Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Route accounting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. GirthSummit _(blether) 17:23, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Route accounting

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 08:11, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:40, 14 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

leaning TNT From what I can see, route accounting is a proper subject, but it only has to do with software because it's the sort of tabulation that computers, after all, were designed to deal with. The article as we have it really doesn't deal with the problem that this software needs to solve, and is constructed largely of generalities about business software packages in general. I would sugfgest that starting over would be a better course. Mangoe (talk) 02:19, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.