Talk:Chera dynasty

	; Archives (Index) ;
	1;
	This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Template:Vital article

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tamil civilization (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tamil civilization, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Tamil civilizationWikipedia:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTemplate:WikiProject Tamil civilizationTamil civilization articles

Dravidian civilizations (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dravidian civilizations, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dravidian civilizationsWikipedia:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsTemplate:WikiProject Dravidian civilizationsDravidian civilizations articles

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

India: Kerala / Tamil Nadu / History B‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Map of Chera Kingdom.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheras Did Not Speak Tamil, But an early form of Malayalam called Tamizh

The language spoken in Chera empire was an ancient form of Malayalam, called Tamizh. It is not Tamil language spoken in Pandia and Chola regions. Malayalam is classical.^[1]

If there is any proof that one of the earliest documents in Malayalam language is from 1200 years ago, it should have been produced in the court. Madras High Court has rejected such baseless claims.

Edit wars with ideologically motivated people are not fruitful. I am too young to do that. Can somebody please help clean up the article. Judgements from Indian judiciary and decisions by the Indian Union Cabinet should be given more weightage than random articles by someone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.248.141.21 (talk) 20:25, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://indiankanoon.org/doc/24294042/

Scholarly books, not "judgements from Indian judiciary and decisions by the Indian Union Cabinet", are reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. Not to mention that the Madras High Court judgment cited by you doesn't even mention the Cheras. utcursch | talk 21:52, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Probably OP was just mentioning that Malayalam (hopefully I spelled it right) is old enough that the first documents where much older than 1200 years old.

I think that the argument by the OP is valid. Judgments from courts are to be considered valid. The judgments are done with all these arguments and evidences being taken into consideration. Wikipedia does not have any official policy stating that Indian judicial declarations are not scholarly. As a person who likes Indology, currently in USA, I can vouch for the fact that in my field (Sinology) considers court judgments valid.

谷歌翻译 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.226.235.112 (talk) 19:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tajuddin

User:StephenPaa, we can discuss here.--79.75.58.80 (talk) 11:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. StephenPaa (talk) 11:59, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://indiankanoon.org/doc/24294042/

[1]