page.

It's gone. Are you happy now? Now please either go away or make some constructive additions to Wikipedia rather than vandalising pages with false information. Axem Titanium 04:14, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

Yes I am happy, and it's not called vandalism when you're adding factual information, but I will leave the Fabula Nova Crystallis page alone as agreed, as long as the 1% stays off this page.

Which is why it's factual, and not vandalism.--Claude 05:09, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I've request Unprotection for the pages, now that you have agreed to stop editing. Just out of interest - how do you know it's 13% / 1.3%? Don't just quote FF Insider, actually tell us how you know so (given that in the photo it says 3% / 1%). SynergyBlades 17:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

I know that it's at the completions I've stated multiple times because I've checked several websites, and just stated the one I know best since the others I'd never used before. And that's why the information is factual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.57.145 (talk • contribs)

Then you have to cite the source (something you should have learned in middle school so as to prevent plagiarism). Since you didn't cite any sources, it is original research. Also, FFI is not a reliable source and therefore cannot be cited. Axem Titanium 04:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Well every bit of info I've ever looked up on FFI has been correct, plus there were 2 or 3 other sources that said the same completions. And my middle school didn't make us cite any sources since they had a good web searcher to check if you just downloaded the paper.

Doesn't matter. FFI has no authority on the subject matter of FFXIII's completion. There are two completion percentages floating around the internet, and neither one of them are official or confirmed in any shape or form.--Claude 08:45, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Actually it does matter, FFI is reliable, so shut up.

How about no, not reliable, so shut up.--Claude 06:42, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

It's very reliable, there's a reason that wikipedia is known as not very reliable among gamers you know, so you're the unreliable one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.57.145 (talk • contribs)

Shut up, it doesn't matter and this arguments pointless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.57.145 (talk • contribs)

If the argument is pointless, then why continue arguing about it and deleting people's posts? Just let it rest, kid. EvilReborn 22:25, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not in on the argument, I just got in and said something to shut them up cause they're being retarded, and that was the first time I deleted any posts, I can't let racist comments be up in our discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.120.57.145 (talk • contribs)

That's 8 deletions. And "racist comments" too now, eh? Even though there were none as I've checked every edit. Somebody pass me the popcorn, this kid's hilarious. :) SynergyBlades 00:19, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

SynergyBlades: don't expect your comments to stay around too long. Every day this kid deletes ones he doesn't like. And "OMG ADD THE PERCENTAGE YOU n00bZ" kid: deal with it. There are no official numbers on the completion. If everyone who reads the FF Versus XIII article doesn't know it's at 3% or 13% or 1.3% or whatever they report, nobody cares. It's a difference of a couple of months, tops and that's way in the future. And while you're at it, try learning some correct grammar—"up in our discussion page" isn't. EvilReborn 02:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Why don't you tell us what somebody said that was racist? I didn't see anything either.

Oh and Synergy I'm pretty sure those were my deletions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.174.128.249 (talk • contribs)

I'll give you a hint about what he said that was racist, I'm left handed.