Talk:Falling in love

Sociology Start‑class

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2020 and 4 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Katelynn.parker (article contribs).

bah

I see nothing wrong or unneutral about this page, and have removed your npov. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PrivateRyan (talk • contribs).

Whether or not it's npov I think the page is terrible. It has two sources, they are very old (1956 and 1983), it uses specialized psychobabble rather than plain english, and it does not have any in-line citations. Come on people! Much more has been written about falling in love than the extremely narrow perspectives portrayed on this page. Cazort (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For those cynical science-minded people out there like myself, who are still, at the end of the day, in fact human, I strongly reccomend reading "A General Theory of Love." Love could be described as a particular from of deep limbic resonance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.3.120.211 (talk) 20:50, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Falling in love

The artical states that love might not be permenet, but I say the differ. Even if you and the object are seperated, love can be permenet, if the love is strong enough.

--216.194.183.29 17:56, 31 May 2007 (UTC)M. Lucas Daly: Husband, but seperated[reply]

Actually, love will "die", sooner or late. It's a scientific fact. Besides, it said it MIGHT not be permanent, not that it's never permanent. 74.33.52.181 00:46, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are no scientific facts. In particular, about stuff that is subjective. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.92.4.75 (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Length

Is really all we have on the subject?It doesn't tell me anything, except that scientists tried to classify it.It needs to be improved.I'll do it if noone else will. Mr. Green^chat 16:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brain Chemistry

The neurostransmitters responsible for falling in love include serotonin and others, if I'm not mistaken. I think they should be included in this article.Calamus Fortis 17:37, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to suggest this be merged with the "Limerence" article, as it has become clear to me that "limerence" is a relatively new word that means "falling in love". Thank you,75.56.51.96 (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Falling in love" is almost certainly a neurobiological condition that has the hallmarks of addiction and numerous similarities, viz. withdrawal, dysphoria, dysthemia in absence, etc. At some point, the precision of neuroscience will converge with common sense and tell us that it is so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.25.13.90 (talk) 02:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]