User:Ched/Arbcom
My page to deal with all things Arbcom:
Considerations
- WP:FRAM
- Eric Corbett Ban
- Ritchie IBAN
My Scorecard
I may be building a table over the next few days to make this more readable.
ACE 2019
Candidates for 2020 term
- 01 Thryduulf - Have disagreed in past but I believe him to be compassionate, intelligent and also have the best interests in the project at heart. likely full support.
- 02 Casliber - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 03 Newyorkbrad - Absolute support, no questions asked. (728 edits)
- 04 Lord Roem - considered them a hat collector in the past .. will think on it though as they should be aware of what's entailed.
- 05 SoWhy - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 07 Richwales - Will have to look into this
- 08 Bradv - doubtful
- 09 Gadfium - very likely support
- 10 Worm That Turned - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 11 Barkeep49 - may be the best "new blood" I could think of - likely support.
- 12 Xeno - strong support
- 13 KrakatoaKatie - statement comes across as condescending and lecturing - will have to research. (613 edits)
- 14 Beeblebrox - likely support (questionable actions recently)
- 15 Llywrch - strong support
- 16 David Fuchs - very likely support (1463 edits)
- 17 Maxim - likely strong support
- 18 Kudpung - I'll have to think on this. I like Kudpung a LOT, but some disagreements with GW crossed the line IMO.
- 19 Enterprisey - Good tech skills, will have to research
- 20 DGG - Often has an alternative and different point of view. Well schooled in deletion protocol and standards.
Candidates for 2020 term
- 01 Newyorkbrad - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 02 Casliber - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 03 Worm That Turned - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 04 Gadfium - very likely support
- 05 Xeno - strong support
- 06 KrakatoaKatie - statement comes across as condescending and lecturing - will have to research. (613 edits)
- 07 David Fuchs - very likely support (1463 edits)
- 08 Enterprisey - Good tech skills, will have to research
- 09 Maxim - likely strong support
- 10 SoWhy - Absolute support, no questions asked.
- 11 Llywrch - strong support
- 12 Barkeep49 - may be the best "new blood" I could think of - likely support.
- 13
- 14 Beeblebrox - likely support (questionable actions recently)
- 15 Bradv - doubtful
- 16
- 17 Richwales - Will have to look into this
- 18 Kudpung - I'll have to think on this. I like Kudpung a LOT, but some disagreements with GW crossed the line IMO.
- 19 Thryduulf - Have disagreed in past but I believe him to be compassionate, intelligent and also have the best interests in the project at heart. likely full support.
- 20 DGG - Often has an alternative and different point of view. Well schooled in deletion protocol and standards.
- 17
- 17
- 17 Maxim - likely strong support
non-admin:
- 21 Isarra - appears to be a joke nom: note: This is NOT User:Isaacl (who I likely would support)
- 22 Calidum - Will have to look into this
- 23 Hawkeye7 - Need to think on this - getting deadmined is a lot to overcome (4817 edits)
- 24 The Rambling Man - Need to think on this - getting deadmined is a lot to overcome
withdrawn:
- GeneralPoxter
- Fish and karate - need to research - but likely support if they stay in - Sorry to see the withdraw
- Laser brain - Pretty sure this will get my full support - Sorry to see the withdraw
- Lord Roem
Spec sheet
| Candidate | edits in 2019 | Thoughts | My Vote |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 * Newyorkbrad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 728 | 2006: Absolute support, no questions asked. They've served in the past, and proven to be level headed, reasonable, and fair. Good sense of humor, even when it's a bit on the dry side at times. Often looked to for advice by other arbs. Institutional memory is a big plus. |  Strong support
|
| 02 * Casliber (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 6980 | 2006: Absolute support, no questions asked. They've served in the past, and proven to be level headed, reasonable, and fair. Very strong in content creation and high-quality articles. Not huge on displaying humor, but appears to appreciate it when it's innocuous. I've been able to approach them for advice in the past. Institutional memory is a big plus. Also, being from the land down under is a plus. | Strong support
|
| 03 * Worm That Turned (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 993 | 2008: Absolute support, no questions asked. Part of the current 2019 AC, which is a negative, but has voiced concerns regarding some of the poorer choices made by the committee. They've served in the past, and proven to be level headed, reasonable, and fair. Goes out of his way to respond to concerns. Good sense of humor. I've been able to approach them for advice when needed. | Strong support
|
| 04 * Gadfium (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 4841 | 2004: Very long term editor and very quiet and polite. Avoids drama and politics. Very dedicated to content. Looking forward to how they respond to being on AC | Support (may go strong support)
|
| 05 * Xeno (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 1669 | 2006: Crat, level-headed, compassionate, and really dedicated to our project. He has experience, tact, and a care for the community. Has the ability to be serious, and yet is still able to display an appreciation for humor. I suspect we could be good friends in real life. | Strong support
|
| 06 * KrakatoaKatie (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 613 | 2006: Part of the 2019 AC, which suffered from resignations and poor decision making. Fair content 34%. Statement comes across as combative, and gender-centric. The statement also appears to be condescending and lecturing. Weak in 2019 participation outside Arbcom. Evasive in responses to questions, and often appears to be agenda driven. Not qualities I want in an arb. |  Strong oppose
|
| 07 * David Fuchs (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 1463 | 2005: Has served before, has a strong background in high-quality content. Sometimes overly strict and doesn't display compassion often. Usually reasonable, and fair.
Does not display a sense of humor on wiki, at least not often, will likely move to support in the end. |
 Neutral
|
| 08 * Enterprisey (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) |  2
|
2012: Fairly new as arbs go. Don't know much about them, appear to be technical in nature which isn't always good when dealing with people. Seems like a very nice person, but doesn't appear to have much experience in many of the areas that Arbs must function in. | Neutral
|
| 09 * Maxim (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 1486 | 2007: 'Crat, and a good one. Over 50% in article work. Has always appeared neutral and yet compassionate when dealing with other users. Often appears to be aware, without contributing to drama holes. Desysoped an admin. during a RFAR case, gutsy IAR action, but considered and reasonable given the circumstances. Good answers to questions. Will likely move to support depending on how many of those I have. | Neutral
|
| 10 * SoWhy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 3539 | 2004: I worked with them a fair amount when I first started, they are very knowledgeable in the content deletion areas. Not a huge content creator. Doesn't wear his heart on his sleeve, but is still reasonable and fair. Very willing to help when asked. Institutional memory is a big plus. | Support
|
| 11 * Llywrch (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 1050 | 2002: Old school admin and editor. HUGE in content creation (75%). Great sense of humor. Thinks before he types, and is always considered and fair. Institutional memory is a big plus. | Strong support
|
| 12 * Barkeep49 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 7038 | 2005-2018: Interesting candidate. Registered in 2005, but didn't really jump in until early 2018. Has been very involved in many areas, displays intelligence, reason, and compassion. Everything I've seen them comment on appears to be well researched and considered before they post. Appears to grasp the weight of serving on Arbcom. It would mean new blood to the AC, and I think that's a good thing. | Support (may change to strong)
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|
| Example (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) | 2
|
comments | Neutral
|