Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov (2nd nomination)

Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov
• Articles for deletion/Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Ahmadiyya Jabrayilov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This page has already been deleted from the Russian and French Wikipedias, and this article has been tagged as a possible hoax for over a year. Therefore, a discussion is necessary to decide whether it is really a hoax that needs to be deleted. Clearly, there are serious concerns about the verifiability of many aspects of his biography that need to be addressed, as this article itself states in its "Criticism of biographies" section. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:44, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: in some sense this is just a procedural nomination, given my lack of familiarity with the sources on which this article is based, as well as my lack of a firm position on whether this article should be deleted or not. In other words, in creating this AFD, my main goal is to provide a venue for other editors who understand this issue much better than I do to discuss whether WP:V and other relevant guidelines are adequately met in regards to this biography. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (talk) 20:46, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

• Keep per previous nomination, nothing has changed since then. The criticism is largely based on WP:OR, particularly an e-mail correspondence with archives and related self-made conclusions. A reliable published secondary source analyzing the validity of claims is required to reach definite conclusions. Brandmeister^talk 09:15, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
• Keep. If this person did exist then he was a notable person, and if not he was a notable fictional character. Phil Bridger (talk) 09:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)