User talk:24.183.100.99

Your edit to Diana Ross Playground

Your recent edit to Diana Ross Playground (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 06:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Diana Ross. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 06:34, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I did not revert your contribution to Diana Ross Playground. However, I did revert Diana Ross, because I failed to see a connection between Diana Ross' 1999 incident and something with Clay Aiken in 2006, especially with absolutely no transition. This entirely random fact was put in the middle of the paragraph with no explanation, and that's why I tagged it as vandalism. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 23:39, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I do not see how you can fail to notice the relevance: Ross's action was thought to be amusing and was well-accepted by all, clay's was not. Obvoiusly Ross had committed the more greivous of invasions to personal space, and such incidents are often noted by historical incidents of great similarity, as someone reading the article specifically for the incident in question would be given relevant knowledge and further ideas for research by the reference, as well as historical context being applied to the situation in question. This mention may be parenthetical in nautre, but I assure you it is legitimate.

---