User talk:Sumanuil

Archives

Archive 1	Archive 2	Archive 3
Archive 4	Archive 5	Archive 6
Archive 7	Archive 8

I understand

Yeah... I can understand why you wanted to revert that, but I think it is correct (according to the two sources there). Let me know if you have any input on how that part should be written. Thanks. Geographyinitiative (talk) 00:34, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying it's wrong, but it could probably be streamlined a bit.- Sumanuil 00:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

I am trying to present the claims of the parties involved as best I can. I'm not sure exactly how to do it, but that's as close as I can come atm. Geographyinitiative (talk) 01:09, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok.- Sumanuil 01:56, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

'Find and replace is not your friend'

For what it's worth, I didn't do a find & replace (primarily because I was worried about "correcting" citations from external sources)—those were just actual human reading errors. Thank you for noticing them & fixing them! Pathawi (talk) 01:07, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brexit

https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AManual_of_Style&type=revision&diff=927187214&oldid=926211181 Preachy ate chew. --Brogo13 (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template : Merthyr, Tredegar and Abergavenny Railway

Thank you for your recent help and I wonder if you can tidy up the part of the template where Pantysgallog (Low Level) Halt appears, as there is a break in line continuity.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 08:00, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure. I'll try. - Sumanuil 00:01, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

I really am most grateful to you. All is now well and the matter mentioned on the Template Talk section is now corrected.

Xenophon Philosopher (talk) 22:14, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ajithkumar Thampan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ajithkumar Thampan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – bradv🍁 05:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Topical cannabidiol not allowed

You are correct in that topical is not mentioned in that ref. I am searching the FDA website for specific mention. FDA Warning Letters to several companies make very clear that the prohibition extends to topical products, but I would prefer not to use a Warning Letter as a ref. See example WL: https://www.fda.gov/inspections-compliance-enforcement-and-criminal-investigations/warning-letters/bella-rose-labs-594246-11222019. David notMD (talk) 18:49, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gotcha. Feel free to add it once you find the right page.- Sumanuil (talk) 18:50, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

apology

I read it as "in Israel" but I see now that it means "in Jerusalem." NotButtigieg (talk) 20:26, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Parra

Please explain this edit, that had no edit-summary. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:07, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a deleted image. Why does this require explaining? - Sumanuil (talk) 19:27, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I see that now. I thought it was vandalism, because you didn't explain it in the edit-summary. I only realized after I reverted it that there was a problem with the image. Then a bot deleted it and explain *why* the image was deleted, and *who* deleted it.

As for edit-summaries, I'll send you a post about that. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:29, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

This is a template that explains edit-summaries. Sorry if any of it is already familiar... --David Tornheim (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! --David Tornheim (talk) 19:31, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indent

Also, if you are not familiar with WP:INDENT, please check that out. Possibly you had just forgotten it, when you replied to me. --David Tornheim (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vitamin B17

Dear Suemanuel

Thank you for your kind and considered thoughts. For your interest:

vandalize /ˈvand(ə)lʌɪz/ verb deliberately destroy or damage (public or private property).

destroy /dɪˈstrɔɪ/ verb end the existence of (something) by damaging or attacking it.

damage /ˈdamɪdʒ/ noun 1. physical harm that impairs the value, usefulness, or normal function of something.

Please brush up on your vocabulary, as indicated above. Moreover, you may want to do some more research into the topic at hand. You may even become enlightened! At the very least you will gain some insight into the principle of valid cognition or valid knowledge, and the principle of absolute and relative truth. Thanks all the same, though, bro/sister. Please, keep up the good work, my friend. 27.252.215.241 (talk) 07:51, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]