Talk:Dark Phoenix (film)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dark Phoenix (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dark Phoenix (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
Plot question - Quicksilver or Peter Maximoff?
As I post this, the plot says "she injures Peter Maximoff..." Wasn't he Quicksilver when injured? That's like saying Peter Parker was injured when it was actually Spider-Man, Logan/Wolverine, Clark Kent/Superman, Bruce Wayne/Batman, etc. The plot originally said Quicksilver. An editor changed it. I haven't seen the movie yet, but the trailer clearly shows Maximoff in Quicksilver mode as he climbs the sky toward Jean. If you've seen the movie and agree it's more accurate to say it was Quicksilver who was injured please make the change to either Quicksilver or Quicksilver (Peter Maximoff). Thanks. 5Q5 (talk) 12:02, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say it's incorrect. It's just a matter of phrasing. "Quicksilver" and "Peter Maximoff" are the same person. He doesn't become Quicksilver by putting on the suit (or "being in Quicksilver mode" which, no disrespect, isn't a thing). It makes no sense to say that one phrasing can be more accurate.Zeck (talk) 22:00, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
RfC notice
There is a request for comment whose outcome may affect this article: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#RfC on distributor of post-merger Fox films. Nardog (talk) 16:30, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
Unexplained removal of cited content
Looks like some anonymous user is attempting to suppress or remove cited content without explanation here and (again, after being warned) here.
They were warned (in good faith) that removing cited content without explanation may in future be seen as vandalism; they immediately removed it again, so have been warned accordingly.
Ubcule (talk) 18:32, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Distributor
Use what references say. And see #RfC notice and comments there. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:33, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
RFC concluded with: The general consensus here is to retain the credited distributor ("20th Century Fox" or "Fox Searchlight Pictures") and as such, to not unilaterally change names of credited subsidiary distributors to their parent, "Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures".
Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:39, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
Change
All the thing i change is right, why are you making that to me ? Citrounou (talk) 00:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Comics articles
- Bottom-importance Comics articles
- C-Class Comics articles of Bottom-importance
- C-Class Marvel Comics articles
- Marvel Comics work group articles
- C-Class comic book films articles
- Comic book films task force articles
- WikiProject Comics articles
- C-Class film articles
- WikiProject Film articles