Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers

WP:DSACTOR

All deletion discussions relating to filmmakers, directors and other non-actor film-related people should now be listed on this page.

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Actors and filmmakers. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Actors and filmmakers|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Actors and filmmakers. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

Purge page cache

watch

Scan for actor AfDs

Scan for filmmaker AfDs

Actors and filmmakers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dasha Nekrasova

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is self-created and self-promotional; no notability. Being covered for 2 days in media as a meme and starring in low-budget softcore porn is not enough to warrant an article. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 17:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 17:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Yellow-billed Loon (talk) 17:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belarus-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:42, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I agree with people who voted "keep" during the first AfD, less than two months ago. She got non-trivial coverage in a large number of independent third-party sources (currently cited on the page, I removed only one of them after checking). For example, The Cut ([1] and [2]), The Times, Teen Vogue and Vice. The coverage is not just about the Infowars interview, so WP:BLP1E does not apply. Therefore, I think she easily passes WP:GNG. My very best wishes (talk) 19:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep. easily passes WP:GNG, already survived an AfD by a significant margin. this is the 2nd nomination from the same user (1st nomination was just last month), who appears to have a personal gripe with the subject. Nomination was unquestionably made for the purposes of vandalism or disruption. Pinchofhope (talk) 03:32, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article subject is not notable and I agree that the article seems self-promotional Kokpep (talk) 06:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Pinchofhope. Article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. _SUPER ^ASTIG 04:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are enough reliable sources in the article to pass WP:GNG—sources which also discuss the subject in terms of her career as an actress. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article absolutely needs to be cleaned up, but as it stands it clearly demonstrates notability even if you just look at the sources in the article. Self promotion doesn't override the WP:GNG. Michepman (talk) 02:11, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apoorva Singh Chaudhary

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. The actress has never acted in any films and has only appeared in few television reality shows. The content has also been written in advertising manner. Abishe (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 10:26, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Via Google it seems the person appeared in some minor roles. The article fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 15:29, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per Nom and that the article is a pseudo biography. Otr500 (talk) 17:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject ~~might pass WP:GNG but she~~ doesn't meet WP:NACTOR. I think it's ~~far~~ WP:TOOSOON for an article on her. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:47, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: On second thoughts, I don't think WP:GNG is met either—unless India West and TellyChakkar are considered reliable sources (the latter, at least, doesn't seem to be). Dflaw4 (talk) 13:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Haven't done any notable work. Not meeting WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. - The9Man | (talk) 12:46, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 00:51, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Micky Lynn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BASIC and WP:ENT: the current sources are a puff-piece AVN profile/interview and a short, promotional bio of Ms. Lynn in an AVN award listing; please note that porn industry awards no longer count towards anything now that PORNBIO has been deprecated. I looked for additional sources and found only trivial or promotional coverage such as cast lists and event billings. Cheers, gnu 57 22:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 22:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 22:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 22:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. gnu 57 22:39, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is yet another case of someone who seems to have had a potentially significant career in the pre-digital era but has an extreme lack of digitally available sources (nor the ability to verify that any others exist). It's quite possible an article could be written if someone had access to the right sources from that era, but as we don't have access to enough WP:RS to even attempt to write an article it's a clear delete at this stage. The Drover's Wife (talk) 22:48, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:40, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Industry hall of fame is something, but I don't think it is sufficient. More sources / recognition would be needed to ass WP:NBIO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even close to meeting the GNG. I am dancing in joy that we have finally gotten the American pornographic actresses category below 300 articles. It is still unjustifiably large.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:43, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as suggested by The Drover's Wife. KartikeyaS (talk) 17:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clear lack of appropriate sources Cardiffbear88 (talk) 19:19, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 05:27, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivan Doan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor - does not meet WP:NACTOR with no major appearances. GSS ^💬 18:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 18:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 18:30, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a non-notable actor.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:RS, WP:TOOSOON, WP:MILL, and WP:NOTRESUME. There are zero reliable sources. This is an ordinary, young actor at the very beginning of his professional career. Everybody knows in 2020 that we are a charity, not a free resume service. Bearian (talk) 13:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: I can't speak to the subject's stage career, but it seems a little WP:TOOSOON for an article. And sourcing is another problem. Dflaw4 (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NACTOR. KartikeyaS (talk) 17:12, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Morgane Polanski

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating for deletion on the basis that notability is not inherited. She truthfully lacks independent notability at this time outside of being the daughter of the preeminent French director. The role on Vikings doesn't absolve that. ⌚️ (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as notability isn't inherited and she does not meet WP:NACTOR. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:45, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Disagree with deletion, she is an actor, and very talented, clearly she deserves to be listed on Wikipedia. some may not like her father, but it has nothing to do with this young woman, she is starting her career, and I for one wish her all the best. User:Julieprus 03:30, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Julieprus: you should vote keep with your comment if you want her article to remain. Can you find more sources in Polish? DiamondRemley39 (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Julieprus: I like it is not valid. Being talented is not criteria for inclusion. It’s about general notability guidelines. ⌚️ (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I'm seeing coverage in W Magazine, Harpers Bazaar (blog, but one meeting WP:RS) and the UK Telegraph. It is admittedly challenging to use a search engine to find material about her that is not primarily about her fugitive father, but it does seem to be out there if one takes the time to sift. TJRC (talk) 01:55, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@TJRC: That W wasted so many words to say how her father gave her her first role as a child before throwing in a sentence about Vikings in the end is exactly what I’m talking about. And two more sources doing the same thing. Going on and on about anecdotes with her father but nothing special about her own career. Nothing about that is in the realm of independent notability. ⌚️ (talk) 02:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In addition to coverage in publications, one should look at the list of movies where she played a role. At least three of them are famous, even if she did not play any of main characters. She also played main character in a major TV series. All of that combined makes her passable. My very best wishes (talk) 03:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: There are quite a few articles out there which discuss the subject. Though you'll be hard-pressed to find an article that doesn't mention her father, I don't see this as detrimental to WP:GNG, since she is being discussed in her own right as an up-and-coming actress. If anything, it might be a little soon for an article on her, but, since the nominated issue is sourcing, I think notability is made out. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:33, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - she payed a fairly major character on a French TV show. Talent has nothing, I add, to influence notability; we have articles on many bad actors and films. Bearian (talk) 20:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. She appears to have enough notability and coverage as an actress in multiple shows and/or movies, and not just as a famous person's daughter. I believe that deleting would be futile, because considering the output and coverage she already has, and assuming she continues to work in similarly distributed and heralded film/TV, she will only continue to maintain, perhaps increase, her notability at least as an actress. Mungo Kitsch (talk) 20:06, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NEXIST. RS has been brought to this AfD even if it is not in the article. Lightburst (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sources I viewed before only to see cute stories about childhood in the Polanski household rather than career achievements. ⌚️ (talk) 01:34, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:44, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Nanton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional/branding "profile" for a professional promoter of "branding" services; I strongly suspect undisclosed COI editing. Orange Mike | Talk 18:18, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Barbados-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:28, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:30, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:31, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Page should be trimmed down for some WP:PROMO but looks like the page meets WP:N overall. Snavehunter (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - technically passes my standards for lawyers and his multiple Emmy wins, even if local or minor, make him a notable producer. Bearian (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Snavehunter and Bearian. Article is notable enough to be kept. _SUPER ^ASTIG 05:59, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:49, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne Gerard Trotman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTRESUME and WP:PROMO. Seems to be a resume type article. Much of the purported notability in the article is unsourced tbh. Most of the citations are primary, could not find anything myself other than some book.google.com searches of novels that he self published. Google search only yields author press bio on Goodreads and Amazon. Editor who maintains the page only edits on other pages that pertains to this guy. Due to the size of the article but lack of citations, I would also assume that the editor is a fan/know the subject. BriefEdits (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Trinidad and Tobago-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 04:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:21, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 11:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 23:03, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. BriefEdits (talk) 23:05, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I didn't see any SNG that the subject appears to meet. I also don't believe that there is enough significant independent coverage of him to show that WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO is met. Papaursa (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

~~The result was no consensus. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)~~ The result was soft delete. Due a lack of participation, this uncontroversial nomination should be treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). A request for undeletion can be made by any editor. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:40, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Street (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Film does not indicate why it is notable. The film's sources are film related websites that simply state the cast like IMDb. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:41, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 11:06, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 19:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer: From lack of discussion, this nomination appears to have no quorum. It seems no previous PRODs, previous AfD discussions, previous undeletions, or a current redirect, so this nomination appears to be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 21:34, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2009-05 ✗ A7

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:34, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mayoora Nritham

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Films that fails to establish its notability. Also, its sources are from film related websites and do not provide any information about the film. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nightfury 11:05, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 19:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 23:43, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ooha (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced film that failes to establish why it is notable. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability under WP:NFILM or WP:GNG Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Total keep consensus and multiple sources found. (non-admin closure) AmericanAir88^(talk) 18:49, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

En Kadhal Kanmani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undersourced film that fails to establish notability. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it was a significant film in the career of a notable artist being Vikram's debut film, as per WP:NFILM#Inclusionary criteria imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:50, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article passes WP:NFILM. It is Vikram's debut film. Please see, this, this, this and this. I think the AfD needs non admin closure now.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 21:49, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shankudeb Panda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article clearly fails WP:GNG. Being the president of party's affiliate organization is not enough for passing WP:NPOL. Becoming a core committee member of party's affiliate organization's state wing is not enough also. He directed only one film. The article fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:ENT and WP:ORG. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:49, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails NPOL as he never won any major election nor occupied any major public office. Party posts occupied by him are not notable. ⋙–DBig Xrayᗙ 08:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN as Panda has only held non-notable party positions and not public offices as required. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 16:07, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ——SN 54129 13:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Preetha Jayaraman

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and seems to be promotional. Article lacks reliable sources. Abishe (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:ENT. She worked in multiple films as a cinematographer. And without a cinematographer a film can not be completed. But, the article needs some work.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 15:18, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:22, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I agree that the article needs work, but there are many sources about the subject online, including the following:

→https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/meet-the-woman-cinematograoher-preetha-jayaraman-of-south-indian-cinema/article30075492.ece – article about the subject

→https://www.newindianexpress.com/entertainment/tamil/2020/jan/27/thamizh-talkies-sid-sriram-the-new-downpour-of-talent-2094887.html – a significant mention in this article

→https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/kannada/movies/news/cinematographer-preetha-jayaraman-heads-to-bollywood/articleshow/58880654.cms – article about the subject

→https://www.thehindu.com/entertainment/movies/watch-mani-ratnams-vaanam-kottattum-teaser-showcases-intense-family-drama/article30513656.ece – subject is mentioned

→https://www.ibtimes.co.in/vijays-wife-ajiths-viswasam-director-rashmika-keerthy-suresh-celebs-wonder-women-awards-807492 – subject won an award for her cinematography

I don't think there's anything wrong with The Hindu article already provided, either. I believe WP:GNG is made out. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:22, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've now added the above references to the article. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:46, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 14:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sanjana Sarathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and it is a kind of WP:TOOSOON. The article is not meeting with WP:NPOV and has been written for promotional purposes. The article lacks reliable secondary sources. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Abishe (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The page seems to pass WP:GNG and I added another few links to reputable reviews and articles about the actress. Given that she's appeared in several films and one notable webseries in addition to other projects, I don't quite agree that it's WP:TOOSOON. I don't see where it fails WP:NPOV either, the writing is very much in keeping with Wikipedia standards (I've certainly never seen a press release that read that way). The only part which may have been inappropriate appeared to be the unnecessary detail about her mother, which I have since removed. IphisOfCrete (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She passes WP:NACTOR. Please see this link) and (this link). in.com called her "Thupakki girl" and "Vaalu Star" and Firstpost called that her performance is spotted on the web series Fingertrip (let alone her other works). I think her these three important roles are enough for passing her WP:NACTOR.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 05:45, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete per nom. Sphinctor (talk) 06:00, 26 February 2020 (UTC) Sock !vote removed.[reply]
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:49, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Weak Delete~~ Weak Keep: I think it probably is a bit WP:TOOSOON, and I don't think WP:GNG is quite made out. There is a New Indian Express source and a Times of India source (both of which are contained in the article), which provide a little bit more than a passing mention—but I'm not sure about the reliability of Silverscreen, CinemaExpress, Firstpost and in.com. As these sources were brought up by IphisOfCrete and S. M. Nazmus Shakib, if they'd like to argue me over as to why these publications are reliable, I'll happily update my vote accordingly. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:32, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dflaw4 I also agree with you that she will not pass WP:GNG. Both Firstpost and in.com owned by a prominent media group Network18 Group. Cinema Express is a fortnightly owned by The New Indian Express. And, we should not consider online portal like silverscreen in that case. I hope you will change your stand!S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

S. M. Nazmus Shakib, thank you for your response! I'll take on your comments and have a think about it. Thanks, Dflaw4 (talk) 11:25, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Having re-assessed the sources, I believe the subject is on the cusp of WP:GNG, and so I'm happy to let the article stand. I have upgraded my vote to a "Weak Keep". Dflaw4 (talk) 13:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Leavitt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable as a theater producer. Not mentioned in any of the articles about plays that he worked on. Article originally created to promote Landmark Worldwide. Similar promotional articles about people linked to Landmark Worldwide have been deleted, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Scheaf and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Regnier. Edward (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not have any notability. Fails WP:N, WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 03:55, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shweta Avasthi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A not notable model who never won any type of notable beauty pegaent. Even she appeared only one film. The article clearly fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACTOR and WP:NMODEL. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and clearly fails WP:GNG. Abishe (talk) 17:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, did not meet WP:GNG.--Richie Campbell (talk) 21:09, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: given references merely mention the name of the subject. No significant media coverage as per WP:SIGCOV. Fails the guidelines at WP:ARTIST. GargAvinash (talk) 23:47, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SNOW. All of the "winning" are just ordinary modeling contracts. Bearian (talk) 15:20, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. BD2412 T 04:17, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of film director and cinematographer collaborations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This list appears to be WP:INDISCRIMINATE. There are no references to any sort of coverage that suggests why certain director/cinematographer collabs are notable. Bait30 ^Talk? 06:46, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Bait30 ^Talk? 06:46, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Bait30 ^Talk? 06:46, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, but trim drastically. The partnership between specific directors and cinematographers is notable (e.g. David Lean and Freddie Young, Alfred Hitchcock and Robert Burks),[3][4] but this list goes overboard. Collaborations on TV episodes, for example, are worthless. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trim per User:Clarityfiend. The bar should be set at notable collaborations; Coen brothers/Roger Deakins is another example. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:27, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Very indiscriminate, full of original research. Wikisaurus (talk) 10:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 00:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This article has zero sources to support the idea that any of these collaborations are notable. If someone wants a list like this to be in the encyclopedia, I would recommend that the article be started over to include only those collaborations which have sources to establish notability. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:32, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am weeding out the unworthy and adding sources. Remember that Afd is not for cleanup. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am changing to no opinion in recognition of the fact that Clarityfiend has put effort into adding some sources and removing some of the unsourced collaborations. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:35, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as the article is being improved with the addition of references to multiple reliable sources that show that the subject passes WP:GNG imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:51, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep passes WP:NLIST Lightburst (talk) 21:15, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Preston Corbell

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NACTOR. The refs are all dead links or passing mentions. Searching does not turn up any in-depth coverage. MB 23:19, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:43, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

keep Article has been updated with new resources and fixed broken links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukepiper12 (talk • contribs) 18:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC) — Lukepiper12 (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Volcom2015 (talk • contribs). [reply]
Weak Delete: I don't think the sources provided in the article constitute WP:SIGCOV, and a lot of the sources aren't reliable, either. I couldn't find anything else, so I don't think WP:GNG is quite met. However, I wasn't able to access the LA Times article provided, and, in terms of his career as a stuntman, the subject has done quite a bit of work. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
keep Comment Added reliable resource — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lukepiper12 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC) — Lukepiper12 (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Volcom2015 (talk • contribs). [reply]

Hi, Lukepiper12, thank you for your work on the article. I'm afraid you can only vote once, though, so I've taken the liberty of striking your second "Keep" vote and renaming it as a "Comment". Thanks, Dflaw4 (talk) 03:52, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“keep” Added notable resource. If this resource is rejected please document why it is used as a reliable source on a variety of wiki articles in which it has been deemed reliable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Welement (talk • contribs) 17:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MILL and WP:GNG, and total lack of reliable sources. In 2007, I might have assumed good faith from a person trying to put up a page like this, but in 2020 the sock-puppetry and alleging a self-punished source is "another reliable source" sounds like one of my lower school kids trying and failing at making up a story. Bearian (talk) 01:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NACTOR and there is not enough significant coverage from reliable sources to support a WP:GNG pass. Best, GPL93 (talk) 00:49, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus was to keep. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Regan (comedian)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not relevant, very low quality article. jrabbit05 (talk) 04:26, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 05:04, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious keep: A popular and well-known stand-up comedian; a Google News search shows a dozen articles from the last month alone. One example: "Brian Regan Preps for New Netflix Special with Aspen Tour Stop", The Aspen Times (Feb 6, 2020). Lots more. -- Toughpigs (talk) 05:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep - Found coverage in NPR and the Wall Street Journal, both reliable sources. Passes GNG and AfD is not cleanup. Hog Farm (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
strong keep: strange that this has been slated for deletion. One look at the article shows he is notable. Locochoko (talk) 12:23, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep: This has to be a WP:SNOW keep right? Regan clearly passes WP:ENTERTAINER. He has had multiple standup specials and has even been featured in Comedians in Cars Getting Coffee. Bait30 ^Talk? 20:38, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep I'm not going to mince words like the rest of the vote!s; WP:IDONTLIKEIT isn't a proper deletion rationale. Obviously notable comedian just by name glance alone. Nate • (chatter) 01:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: It's unclear what the exact policy reason for the nomination is. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:24, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:21, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Satti Dhillon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable music video director. The links on the page are to music videos and contain no biographical information about the subject. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. GSS ^💬 04:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 04:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 04:07, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit _(blether) 16:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

KV Dhillon

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film producer who has "co-produced" two films of which one is not yet released. Fail WP:GNG and there is no other evidence of independent notability. GSS ^💬 03:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 03:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. qedk (t 桜 c) 08:33, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shaheen Banu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 22:18, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:19, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG GDX420 (talk) 12:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: At most, this would be a very weak "Keep". The subject had main roles in two Bollywood films of low-to-moderate notability, so she may pass WP:ENT—but the bigger problem is sources. While the subject is mentioned in a lot of articles (I'm only referring to articles written in English), she is generally mentioned in respect of her famous relatives; few articles talk about her career. (I'm going to spend some more time perusing the articles and may change my vote.) Dflaw4 (talk) 05:40, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Per nom. Article does not meet WP:GNG. Alex-h (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. Her own work is admittedly ordinary, even run of the mill, and she does not get a freebie encyclopedia article because of her notable relatives. Bearian (talk) 01:07, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Withdrawn by nominatior, Speedy Keep #1. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 01:36, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Florence Auer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Unref article. Appears to be on an actress with a long but not distinguished career. Unclear she meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 22:02, 22 February 2020 (UTC)~~[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not sure how an actress who has appeared in at least seventeen Broadway productions (per ibdb and Brodway World), sixty-nine film credits as an actress ranging from 1908 to 1956 in films released by major motion picture companies such as American Mutoscope & Biograph, Vitagraph, Edison Manufacturing Company, Paramount, Fox Film Corporation, and Warner Bros., and three screenwriting credits for films released by major motion picture companies (per imdb) qualifies as having a "not distinguished career". According to imdb, she had the starring and secondary roles in the first several motion pictures released by American Mutoscope & Biograph as early as 1908, directed by Wallace McCutcheon Sr. and D.W. Griffith. Author Martin Shingler lists her as being being part of fourteen prominent stage actors who were part of Charles Frohman's stock theatre group specifically brought to Vitagraph in the early 1900s in the 2018 book When Warners Brought Broadway to Hollywood, 1923-1939 (some others others being Thomas H. Ince, Clara Kimball Young, Florence Lawrence, Maurice Costello, and Charles Stanton Ogle), as well as being among seven noted for Biograph's earliest stock of actors (including Lionel Barrymore, Mabel Normand, Harry Carey, and Blanche Sweet.) She is also cited in Roy Liebman's 2010 book Vitaphone Films: A Catalogue of the Features and Shorts for her lengthy career as an actress beginning in the 1900s and mentioning of her screenwriting credits. That she doesn't have much of a digital/internet presence, I suspect has to do with her "heyday" being in the 1900s and 1910s. ExRat (talk) 23:13, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Someone with this many major credits is sure to have many more paper sources available. Pburka (talk) 23:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Definite "Keep"—and there are now sources, thanks to ExRat and Pburka. Dflaw4 (talk) 01:54, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. See WP:BEFORE. —Мандичка^YO 😜 16:05, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Withdraw nomination per all the hard work and helpful comments above. Thank you, Boleyn (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Bearian (talk) 01:18, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:08, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pravat Rout

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article appears to fail WP:DIRECTOR and WP:GNG. The article was deleted in 2018 per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PRAVAT ROUT. I'm starting another AfD rather than requesting G4 deletion because the subject has a couple of additional IMDb credits since the previous AfD was closed.

Although the article introduces Rout as a film director, he has primarily worked as a casting director. As mentioned by Bearian in the previous AfD, this is not something that automatically confers notability. I was not able to turn up any good sources through an online search (this is all I could find, and it consists entirely of an interview with no original reporting). I suggest deleting per WP:TOOSOON. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 18:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The submitter has also submitted Draft:Pravat Rout. I have declined the draft as duplicating this article, on account of the previous AFD, and as failing to address notability for creative professions. If the article is kept, the draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, the draft may be kept for future notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article as written fails to satisfy notability for directors or general notability, and fails to overcome the presumption of non-notability due to the previous deletion discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
comment they also submitted another version User:Mansinghactor/sandbox to AfC - declined before I noticed this copy KylieTastic (talk) 19:50, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying to work out what happened at that sandbox, KylieTastic, as it doesn't appear to have played out how you think it did :) The edit history shows you added 3906 bytes onto a redirect. I'm guessing Robert moved the submission just before you pressed save?! Anyway, I'm going to redirect the sandbox to the draft. --kingboyk (talk) 21:53, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

damn I didn't even notice - way to many edit clashes today KylieTastic (talk) 23:23, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

delete - can't see enough for any notability criteria KylieTastic (talk) 19:52, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yes, User:KylieTastic and I edit-conflicted on the sandbox. I was moving/renaming it in order to decline it while Kylie was declining it. The draft can now be kept for the future if the article is deleted. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:06, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - although he's had more work, I remain convinced this person is not yet notable. The only film he's directed is Prarabdh, an apparently NN film. Bearian (talk) 14:45, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 21:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whitney Ann Jenkins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable author/creative professional, sourced entirely to hyper local sources and pay-to-publish blackhat sites like voyagela. Searching "Whitney Jenkins" and "Whitney Ann Jenkins" reveal a lot of mentions of people who aren't her and only 2 of her. Praxidicae (talk) 16:21, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of West Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:11, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, there's no evidence of major television or film roles, neither do her recordings show signs of proven success. Insufficient independent significant news coverage to pass WP:GNG. Sionk (talk) 14:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - This is clearly an attempt at promotion. She has been mentioned in a few reliable sources but they are always articles about something she merely appeared in. She has one local newspaper mention (currently footnote #13 in the article), but her works in general have not received the necessary level of reliable and significant media coverage. Everything else to be found is the usual industry directories and self-promotional sites. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:12, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This was not written for profit nor was it written for promotion. The sources are valid, and No Depression and Ink19 are not local publications, they are national brands independent of promotional content. Also, searching "Whitney Ann Jenkins" on Google brings up many pages that contain information about her. Bodhibear777 (talk) 01:56, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete trivial work in film or other media. DGG ( talk ) 18:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - run of the mill character actress; paid SPA and possible sockpuppet who should know better in 2020 - I can't assume good faith here. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR.4meter4 (talk) 20:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 15:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Maheshi Madushanka

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is either too soon for an article on this actress/model, or it is an attempted promotion. I can find no significant coverage and she only appears in typical film directories and model associations. The article also says she is "award winning" but I can find no evidence of anything she has won or if any such award is notable in itself. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:47, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Only imdb refs. Hyperbolick (talk) 17:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. —C.Fred (talk) 17:26, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:15, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Fails WP:NACTOR/WP:NMODEL - IMDb is not an acceptable or reliable source. No other reliable sources found. Dan arndt (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG Angus1986 (talk) 10:06, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject only appears to have acted in non-notable productions, so I think she fails WP:NACTOR, and she probably doesn't meet the threshold for WP:GNG either. I'll defer to others on her notability as a model. As for whether she has won awards, she won a best-dressed award at a function, but I hardly think the article could have been referring to that: http://www.hirunews.lk/entertainment/150671/hiruth-ekka-naththal-2016-star-studded-event-that-shone-during-xmas-exclusive-photos. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Totally fails WP:GNG. —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 18:58, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As an actor she has done multiple films, two of them are having Wikipedia pages as well. However she lacks in the coverage part. What are the possibilities of having the coverage in local language? - The9Man | (talk) 09:15, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 22:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shaize Kazmi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not seeing any coverage on this actor and there is no evidence he played a significant role in the film or shows listed in the article. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. GSS ^💬 12:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 12:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS ^💬 12:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The subject doesn't currently pass WP:NACTOR. I think it's WP:TOOSOON for an article on this subject. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:47, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:33, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 18:57, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:24, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Matariki Whatarau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR, WP:MUSICBIO. From the coverage available in the article and elsewhere online, it seems that Modern Maori Quartet is likely notable, but it doesn't seem that Whatarau meets the criteria. If an article about the quarter is created, we could redirect this page to there, but until then deletion seems appropriate. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:27, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Matariki has had an extensive acting career in New Zealand. Including Theatre, television, cabaret and film. I am able to provide more information about his career with verifiable sources. Sycofantic (talk) 03:35, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request Would you mind declaring an conflict of interest you have with the articles you created?

From reading the article, I don't really see any major roles in notable works. Could you identify which movies/shows you think meet this criterion? _signed,Rosguill ^talk 05:12, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ The Almighty Johnsons. (Jerome (Māui), Find Me a Maori Bride (2 series on Maori Television), The Pa Boys (film) Lead character "Tau". He recently toured with Modern Māori Quartet: Modern Maori Quartet: Two Worlds, a cabaret style theatre show.

These roles are relevant in New Zealand, especially within the Māori community. The Māori have their own television network Māori Television on which Matariki has appeared. Marginalized people may have a larger notability in their own community than in the larger society. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sycofantic (talk • contribs) 18:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notability is measured by the amount of coverage available about the subjects, not just how "important" the subject is. Are there Maori community publications that you could bring to this discussion to back up the assertions that you're making? Also, please refrain from voting more than once. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:49, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:NACTOR - he has had significant roles in multiple notable films and television shows. Paora (talk) 11:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Needs analysis as to whether these television shows/films are actually notable.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:36, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This person (along with their roles) does not appear sufficiently notable. (Also, user "Sycofantic" - who created and made almost all of the edits to this page - appears likely to have an undeclared conflict of interest, and this user's edits do not demonstrate a sufficiently non-neutral POV.) Rangatira80 (talk) 23:06, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:44, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Gareth Fient

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no sources that demonstrate Mr. Fient's notability. The only external links are to his IMDB and YouTube pages. After searching his name, the only other results are a Kickstarter campaign in which he is mentioned and his Twitter handle. His website is not currently accessible. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 20:09, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article lacks any reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:57, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. He is 26 years old and at the very beginning of his professional career. Bearian (talk) 14:51, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete:Per nomination, the article fails WP:GNG and there's not much that I could find about the subject. Most credits are for small projects, so fails WP:FILMMAKER. — BriefEdits (talk) 22:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:58, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shang Na

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE. Haven't found any noteworthy coverage. Less Unless (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Less Unless (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:41, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The evaluation of the sources is difficult due to the exclusive use of Chinese sources but the ones presented appear to be either not independent of the article subject or not significant. Normally, I would suggest an WP:ATD but the article creator has left this alone for nearly three years and is not likely to improve it if it was returned to draft. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:53, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:52, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Wilson (actor)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of his roles are unnamed bit parts. I doubt that he would have an article if his brothers weren't famous but notability isn't inherited. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 12:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 12:59, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a bunch of minor roles does not notability make.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:38, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I think the subject can make a case for WP:NACTOR: he had starring roles in Time Trap (film), Church Ball and Druid Peak (though the latter two films are less notable), and supporting roles in Bottle Rocket (film), Fever Pitch (2005 film), Idiocracy (film), Calvin Marshall, Whip It (film) and The Big Year. He also co-directed The Wendell Baker Story with brother Luke. In terms of WP:GNG, however, many of the articles I've found mention or discuss the subject with respect to his brothers:

–Most reliable sources:

→https://ew.com/movies/celebrity-third-brothers/?slide=5944590#5944590 – Entertainment Weekly, briefly stating that the subject is the older brother of Owen Wilson and that he works as an actor and director

→https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-druid-peak-movie-review-20150110-story.html – LA Times, mention in Druid Peak review

→https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/movies/la-et-mn-capsule-time-trap-review-20181101-story.html – LA Times review of Time Trap, at the very least a mention, I couldn’t access the whole article

–Sources where there is no general consensus as to reliability:

→https://www.businessinsider.com.au/actors-in-most-wes-anderson-movies-bill-murray-owen-wilson-2018-3?r=US&IR=T – Business Insider, brief discussion of the subject

→https://www.businessinsider.my/celebrity-brothers-and-sisters-2017-7/ – Business Insider article about celebrities' siblings that we don’t know exist, says he has had minor parts in films, ironically the alleged non-notability of the subject makes him notable in this article

→https://screenrant.com/idiocracy-weird-facts/ – discusses him in reference to his part in Idiocracy

→https://screenrant.com/wendell-baker-story-movie-owen-wilson-family-actors/ – discussion regarding The Wendell Baker Story and other projects with his brothers

→https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/film/owen-wilson-he-s-charming-he-s-relaxed-and-he-talks-real-slow-1.2339161 – claims that his performance in Druid Peak has been well-received

I realise these aren't the greatest sources, but, combined with his significant and numerous roles in very notable films, I think there is enough for a "Weak Keep". Dflaw4 (talk) 08:53, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, qedk (t 桜 c) 08:37, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep From what Dflaw4 has shown I think there should be enough to pass GNG, Govvy (talk) 10:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:19, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I've now updated the page, adding the above sources as well as some text. Dflaw4 (talk) 12:46, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Dflaw4's additions. -- Toughpigs (talk) 15:50, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per Dflaw4's shown sources and per WP:BASIC that states, If the depth of coverage in any given source is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be combined to demonstrate notability. I think the combination of the "filmography" and multiple sources gives evidence of notability. Otr500 (talk) 14:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Dflaw4. _SUPER ^ASTIG 06:24, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:10, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Singanamala Ramesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unknown film producer with no sources. Fails WP: Notability for film makers. DragoMynaa (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 23:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:GNG. Would suggest WP:PROD for similar articles. BonkHindrance (talk) 00:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've found couple of sources on him this, this, this. There are more covering the same story. --Less Unless (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 01:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:29, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:MILL, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:OUTCOMES. We have for many years agreed with producers, absent strong evidence otheriwse, are ordinary and run of the mill business people who don't automatically get their own article here. Bearian (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 08:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pepper Binkley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Actress doesn't meet WP:GNG. Lack of third-party sources. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 13:34, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Does not meet WP:ENT PenulisHantu (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As per WP:HEY. On February 19 a number of sources were added to the page by IphisOfCrete (thank you, IphisOfCrete!), two of which—the Hollywood Reporter article and the New York Times article—describe the subject in relation to her work. Two other articles I found from reliable sources (https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-call-to-the-park-avenue-armory-1475793786 (Wall Street Journal) and https://ew.com/recap/good-wife-season-3-episode-9/ (Entertainment Weekly)) provide mere mentions, and there are various other mentions and discussions of the subject in less reliable sources, too, such as Broadway World. I think this makes a good cumulative case for meeting WP:GNG. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Dflaw4, I've randomly checked your links and a lot of them just name drop her; she's not the subject of the articles. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 10:33, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk), that's correct; as I said, they are mere mentions. But, when taken with the sources already in the article as well as other, less reliable sources online, I think that WP:GNG is met. Dflaw4 (talk) 00:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: More time for input from other people
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラ P 15:54, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per WP:ENT, there is a lack of notable roles (even in notable shows) that she has done to warrant her own page. Per WP:GNG, while the subject has been mentioned by reputable sources, I do not believe that the coverage (as it stands) is "significant" enough to warrant an entire article about the subject. Right now, it's really only an extended imdb page. Only comment is that I do not have access to the WSJ article, so I can't say much about its content. – BriefEdits (talk) 21:12, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
BriefEdits, the only line of the WSJ that mentions her is "The evening brought out guests like actress Ruth Wilson (with Mr. Ashford), Lynn Wyatt, Jamee and Peter Gregory, Agnes Gund, Bill and Karen Ackman, Chris Mack, Bettina Zilkha, Ziel and Helene Feldman, ICM agent Jennifer Joel and her sister Haley Joel Satnick, Pepper Binkley and Marshall Sebring, Ken Kuchin and Tyler Morgan, Armory President Rebecca Robertson and new artistic director Pierre Audi."

I can copy and paste the entire article if you want since I have access but I think that might be a copyvio for Wikipedia.--Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:36, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tyw7 Oh no, it's fine. But yeah, it seems like the WSJ article is about the same as the other sources then. – BriefEdits (talk) 22:46, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BriefEdits, it's true that the Wall Street Journal article is just a mere mention, but the two articles I referred to above which are in the page itself provide more substantial coverage. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:35, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dflaw4, only https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/review/a-night-armor-996155 and https://theweek.com/articles/792623/freezing-there-web-series-about-egg-freezing-didnt-know-needed mention Binkley more than once. I also found https://bust.com/entertainment/195716-its-freezing-out-there-web-series-review.html and https://sheroars.princeton.edu/speaker/pepper-binkley-01/ during research, but they're not great sources. But having spent some much time editing minor actors' wikipedia pages, I do feel like after review, this does pass the bare minimum of WP:GNG and is WP:POTENTIAL due to her being on Fifteen (TV series) for 26 episodes (according to IMDB) and might show up in a magazine review somewhere. For now, I'm changing my vote to Weak Keep, even if the ancillary sources are mostly trivial. — BriefEdits (talk) 07:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BriefEdits, I'll certainly keep my eyes peeled for better sources, too. Thanks for your reply, much appreciated! Dflaw4 (talk) 07:54, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BriefEdits, well WP:ITEXISTS isn't really a strong reason to keep. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 16:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Dflaw4. Article is now good enough to pass WP:GNG. _SUPER ^ASTIG 06:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Given the close, ongoing discusion, and disagreement over whether the non-ancillary source coverage is sufficient for notability
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:21, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have now updated the page and added the two references I provided above. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I didn't previously comment on WP:NACTOR because it was not nominated as an issue (only WP:GNG was), but, in addition to my previous arguments for "Keeping" this article, I would add the following: the subject was a series regular for season 4 of Fifteen and she starred in the 2009 film, Asylum Seekers, both of which appear to be notable productions; and she also had what seems to be a significant role in the 2010 film, Stone, and has starred in a couple of other films of low-to-moderate notability. I believe there is enough here to satisfy WP:NACTOR. Dflaw4 (talk) 14:47, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:28, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bathiladi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced film that fails to establish why it is notable. DragoMynaa (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 01:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:27, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 04:21, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per no RS found to support notability.WikiAviator (talk) 04:41, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFILM/WP:GNG. I found a film trailer but little else. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 04:44, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Barely scrapes through with a weak keep consensus. Dflaw4 has a good analysis, though BriefEdits makes a valid counter. Ultimately, the consensus that it just gets by WP:GNG narrowly eaks out the weak keep consensus.Mojo Hand (talk) 18:16, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alvin Alvarez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One notable role, but doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENT. Boleyn (talk) 09:13, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:05, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: I think this article is extremely borderline. The subject starred in The Brothers Garcia and appeared in a handful of films and TV shows, but seems to have dropped off the radar since 2004. The Variety article provided is good—it's dedicated to the subject—and there are a couple of mentions with photos in https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/09/us/when-hollywood-is-your-mirror.html and www.mtv.com/news/2278834/old-nickelodeon-shows-you-forgot-about/. Apart from that, I can't really find anything else. Therefore, only a very weak case could be made for WP:GNG or WP:ENT. He was, however, nominated for an ALMA Award and Young Artist Awards, and he won a Young Artist Award, but I'm not sure if these awards are notable enough to satisfy WP:ANYBIO. Even so, they could go towards his general notability. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:26, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because it fails WP:GNG. The awards are non-notable and not sourced. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:55, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Young Artist Awards and ALMA Awards are actually "notable". ExRat (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we lack the multiple sources needed to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:34, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ミラ P 18:43, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Appeared for several years in a role on The Brothers Garcia as a main cast member, which aired on Nickelodeon -- not quite some obscure cable access station. There is also specific mention of him and the series in Austin Chronicle. ExRat (talk) 23:57, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep per Dflaw4. Passes WP:SIGCOV. In addition to the sources provided above, I found a pretty decent Spanish language reference: Martinez, Julio (July 23, 2000). LOS GARCIA: 'The Brothers Garcia' es la primera serie de comedia de television creada, producida y con un elenco estelar totalmente latino, que estrenara en Nickelodeon. Vol. 74(312). p. 1F. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help).4meter4 (talk) 23:31, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per the sources provided above, passes GNG. Smartyllama (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Comments have shown that it while it may pass WP:GNG (barely), this subject fails to pass the more subject specific WP:NACTOR, in which the subject must have significant roles in multiple productions. Alvarez was a child actor who was popular in 1 children's tv show in the early 2000's. His previous credits are all minor and I don't think that he'll be popping up any time soon, as his credits ended with Brothers Garcia. — BriefEdits (talk) 23:02, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 10:06, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Troy Walker

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An example of WP:BLP1E. His unsuccessful lawsuit against SpongeBob SquarePants received media coverage at the time, but the person himself has no notability beyond that single event. On his own, he fails WP:NAUTHOR: he has not been involved in any professional or well-known comics or television cartoons. Sanchez.donatelli (talk) 14:44, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete based on the lack of reliable sources addressing Walker directly and in detail. I only found mentions in coverage of the lawsuit. The article was also created by a promotional single-purpose account years ago and still no reliable source has written about him. Capcapandgengen (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 00:08, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non WP:GNG here.GDX420 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:BLP1E . LibStar (talk) 14:32, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Vambu Sandai. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 23:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lakshmi Putrudu

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article shouldn't exist. It is a dubbed version of a Tamil film. All sources (Oneindia, Indiaglitz) fail WP: Notability for films. DragoMynaa (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 07:14, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. This movie is a dubbed version of Vambu Sandai and not an independent film. Hence, merge. The9Man | (talk) 08:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:51, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as above, only minor differences imv Atlantic306 (talk) 19:20, 23 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hal Stalmaster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Possibly fails WP:NACTOR having no major roles outside being the lead of Johnny Tremain and both sources are databases. Before gave me only an interview (probably useful for facts to add to the movie article but we don't count interviews towards WP:GNG) and some mentions. Page creator was banned for persistent copyright violations. ミラ P 03:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 03:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ミラ P 03:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 03:55, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disney-related deletion discussions. Toughpigs (talk) 04:04, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: I'm conflicted over this one. The subject, as the nominator points out, likely fails WP:NACTOR because he only has one main role in a notable production—but that main role was the lead in a well-known Disney production. As for WP:GNG, he is mentioned in many articles in respect of the film, including articles on Google Scholar, in books, and reviews by Variety (https://ia601005.us.archive.org/4/items/variety206-1957-05/variety206-1957-05.pdf) and The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/1957/07/11/archives/johnny-tremain-at-neighborhood-houses.html). He is also quoted in some books in his capacity as a talent agent (https://books.google.com.au/books?id=FUdZAAAAYAAJ&q=%22Hal+Stalmaster%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Hal+Stalmaster%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi70N_hktDnAhXYF3IKHUupBkUQ6AEIXjAG; https://books.google.com.au/books?id=1ex5ESBl4hkC&q=%22Hal+Stalmaster%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22Hal+Stalmaster%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi70N_hktDnAhXYF3IKHUupBkUQ6AEIczAJ). I wouldn't be averse to letting this article remain in spite of the questionable notability of the subject, but I suspect other editors may not agree. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The movie's not particularly notable, and even in the reviews, Stalmaster barely gets a couple of passing mentions. Hardly enough to pass NACTOR. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:13, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:04, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Passes WP:SIGCOV. His work in Johnny Trumain has been covered in numerous publications, including scholarly articles. He has been covered for his work as a talent agent as well. In addition to the sources provided above, here are some more high quality sources.

York, Neil L. (Fall 2008). Son of liberty: Johnny Tremain and the art of making American patriots.(Report). Vol. 6(2). p. 422(26). {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)CS1 maint: year (link) (extensive analysis of his performance; peer reviewed)
Lehman, Harry (Oct 22, 1971). Major Production Centers: On Camera Out West. Vol. 12(43). p. 10, 13. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (work as talent agent is main subject)
Lehman, Harry (July 16, 1976). On Camera Out West. Vol. 17(29). p. 19. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (profiles his career as a talent agent)
Richard M. Millard (June 29, 1979). As American as -- Well, as the Movies. p. 29. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help) (article indicates a feature role in the Disney TV film The Swamp Fox; this would be another lead part towards satisfying WP:NACTOR)

Ultimately there is enough here to satisfy WP:GNG.4meter4 (talk) 01:20, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Dflaw4 and 4meter4. Article is good enough to pass WP:GNG. _SUPER ^ASTIG 03:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 15:01, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Myndy Crist

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR. Article hinges completely on their IMDB page and cursory google search doesn't show any mention of this subject outside of routine, typical coverage. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sulfurboy (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:51, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:52, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:53, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. I couldn't find anything that shows this article is notable. TheAwesome Hwyh 03:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: I think the subject passes WP:NACTOR—she's played supporting roles in some big films, including Dark Skies (film) and Hanging Up, as well as dozens of guest spots in TV series and smaller roles in several other films. The argument for WP:GNG is a bit weaker, because most of the sources I am finding simply mention her with respect to her roles—but, there are quite a few sources, from Broadway World and Los Angeles Times, among others. The article itself needs some work, but I don't think deletion is necessary in this instance. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:56, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Her guest roles and smaller roles wouldn't come in to play with WP:NACTOR. I see she had supporting roles in those two films, but I'm not seeing evidence that her role in those movies were significant. Broadway World wouldn't be considered a reliable secondary source. And what La Times article are you referencing? The only two I see only mention the person in a WP:ROUTINE manner and wouldn't constitute the substantial coverage required by GNG. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right, Sulfurboy, but they do show that the actress has a fairly large body of work, and there are a few more films in which she has had supporting roles, too. I generally consider supporting roles in notable films to be "significant". As for the Los Angeles Times articles, they do seem to be fairly routine, I agree: https://www.latimes.com/entertainment-arts/story/2019-09-10/new-movies-opening-in-la-this-week-sept-15-22-brad-pitt-ad-astra-downton-abbey-Rambo; https://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-thursdays-tv-highlights-working-the-engels-on-nbc-20140820-story.html. There are more substantial articles, too, although they come from less reliable sources. But, putting it all together, I think there is enough for a "Weak" Keep—certainly not a "Strong" Keep. Dflaw4 (talk) 09:40, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 09:38, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 14:49, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be a borderline keep. I agree with Dflaw4 that being a supporting actress in so many movies is an indication of notability. However, relatively little can be found about her in RS. My very best wishes (talk) 22:27, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per Dflaw4. _SUPER ^ASTIG 03:48, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only source is IMDb which is not reliable, we should not have articles with no reliable sources especially on living people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:01, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've now added text and sources to the article. Dflaw4 (talk) 15:39, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The coverage of her is minimal, so the article fails WP:GNG. It is not obvious that her supporting roles reaches the bar set by WP:ACTOR. I see that our article and imdb give different birth years (1971 vs 1975), so there is definitely also a question about our ability to write a verifiable article. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 20:30, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Had a starring role in a TV series Breaking news with Tim Matheson and Clancy Brown. Кирилл С1 (talk) 12:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 14:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Geetanjali Singh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previously deleted under WP:CSD#A7. Fails WP:GNG. — Jeff G. ツ 09:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. — Jeff G. ツ 09:44, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:40, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:41, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 12 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I believe the subject passes WP:GNG, with several articles dedicated to her, including at least 2 Times of India articles. The page does need some work, though. (Personally, I think a nomination argument of failing WP:NACTOR would have been more compelling; however, she did appear in all 269 episodes of the Indian soap opera, Tumhari Paakhi, and she starred in the Bollywood film, Falsafa: The Other Side. She also appears to have had some minor success as a model.) Dflaw4 (talk) 05:17, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:51, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 02:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per Dflaw4. _SUPER ^ASTIG 16:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I've now added a couple of sources to the article. Dflaw4 (talk) 13:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhinav Gomatam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced actor. Fails notability. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 19:00, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: The subject is mentioned and discussed in a number of Times of India articles, such as https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/telugu/movie-reviews/ee-nagaraniki-emaindi/movie-review/64785903.cms, where he is praised for his performance in Ee Nagaraniki Emaindhi. He starred in that film, which seems to have been quite notable, and has had supporting roles in a number of other films too, so he might just pass WP:NACTOR. He appears to be an up and coming actor, so I'd be willing to let the article stand. Dflaw4 (talk) 11:09, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as has some prominent roles in notable films as confirmed in reliable sources such as national newspapers such ss Times of India and others and therefore passes WP:NACTOR so that deletion is unnecessary, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:43, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete according to the wikipedia article, the subject has 10 credits as film actor. According to my search, the subject has only two significant roles (in the movies released is 2017, and 2018). Out of 10 credits, the wikipedia article cant name 5 of his characters, and one credits as "cameo as a psychiatrist". Notability guideline for actors requires significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. Our subject doesnt have it. Verifiable existence doesnt mean notability. To achieve notability significant coverage is required; which the subject doesnt have, therefor subject fails general notability criteria as well. Also per user deflower: WP:TOOSOON. —usernamekiran (talk) 21:35, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:03, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

He has three prominent roles in notable feature films, third in the credits of Meeku Maathrame Cheptha, fourth in the credits of Ee Nagaraniki Emaindhi, and third in the credits of Malli Raava which is enough for criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Atlantic306: Hi. Like I said in my vote/comment above, he has prominent roles only in Ee Nagaraniki Emaindhi, and Malli Raava. I will provide the sources in a few hours. —usernamekiran (talk) 10:14, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

usernamekiran(talk), I'm not clear on your position. Are you arguing that the subject fails WP:NACTOR because he does not have "multiple" significant roles in notable productions, or because the roles themselves are not "significant"? Dflaw4 (talk) 06:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:16, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Nom and usernamekiran. My location may present some sourcing bias, as I could only verify what has already been shown, but links to "YouTube", "idlebrain" (2), and "facebook" does not satisfy the WP:BLP sourcing criteria. Lacking basic biographical content such as age makes this a pseudo-biography. The previous comments seems to center around what "minimum degree" of bare notability there might be. A lack of reliable and independent sources seems to indicate it might be WP:TOOSOON. Otr500 (talk) 15:50, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Satisfies criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV with three significant roles in three films as supported by multiple articles in The Times of India. My WP:BEFORE search yielded numerous articles verifying that content.4meter4 (talk) 14:45, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is keep, but not by a wide margin. Notability is not relational. Consensus is that NACTOR is met and that GNG is met through some of the available, unchallenged sources. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Raghavendra

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unknown father of a popular singer. Notability is not established. This actor needs sources as to why he is notable. This article is a blatant promotion of Anirudh's father. DragoMynaa (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. DragoMynaa (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: True, the subject owes some of his notability to his son, but I feel he probably deserves an article based on his own career, too. He's played many supporting roles in notable films, so I feel he would just get through under WP:NACTOR. He is also mentioned/discussed in various articles from the following news outlets: Sify, The Hans India, The Hindu, The Indian Express, and more. There doesn't seem to be a consensus on the reliability of these sources, however, so I would welcome feedback from others and will update my vote if necessary. Dflaw4 (talk) 07:42, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:01, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Hindu, Hans India and New Indian Express are reliable sources but i'm not sure about sify, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic306, thanks! Dflaw4 (talk) 06:52, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, b uidhe 00:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Definitely fails WP:GNG and breaches WP:NPOV. I agree per nom that the person is not notable compared to his son Anirudh. Abishe (talk) 15:43, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abishe, it shouldn't matter whether the subject is notable when compared to his son, but rather whether he is notable as per the notability standards. If you believe he fails WP:GNG, that is fair enough, but being less notable than his son isn't relevant to the policy, as I understand it. Also, a breach of WP:NPOV can be addressed without deleting the entire article. Dflaw4 (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as he has some prominent roles in notable films such as being credited 2nd and third in the credits and therefore has claims to pass WP:NACTOR criteria 1, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 23:24, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Passes criteria 1 of WP:NACTOR.4meter4 (talk) 00:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Proposed deletions

Comment on the talk pages of the articles, not here.

2007-2008
Atsuko Kawada (via WP:PROD on 4 July 2008) Cherylee Houston (via WP:PROD on 21 December 2007) Robert Phillips (Actor) (via WP:PROD on 21 December 2007) Lloyd Sherr (via WP:PROD on 21 December 2007) Michael Goz (via WP:PROD on 15 December 2007) Deleted Amy O'Malley (via WP:PROD on 2 December 2007) Deleted Clément Laloy (via WP:PROD on 3 May 2009)