Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2020 January 25

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Primefac (talk | contribs) at 03:37, 2 February 2020 (Template:NBA roster statistics full: Relisted on 2020 February 2 (XFDcloser)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. I'm WP:INVOLVED but see the third paragraph there; it is hardly disputable. (non-admin closure) J947(c), at 20:16, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Navbox with just two links. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:26, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, if you want to give me homework, just let me know on my talk page.--Wolbo (talk) 23:18, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Homework done. Can I play outside now? --Wolbo (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2020 February 2. Primefac (talk) 03:37, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This template is used in a total of 3 articles that can be easily be fixed by substitution. While reference templates can be useful, AFAIK, they are usually reserved for references that are used in hundreds or thousands of articles. There is a very low likelihood that will happen in this case. I think it is wishful thinking for this book. Having the reference is the article proper is beneficial to allow regular maintenance and ease of editing. A template with such low usage is unlikely to be maintained properly. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 09:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete after orphaning and substituting per nom. Looks like a citation used for bibliographic references on related articles. I can see the use, but at the same time, just copy+paste it from one article to the next. Doug Mehus T·C 14:17, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Primefac (talk) 03:10, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Only two articles. This position was found not to be notable in three AFDs. ミラP 00:05, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).