Jump to content

User talk:Emain Macha

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Emain Macha (talk | contribs) at 15:13, 2 December 2019 (→Help me!: thanks). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Thisissusanbell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! sats 15:45, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

Hello, great to see that you're interested in getting involved with the Museums Galleries Scotland residency. Are there any particular types of events or collections in which you're interested? 11:19, 4 February 2015 (UTC)Lirazelf (talk)

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 18:04, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Angèle Diabang Brener has been accepted

Angèle Diabang Brener, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

LaMona (talk) 23:09, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions

Thank you for participating in the

Black Women's History edit-a-thon

  • February 2016
  • More than 170 articles were created
  • Hosted by Women in Red

(... check out our next event)

--Ipigott (talk) 14:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Emain Macha! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:00, Monday, October 10, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Emain Macha! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:01, Monday, October 10, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Halloween Wikipedia editathon

Hi. If you are still okay to make it on Monday, or Tuesday for that matter, could you book on the booking links asap please. I just want to make sure I have a correct handle on the numbers to ensure we have enough refreshments ordered so am looking to finalise catering numbers tomorrow. Cheers, Stinglehammer (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Already done! Emain Macha (talk) 13:19, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Emain Macha, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Emain Macha, good luck, and have fun. Stinglehammer (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:54, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Please help me with understanding if a newspaper article citing only 'senior party figures' can be credibly used for a WP:BLP. What is the policy or good practice on repeating claims made by anonymous sources in the press - can we guard against Wikipedia being use for anonymous briefings / political infighting?

Case in point: Joanna Cherry. The current last paragraph reads 

Following the suspension of SNP election candidate for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath Neale Hanvey, for alleged anti-semitism,[1] it was reported by The Herald that some senior figures within the SNP felt that Cherry's recent criticisms of the party's vetting procedures had resulted in the party being unable to properly vet candidates in the run up to the 2019 general election.[2]

The second source says only 'Senior figures within the SNP', no named figures. On one hand, it's not a tabloid newspaper, on the other hand it's the only source for this claim. I'd appreciate advice on good practice. In an election period it seems important to guard against repeating speculation.

Emain Macha (talk) 13:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say the main problem with the above quote is that the Guardian doesn't mention Cherry and thus shouldn't be in the article on Cherry at all. That said, the Herald indeed is not a tabloid, the statement is properly attributed, and while it's understandable that those "senior figures" may want to remain anonymous, the incident seems to represent significant criticism of Cherry from within her own party. I'd reword it, but I don't think mentioning it is problematic from a BLP point of view. Huon (talk) 14:53, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice. Yes, the Guardian reference is for the Hanvey info, although that's covered in the Herald article in the second source too. It would be more balanced with a response from Cherry but the Herald has neither that nor one from an official SNP spokesperson! Emain Macha (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ "'SNP suspends election candidate over alleged antisemitism". The Guardian. 28 November 2019. Retrieved 28 November 2019.
  2. ^ "'SNP's vetting process 'frustrated' by senior MP prior to candidate selection". The Herald. 1 December 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Emain_Macha&oldid=928924796"