User talk:Alvinategyeka

Hi Alvinategyeka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

10:30, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Davinia Esther Anyakun has been accepted

Davinia Esther Anyakun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 16:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Agnes Nandutu has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Agnes Nandutu. Thanks! Nosebagbear (talk) 19:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Agnes Nandutu (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mjs1991 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The Sqoop source isn't a very trusted source for systems

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Agnes Nandutu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Agnes Nandutu, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 09:20, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Agnes Nandutu concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Agnes Nandutu, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Agnes Nandutu

Hello, Alvinategyeka. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agnes Nandutu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:24, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rose Kirumira moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Rose Kirumira, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GirthSummit _(blether) 14:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - just a personal note to explain in a bit more detail why I moved this to draft. Your article was about a living person, but it didn't contain any sources at all - our verifiability require that information is referenced to reliable sources, and with biographies of living people it's particularly important. You can carry on working on the article as a draft until it's ready to publish, with reliable sourcing demonstrating that the subject is notable, and then move it back into article space when it's ready. Hope this makes sense, let me know if you have any questions. Cheers GirthSummit _(blether) 14:26, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rose Kirumira (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AaqibAnjum were:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:Layout and WP:Tone altogether. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rose Kirumira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rose Kirumira, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 16:31, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rose Kirumira has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rose Kirumira. Thanks! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have made corrections on the article, please review again and advise accordingly. Thanks alot Alvinategyeka (talk) 19:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Robina Hope Mukisa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robina Hope Mukisa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lydia Daphine Mirembe moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lydia Daphine Mirembe, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Lamwaka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Catherine Lamwaka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 17:37, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lydia Daphine Mirembe has been accepted

Lydia Daphine Mirembe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 07:52, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, look forward to creating more Alvinategyeka (talk) 10:29, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Catherine Lamwaka has been accepted

Catherine Lamwaka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.