Talk:Christ the King Statue, Świebodzin

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Catholicism Low‑importance

Christ the King Statue, Świebodzin is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Visual arts: Public art

	Visual arts portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
	This article is supported by the public art task force.

total height unclear from sources

The sources at the moment seem to give 33m for the statue itself, and Przekroj gives 2m for the crown. But the crown overlaps with the statue, so we can only guess a total height of e.g. 34m. Also, List_of_statues_by_height typically comments on the total height including the pedestal. Boud (talk) 10:42, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable as to whether the crown is part of the statue at all: it is made separately of a different material, and it more an additional element of the total structure than part of the structure. If the people who maintain the Cochabamba construction were to weld a tall shepherd's crook onto one of the hands, could that make it taller again? Kevin McE (talk) 11:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I sourced some numbers, some of them are contradictory. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:31, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Photo Needed

Full size photo is needed of finished statue. More information on its history and construction are also needed. 76.28.77.142 (talk) 23:50, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Maybe next time I'll get there while the sun is still shining. ProhibitOnions ^(T) 13:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Art Deco?

Which source describes this statue's style as Art Deco? I can't read the Polish sources and the Irish source is behind a paywall. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have big doubts about it. I don't think the author knows what art déco is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A01:E35:8A8D:FE80:457E:35E8:9317:1769 (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the reference to Art Deco from the article. 84.81.186.138 (talk) 21:04, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Christ the King (Świebodzin). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://przekroj.pl/cywilizacja_otworz_artykul,3984,0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Biggest jesus statue" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Biggest jesus statue. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]