Talk:Climate change and fisheries

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Climate change C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Fisheries and Fishing C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Climate change and fisheries appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 December 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that climate change and rising ocean acidity is affecting fisheries and modifying fish distributions?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/December.

Wikipedia

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Knn019 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Knn019.

Proposed edits and sources

Add text to Impact on fishing communities: - discuss the threats that fishing regions can have, not only because of climate change but due to how people living in the region can effect production. (Adlb03 (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Add new section: Inland fisheries - discuss how the climate change makes it difficult for inland fisheries to continue to produce consumption. Temperature change means drying up of lakes where fresh water fish come from. Without these lakes and other inland resources for fish there would be a significant decrease in fish production. (Adlb03 (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Add text to Impact on Fish Production: - discuss how the slightest increase in temperature can have very harmful effects on the ocean water. This can be fatal to the fish and to marine plants. (Adlb03 (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Add new section: Over-fishing - discuss how not only is climate change the only reason for loss of fish and fishing industries but also how people over fish and take advantage of the fish production that our oceans and lakes provide for our world. (Adlb03 (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Sources: Brander, K. M. (2007). Global fish production and climate change. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the united states of america, 104(50), doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702059104 (Adlb03 (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Roessig, J. M., & Woodley, C. M. (2004). Effects of global climate change on marine and estuarine fishes and fisheries. Fish biology and fisheries, 14(2), 251-275. doi: 10.1007/s11160-004-6749-0 (Adlb03 (talk) 22:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Scorse, J. (2010). What environmentalists need to know about economics. (pp. 145-152). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. (Adlb03 (talk) 22:47, 5 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Nye, J. (2010). Climate change and its effects on ecosystems, habitats and biota. (pp. 1-17). Maine: The gulf of maine council on the marine enviroment. (Adlb03 (talk) 00:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Ficke, A. D., Myrick, C. A., & Hansen, L. J. (2007). Potential impacts of global climate change on freshwater ﬁsheries. 581-613. doi: 10.1007/s11160-007-9059-5 (Adlb03 (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Be bold and add what you think the articles needs. Make sure you cite additions with reliable sources and paraphrase your additions to avoid copy violations. Don't worry about making mistakes. I'll keep a look out and give you a hand if you need it. --Epipelagic (talk) 00:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Fisheries and climate change. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hello. I have a couple of suggestions and critiques regarding this particular Wikipedia article.

The article is well-cited and well-researched, but it has some information that goes beyond the scope of the article. In particular, the overfishing section at the end of the article seems out of place. It has little relation to the rest of the article and is another topic altogether. It could have a place if one were to talk about the overall health of fisheries but would require more information and sources than currently provided or asked under the article title. The section under Adaptation and Mitigation has extraneous details in regards to energy alternatives.

In a similar vein, the article does not have a neutral agenda. Examples of bias can be found throughout the article. The section on Adaptation recommends algae as an alternative to water. The section on Overfishing holds a preference for a certain policy: limiting the amount of fish caught. The section under Mitigation ends with a call for action for scientific understanding. The overall language of the article leans toward persuading the reader toward conservation (a reasonable conclusion to reach, however can be done without the persuasive language).

The referenced materials are relatively outdated. The most recent references and citation are from 2012. Other, more recent sources are encouraged. In addition, some of the cited sources have a bias advocating for change. Sources such as the Blue Carbon website are examples of such. Their numbers and statistics may not be wrong or misleading, but further research is needed to reach that conclusion and it needs to be noted that they do have an agenda. Knn019 (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]