User talk:DriftFan202

February 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Shimmer and Shine. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 05:56, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is even more obnoxious that you restored that after two different editors had fixed it. Look it up: Wikipedia:Titling in sentence case. See also: MOS:DATETOPRES. And don't do it again. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 07:36, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:10, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 04:15, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DriftFan202 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I wanted to be unblocked because it was a mistake and it wasn't vandalism at all. I was removing something for my friend named Julie as she didn't want to see something for her fitting. So I want my block to be appealed now as an apology, I'm sorry for what I just happened. Thank you. User:DriftFan202

Decline reason:

While "vandalism" is probably the wrong term, you have been edit warring at Shimmer and Shine. A simple unspecific "apology" does not work; the requirements are different:

To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:26, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What constructive contributions do you want to make if unblocked? 331dot (talk) 16:32, 25 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]