Jump to content

User talk:Matthew Beale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by HasteurBot (talk | contribs) at 01:35, 7 March 2020 (User:HasteurBot: Notification of CSD:G13 potential nomination of Draft:Kirsten Orsborn). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, Matthew Beale, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kirsten Orsborn did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 06:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Kirsten Orsborn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — JJMC89(T·C) 06:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of my contribution

Why would you propose deletion of a page that is still being created? Matthew Beale (talk) 07:01, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pages should not be created from scratch in the mainspace. They should usually be created in your sandbox, where they can be worked on in userspace and improved without anyone seeing them. But once articles enter the mainspace, the article can become searchable through google, and Wikipedia's standards for article quality come into play. The article you created had no sources whatsoever, and thus a BLP PROD was placed on it. What that means, is that if in 7 days there are still no sources on it, it will be deleted. You can avoid having that happen by simply adding some reliable sources before then. If you have any other questions, let me know. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 07:10, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have moved the article into the WP:DRAFT space so that it can be edited at a more leisurely pace, and you can get feedback on the article creation process. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 07:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kirsten Orsborn (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 08:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Matthew Beale! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 08:36, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kirsten Orsborn, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]