User talk:Hagerman/Archive/1

Please click here to leave me a new message.

This is the talk page for Hagerman.
Please sign your comments using four tildes (`~~~~`). Place comments that start a new topic at the bottom of the page and give them ==A Descriptive Header==. If you're new to Wikipedia, please see Welcome to Wikipedia and frequently asked questions.	Talk page guidelines Please respect Etiquette, assume good faith and be nice.

To let you know about "Policyowner"

I am not sure what your past conversations were with User:Policyowner, however to update you he has been blocked indefinitely for his repeated posting to several insurance compaines pages. I am letting you know as he has posted on his talk page a statement that he hasworked with you on various edits until and that you approved a template for his posts. Just wanted to let you know about the issue as he is working to get unblocked. Thanks for all your hard work to build wikipedia. TheRanger 23:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the update. Just to be clear, I don't condone the controversial edits they have made regarding demutualization. While I did provide some constructive feedback in the past, I don't agree with Policyowner's decisions to promote their own site. It was my original intention to assist the new user in understanding Wikipedia's NPOV, however, the attack edits continued. I fully support the block. Thanks again, Hagerman^(talk) 00:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

From going back and reading the talk and post that went on between you and policyowner that is what I thought you side would be, so thats why I let you know. For your information even though he is block he is back with sockpuppets the latest was User:Spotlighter (which is now blocked) and also a couple IP edits. I'll keep a eye on the insurance company pages and try to keep this at bay. Thanks for your help making wikipeida the best it can be. TheRanger 01:08, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrus Society

Good Evening Haggerman, I am a member of the Cyrus Society. We felt that this is a great tool to allow curious people to find out a little history of the group. The Z society also has a site on Wikipedia and we felt it is a good way for curious people to see what exactly has impacted them. If anything on the site needs to be fixed we are happy to do so thank you. Frank —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cyrus Society (talk • contribs) .

I understand why you'd like to create an article, however, you must cite sources in your article that prove the subject is notable. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reply. Thanks, Hagerman^(talk) 05:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Madison Middle School

This is not nonsense, though I agree some of it is. I am afraid the school is not very good being a student I know. I am generally against vandalization of this site, but for stuff like this you should let it slide. :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.35.78.185 (talk • contribs)

Can you cite a reliable source? Please take a look at Wikipedia's guidelines on neutral point of views. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to reply. Thanks, Hagerman^(talk) 03:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD speedy delete question

I am in full agreement with your comment regarding the "Michelle Zakarian" page. My question is - and no one has been able to give me a good answer... What is to be done when the author is sitting there removing the db-whatever tag from their page? (and they weren't challenging it, they were just removing the template) I saw this done for what looked like about 12 hours once!! It apparently wasn't allowing enough lag time for any bot to pick it up. A one timer doing this isn't vandalasm, per se, but is there a way to override their continual removal of the template from their page?SkierRMH 05:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If the user removes the speedy deletion template, you should add it again and warn the user with the {{drmspeedy}} template. Every time they remove the template, add a new warning to their page, incrementing the template: {{drmspeedy2}}, then {{drmspeedy3}, and finally {{drmspeedy4}}. If they remove it again after you leave the fourth warning, you may put a notice on administrator intervention against vandalism and the user will be blocked from editing by an administrator. I hope this helps! Thank you, Hagerman^(talk) 13:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Terry MacNeil became Nandi Devam

I am rather new to Wikipedia so please forgive my clumsiness at this. I looked up the name of the sixties musical group that I co-founded (Sopwith Camel/band) and found my name there (actually my old name) and when I clicked on it, it said that thee was no page for that name, but that one could be created. I just wanted to do that, using verifiable information from already-existing web sites, and I wanted to reference to my new name, because I have a current web site under that name. Is this OK to do? —the preceding comment is by Nandidevam (talk • contribs) : Please sign your posts!.

Generally, it's a bad idea to edit an article about yourself. It's best to wait for someone else to add the content on their own. See guidelines on autobiographies for more information. Thanks, Hagerman^(talk) 14:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism reverting

I would like to show you my appreciation over your recent vandalism reverting, you beat me to revert at least 20 times today. We need more people like you here on Wikipedia. Keep up the excellent work! :) Michaelas10 (Talk) 19:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the positive feedback, you actually beat me to a few reverts as well! Best, Hagerman^(talk) 19:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ha-ha. "The Lonely RV Holiday Club." (speaking for myself) It sure beats video games and TV reruns. :P ^~DBS ^Talk/_Contribs

Agreed! :-) Hagerman^(talk) 20:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Spree

My vandalism spree has ended. All "modifications" have been reverted It was immature, but more just an experiment to see how long nonsense could stay up, especially when it pertained to "obscenity." Judging by your rapid resposne, Wikipdia indeed appears to be quite reputable. Kudos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.96.51.179 (talk • contribs)

Hopefully you'll use your editing power to do something positive with Wikipedia this time around. Thanks, Hagerman^(talk) 20:03, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How thoughtful. ,:) ^~DBS ^Talk/_Contribs 20:09, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the kooks

i can assure you the changes i made were correct —the preceding comment is by Birdie23 (talk • contribs) : Please sign your posts!.

I've reverted the revert. Please make sure you cite a source for the change. Thanks, Hagerman^(talk) 20:23, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sorry

dear sir , i deeply apoligise for my behaveure and comments i am a boy of 12 and was dared by my friends once again i apologise your sincerly the boy —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 172.143.255.90 (talk • contribs) 20:27, 23 November 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The Sp-Un-Ka

I made a article refering to the Sp-Un-Ka tribe of Stains, Reading on the 23rd of November 2006. It portrayed a group of people that live in a way, that may seem differant to you. I think that it showed people that, even if others live differantely, they should be respected and encorouged. The deletion of the article is an uttermost disgrace as it had great anthropological meaning, portaying a fair and objective view of the world - these people in particualr. I am new to wikipedia and don't know all the details on how it works but i'd like you to re-think about your speedy deletion decision, Thank you, Daniel Rutter, Chris White, Michael Scarborough, Neal Monk, Matt King and Will Eldon (Sp-Un-Ka) —the preceding comment is by Djrutter (talk • contribs) : Please sign your posts!.

I'm not an Administrator, so I don't have the power to speedy delete an article. Looking at the history from the article [1] it was deleted because it met the the patent nonsense speedy deletion criteria. If you feel that the article should have not been deleted, you are always free to open a deletion review. Thanks, Hagerman^(talk) 18:59, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers dude, sorry about that, i was just a bit angry.

Daniel Rutter (Sp-Un-Ka)