Talk:Trademark

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trademark. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/201110232

you really think you're cool lol im lericc the epic hacker

25719/http://www.cbp.gov/xp/CustomsToday/2002/February/other/christmas.xml to http://www.cbp.gov/xp/CustomsToday/2002/February/other/christmas.xml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Mobile short describtion appears to be wrong

Hello, I was never active on Wikipedia, so i just use this here. I recently noticed that the short describtion in the mobile version does not fit. It mentiones something about the KKK, maybe some line of a song. I could be wrong, thus i do not know and do not dare to change it. However, I wanted to draw attention to it so that maybe someone more experienced might fix this.Shut up

dickhead With kind regards. Thank you for your contribution to this magnificient website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.226.237.6 (talk) 03:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

missing “third” in oldest

Currently says: “United States: there are at least three claims:” But only 2 are cited (Averill and Samson). 120.16.204.25 (talk) 10:08, 11 June 2018 (UTC)MBG

Agreed. I am changing to two. GrindtXX (talk) 12:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Good edit; but I would be unsurprised if a third claim had been deleted somewhere along the way. Currently we have 1) the oldest registration, but under an act later found to be invalid as unconstitutional (thereby calling its legitimacy as a registration into question); and 2) the oldest registration still in use today. I would expect there to have been an entry for the first registration under a constitutional act, regardless of whether it is still in use. I bet it was there and removed some time ago. TJRC (talk) 14:15, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

I would have lost that bet. The "third claim" was the Edgar Rice Burroughs registration of his "Tarzan" mark: [1]. But that was in 1923, far too late to have been the first registration under a constitutional act (which was enacted in 1881). The mark is rather elderly, but is in no way in the running to be "oldest" under any definition. The "Tarzan" text now resides in the "Comparison with patents, designs and copyright" section, but it looks like when it was moved out, the "three" was not updated to "two"; GrindtXX's edit today fixes that.

Of course, now I'm wondering what the first registration under a constitutional act was. TJRC (talk) 16:13, 14 August 2019 (UTC)