Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spacecraft in Red Dwarf
Appearance
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Spacecraft in Red Dwarf (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is a list of in-universe minutia. These are details irrelevant to the casual reader, more suited to Fandom or another fan wiki. While not currently even present in this article, any details on the modeling the ships could easily fit inside Red Dwarf#Production. I don't think there is any argument to describe this as a necessary fork. The only one that could be described as important to the series would be the main ship, but that does not need more than a small paragraph unless there is real world information somewhere out there. The rest of the information is way too in-depth, and it does not need to be merged. TTN (talk) 14:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 14:14, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete- I like Red Dwarf, but this really is excessive fancruft. Fortunately there are sites like Wikia to take elaborate, but ultimately unencyclopedic, labours of love. Reyk YO! 18:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. 99% of these fan lists have to go, and probably the other 1% too. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:56, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep as a classic case of deletioncruft. This encyclopedic content is definitely worthy of inclusion on Wikipedia. --199.123.13.2 (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2019 (UTC)