User talk:Ubiquitouslarry

Welcome!

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 03:28, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of COPRA enemies moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of COPRA enemies, has mostly primary sources and no reliable sources as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. The editor whose username is Z0 10:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note on adding unsourced content

Hey, I'm Z0. I noticed that you added content to an article but didn't provide a reliable source. You should cite a reliable source for all of your edits so that they can be verified. In Wikipedia, verifiability means that other people using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Adding unsourced content contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

Wikipedia does not publish original research, which refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. The verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material challenged or likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. Articles should be based on reliable and published sources (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) and if no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. The editor whose username is Z0 10:06, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Further Adventures of Stardust the Super Wizard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kevin O'Neill

Stardust the Super Wizard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kevin O'Neill

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of COPRA agents

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of COPRA agents".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:24, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Late Life theatrical poster.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:04, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Equipboard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Equipboard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Equipboard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 04:46, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Unify Square, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Slack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaz Stevens, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Republican, Bill O'Reilly and Equal rights (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:50, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chaz Stevens without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. For example, why did you remove the sourced section on his religious beliefs? —C.Fred (talk) 13:51, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank W Chen (director) (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Frank W Chen (director) may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:21, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaz Stevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake Worth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaz Stevens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidential debate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nita Strauss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barbarella (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of COPRA agents

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of COPRA agents".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:51, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of COPRA enemies

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of COPRA enemies".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 15:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Somos Group (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CaptainEek was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Somos Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Somos Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 05:00, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible conflict of interest

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 02:37, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition the the inquest above, also see WP:PAID. SamHolt6 (talk) 02:38, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ubiquitouslarry: please answer the inquest above at the earliest possible convenience. Thanks. SamHolt6 (talk) 23:34, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, SamHolt6. I am not writing articles about my family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors. I do not have an organization with which I am affiliated that has a Wikipedia page. So linking is not an issue. I am doing my best to comply with Wikipedia content policies. Ubiquitouslarry (talk) 00:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In addition, I have updated my talk page to properly identify my paid work on Wikipedia. Ubiquitouslarry (talk) 07:17, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you for disclosing. One more note; paid editors are required to provide links to all websites on which they advertise paid editing services. Please make the necessary links, if applicable. Best. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucy Guo (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucy Guo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucy Guo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 10:39, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucy Guo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucy Guo. Thanks! MurielMary (talk) 19:54, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucy Guo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucy Guo. Thanks! Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 00:28, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucy Guo has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucy Guo. Thanks! DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 01:08, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Draft:ProProfs, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Ubiquitouslarry, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ubiquitouslarry|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Template:Z160 — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:30, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, JJMC89. I have updated my talk page to properly disclose my employers for all of my paid work. Ubiquitouslarry (talk) 07:12, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isobel Yeung, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conflict (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:32, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Super Wizard Stardust

Hello, Ubiquitouslarry. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Super Wizard Stardust".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! IM3847 (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank W Chen (director) (December 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This reads like what I'd expect to see in his about me on his website.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank W Chen (director) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Frank W Chen (director), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 18:02, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phil Haus (December 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The subject does not appear to satisfy entertainment notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Phil Haus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Phil Haus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:16, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo-black.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-black.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing and reviews

Thank you for disclosing however I find your self-publishing/reviewing of articles for which you are paid to write to be quite problematic. In at least two recent instances, you've gone around an AFC review that declined your article (one several times) and published it anyway, subverting any attempts to get a second set of non-COI edits on it. While AFC isn't explicitly required it is generally expected of paid editors to allow reviews. Praxidicae (talk) 19:21, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And as a more specific example this is so heavily ref-bombed with sources that say virtually nothing about the subject, it's impossible to parse for what should actually be in the article. It very much would have benefited from an actual review and I'd strongly suggest you move it back to draft space. Praxidicae (talk) 19:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Wooldridge (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Like I've said elsewhere, this too is heavily ref-bombed with tangentially related sources. He'd probably be notable if he were the attorney of the Boston bombers but not their roommates which strikes me as super WP:COATRACKy. Almost all of the sources are passing mentions or not directly about Wooldridge. Additionally, Forbes contributor pieces and op-eds do nothing to establish notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nicholas Wooldridge and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nicholas Wooldridge, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:35, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]