Jump to content

Talk:Gauge fixing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 148.78.243.122 (talk) at 15:31, 3 December 2006 (Questions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconPhysics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Would not a more accurate nomenclature be (divA = 0) for the Coulomb gauge and (divA = 0 together with scalar potential = 0) for the radiation gauge? The radiation gauge, which is used in perturbative calculations, is just the Coulomb gauge in the absence of charge and describes the free electromagnetic field. The Coulomb gauge, in the presence of charge and accordingly with non-zero scalar potential, is used in quantum chemistry. Xxanthippe 09:28, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good reference for gauge-fixing in context of Maxwell's equations.

Hi, I think this reference does a good job in explaining the concepts, at least for maxwell's equations. http://www.mathematik.tu-darmstadt.de/~bruhn/Maxwell-Theory.html

Questions for introduction paragraph

What is meant by "redundant degree of freedom"

What is an "equivalence class"

What is "configuration space"

What calculations do gauge fixing simplify? What calculations don't gauge fixing simplify?

And if you could settle an argument for me, is gauge fixing compatible with the Lorentz Transformations?